Abstract
Despite their essential role in learning, the cognitive and affective underpinnings of student self-assessment are not yet well understood. This research responded to calls to examine how students in K-12 contexts think and feel while engaged in evidence-informed self-assessment activities (i.e., self-assessment processes). We drew on a framework of classroom assessment as the co-regulation of learning to theorize the cognitive and affective self-regulatory operations learners may activate during self-assessment. Leveraging a collective case study, we collected digital trace data as participants, a class of Year 12 students (n = 16) in England, completed a self-assessment-based English literature lesson. In the lesson, participants completed a writing task, self-generated feedback using resources, and revised their writing using a study website. Matomo Analytics, a web analytics platform, ambiently collected session recording, heatmap, and keystroke log data. Participants also completed an exit survey to provide qualitative data on their cognitive and affective processes. We analyzed logs of trace data using transition graphs and graph theoretic statistics to identify patterns across participants’ self-assessment processes. Analyzing trace data concurrently with qualitative and heatmap data, we mapped each participant’s cognitive and affective processes as they self-assessed and revised their writing. Findings highlighted key cognitive and affective operations across participants, pointing to mechanisms whereby participants’ self-assessment processes shaped their learning, and illuminated the recursive nature of self-assessment processes. Informing an initial theory of self-assessment processes, this research advances a core component of classroom assessment theory and practice.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allal, L. (2011). Pedagogy, didactics and the co-regulation of learning: A perspective from the French-language world of educational research. Research Papers in Education, 26(3), 329–336. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2011.595542
Allal, L. (2016). The co-regulation of student learning in an assessment for learning culture. In D. Laveault & L. Allal (Eds.), Assessment for learning: Meeting the challenge of implementation (pp. 259–273). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39211-0_15
Andrade, H. L., & Valtcheva, A. (2009). Promoting learning and achievement through self-assessment. Theory into Practice, 48(1), 12–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405840802577544
Andrade, H. L. (2010). Students as the definitive source of formative assessment: Academic self-assessment and the self-regulation of learning. In H. L. Andrade & G. J. Cizek (Eds.), Handbook of formative assessment (pp. 102–117). Routledge.
Andrade, H. L. (2013). Classroom assessment in the context of learning theory and research. In J. McMillan (Ed.), Sage handbook of research on classroom assessment (pp. 17–34). Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452218649.n2
Andrade, H. L. (2019). A critical review of research on student self-assessment. Frontiers in Education, 4, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2019.00087
Andrade, H. L., & Boulay, B. A. (2003). Role of rubric-referenced self-assessment in learning to write. The Journal of Educational Research, 97(1), 21–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220670309596625
Andrade, H. L., & Brookhart, S. M. (2020). Classroom assessment as the co-regulation of learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 27(4), 350–372. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2019.1571992
Andrade, H. L., & Brown, G. T. (2016). Student self-assessment in the classroom. In G. T. Brown & L. R. Harris (Eds.), Handbook of human and social conditions in assessment (pp. 319–334). Routledge.
Andrade, H., & Du, Y. (2007). Student responses to criteria-referenced self-assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 32(2), 159–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930600801928
Beheshitha, S. S., Gašević, D., & Hatala, M. (2015). A process mining approach to linking the study of aptitude and event facets of self-regulated learning. In J. Baron (Ed.), Proceedings of the fifth international conference on learning analytics and knowledge (pp. 265–269). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2723576.2723628
Birenbaum, M., DeLuca, C., Earl, L., Heritage, M., Klenowski, V., Looney, A., Smith, K., Timperley, H., Volante, L., & Wyatt-Smith, C. (2015). International trends in the implementation of assessment for learning: Implications for policy and practice. Policy Futures in Education, 13(1), 117–140. https://doi.org/10.1177/1478210314566733
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2006). Develo** a theory of formative assessment. In J. Gardner (Ed.), Assessment and learning (pp. 81–100). Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446250808.n13
Boekaerts, M. (2010). The crucial role of motivation and emotion in classroom learning. In H. Dumont, D. Istance, & F. Benavides (Eds.), The nature of learning: Using research to inspire practice (pp. 91–111). Center for Educational Research and Innovation, Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264086487-6-en
Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., & Freeman, L. C. (2002). UCINET 6 for Windows: Software for social network analysis (Version 6.727). Analytic Technologies. https://sites.google.com/site/ucinetsoftware/home
Borgatti, S. P. (2002). NetDraw network visualization (Version 2.176). Analytic Technologies. https://sites.google.com/site/netdrawsoftware/home
Boud, D., Ajjawi, R., Dawson, P., & Tai, J. (Eds.). (2018). Develo** evaluative judgement in higher education: Assessment for knowing and producing quality work. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315109251
Bouffard, T., Vezeau, C., Roy, M., & Lengelé, A. (2011). Stability of biases in self-evaluation and relations to well-being among elementary school children. International Journal of Educational Research, 50(4), 221–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2011.08.003
Bourke, R. (2016). Liberating the learner through self-assessment. Cambridge Journal of Education, 46(1), 97–111. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2015.1015963
Bourke, R., & Mentis, M. (2013). Self-assessment as a process for inclusion. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 17(8), 854–867. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2011.602288
Brookhart, S. M. (2013). Classroom assessment in the context of motivation theory and research. In J. McMillan (Ed.), Sage handbook of research on classroom assessment (pp. 35–54). Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452218649.n3
Brown, G. T. L., & Harris, L. (2013). Student self-assessment. In J. H. McMillan (Ed.), Sage handbook of research on classroom assessment (pp. 367–393). Sage.
Brown, G. T., & Harris, L. R. (2014). The future of self-assessment in classroom practice: Reframing self-assessment as a core competency. Frontline Learning Research, 2(1), 22–30. https://doi.org/10.14786/flr.v2i1.24
Brown, G. T., Andrade, H. L., & Chen, F. (2015). Accuracy in student self-assessment: Directions and cautions for research. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 22(4), 444–457. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2014.996523
Butler, R. (2005). Competence assessment, competence, and motivation between early and middle childhood. In A. Elliot & C. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 202–221). The Guildford Press.
Butler, Y. G. (2018). Young learners’ processes and rationales for responding to self-assessment items: Cases for generic can-do and five-point Likert-type formats. In J. Davis, J. Norris, M. Malone, T. McKay, & Y. Son (Eds.), Useful assessment and evaluation in language education (pp. 21–39). Georgetown University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvvngrq.5
Butler, D. L., & Winne, P. H. (1995). Feedback and self-regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 65(3), 245–281. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543065003245
Callan, G. L., & Cleary, T. J. (2018). Multidimensional assessment of self-regulated learning with middle school math students. School Psychology Quarterly, 33(1), 103–111. https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000198
Cervantes, B., Gómez, F., Monroy, R., Loyola-González, O., Medina-Pérez, M. A., & Ramírez-Márquez, J. (2019). Pattern-based and visual analytics for visitor analysis on websites. Applied Sciences, 9(18), 3840. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9183840
Cleary, T. J. (2011). Emergence of self-regulated learning microanalysis: Historical overview, essential features, and implications for research and practice. In B. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 343–359). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203839010.ch21
Cleary, T. J., Slemp, J., & Pawlo, E. (2021). Linking student self-regulated learning profiles to achievement and engagement in mathematics. Psychology in the Schools, 58(3), 443–457. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22456
D’Mello, S. K. (2021, April 9). Measuring affect. In P. E. Poekert (Chair), Precision education: Experiences of the Virtual Learning Lab [Seminar]. American Educational Research Association 2021 Annual Meeting, online.
Draper, S. W. (2009). What are learners actually regulating when given feedback? British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(2), 306–315. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2008.00930.x
Earl, L. M. (2012). Assessment as learning: Using classroom assessment to maximize student learning. Corwin Press.
Fastré, G. M., van der Klink, M. R., Sluijsmans, D., & van Merriënboer, J. J. (2012). Drawing students’ attention to relevant assessment criteria: Effects on self-assessment skills and performance. Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 64(2), 185–198. https://doi.org/10.1080/13636820.2011.630537
FitzGerald Quintel, D., & Wilson, R. (2020). Analytics and privacy: Using Matomo in EBSCO’s discovery service. Information, Technology and Libraries, 39(3), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.6017/ital.v39i3.12219
Frey, N., Fisher, D., & Hattie, J. (2018). Develo** “assessment capable” learners. Educational Leadership, 75(5), 46–51. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1170072.
