SpringerLink
Log in

Critical success factors for small contractors to conduct green building construction projects in Singapore: identification and comparison with large contractors

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As a major participant of the construction industry, small contractors have been increasingly involved in green building construction projects in recent years. However, existing literature indicates that little research has been done to investigate the critical success factors for small contractors to conduct green building construction projects. As a result, this study aims to fill up the gap by identifying the most critical success factors of small contractors and comparing them against large contractors. To achieve these goals, a comprehensive literature review and pilot interviews with experienced industry experts were conducted first, followed by a questionnaire survey administered to 30 small contractors from the construction industry of Singapore. Non-parametric statistical tests were used to analyze the data. Results reported that “laborers with experience in conducting green building construction projects,” “incentives/subsidies provided by government,” “support of senior management,” “return on investment,” “commit to changing behavior,” “effective communication between stakeholders on goals for sustainable construction,” “early contractor involvement,” “engaging experts with sound knowledge of green building construction,” “cost control,” and “competency of project manager” were the top ten critical success factors for small contractors to conduct green building construction projects. Additionally, the comparison results between small and large contractors revealed that eight factors were statistically different assessed by industry practitioners. These factors are “procurement process,” “cost control,” “commit to changing behavior,” “educating clients on benefits in sustainable construction,” “laborers with experience in conducting green building construction projects,” “hefty levy and tax on unsustainable construction practices,” and “public demand for green building construction” and “industrial culture.” This study enriches the knowledge by exploring the critical success factors for small contractors to conduct green building construction projects. Furthermore, this study is informative to industry practitioners as well, especially to those small contractors who plan to conduct green building construction projects in the future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abachi HM, Hosseini S, Maskouni MA, Kangavari M & Cheung NM (2018) Statistical discretization of continuous attributes using kolmogorov-smirnov test. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

  • Abduh, M., Wirahadikusumah, R. D. & Messah, Y. Framework development methodology for Sustainable procurement of construction works in Indonesia. MATEC Web of Conferences, 2018.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Alsanad S (2015) Awareness, drivers, actions, and barriers of sustainable construction in Kuwait. Procedia Eng:969–983

  • Ametepey O, Aigbavboa C, Ansah K (2015) Barriers to successful implementation of sustainable construction in the Ghanaian construction industry. Procedia Manufacturing 3:1682–1689

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banihashemi S, Hosseini MR, Golizadeh H, Sankaran S (2017) Critical success factors (CSFs) for integration of sustainability into construction project management practices in develo** countries. Int J Proj Manag 35:1103–1119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrett P, Sexton M (2006) Innovation in small, project-based construction firms. Br J Manag 17:331–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Battistelli A, Montani F, Odoardi C, Vandenberghe C, Picci P (2014) Employees' concerns about change and commitment to change among Italian organizations: the moderating role of innovative work behavior. Int J Hum Resour Manag 25:951–978

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BCA. 2014. 3rd Green Building Masterplan. Singapore: Building and Construction Authority [Online]. Available: https://slidelegend.com/3rd-green-building-masterplan-building-construction-authority_59d70de81723dd35225b4eb1.html [Accessed 16 August,2019].

  • BCA. 2015. Home-Technology-BCA Green Mark Scheme-Enhanced SGD 20 Million Green Mark Incentive Scheme for New Buildings (GMIS-NB) [Online]. http://www.bca.gov.sg/greenmark/gmis.html [Accessed 16 August,2019].

  • BCA. 2017a. BCA Directory of Registered Contractors and Licensed Builders [Online]. https://www.bca.gov.sg/ContractorsRegistry/others/CRS_FAQ.pdf. [Accessed 16 August,2019].

  • BCA. 2017b. BCA Green mark assessment criteria and online application [Online]. Available: https://www.bca.gov.sg/GreenMark/green_mark_criteria.html [Accessed 16 August, 2019].

  • BCA. 2017c. Sustainable Construction Masterplan [Online]. https://www.bca.gov.sg/SustainableConstruction/sustainable_construction.html. [Accessed 16 August, 2019].

