Log in

Reply to the paper of Breuer et al.: complementary information concerning the suspected interindividual transmission of GW1516, a substance prohibited in sport, through intimate contact—a case report

  • Letter to the Editor
  • Published:
Forensic Toxicology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (France)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Breuer J, Garzinsky AM, Thomas A, Nieschlag E, Kliesch S, Fedoruk M, Geyer H, Thevis M (2024) Complementary information concerning the suspected interindividual transmission of GW1516, a substance prohibited in sport, through intimate contact: a case report. Forensic Toxicol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s114119-024-00689-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Thevis M, Kuuranne T, Fedoruk M, Geyer H (2021) Sports drug testing and the athletes’ exposome. Drug Test Anal 13:1814–1821. https://doi.org/10.1002/dta.3187

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kintz P (2024) Drug transfer during intimate moments: a key issue in do** control that can be documented by hair tests of the athlete and the partner. Med Sci Law 64:72–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/002580242311773346

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kintz P (2022) The forensic response after an adverse analytical finding (do**) involving a selective androgen receptor modulator (SARM) in human athlete. J Pharm Biomed Anal 2022(207):114433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpba.2021.114433

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kintz P, Gheddar L (2024) Interest of hair tests to discriminate a tail end of a do** regimen from a drug transfer between two individuals in case of challenging an anti-do** rule violation. IV. Case example with mesterolone. Drug Test Anal. https://doi.org/10.1002/dta.3676

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Alvarez JC, Etting I, Larabi IA (2024) Body fluid contamination in the context of an adverse analytical finding in do**: about a case involving ostarine. Clin Chim Acta 557:117871. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2024.117871

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. https://www.sportresolutions.com/decisions/view/international-tennis-federation-v-anastasiya-shoshyna. Consulted 8 May 2024

  8. Kintz P, Ameline A, Gheddar L, Raul JS (2020) Testing for GW501516 (cardarine) in human hair using LC/MS-MS and confirmation by LC/HRMS. Drug Test Anal 12:980–986. https://doi.org/10.1002/dta.2802

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ameline A, Gheddar L, Raul JS, Kintz P (2021) Characterization of letrozole in human hair using LC-MS/MS and confirmation by LC-HRMS: application to a do** case. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci 1162:122495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchromb.2020.122495

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Favretto D, Snenghi R, Pertile R, El Mazloum R, Tucci M, Visentin S, Vogliardi S (2019) Hair analysis to discriminate voluntary do** vs inadvertent ingestion of the aromatase inhibitor letrozole. Drug Test Anal 11:762–771. https://doi.org/10.1002/dta2555

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kintz P, Gheddar L, Ameline A, Arbouche N, Raul JS (2020) Hair testing for do** agents. What is known and what remains to do. Drug Test Anal 12:316–322. https://doi.org/10.1002/dta.2766

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kintz P (2017) Hair analysis in forensic toxicology: an updated review with a special focus on pitfalls. Curr Pharm Des 23:5480–5486. https://doi.org/10.2174/1381612823666170929155628

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Woolley R (1989) The biologic possibility of HIV transmission during passionate kissing. JAMA 262:2230–2231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. https://jurisprudence.tas-cas.org/Shared%20Documents/5296.pdf. Consulted 8 May 2024

  15. Kintz P, Gheddar L, Garnier D (2024) Evidence of ostarine excretion in oral fluid after a single oral administration. Clin Chim Acta 557:117879. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2024.117879

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Walpurgis K, Rubio A, Wagener F, Krug O, Knoop A, Görgens C, Guddat S, Thevis M (2020) Elimination profiles of microdosed ostarine mimicking contaminated products ingestion. Drug Test Anal 12:1570–1580. https://doi.org/10.1002/dta.2933

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kintz P, Gheddar L (2024) Violation des règles antidopage et contamination. Stratégie de défense des athletes à partir d’une analyse de cheveux et considerations générales. Toxicol Anal Clin 36:105–108

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pascal Kintz.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare conflict of interest due to the analytical services provided.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kintz, P. Reply to the paper of Breuer et al.: complementary information concerning the suspected interindividual transmission of GW1516, a substance prohibited in sport, through intimate contact—a case report. Forensic Toxicol (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11419-024-00694-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11419-024-00694-0

Keywords

Navigation