Log in

Quietism versus jihadism: the need to rethink contemporary Salafism

  • Published:
Contemporary Islam Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article re-examines the relevance of the typology Quintan Wiktorowicz put forth considering the process of rupture between two of three categories of Salafism he had identified: Quietist Salafism and Jihadi Salafism. Salafism is traditionally understood as the attempt of a part of the Muslim clergy to return to the fundamentals of Islam through a literalist approach. Accordingly, for several authors, jihadism has its ideological roots in Salafism. This theoretical perspective is based on the work of Wiktorowicz, according to whom there are three sensibilities or strands within Salafism (purist, political and revolutionary) when it comes to its relationship with the political. This typology, which has the epistemological merit of accounting for the plurality of the different trends in Salafism, implies that they belong to the same ideological family and that they share a common background. This approach, which has flourished in the academic literature on Islamic radicalisation, subscribes to the idea that quietist Salafism and jihadist Salafism share a common base and the same objectives, but are opposed in terms of how to achieve them: quietist Salafism focuses on preaching and jihadi Salafism on violence. However, this article questions the links between these two categories and argues that they have become increasingly weaker and have now virtually disappeared because of the political and religious events that have affected the Muslim world over the last four decades.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Not applicable.

Notes

  1. Available at Salafism.fr.

  2. Available at https://www.al-hamdoulillah.com/blog/actualite/comprendre-le-salafisme-et-ses-differents-groupes-points-communs-et-desaccords.html

  3. Interview with S., Paris, France, 23 January 2019.

  4. Available at https://www.al-hamdoulillah.com/blog/actualite/comprendre-le-salafisme-et-ses-differents-groupes-points-communs-et-desaccords.htm

  5. Interview with V., june 2016, Brussels.

  6. http://anti-talafiya.over-blog.com

  7. An expression often used by jihadists to refer to Salafist theologians close to the government. See the French-speaking jihadist site: htpp//:anti-talafiya.over-blog.com.

  8. Interview with F, March 2013, Paris.

  9. Interview with R., June 2019, Paris.

References

  • Abdelwahab, M. (2002). La maladie de l’islam. Le Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Achcar, G. (2008). L’Orientalisme à rebours: De certaines tendances de l’orientalisme français après 1979. Mouvements, 54(2), 127–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adraoui, M. A. (2022). Understanding the Salafism. Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Utaybi, C. (2012). Le takfirisme. Al-hadith éditions.

  • Amghar, S. (2006). Le salafisme en Europe. La mouvance polymorphe d'une radicalisation. Politique étrangère, 1, 65–78.

  • Amghar, S. (2008). ‘Le salafisme en France : De la révolution islamique à la révolution conservatrice ». Critique Internationale, 40(3), 95–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benraad, M. (2018). Jihad: des origines religieuses à l'idéologie : Idées reçues sur une notion controversée. Le Cavalier Bleu.

  • Bin Ali, M. (2012). The Islamic Doctrine of Al-Wala' wal Bara' (Loyalty and Disavowal) in Modern Salafism (PhD thesis (in Arabic and Islamic Studies), University of Exeter, UK 263, Exeter, UK.

  • Blanc, T. (2018). ‘Être "islamiste" ou "salafiste en 2018’, La Lettre de l'IRMC, n°22, avril-octobre.

  • Bligh, A. (2018). Change in the domestic-foreign policies relationship in the Saudi Context in the wake of the change of the guard. The Journal of the Middle East and Africa, 9(1), 110.

  • Boukhars, A. (2015). Quietist and firebrand Salafism in Algeria. Carnegie Papers. Available at: https://carnegieendowment.org/2015/11/24/quietist-and-firebrand-salafism-in-algeria-pub-62075

  • Bourdieu, P., Chamboredon, J. C., & Passeron J. C. (2021). Le métier de sociologue: Préalables épistémologiques. éditions de l'EHESS.

  • Cavatorta, F. and Merone, F. (ed.), (2016). Salafism after the Arab Awakening. Contending with People's Power. Hurst & Co.

