Log in

Effect of Biofuels on Catalyzed Diesel Particulate Filter Regeneration

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Topics in Catalysis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Under the terms of the Renewable Energy Directive, EU member states are required to use 10 % of transport energy sourced from renewable sources, mainly biofuels, by 2020. The purpose is to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from the transport sector. However, biodiesel used as fuel has a significant impact on emissions, as related by most of the literature on the subject. In particular, nitric oxides (NOx) and particulate matter (PM) emissions from current diesel technologies are critical factors because they are already close to the limits permitted by regulations and both limits will be even more stringent in the near future. Soot particles are trapped on a diesel particulate filter (DPF). If the DPF is catalyzed like in this study, the soot is then burned by reaction with NO2 (CDPF continuous regeneration) which occurs at lower temperatures than reaction with O2 (active regeneration). Tests of ultra-low sulfur diesel blended with rapeseed-biodiesel at 30 % (B30) and Fischer–Tropsch diesel (FT30) were conducted. The Fischer–Tropsch diesel was chosen to represent a biomass-to-liquid fuel. This work investigated the impact of these two biofuels on engine polluting emissions and the resulting CDPF ability to regenerate. When compared with similar inlet conditions on a synthetic gas bench, an impact of fuel was observed on soot reactivity: the CDPF loaded with FT30 soot regenerated slightly faster. Engine bench tests were also performed to combine the effects of fuel on engine emissions and soot reactivity and to evaluate the CDPF. The increase in NOx and decrease in PM emissions observed for B30 appeared to significantly improve CDPF continuous regeneration by NO2.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Directive 2009/28/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources (2009) http://europa.eu/legislation_summaries/energy/renewable_energy/en0009_en.htm. Accessed 26 April 2012

  2. Agarwal AK (2007) Progr Energy Combust Sci 33:233–271

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Beer T, Grant T, Morgan G, Lapszewicz J, Anyon P, Edwards J et al (2001) Comparison of transport fuels. Final report (Ev45a/2/F3c) to the Australian Greenhouse Office on the Stage 2 study of life-cycle emissions analysis of alternative fuels for heavy vehicles, Australia

  4. Lapuerta M, Armas O, Rodriguez-Fernandez J (2008) Progr Energy Combust Sci 34:198–223

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Moser BR, Williams A, Haas MJ, McCormick RL (2009) Fuel Process Technol 90:1122–1128

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Thornton MJ, Alleman TL, Luecke J, McCormick RL (2009) SAE 2009-01-1790

  7. Tatur M, Nanjundaswamy H, Tomazic D (2009) SAE 2009-01-0281

  8. Williams A, McCormick RL, Hayes RR, Ireland J (2006) SAE 2006-01-3280

  9. Austin G, Naber J, Johnson J, Hutton C (2010) SAE 2010-01-0557

  10. Sinha S, Agarwal AK (2008) SAE 2008-01-1385

  11. Agarwal AK, Gupta T, Kothari A (2011) Renew Sust Energy Rev 15:3278–3333

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Sharp CA, Howell SA, Jobe J (2000) SAE 2000-01-1967

  13. Sappok AG, Wong VW (2008) SAE 2008-01-1395

  14. Morcos M, Ayyappan P, Harris T (2011) SAE 2011-01-1248

  15. Xue J, Grift TE, Hansen AC (2011) Renew Sust Energy Rev 15:1098–1116

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Williams A, McCormick R, Luecke J, Brezny R, Geisselmann A, Voss K, Hallstrom K, Leustek M, Parsons J, Abi-Akar H (2011) SAE 2011-01-1136

  17. Song J, Alam M, Boehman AL (2007) Combust Sci Tech 179:1991–2037

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Song J, Alam M, Boehman AL, Kim U (2006) Combust Flame 146:589–604

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Jung H, Kittelson DB, Zachariah MR (2006) Environ Sci Technol 40:4949–4955

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Peterson AM, Lee PI, Lai MC, Wu MC, Di Maggio CL, Ng S, Tang H (2010) J Eng Gas Turb Power-Trans ASME 132:11

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lamharess N, Millet CN, Starck L, Jeudy E, Lavy J, Da Costa P (2011) Catal Today 176:219–224

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Boehman AL, Song J, Alam M (2005) Energy Fuels 19:1857–1864

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Mueller CJ, Boehman AL, Martin GC (2009) SAE 2009-01-1792

  24. Knight BM, Bittle JA, Jacobs TJ (2010) SAE 2010-01-0565

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the French Environment and Energy Management Agency (ADEME).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L. Starck.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lamharess, N., Starck, L., Millet, C.N. et al. Effect of Biofuels on Catalyzed Diesel Particulate Filter Regeneration. Top Catal 56, 462–466 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11244-013-9997-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11244-013-9997-1

Keywords

Navigation