Gan, Z., Liu, F., & Yang, C. C. R. (2017). Assessment for learning in the Chinese context: Prospective EFL teachers’ perceptions and their relations to learning approach. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 8(6), 1126–1134. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.0806.13
Gonida, E. N., & Leondari, A. (2011). Patterns of motivation among adolescents with biased and accurate self-efficacy beliefs. International Journal of Educational Research, 50(4), 209–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2011.08.002
Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (2018). Evidence-based writing practices: A meta-analysis of existing meta-analyses. In R. Fidalgo, K. R. Harris, & M. Braaksma (Eds.), Design principles for teaching effective writing (pp. 13–37). Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004270480_003
Gulikers, J., Veugen, M., Baartman, L., Beekman, K., Brookhart, S. M., & Tay, H. Y. (2021). What are we really aiming for? Identifying concrete student behavior in co-regulatory formative assessment processes in the classroom. Frontiers in Education, 6, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.750281
Hadwin, A. F., Nesbit, J. C., Jamieson-Noel, D., Code, J., & Winne, P. H. (2007). Examining trace data to explore self-regulated learning. Metacognition and Learning, 2(2–3), 107–124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-007-9016-7
Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). Most people are not WEIRD. Nature, 466(7302), 29–29. https://doi.org/10.1038/466029a
Hutt, S., Grafsgaard, J. F., & D'Mello, S. K. (2019, May 2). Time to scale: Generalizable affect detection for tens of thousands of students across an entire school year. In S. Brewster, G. Fitzpatrick, A. Cox, & V. Kostakos (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2019 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems (Paper no. 496, pp. 1–14). https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300726
Järvelä, S., Malmberg, J., Haataja, E., Sobocinski, M., & Kirschner, P. A. (2021). What multimodal data can tell us about the students’ regulation of their learning process? Learning and Instruction, 72, 101203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2019.04.004
Johnson, C. C., Sondergeld, T. A., & Walton, J. B. (2019). A study of the implementation of formative assessment in three large urban districts. American Educational Research Journal, 56(6), 2408–2438. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831219842347
Lee, H., Chung, H. Q., Zhang, Y., Abedi, J., & Warschauer, M. (2020). The effectiveness and features of formative assessment in US K-12 education: A systematic review. Applied Measurement in Education, 33(2), 124–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/08957347.2020.1732383
Lin-Siegler, X., Shaenfield, D., & Elder, A. D. (2015). Contrasting case instruction can improve self-assessment of writing. Educational Technology Research and Development, 63(4), 517–537. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-015-9390-9
Lopez, R., & Kossack, S. (2007). Effects of recurring use of self-assessment in university courses. International Journal of Learning, 14(4), 203–216. https://doi.org/10.18848/1447-9494/cgp/v14i04/45277
Lui, A. M., & Andrade, H. L. (2022). The Next Black Box of Formative Assessment: A Model of the Internal Mechanisms of Feedback Processing. Frontiers in Education, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.751548
Malmberg, J., Järvenoja, H., & Järvelä, S. (2010). Tracing elementary school students’ study tactic use in gStudy by examining a strategic and self-regulated learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(5), 1034–1042. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.03.004
Matomo. (2021a). Heatmaps user guide. Matomo Analytics. Retrieved January 15, 2021, from https://matomo.org/docs/heatmaps/
Matomo. (2021b). Session recordings user guide. Matomo Analytics. Retrieved January 15, 2021, from https://matomo.org/docs/session-recording/
McMillan, J. H. (2013). Why we need research on classroom assessment. In J. McMillan (Ed.), Sage handbook of research on classroom assessment (pp. 1–16). Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452218649.n1
McMillan, J. H., & Hearn, J. (2008). Student self-assessment: The key to stronger student motivation and higher achievement. Educational Horizons, 87(1), 40–49. https://www.jstor.org/stable/42923742.
Montanari, M., Barth, I., Lariccia, S., Pantazatos, D., De Carnero, F. M., Sansone, N., & Toffoli, G. (2020). Using learning analytics in a next generation digital learning environment to transition from face-to-face to remote learning during the coronavirus crisis. In L. G. Chova, A. L. Martinez, & I. C. Torres (Eds.), Proceedings of the 13th international conference of education, research and innovation (pp. 6257–6265). IATED. https://doi.org/10.21125/iceri.2020.1345
Ndoye, A. (2017). Peer/Self assessment and student learning. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 29(2), 255–269. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1146193.pdf.
