SpringerLink
Log in

Network Architecture and Wireless Ad Hoc Routing for Airborne Internet Services

  • Published:
Wireless Personal Communications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The passengers traveling in aircraft require access to the internet to effectively utilizing their precious in-flight time. Providing internet services to such users with similar specifications (i.e., speed, cost, latency, etc) as that of being provided to terrestrial users is an open research problem. To this end, various attractive solutions are proposed in the literature which includes satellite-based, extended terrestrial network-based, and ad hoc networking-based solutions—to name a few. In this paper, inspired by the widely deployed terrestrial radio cellular networks, an architectural advancement is proposed which together with ad hoc networking renders airborne internet services to remote aircraft. Simulation analysis is performed to evaluate the potential of the proposed network architecture, while two notable routing algorithms are implemented and analyzed. In the conducted analysis, mean End-to-End (E2E) packet delay, Packet Delivery Ratio (PDR), and throughput are used as key performance metrics. Routing protocols from two diverse classes are implemented, which are topology-based and position-based protocols. In a scenario when transmitting message length, bit-rate, coverage radius of nodes, the velocity of nodes, and direction of motion of nodes is set as 4000 bytes, 300 Mbps, 140 km, up to 250 m/s, and randomly drawn from the uniform distribution, respectively, the Greedy Perimeter Stateless Routing (GPSR) algorithm is observed to outperform the Ad-hoc On-demand Distance Vector Routing (AODV) algorithm. However, converse behaviour is observed along with an increase in the network load and the velocity of routing (intermediate) and destination aerial nodes. Moreover, the impact of changes in various other important network and physical parameters on the network performance is also investigated and various useful recommendations are made. The conducted analysis is of high significance for determining a suitable choice of routing protocol in a given network and nodes’ mobility conditions in real-time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Not applicable.

Code Availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. Nawaz, S. J., Sharma, S. K., Mansoor, B., Patwary, M. N., & Khan, N. M. (2021). Non-coherent and backscatter communications: Enabling ultra-massive connectivity in 6g wireless networks. IEEE Access, 9, 144–186.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Zhang, J., Chen, T., Zhong, S., Wang, J., Zhang, W., Zuo, X., Maunder, R. G., & Hanzo, L. (2019). Aeronautical \(ad~hoc\) networking for the internet-above-the-clouds. Proceedings of the IEEE, 107(5), 868–911.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Nawaz, S. J., Khan, N. M., Tiwana, M. I., Hassan, N., & Shah, S. I. (2015). Airborne internet access through submarine optical fiber cables. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 51(1), 167–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Sakhaee, E., & Jamalipour, A. (2006). The global in-flight internet. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 24(9), 1748–1757.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Medina, D., Hoffmann, F., Rossetto, F., & Rokitansky, C.-H. (2012). A geographic routing strategy for north atlantic in-flight internet access via airborne mesh networking. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 20(4), 1231–1244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Yau, K. A., Syed, A. R., Hashim, W., Qadir, J., Wu, C., & Hassan, N. (2019). Maritime networking: Bringing internet to the sea. IEEE Access, 7, 236–255.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Rohrer, J. P., Jabbar, A., Cetinkaya, E. K., Perrins, E., & Sterbenz, J. P. (2011). Highly-dynamic cross-layered aeronautical network architecture. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 47(4), 2742–2765.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Abolhasan, M., Wysocki, T., & Dutkiewicz, E. (2004). A review of routing protocols for mobile ad hoc networks. Ad hoc Networks, 2(1), 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Wu, X., Xu, H., Sadjadpour, H.R., & Garcia-Luna-Aceves, J. (2008). “Proactive or reactive routing: A unified analytical framework in MANETs,” in Proc. of International Conference on Computer Communications and Networks. IEEE, pp. 1–7.

  10. Akbari, A. (2011). “A new algorithm AODV routing protocol in mobile ADHOC networks,” International Journal of Latest Trends in Computing, 2(3), 457–464.

  11. Karp, B., & Kung, H.-T. (2000). “GPSR: Greedy perimeter stateless routing for wireless networks,” in Proc. of Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking. ACM, pp. 243–254.

  12. Dinc, E., Vondra, M., Hofmann, S., Schupke, D., Prytz, M., Bovelli, S., Frodigh, M., Zander, J., & Cavdar, C. (2017). In-flight broadband connectivity: Architectures and business models for high capacity air-to-ground communications. IEEE Communications Magazine, 55(9), 142–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Savanoor, L.F., & Guruprasad, H. (2020). “Airborne internet-a step towards technological inclusion,” International Journal of Innovative Research in Applied Sciences and Engineering, 4, 659–663.

  14. Lavina, N., & Krishna, S. (2017). “Projet LOON: Innovating the connectivity worldwide,” in proc. of IEEE International Conference On Recent Trends in Electronics Information & Communication Technology.

  15. Mehta, P. L., & Prasad, R. (2017). Aerial-heterogeneous network: A case study analysis on the network performance under heavy user accumulations. Wireless Personal Communications, 96(3), 3765–3784.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Mehta, P. L., & Prasad, R. (2019). Distributed dynamic backhauling in aerial heterogeneous networks. Wireless Personal Communications, 109(1), 621–643.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Gulfam, S. M., Nawaz, S. J., Ahmed, A., Patwary, M. N., & Ni, Q. (2016). A novel 3D analytical scattering model for air-to-ground fading channels. Applied Sciences, 6(8), 207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Jamal, H., & Matolak, D. W. (2017). FBMC and L-DACS performance for future air-to-ground communication systems. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 66(6), 5043–5055.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lucent, A. (2015). “Using air-to-ground LTE for in-flight ultrabroadband,” Strategic White Paper

  20. Nawaz, S. J., Sharma, S. K., Wyne, S., Patwary, M. N., & Asaduzzaman, M. (2019). Quantum machine learning for 6G communication networks: State-of-the-art and vision for the future. IEEE Access, 7, 317–350.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lin, X., Furuskär, A., Liberg, O., & Euler, S. (2020). “Sky high 5G: New radio for air-to-ground communications,” ar**v preprint ar**v:2003.06361

  22. Numani, A., Nawaz, S.J., & Javed, M.A. (2018). “Architecture and routing protocols for airborne internet access. In: proc. of IEEE International Conference on Consumer Electronics – Asia, June 2018, pp. 206–212.

Download references

Funding

No funding was received from any source for conducting this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, COMSATS University Islamabad (CUI), Islamabad, 45550, Pakistan

    Abdullah Numani, Muhammad Awais Javed & Syed Junaid Nawaz

  2. Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, COMSATS University Islamabad (CUI), Abbottabad Campus, Pakistan

    Sardar Muhammad Gulfam

  3. CTIF Global Capsule, Department of Business Development and Technology, Aarhus university, 7400, Herning, Denmark

    Bilal Muhammad & Ramjee Prasad

Authors
  1. Abdullah Numani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sardar Muhammad Gulfam
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Muhammad Awais Javed
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Bilal Muhammad
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ramjee Prasad
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Syed Junaid Nawaz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Syed Junaid Nawaz.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interests

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

A part of this paper was presented at IEEE International Conference on Consumer Electronics-Asia (ICCE-Asia), Jeju, Korea, 24–26 June 2018.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Numani, A., Gulfam, S.M., Javed, M.A. et al. Network Architecture and Wireless Ad Hoc Routing for Airborne Internet Services. Wireless Pers Commun 122, 3529–3543 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-021-09099-3

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-021-09099-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation