Abstract
Water shortage has forced coastal cities to seek multi-source water supply with a focus on inter-basin water and desalinated seawater. The differences of water supply costs pose a challenge in the optimal use of multiple water resources. This paper aims to understand the impact of desalinated seawater’s variable costs on multi-source water supply through a cost-benefit analysis method based on a multi-objective optimization model, considering different combination scenarios of desalination yield, streamflow condition, seawater desalting plant (SDP) scheme, water shortage index and utilization ratio of the SDP. The application in the coastal city Tian**, China shows that the desalination yield has an impact on the tradeoff between the water shortage index and the total water supply cost and an optimal desalination yield can be determined at a turning point. And where the turning point appears is influenced by the utilization ratio of the SDP and streamflow conditions of inter-basin water. Moreover, a single centralized SDP is found to have an overall lower water supply cost than several decentralized small-sized SDPs. Lower water shortage index leads to higher cost, and the unit decrease of shortage index will need more added cost when the shortage index is very low. This method is proven to be effective in identifying the best conjunctive use of inter-basin water and desalinated seawater, which can contribute to relieve urban water shortage.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Al-Zahrani M, Musa A, Chowdhury S (2016) Multi-objective optimization model for water resource management: a case study for Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Environ Dev Sustain 18(3):777–798. doi:10.1007/s10668-015-9677-3
Bazargan-Lari MR, Kerachian R, Mansoori A (2009) A conflict-resolution model for the conjunctive use of surface and groundwater resources that considers water-quality issues: a case study. Environ Manag 43(3):470–482. doi:10.1007/s00267-008-9191-6
Bennett A (2011) Cost effective desalination: innovation continues to lower desalination costs. Filtr Sep 48(4):24–27
Crisp G, Swinton EA (2008) Desalination in Australia: a review. Water 35(2):94
Deb K, Pratap A, Agarwal S, Meyarivan T (2002) A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 6(2):182–197
Druetta P, Aguirre P, Mussati S (2014) Minimizing the total cost of multi effect evaporation systems for seawater desalination. Desalination 344:431–445. doi:10.1016/j.desal.2014.04.007
Ettouney HM, El-Dessouky HT, Faibish RS, Gowin PJ (2002) Evaluating the economics of desalination. Chem Eng Prog 98(12):32–39
Fu G, Butler D, Khu S (2008) Multiple objective optimal control of integrated urban wastewater systems. Environ Model Softw 23(2):225–234. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2007.06.003
Fu G, Khu S, Butler D (2010) Optimal distribution and control of storage tank to mitigate the impact of new developments on receiving water quality. J Environ Eng ASCE 136(3):335–342. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0000161
Gaivoronski AA, Sechi GM, Zuddas P (2012) Balancing cost-risk in management optimization of water resource systems under uncertainty. Phys Chem Earth 42-44:98–107. doi:10.1016/j.pce.2011.05.015
Ghaffour N (2009) The challenge of capacity-building strategies and perspectives for desalination for sustainable water use in MENA. Desalin Water Treat 5:48–53
Hsu CI, Li HC (2009) An integrated plant capacity and production planning model for high-tech manufacturing firms with economies of scale. Int J Prod Econ 118(2):486–500. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2008.09.015
Lapuente E (2012) Full cost in desalination. A case study of the Segura River Basin. Desalination 300:40–45. doi:10.1016/j.desal.2012.06.002
Mabrouk AN, Nafey AS, Fath HES (2010) Steam, electricity and water costs evaluation of power-desalination co-generation plants. Desalin Water Treat 22(1–3):56–64
Sweetapple C, Fu G, Butler D (2014) Multi-objective optimisation of wastewater treatment plant control to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Water Res 55:52–62. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2014.02.018
Tabari M, Soltani J (2013) Multi-objective optimal model for conjunctive use management using SGAs and NSGA-II models. Water Resour Manag 27:37–53. doi:10.1007/s11269-012-0153-7
Tenne A, Hoffman D, Levi E (2013) Quantifying the actual benefits of large-scale seawater desalination in Israel. Desalin Water Treat 51(1):26–37. doi:10.1080/19443994.2012.695047
Vieira J, Cunha MC, Nunes L, Monteiro JP, Ribeiro L (2014) Optimization of the operation of large-scale multisource water-supply systems. J Water Resour Plan Manag 137(2):150–161. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000102
Zhang C, Wang G, Peng Y, Tang G, Liang G (2012) A negotiation-based multi-objective, multi-party decision-making model for inter-basin water transfer scheme optimization. Water Resour Manag 26(14):4029–4038. doi:10.1007/s11269-012-0127-9
Ziolkowska JR (2015) Is desalination affordable?—Regional cost and price analysis. Water Resour Manag 29:1385–1397. doi:10.1007/s11269-014-0901-y
Acknowledgements
This study is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51320105010 and 51579027) and is partly funded by the national science and technology major project under grant 2014ZX03005001.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yu, B., Zhang, C., Jiang, Y. et al. Conjunctive use of Inter-Basin Transferred and Desalinated Water in a Multi-Source Water Supply System Based on Cost-Benefit Analysis. Water Resour Manage 31, 3313–3328 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-017-1669-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-017-1669-7