Log in

Does the degree of experience for the tension-free vaginal tape procedure influence the results of the suprapubic arc sling procedure during the learning phase?

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Urology and Nephrology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aim

The object was to evaluate whether the degree of experience for the tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) procedures influenced the early results of the suprapubic arc (SPARC) sling procedure.

Materials and methods

We performed the TVT from March 1999 to May 2003 and SPARC from June to April 2004 by experienced surgeon (A) and inexperienced surgeon (B), respectively. Patients were divided as four subgroups: first 50 patients who underwent the TVT by surgeon A (TVT A); first 15 patients who underwent the TVT by surgeon B (TVT B); first 50 patients who underwent the SPARC by surgeon A (SPARC A); first 15 patients who underwent the SPARC by surgeon B (SPARC B).

Results

Bladder perforations were noted in 4 (8.5%) in the TVT A group and 2 (13.3%) in the TVT B group, respectively (P = 0.626). There was no bladder perforation occurred in the SPARC A and B groups. The rates of transient postoperative urinary retention were 6.4% in the TVT A group and 0.0% in the TVT B group, respectively (P = 1.000). No retention occurred in the SPARC A and B groups. Stress urinary incontinence was cured by 89.4% in the TVT A group and 80.0% in the TVT B group, respectively (P = 0.388). Similar success rates were found in the SPARC A (85.4%) and SPARC B (92.3%) group (P = 1.000).

Conclusion

Our findings suggest that the degree of experience for the TVT procedure does not influence the results of the SPARC procedure during the learning phase.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Klutke C, Siegel S, Carlin B, et al (2001) Urinary retention after tension-free vaginal tape procedure: incidence and treatment. Urology 58:697–701

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Ulmsten U, Henriksson L, Johnson P, et al (1996) An ambulatory surgical procedure under local anesthesia for treatment of female urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J 7:81–86

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ulmsten U, Falconer C, Johnson P, et al (1998) A multicenter study of tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) for surgical treatment of stress urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J 9:210–213

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ulmsten U, Johnson P, Rezapour M (1999) A three-year follow up of tension free vaginal tape for surgical treatment of female stress urinary incontinence. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 106:345–350

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Wang AC, Lo TS (1998) Tension-free vaginal tape. A minimally invasive solution to stress urinary incontinence in women. J Reprod Med 43:429–434

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Deval B, Levardon M, Samain E, et al (2003) A French multicenter clinical trial of SPARC for stress urinary incontinence. Eur Urol 44:254–258

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. de Leval J (2003) Novel surgical technique for the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: transobturator vaginal tape inside-out. Eur Urol 44:724–730

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Groutz A, Gordon D, Wolman I, et al (2002) Tension-free vaginal tape for stress urinary incontinence: Is there a learning curve? Neurourol Urodyn 21:470–472

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lebret T, Lugagne PM, Herve JM, et al (2001) Evaluation of tension-free vaginal tape procedure. Its safety and efficacy in the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence during the learning phase. Eur Urol 40:543–547

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ingelman-Sundberg A, Ulmsten U (1983) Surgical treatment of female urinary stress incontinence. Contrib Gynecol Obstet 10:51–69

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Abrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M, et al (2003) The standardisation of terminology in lower urinary tract function: report from the standardisation sub-committee of the International Continence Society. Urology 61:37–49

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Juma S, Little NA, Raz S (1993) Evaluation of stress urinary incontinence. In: Buchsbaum HJ, Schmidt JD (eds) Gynecologic and obstetric urology. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 251–263

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bump RC, Coates KW, Cundiff GW (1997) Diagnosing intrinsic sphincter deficiency: comparing urethral closure pressure, urethral axis, and Valsalva leak point pressure. Am J Obstet Gynecol 177:303–310

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Madjar S, Tchetgen MB, Van Antwerp A (2002) Urethral erosion of tension-free vaginal tape. Urology 59:601

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Shah PJR (2003) A French multicenter clinical trial of SPARC for stress urinary incontinence: editorial comment. Eur Urol 44:258–259

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ja Hyeon Ku.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Paick, JS., Oh, J.G., Shin, J.W. et al. Does the degree of experience for the tension-free vaginal tape procedure influence the results of the suprapubic arc sling procedure during the learning phase?. Int Urol Nephrol 39, 1079–1084 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-006-9156-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-006-9156-8

Keywords

Navigation