Log in

Advantages of retrograde intrarenal incision versus laparoscopic surgery in management of pararenal cysts: a single-center experience

  • Urology - Original Paper
  • Published:
International Urology and Nephrology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Renal cysts are typically a benign condition, and parapelvic cysts are a type of renal cyst that occur adjacent to the renal pelvis or renal sinus. Parapelvic cysts can increase the risk for injury to adjacent organs or urine leakage during laparoscopic surgery. Flexible ureteroscopes with laser assistance were used to make internal incisions in cysts. Perioperative outcomes of this method were compared with those of laparoscopic surgery.

Methods

Eight-three patients, who underwent surgical treatment for renal cysts at the authors’ medical center between January 2019 and June 2022, were evaluated. Two patients were excluded because they originally opted for RIRS but subsequently converted to laparoscopic surgery. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on surgery type: laparoscopic; and RIRS for internal incision. Outcomes in both groups were analyzed.

Results

Of the 81 patients analyzed, 60 [74% (group 1)] underwent laparoscopic surgery and 21 [26% (group 2)] underwent RIRS for internal incision. The median operative durations for groups 1 and 2 were 87 and 56 min, respectively (p < 0.001). Relative to RIRS, laparoscopic surgery resulted in greater postoperative painkiller use (laparoscopic surgery versus [vs.] RIRS, 43% vs. 19%; p = 0.047). The median length of hospital stay was 2 and 1 days, respectively (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

RIRS demonstrated several advantages over laparoscopic surgery for the internal incision of parapelvic cysts, including shorter operative duration, shorter hospital stay, and less postoperative pain control. These findings may guide the selection of appropriate surgical approaches for patients with renal cysts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Terada N, Ichioka K, Matsuta Y, Okubo K, Yoshimura K, Arai Y (2002) The natural history of simple renal cysts. J Urol 167(1):21–23 (PMID: 11743266)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Laucks SP Jr, McLachlan MS (1981) Aging and simple cysts of the kidney. Br J Radiol 54(637):12–14. https://doi.org/10.1259/0007-1285-54-637-12

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Amis ES Jr, Cronan JJ (1988) The renal sinus: an imaging review and proposed nomenclature for sinus cysts. J Urol 139(6):1151–1159. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(17)42845-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Shah JB, Whitman C, Lee M, Gupta M (2007) Water under the bridge: 5-year outcomes after percutaneous ablation of obstructing parapelvic renal cysts. J Endourol 21(10):1167–1170. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2007.9914

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Meng X, Mi Q (2022) Transurethral flexible ureteroscopic incision and drainage with holmium laser in the treatment of parapelvic renal cysts: a retrospective study. Int Braz J Urol 48(5):842–849. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2022.0142

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Eissa A, El Sherbiny A, Martorana E, Pirola GM, Puliatti S, Scialpi M, Micali S, Rocco B, Liatsikos E, Breda A, Porpiglia F, Bianchi G; European Section of Uro-Technology (ESUT) (2018) Non-conservative management of simple renal cysts in adults: a comprehensive review of literature. Minerva Urol Nefrol 70(2): 179–192. https://doi.org/10.23736/S0393-2249.17.02985-X

  7. Kavoussi LR, Clayman RV, Mikkelsen DJ, Meretyk S (1991) Ureteronephroscopic marsupialization of obstructing peripelvic renal cyst. J Urol 146(2):411–414. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(17)37809-6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Li EC, Hou JQ, Yang LB, Yuan HX, Hang LH, Alagirisamy KK, Li DP, Wang XP (2011) Pure natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery management of simple renal cysts: 2-year follow-up results. J Endourol 25(1):75–80. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2009.0676

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Luo Q, Zhang X, Chen H, Liu Z, Chen X, Dai Y, Zhao Z (2014) Treatment of renal parapelvic cysts with a flexible ureteroscope. Int Urol Nephrol 46(10):1903–1908. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-014-0741-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhao Q, Huang S, Li Q, Xu L, Wei X, Huang S, Li S, Liu Z (2015) Treatment of parapelvic cyst by internal drainage technology using ureteroscope and holmium laser. West Indian Med J 64(3):230–235. https://doi.org/10.7727/wimjopen.2014.220

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Mao X, Xu G, Wu H, **ao J (2015) Ureteroscopic management of asymptomatic and symptomatic simple parapelvic renal cysts. BMC Urol 15:48. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-015-0042-5

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Shen J, Chen Y, Wang R (2019) Efficacy and complication of flexible ureteroscopic holmium laser incision for simple renal cysts: a retrospective study. J Endourol 33(11):881–886. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2019.0515

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Huang B, Lu G, Tu W, Zhao Y, Wang Y, Zhang L, Shao Y, Wang D (2021) Factors influencing surgical outcome in retrograde management of parapelvic renal cysts. J Endourol 35(4):466–472. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2020.0508

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Huang T, Yang Q, Wu H, Zhu D, Hu Y, Xu M (2022) Clinical efficacy of intraoperative real time ultrasound-assisted flexible ureteroscopic holmium laser incision and internal drainage in the treatment of parapelvic cysts. BMC Surg 22(1):315. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-022-01763-0

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Park H, Kim CS (2015) Natural 10-year history of simple renal cysts. Korean J Urol 56(5):351–356. https://doi.org/10.4111/kju.2015.56.5.351

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Arisan S, Dalkilincaa A, Caskurlu T, Sonmez NC, Guney S, Ergenekon E (2006) Laparoscopic unroofing and aspiration-sclerotherapy in the management of symptomatic simple renal cysts. Sci World J 6:2296–2301. https://doi.org/10.1100/tsw.2006.358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Shao Q, Xu J, Adams T, Tao S, Cui Y, Shen H, Cao W, **e J, Fan Y, Zhang Y, Huang M (2013) Comparison of aspiration-sclerotherapy versus laparoscopic decortication in management of symptomatic simple renal cysts. J Xray Sci Technol 21(3):419–428. https://doi.org/10.3233/XST-130393

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Zerem E, Imamovíc G, Omerovíc S (2008) Symptomatic simple renal cyst: comparison of continuous negative-pressure catheter drainage and single-session alcohol sclerotherapy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 190(5):1193–1197. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.07.2867

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Camacho MF, Bondhus MJ, Carrion HM, Lockhart JL, Politano VA (1980) Ureteropelvic junction obstruction resulting from percutaneous cyst puncture and intracystic isophendylate injection: an unusual complications. J Urol 124(5):713–714. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(17)55623-2

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Shiraishi K, Eguchi S, Mohri J, Kamiryo Y (2006) Laparoscopic decortication of symptomatic simple renal cysts: 10-year experience from one institution. BJU Int 98(2):405–408. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.06249.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Camargo AH, Cooperberg MR, Ershoff BD, Rubenstein JN, Meng MV, Stoller ML (2005) Laparoscopic management of peripelvic renal cysts: University of California, San Francisco, experience and review of literature. Urology 65(5):882–887. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2004.11.012

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Giusti G, Proietti S, Villa L, Cloutier J, Rosso M, Gadda GM, Doizi S, Suardi N, Montorsi F, Gaboardi F, Traxer O (2016) Current standard technique for modern flexible ureteroscopy: tips and tricks. Eur Urol 70(1):188–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2016.03.035

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Wen J, Xu G, He G, Wang B, Mao X, Zhang S (2020) The clinical efficacy and safety of flexible ureteroscopic treatment for parapelvic renal cyst and secondary renal stone. Urol J. 17(3):243–247. https://doi.org/10.22037/uj.v0i0.5441

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Matsuoka K, Inoue M, Iida S, Tomiyasu K, Noda S (2002) Endoscopic antegrade laser incision in the treatment of urethral stricture. Urology 60(6):968–972. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0090-4295(02)01994-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Zewu Z, Hequn C, Yu C, Yang L, Zhongqing Y, Zhiyong C, Feng Z (2019) Long-term outcome after flexible ureteroscopy with holmium laser for simultaneous treatment of a single renal cyst and ipsilateral renal stones. J Int Med Res 47(8):3601–3612. https://doi.org/10.1177/0300060519855573

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Wang Z, Zeng X, Chen C, Wang T, Chen R, Liu J (2019) Methylene blue injection via percutaneous renal cyst puncture used in flexible ureteroscope for treatment of parapelvic cysts: a modified method for easily locating cystic wall. Urology 125:243–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2018.11.014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funding was received for this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

WHT, CCH: IRB approval, data collection, analysis, and manuscript preparation, editing, and revision. WHT, SKH, CLL, KHL, KLH, and ZHC: surgery. AWC, CFL, and YLS: Study design and review. All the authors have read and approved the final version of the manuscript submitted for publication.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Chia-Chih Hsieh or Yow-Ling Shiue.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board Committee (Chi Mei Hospital Institutional Review Board, IRB number 11110–007) and the Chimei Hospital Institutional Review Board provided a waiver for informed consent. All experimental protocols involving humans were performed in accordance with institutional guidelines and the Declaration of Helsinki.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tseng, WH., Hsieh, CC., Huang, S.K. et al. Advantages of retrograde intrarenal incision versus laparoscopic surgery in management of pararenal cysts: a single-center experience. Int Urol Nephrol 56, 1307–1313 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-023-03881-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-023-03881-x

Keywords

Navigation