  • BCA, S. 2017d. BCA Contractors Registration System (CRS) [Online]. https://www.bca.gov.sg/ContractorsRegistry/others/CRS_FAQ.pdf. [Accessed 16 August , 2019].

  • Blair RC, Higgins JJ (1985) Comparison of the power of the paired samples t test to that of Wilcoxon's signed-ranks test under various population shapes. Psychol Bull 97:119–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolton, J. E. 1971. Small firms: report of the committee of inquiry on small firms, London [Online]. Available: https://ipmall.law.unh.edu/sites/defau [Accessed 16 August, 2019].

  • Bossink BAG (2002) A Dutch public-private strategy for innovation in sustainable construction. Constr Manag Econ 20:633–642

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks A, Rich H (2016) Sustainable construction and socio-technical transitions in London's mega-projects. Geogr J 182:395–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan APC, Scott D, Chan APL (2004) Factors affecting the success of a construction project. J Constr Eng Manag 130:153–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan APC, Darko A, Olanipekun AO, Ameyaw EE (2018) Critical barriers to green building technologies adoption in develo** countries: The case of Ghana. J Cleaner Prod 172:1067–1079

  • Ding GKC (2008) Sustainable construction-The role of environmental assessment tools. J Environ Manag 86:451–464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durdyev S, Ismail S, Ihtiyar A, Abu Bakar NFS, Darko A (2018) A partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) of barriers to sustainable construction in Malaysia. J Clean Prod 204:564–572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2011) Key figures on European business with a special feature on SMEs [Online]. http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/3930297/5967534/KS-ET-11-001-EN.PDF/81dfdd85-c028-41f9-bbf0-a9d8ef5134c5. [Accessed 16 August, 2019].

  • EY (2017) Budget 2017 New Alert [Online]. https://www.ey.com/sg/en/services/tax/ey-singapore-budget-2017-news-alert. [Accessed 16 August, 2019].

  • Eyiah AK (2001) An integrated approach to financing small contractors in develo** countries: a conceptual model. Constr Manag Econ 19:511–518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eyiah AK, Cook P (2003) Financing small and medium-scale contractors in develo** countries: A Ghana case study. Constr Manag Econ 21:357–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghobadian A, Gallear D (1997) TQM and organization size. Int J Oper Prod Manag 17:121–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gudiene N, Banaitis A & Banaitiene N (2013) Evaluation of critical success factors for construction projects—an empirical study in Lithuania. Int J Strateg Prop Manag, 17, 21-31.

  • Gudiene N, Banaitis A, Podvezko V, Banaitiene N (2014) Identification and evaluation of the critical success factors for construction projects in Lithuania: AHP approach. J Civ Eng Manag 20:350–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunhan S (2019) Analyzing sustainable building construction project delivery practices: builders' perspective. Pract Period Struct Des Constr 24

  • Häkkinen T, Belloni K (2011) Barriers and drivers for sustainable building. Build Res Inf 39:239–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris T, Hardin JW (2013) Exact Wilcoxon signed-rank and Wilcoxon Mann-Whitney ranksum tests. Stata J 13:337–343

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hill RC, Bowen PA (1997) Sustainable construction: principles and a framework for attainment. Constr Manag Econ 15:223–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holloway, S. & Parrish, K. 2015. The contractor's role in the sustainable construction industry. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers: Engineering Sustainability, 168, 53-60.

  • Hwang B-G, Lim E-SJ (2012) Critical success factors for key project players and objectives: Case study of Singapore. J Constr Eng Manag 139:204–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang B-G, Zhu L, Tan Joanne Siow, H. (2017a) Identifying Critical Success Factors for Green Business Parks: Case Study of Singapore. J Manag Eng 33:04017023

  • Hwang BG, Shan M, Lye JM (2018) Adoption of sustainable construction for small contractors: major barriers and best solutions. Clean Techn Environ Policy 20:2223–2237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang BG, Shan M, Phua H, Chi S (2017b) An exploratory analysis of risks in green residential building construction projects: the case of Singapore. Sustainability 9:21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang BG, Tan JS (2012) Green building project management: obstacles and solutions for sustainable development. Sustain Dev 20:335–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • INITIAFY. 2017. How Does Construction Impact the Environment? [Online]. Available: https://www.initiafy.com/blog/how-does-construction-impact-the-environment/ [Accessed 16 August, 2019].