Nesbit, J. C., Winne, P. H., Jamieson-Noel, D., Code, J., Zhou, M., Allister, K. M., Bratt, S., Wang, W., & Hadwin, A. (2006). Using cognitive tools in gStudy to investigate how study activities covary with achievement goals. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 35(4), 339–358. https://doi.org/10.2190/h3w1-8321-1260-1443
Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070600572090
OECD (2018). The future of education and skills: Education 2030. https://www.oecd.org/education/2030/E2030%20Position%20Paper%20(05.04.2018).pdf
Oliver, T. L., Shenkman, R., Diewald, L. K., & Smeltzer, S. C. (2021). Reflective journaling of nursing students on weight bias. Nurse Education Today, 98, 104702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104702
Panadero, E., & Alonso-Tapia, J. (2013). Self-assessment: theoretical and practical connotations. When it happens, how is it acquired and what to do to develop it in our students. Electronic Journal of Research in Psychology, 2(11), 551–576. https://doi.org/10.14204/ejrep.30.12200
Panadero, E., Alonso-Tapia, J., & Huertas, J. A. (2014). Rubrics vs. self-assessment scripts: effects on first year university students’ self-regulation and performance/Rúbricas y guiones de autoevaluación: efectos sobre la autorregulación y el rendimiento de estudiantes universitarios de primer año. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 37(1), 149–183. https://doi.org/10.1080/02103702.2014.881655
Panadero, E., Brown, G. T., & Strijbos, J. W. (2016). The future of student self-assessment: A review of known unknowns and potential directions. Educational Psychology Review, 28(4), 803–830. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9350-2
Panadero, E., Jonsson, A., & Botella, J. (2017). Effects of self-assessment on self-regulated learning and self-efficacy: Four meta-analyses. Educational Research Review, 22, 74–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2017.08.004
Panadero, E., Fernández-Ruiz, J., & Sánchez-Iglesias, I. (2020). Secondary education students’ self-assessment: The effects of feedback, subject matter, year level, and gender. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 27(6), 607–634. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2020.1835823
Perry, N. E., Thauberger, C., & Hutchinson, L. (2010). gStudy traces of children’s self-regulated learning in the Lifecycles Learning Kit. Psychological Test and Assessment Modeling, 52(4), 432–453. https://www.csmh.uwo.ca/docs/publications/Perry,%20Thauberger,%20and%20Hutchinson%202010.pdf.
Pintrich, P. R., & Zusho, A. (2002). The development of academic self-regulation: The role of cognitive and motivational factors. In A. Wigfield & J. S. Eccles (Eds.), Development of achievement motivation (pp. 249–284). Academic Press. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/macewan-ebooks/detail.action?docID=294585.
Privitera, G. J., & Ahlgrim-Delzell, L. (2018). Research methods for education. Sage.
Ripp, S., & Falke, S. (2018). Analyzing user behaviour with Matomo in the online information system Grammis. In J. Cibek, V. Gorjanc, I. Kosem, & S. Krek (Eds.), Proceedings of the XVIII EURALEX international congress lexicography in global contexts (pp. 87–100). Ljubljana University Faculty of Arts.
Rohloff, T., Oldag, S., Renz, J., & Meinel, C. (2019). Utilizing web analytics in the context of learning analytics for large-scale online learning. In A. Ashmawy & S. Schreiter (Eds.), IEEE global engineering education conference (EDUCON) (pp. 296–305). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON.2019.8725118
Ross, J. A. (2006). The reliability, validity, and utility of self-assessment. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 11, 10. https://doi.org/10.7275/9wph-vv65
Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18(2), 119–144. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00117714
Sargeant, J., Armson, H., Chesluk, B., Dornan, T., Eva, K., Holmboe, E., Lockyer, J., Loney, E., Mann, K., & van der Vleuten, C. (2010). The processes and dimensions of informed self-assessment: A conceptual model. Academic Medicine, 85(7), 1212–1220. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181d85a4e
Schellings, G. L., van Hout-Wolters, B. H., Veenman, M. V., & Meijer, J. (2013). Assessing metacognitive activities: The in-depth comparison of a task-specific questionnaire with think-aloud protocols. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 28(3), 963–990. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-012-0149-y
Sedikides, C., & Strube, M. J. (1995). The multiply motivated self. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21(12), 1330–1335. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672952112010
Stobart, G. (2008). Testing times: The uses and abuses of assessment. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203930502
Tanner, H., & Jones, S. (1994). Using peer and self-assessment to develop modelling skills with students aged 11 to 16: A socio-constructive view. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 27(4), 413–431.
