Abstract
Ship** companies’ implementation of sustainable ship** management is an important means of protecting major water bodies in the marine environment. This research establishes a theoretical model based on institutional theory and incorporates a micro-consciousness level to explore the factors influencing companies’ implementation of sustainable ship** practices. After surveying the management of Chinese ship** companies, a total of 282 datasets were obtained for analysis. This study demonstrated that rules and regulations, societal norms, environmental awareness, and legal awareness can improve ship** companies’ sustainable ship** practices. Meanwhile, these practices have a positive impact on the environmental, financial, and competitive performance of ship** companies. Moreover, these findings are highly significant for maritime environmental protection and sustainability.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The datasets analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Abbas J, Dogan E (2022) The impacts of organizational green culture and corporate social responsibility on employees’ responsible behaviour towards the society. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29(40):60024–60034. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-20072-w
Alexandrou SE, Panayides PM, Tsouknidis DA, Alexandrou AE (2022) Green supply chain management strategy and financial performance in the ship** industry. Marit Policy Manag 49(3):376–395. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2021.1883141
Armstrong JS, Overton TS (1977) Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. J Market Res 14(3):396–402. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224377701400320
Awan FH, Dunnan L, Jamil K, Gul RF (2023) Stimulating environmental performance via green human resource management, green transformational leadership, and green innovation: a mediation-moderation model. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30(2):2958–2976. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-22424-y
Bacallan J (2000) Greening the supply chain. Bus Environ 6(5):11–12
Ballini F, Bozzo R (2015) Air pollution from ships in ports: the socio-economic benefit of cold-ironing technology. Res Transp Bus Manag 17:92–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2015.10.007
Berger P (1966) Identity as a problem in the sociology of knowledge. Eur J Sociol 7(1):105–115. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003975600001351
Chaudhuri A, Holbrook MB (2001) The chain of effects from brand trust and brand affect to brand performance: the role of brand loyalty. J Mark 65(2):81–93. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.65.2.81.18255
Chen J, Huang J, Huang X, Sun S, Hao Y, Wu H (2020) How does new environmental law affect public environmental protection activities in China? Evidence from structural equation model analysis on legal cognition. Sci Total Environ 714:136558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.136558
DiMaggio PJ, Powell WW (1997) Institutional isomorphism//organizational theory: selected readings. In: DS Pugh (ed)
DiMaggio PJ, Powell WW (1983) The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review 48:147
Drempetic S, Klein C, Zwergel B (2020) The influence of firm size on the ESG score: corporate sustainability ratings under review. Journal of Business Ethics 167(2):333–360. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04164-1
Drozdova AM, Balakireva LM, Vorotilina TV, Makarova EV, Meleshkin VV (2019) Legal awareness and legal culture as elements and means for the implementation of a mechanism for ensuring the legal impact. Opción: Revista de Ciencias Humanas y Sociales 89:2922–2934
Economy E, Kenneth L (2008) Scorched earth: will environmental risks in China overwhelm its opportunities? Harv Bus Rev 85(6):88
Fan L, Xu Y, Luo M, Yin J (2022) Modeling the interactions among green ship** policies. Marit Policy Manag 49(1):62–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2021.1872808
Fu L, Sun Z, Zha L, Liu F, He L, Sun X, **g X (2020) Environmental awareness and pro-environmental behavior within China’s road freight transportation industry: moderating role of perceived policy effectiveness. J Clean Prod 252:119796. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119796
Gritsenko D (2017) Regulating GHG Emissions from ship**: local, global, or polycentric approach? Mar Policy 84:130–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2017.07.010
Hair JF, Anderson RE, Babin BJ, Black WC (2010) Multivariate data analysis: a global perspective (Vol. 7). Pearson, Upper Saddle River, NJ
Howell KE, Bhattacharya S (2016) Functional and territorial jurisdictions: regulating a globalized ship** industry. J Transp Geogr 55:92–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2016.07.010
Jennings PD, Zandbergen PA (1995) Ecologically sustainable organizations: an institutional approach. Acad Manage Rev 20(4):1015–1052. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9512280034
Kostova T, Roth K, Dacin MT (2008) Institutional theory in the study of multinational corporations: a critique and new directions. Acad Manage Rev 33:994–1006. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2008.34422026
Lai KH, Lun YHV, Wong CWY, Cheng TCE (2013b) Measures for evaluating green ship** practices implementation. Int J Shipp Transp Logist 5(2):217. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSTL.2013.053251
Lai K, Wong CWY, Veus Lun YH, Cheng TCE (2013a) Ship** design for compliance and the performance contingencies for ship** firms. Transp Res E: Logist Transp 55:74–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2013.03.004
Lai K-H, Lun VYH, Wong CWY, Cheng TCE (2011) Green ship** practices in the ship** industry: conceptualization, adoption, and implications. Resour Conserv Recycl 55(6):631–638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2010.12.004
Larkin A, Smith T, Wrobel P (2017) Ship** in changing climates. Mar Policy 75:188–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2016.05.033
Lirn T-C, Lin H-W, Shang K-C (2014) Green ship** management capability and firm performance in the container ship** industry. Marit Policy Manag 41(2):159–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2013.819132
Lin DY, Juan CJ, Ng M (2021) Evaluation of green strategies in maritime liner ship** using evolutionary game theory. J Clean Prod 279:123268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123268
Liu H, Meng Z-H, Lv Z-F, Wang X-T, Deng F-Y, Liu Y, Zhang Y-N, Shi M-S, Zhang Q, He K-B (2019) Emissions and health impacts from global ship** embodied in US–China bilateral trade. Nat Sustain 2(11):1027–1033. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0414-z
Liu X (2022) The supervision and multi-sectoral guarantee mechanism of the global marine sulphur limit-assessment from Chinese ship** industry. Front Mar Sci 2021. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2022.1028388
Lu C-S, Liu W-H, Wooldridge C (2014) Maritime environmental governance and green ship**. Marit Policy Manag 41(2):131–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2013.819134
Lu H, Xu W, Cai S, Yang F, Chen Q (2022) Does top management team responsible leadership help employees go green? The role of green human resource management and environmental felt-responsibility. Corp Soc Respon Environ Manag 29(4):843–859. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2239
Lun YHV (2011) Green management practices and firm performance: a case of container terminal operations. Resour Conserv Recycl 55(6):559–566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2010.12.001
Lun YV, Lai K-H, Wong CW, Cheng T (2015) Environmental governance mechanisms in ship** firms and their environmental performance. Transp Res E: Logist Transp 78:82–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2015.01.011
Mander S (2017) Slow steaming and a new dawn for wind propulsion: a multi-level analysis of two low carbon ship** transitions. Mar Policy 75:210–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2016.03.018
Mansouri SA, Lee H, Aluko O (2015) Multi-objective decision support to enhance environmental sustainability in maritime ship**: a review and future directions. Transp Res E: Logist Transp 78:3–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2015.01.012
Meng L, Wang J, Yan W, Han C (2022) A differential game model for emission reduction decisions between ports and ship** enterprises considering environmental regulations. Ocean Coast Manag 225:106221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2022.106221
Oliver C (1997) Sustainable competitive advantage: combining institutional and resource-based views. Strateg Manag J 18(9):697–713. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199710)18:9<697::AID-SMJ909>3.0.CO;2-C
Pang K, Lu CS, Shang KC, Weng HK (2021) An empirical investigation of green ship** practices, corporate reputation and organisational performance in container ship**. Int J Shipp Transp Logist 13(3-4):422–444. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijstl.2021.113996
Pang Q, Fang M, Wang L, Mi K, Su M (2023) Increasing couriers’ job satisfaction through social-sustainability practices: perceived fairness and psychological-safety perspectives. Behav Sci 13(2):125. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13020125
Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Lee J-Y, Podsakoff NP (2003) Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J Appl Psychol 88(5):879. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
Powell WW, Jeannette C (2008) Microfoundations of institutional theory. In: The sage handbook of organizational institutionalism, SAGE Publications, London, p 298
Pieraccini M, Cardwell E (2016) Divergent perceptions of new marine protected areas: comparing legal consciousness in Scilly and Barra, UK. Ocean Coast Manag 119:21–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2015.09.016
Rao P, Holt D (2005) Do green supply chains lead to competitiveness and economic performance? Int J Oper Prod Manag 25(9):898–916. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570510613956
Rehman SU, Bresciani S, Ashfaq K, Alam GM (2022a) Intellectual capital, knowledge management and competitive advantage: a resource orchestration perspective. J Knowl Manag 26(7):1705–1731. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-06-2021-0453
Rehman SU, Elrehail H, Alsaad A, Bhatti A (2022b) Intellectual capital and innovative performance: a mediation-moderation perspective. J Intellect Cap 23(5):998–1024. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIC-04-2020-0109
Rehman SU, Giordino D, Zhang Q, Alam GM (2023) Twin transitions & industry 4.0: unpacking the relationship between digital and green factors to determine green competitive advantage. Technology in Society 73:102227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102227
Scott R (1995) Institutions and organizations, Sage Publications Ltd, London
Sharif A, Kartal MT, Bekun FV, Pata UK, Foon CL, Depren SK (2023) Role of green technology, environmental taxes, and green energy towards sustainable environment: insights from sovereign Nordic countries by CS-ARDL approach. Gondw Res 117:194–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2023.01.009
Shrivastava P (1995) Environmental technologies and competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal 16(S1):183–200. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250160923
Suddaby R, Seidl D, Lê JK (2013) Strategy-as-practice meets neo-institutional theory. Strategic Organization 11(3):329–344. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127013497618
Su M, Pang Q, Kim W, Yao J, Fang M (2023) Consumer participation in reusable resource allocation schemes: a theoretical conceptualization and empirical examination of Korean consumers. Resour Conserv Recycl 189:106747. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106747
Teo W, Benbasat. (2003) Predicting intention to adopt interorganizational linkages: an institutional perspective. MIS Q 27(1):19. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036518
Tran TMT, Woo S-H, Yuen KF (2021) The impacts of sustainable inter-firm collaboration on business performance of ship** companies. Int J Logist Manag 32(3):766–789. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLM-11-2020-0453
Tran TMT, Yuen KF, Wang X, Li KX (2020) The antecedents of sustainable ship** management and organisational performance: resource accumulation and orientation perspectives. Int J Phys Distrib Logist 50(9/10):833–854. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPDLM-03-2020-0066
Tzannatos E, Stournaras L (2015) EEDI analysis of Ro-Pax and passenger ships in Greece. Marit Policy Manag 42(4):305–316. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2014.905722
van Leeuwen J (2015) The regionalization of maritime governance: towards a polycentric governance system for sustainable ship** in the European Union. Ocean Coast Manag 117:23–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2015.05.013
Vural CA, Baştuğ S, Gülmez S (2021) Sustainable brand positioning by container ship** firms: evidence from social media communications. Transp Res D: Transp Environ 97:102938. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2021.102938
Wagner M, Schaltegger S (2004) The effect of corporate environmental strategy choice and environmental performance on competitiveness and economic performance. Eur Manag J 22(5):557–572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2004.09.013
Wan Z, el Makhloufi A, Chen Y, Tang J (2018) Decarbonizing the international ship** industry: solutions and policy recommendations. Mar Pollut Bull 126:428–435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2017.11.064
Wang L, Yao J, Zhang H, Pang Q, Fang M (2023) A sustainable ship** management framework in the marine environment: institutional pressure, eco-design, and cross-functional perspectives. Front Mar Sci 9:2863
Yang C-C, Marlow PB, Lu C-S (2009) Assessing resources, logistics service capabilities, innovation capabilities and the performance of container ship** services in Taiwan. Int J Prod Econ 122(1):4–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2009.03.016
Yang C-S (2018) An analysis of institutional pressures, green supply chain management, and green performance in the container ship** context. Transp Res D: Transp. Environ 61:246–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2017.07.005
Yang C-S, Lu C-S, Haider JJ, Marlow PB (2013) The effect of green supply chain management on green performance and firm competitiveness in the context of container ship** in Taiwan. Transp Res E: Logist Transp Rev 55:55–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2013.03.005
Yuen KF, Wang X, Wong YD, Ma F (2019) A contingency view of the effects of sustainable ship** exploitation and exploration on business performance. Transport Policy 77:90–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2019.03.004
Yuen KF, Wang X, Wong YD, Zhou Q (2017) Antecedents and outcomes of sustainable ship** practices: the integration of stakeholder and behavioural theories. Transp Res E: Logist Transp Rev 108:18–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2017.10.002
Zhang B, Chen X, Guo H (2018) Does central supervision enhance local environmental enforcement? Quasi-experimental evidence from China. J Public Econ 164:70–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2018.05.009
Zhou Y, Li X, Yuen KF (2023) Sustainable ship**: a critical review for a unified framework and future research agenda. Mar Policy 148:105478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2023.105478
Zhu Q, Sarkis J (2007) The moderating effects of institutional pressures on emergent green supply chain practices and performance. Int J Prod Res 45(18–19):4333–4355. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540701440345
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to the editors and anonymous reviewers for their valuable feedbacks and insightful comments.
Funding
This work was supported by the research start-up funds of Ningbo University of Finance & Economics. In addition, this work was partially supported by the Korea University Business School Research Grant.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
**g**g **ng: conceptualization, methodology, software, formal analysis, writing—original draft. Jia Shen: conceptualization, investigation, resources, writing—review and editing. Qiwei Pang: conceptualization, investigation, resources, writing—review and editing. Mingjie Fang: methodology, writing—review and editing. Hong Chen: conceptualization, methodology, formal analysis, data curation, resources, writing—original draft.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical approval
According to institutional guidelines and national laws and regulations, ethical approval was not required as there was no unethical conduct in this study. We only conducted a questionnaire, and as this study did not involve human clinical trials or animal experiments, no further approval from the ethics committee was required.
Consent to participate
All subjects gave written informed consent in accordance with the “Declaration of Helsinki.” Respondents were assured of confidentiality and anonymity. All participation is voluntary.
Consent for publication
That its publication has been approved by all co-authors.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Arshian Sharif
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-28368-1