  • Commins, D. (2015). Islam in Saudi Arabia. I.B Tauris.

  • Egerton, F., (2011). Jihad in the West: The Rise of Militant Salafism. Cambridge University Press.

  • El Difraoui, A. (2021). Le djihadisme. PUF.

  • Esposito, J.L. (1998). Islam and Politics. Syracuse University Press.

  • Haykel, B. (2014). On the nature of salafi thought and action. In: R. Meijer (Ed.), Global Salafism: Islam's New Religious Movement.Oxford University Press.

  • Hegghamer, T. (2010). Jihad in Saudi Arabia: Violence and Pan-Islamism since 1979. Cambridge University Press.

  • Hussein, H. (2016). The common Salafist soil of Wahhabism and Daesh. Les cahiers de l'Islam.

  • Kadivar, J. (2015). Exploring Takfir, its origins and contemporary use: The case of Takfiri approach in Daesh’s Media. Contemporary Review of the Middle East7(3), 259–285.

  • Kepel, G. (2008) Al-Qaida in the text (with Jean-Pierre Milelli). Paris, France: Presses universitaires de France, 2005; new revised and expanded edition, coll. "Quadrige", PUF.

  • Kepel, G. (2021). Le prophète et la pandémie. Du Moyen-Orient au jihadisme d’atmopshère. Paris: Gallimard.

  • Lahire, B. (2016). Pour la sociologie. Et pour en finir avec une prétendue "culture de l'excuse". La Découverte.

  • Lahoud, C. (2010). Islam and Politics in Kuwait. PUF.

  • Lauzière, H. (2010). The construction of salafiyya: Reconsidering Salafism from the perspective of conceptual history. International Journal of Middle East Studies, 42, 369–289.

  • Lauzière, H. (2015). The Making of Salafism: Islamic Reform in the Twentieth Century (Vol. 328). Columbia University Press.

  • Meijer, R. (2011). Salafism: Doctrine, diversity and practice. In K. Hroub (Ed), Political Islam: Context Versus Ideology. Saqi Books.

  • Micheron, H. (2020). Le jihadisme français. Quartiers, Syrie, prison. Gallimard.

  • Mouline, N. (2011). Les clercs de l’islam. PUF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pall, Z. (2013). Lebanese Salafis between the Gulf and Europe: Development, fractionalization and transnational networks of Salafism in Lebanon (Vol. 24). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

  • Rabil, R. (2018). Contextualizing Jihad and Takfir in the Sunni conceptual framework. Washington, DC: The Washington Institute for Near East Policy

  • Rasheed, M. (2017). Contesting the Saudi State: Islamic Voices fron a New Generation. Cambridge University Press.

  • Roy, O. (2017). Jihad and Death: The Global Appeal of Islamic State. Hurst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shadi, H. (2016) Islamic Exceptionalism: How the struggle over Islam is resha** the world. St. Martin’s Press.

  • Steinberg, G. (2013). German Jihad: On the Internationalization of Islamist Terrorism. Columbia University Press.

  • Tarkhani, F. (2016). Mal vu. Don Quichotte editions.

  • Toth, J. (2013). The life and legacy of a radical Islamic intellectual. Oxford University Press.

  • Wagemakers, J. (2017). Revisiting Wiktorowicz: Categorising and defining the branches of Salafism. In F. Cavatorta & F. Merone (Eds.), Salafism after Arab Awakening. London: Hurst.

  • Wagemakers, J. (2020). Salafism: Generalisation, conceptualisation and categorisation. In M. Ranstorp (Ed.), Contextualisation Salafism and Salafi Jihadism (pp. 21–36). Copenhagen: National Centre for Prevention of Extremism.

  • Wiktorowicz, Q. (2006). Anatomy of the Salafi movement. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 29, 207–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Samir Amghar.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The author declares no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Amghar, S. Quietism versus jihadism: the need to rethink contemporary Salafism. Cont Islam 17, 205–221 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11562-023-00525-w

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11562-023-00525-w

Keywords

Navigation