Thomas, D. R. (2006). A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. American Journal of Evaluation, 27(2), 237–246. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214005283748
Tierney, R. D. (2014). Fairness as a multifaceted quality in classroom assessment. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 43, 55–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2013.12.003
van Reybroeck, M., Penneman, J., Vidick, C., & Galand, B. (2017). Progressive treatment and self-assessment: Effects on students’ automatisation of grammatical spelling and self-efficacy beliefs. Reading and Writing, 30(9), 1965–1985. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-017-9761-1
Veenman, M. V. (2007). The assessment and instruction of self-regulation in computer-based environments: A discussion. Metacognition and Learning, 2(2–3), 177–183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-007-9017-6
Volante, L. (2010). Assessment of, for, and as learning within schools: Implications for transforming classroom practice. Action in Teacher Education, 31(4), 66–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/01626620.2010.10463536
Wang, W. (2017). Using rubrics in student self-assessment: Student perceptions in the English as a foreign language writing context. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(8), 1280–1292. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2016.1261993
Winne, P. H. (2018). Paradigmatic issues in state-of-the-art research using process data. Frontline Learning Research, 6(3), 250–258. https://doi.org/10.14786/flr.v6i3.551
Winne, P. H., & Hadwin, A. F. (1998). Studying as self-regulated learning. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp. 277–304). Lawrence Erlbaum.
Winne, P. H., Gupta, L., & Nesbit, J. C. (1994). Exploring individual differences in studying strategies using graph theoretic statistics. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 40, 177–193.
Winne, P. H., Teng, K., Chang, D., Lin, M. P. C., Marzouk, Z., Nesbit, J. C., Patzak, A., Rakovic, M., Samadi, D., & Vytasek, J. (2019). nStudy: Software for learning analytics about processes for self-regulated learning. Journal of Learning Analytics, 6(2), 95–106. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2019.62.7
Winne, P. H. (2019). nStudy: Process oriented learning analytics [Conference session]. Canadian Society for the Study of Education (CSSE) Annual Conference, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Wong, Y. L. R., & Vinsky, J. (2021). Beyond implicit bias: Embodied cognition, mindfulness, and critical reflective practice in social work. Australian Social Work, 74(2), 186–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/0312407X.2020.1850816
Yan, Z. (2018). Student self-assessment practices: The role of gender, school level and goal orientation. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 25(2), 183–199. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2016.1218324
Yan, Z. (2020a). Develo** A Short Form of the Self-assessment Practices Scale: Psychometric Evidence. Frontiers in Education, 4, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2019.00153
Yan, Z. (2020b). Self-assessment in the process of self-regulated learning and its relationship with academic achievement. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 45(2), 224–238. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1629390
Yan, Z., & Brown, G. T. (2017). A cyclical self-assessment process: Towards a model of how students engage in self-assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(8), 1247–1262. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2016.1260091
Yan, Z., Brown, G. T., Lee, J. C. K., & Qiu, X. L. (2019). Student self-assessment: Why do they do it? Educational Psychology, 40(4), 509–532. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2019.1672038
Yan, Z., Wang, X., Boud, D., & Lao, H. (2021). The effect of self-assessment on academic performance and the role of explicitness: A meta-analysis. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 48(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2021.2012644
Zimmerman, B. J. (2013). From cognitive modeling to self-regulation: A social cognitive career path. Educational Psychologist, 48(3), 135–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2013.794676
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to acknowledge the thoughtful advice of Dr. Heidi Andrade (University at Albany, State University of New York) in carrying out this study. We are grateful for Dr. Andrade’s support and expertise.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical approval
Ethical clearance for this study was provided by university research ethics boards and participating school administration.
Informed consent
All participants provided informed consent to participate in this study.
Competing interests
The authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix
Appendix
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Rickey, N., DeLuca, C. & Beach, P. Towards a new theory of student self-assessment: Tracing learners’ cognitive and affective processes. Metacognition Learning 18, 945–981 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-023-09359-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-023-09359-6