  • Jaafar MAA-AAR (2005) Resource-based view and critical success factors: a study on small and medium sized contracting enterprises (SMCEs) in Malaysia. Int J Constr Manag 5(2):61–77

    Google Scholar 

  • ** X-H, Tan HC, Zuo J, Feng Y (2012) Exploring critical success factors for develo** infrastructure projects in Malaysia–main contractors’ perspective. Int J Constr Manag 12:25–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Ke Y, Wang S, Chan APC, Cheung E (2011) Understanding the risks in China’s PPP projects: ranking of their probability and consequence. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management 18(5):481–496

  • Kibwami N, Tutesigensi A (2016) Enhancing sustainable construction in the building sector in Uganda. Habitat International 57:64–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim TK (2015) T test as a parametric statistic. Korean J Anesthesiol 68:540–546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim YJ, Cribbie RA (2018) ANOVA and the variance homogeneity assumption: Exploring a better gatekeeper. Br J Math Stat Psychol 71:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lavanya R, Murthi P, Karthikeyan V (2018) Environment sustainable construction materials for garden-fresh and mechanical properties of high strength self-compacting concrete mixes with diverse mineral admixtures and water binder ratios. Int J Environ Sustain Dev 17:379–389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li Y, Gu YF, Liu CL (2018) Prioritising performance indicators for sustainable construction and development of university campuses using an integrated assessment approach. J Clean Prod 202:959–968

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li Y, Song H, Sang P, Chen P-H, Liu X (2019) Review of critical success factors (CSFs) for green building projects. Build Environ 158:182–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li YY, Chen P-H, Chew DAS, Teo CC, Ding RG (2011) Critical project management factors of AEC firms for delivering green building projects in Singapore. J Constr Eng Manag 137:1153–1163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorincová S, Hitka M, Štarchoň P & Stachová K (2018) Strategic instrument for sustainability of human resource management in small and medium-sized enterprises using management data Sustainability (Switzerland), 10.

  • Low SP, Gao S, Tay WL (2014) Comparative study of project management and critical success factors of greening new and existing buildings in Singapore. Struct Surv 32:413–433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu, S.-L., Sexton, M. G. & Abbot, C (2008a) Key characteristics of small construction firms: a United Kingdom perspective. Proceedings: CIBW065/055 Joint International Symposium: Transformation through Construction.

  • Lu W, Shen L, Yam MCH (2008b) Critical success factors for competitiveness of contractors: China study. J Constr Eng Manag 134:972–982

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney M, Magel R (1996) Estimation of the power of the Kruskal-Wallis test. Biom J 38:613–630

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ng ST, Tang Z (2010) Labour-intensive construction sub-contractors: their critical success factors. Int J Proj Manag 28:732–740

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen, H. D. 2018. A Two-sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov-like test for big data. Communications in Computer and Information Science.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ofori-Kuragu JK, Baiden B, Badu E (2016) Critical success factors for Ghanaian contractors. Benchmarking: An International Journal 23:843–865

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pacheco-Torgal F (2014) Eco-efficient construction and building materials research under the Eu Framework Programme Horizon 2020. Constr Build Mater 51:151–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pitt M, Tucker M, Riley M, Longden J (2009) Towards sustainable construction: Promotion and best practices. Constr Innov 9:201–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollak M, Cohen J (1981) A comparison of the independent-samples t-test and the paired-samples t-test when the observations are nonnegatively correlated pairs. J Stat Plan Inference 5:133–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robichaud LB, Anantatmula VS (2011) Greening project management practices for sustainable construction. J Manag Eng 27:48–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruparathna R, Hewage K (2015) Sustainable procurement in the Canadian construction industry: current practices, drivers and opportunities. J Clean Prod 109:305–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schropfer VLM, Tah J, Kurul E (2017) Map** the knowledge flow in sustainable construction project teams using social network analysis. Eng Constr Archit Manag 24:229–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SGBC Member Directory (2019) Available: https://web.sgbc.online/public/memberdirectory [Accessed 16 August, 2019].

  • Shen W, Tang W, Siripanan A, Lei Z, Duffield CF, Wilson D, Hui FKP, Wei Y (2017) Critical success factors in Thailand′s green building industry. J Asian Archit Build Eng 16:317–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shi Q, Zuo J, Huang R, Huang J, Pullen S (2013) Identifying the critical factors for green construction - An empirical study in China. Habitat International 40:1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siniavskaia, N. 2015. Most Homebuilders are Small Businesses [Online]. Available: http://eyeonhousing.org/2015/12/most-homebuilders-are-small-businesses/ [Accessed 21 June 2018].

  • Siva V, Hoppe T, Jain M (2017) Green buildings in Singapore; analyzing a frontrunner's sectoral innovation system. Sustainability (Switzerland) 9

  • Sommer A, Steland A (2019) Multistage acceptance sampling under nonparametric dependent sampling designs. J Stat Plan Inference 199:89–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sourani A, Sohail M (2011) Barriers to addressing sustainable construction in public procurement strategies. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers: Engineering Sustainability 164:229–237

    Google Scholar 

  • Thakur AK, Pappu A, Thakur VK (2018) Resource efficiency impact on marble waste recycling towards sustainable green construction materials. Curr Opin Green Sustainable Chem 13:91–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thas O, Rayner JCW, Best DJ (2005) Tests for symmetry based on the one-sample Wilcoxon signed rank statistic. Communications in Statistics: Simulation and Computation 34:957–973

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Small Business Administration 2017. Size standards define small business [Online]. https://www.sba.gov/federal-contracting/contracting-guide/size-standards. [Accessed 16 August, 2019].

  • Wai SH, Yusof AM, Ismail S, & Tey KH (2012) Critical Success Factors for Sustainable Building in Malaysia [Online]. http://www.ipedr.com/vol45/025-ICMTS2012-M00025.pdf. [Accessed 16 August, 2019].

  • Wendler, T. & Gröttrup, S. 2016. Data mining with SPSS modeler: Theory, exercises and solutions.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Yin BCL, Laing R, Leon M, Mabon L (2018) An evaluation of sustainable construction perceptions and practices in Singapore. Sustain Cities Soc 39:613–620

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yong YC, Mustaffa NE (2013) Critical success factors for Malaysian construction projects: An empirical assessment. Constr Manag Econ 31:959–978

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu ATW, Javed AA, Lam TI, Shen GQ, Sun M (2018) Integrating value management into sustainable construction projects in Hong Kong. Eng Constr Archit Manag 25:1475–1500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yung EHK, Chan EHW (2012) Implementation challenges to the adaptive reuse of heritage buildings: Towards the goals of sustainable, low carbon cities. Habitat International 36:352–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zainul Abidin Nazirah N (2010) Investigating the awareness and application of sustainable construction concept by Malaysian developers. Habitat International 34:421–426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zou PXW, Zhang G, Wang J (2007) Understanding the key risks in construction projects in China. Int J Proj Manag 25:601–614

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Civil Engineering, Central South University, 68South Shaoshan Road, Changsha, 410004, China

    Ming Shan & Wen-Que Liu

  2. Department of Building, National University of Singapore, 4 Architecture Drive, Singapore, 117566, Singapore

    Bon-Gang Hwang

  3. Frasers Centrepoint Limited, 438 Alexandra Road, Alexandra Point, Singapore, 119958, Singapore

    Jun-Ming Lye

Authors
  1. Ming Shan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Wen-Que Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Bon-Gang Hwang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jun-Ming Lye
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bon-Gang Hwang.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Philippe Garrigues

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shan, M., Liu, WQ., Hwang, BG. et al. Critical success factors for small contractors to conduct green building construction projects in Singapore: identification and comparison with large contractors. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27, 8310–8322 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-06646-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-06646-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation