Log in

D-separation, forecasting, and economic science: a conjecture

  • Published:
Theory and Decision Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper considers the conjecture that forecasts from preferred economic models or theories d-separate forecasts from less preferred models or theories from the Actual realization of the variable for which a scientific explanation is sought. D-separation provides a succinct notion to represent forecast dominance of one set of forecasts over another; it provides, as well, a criterion for model preference as a fundamental device for progress in economic science. We demonstrate these ideas with examples from three areas of economic modeling.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bessler D. A., Brandt J. A. (1981) Forecasting livestock prices with individual and composite methods. Applied Economics 13(4): 513–522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bessler D. A., Brandt J. A. (1992) Analysis of forecasts of livestock prices. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 18: 249–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bessler D. A., Chamberlain P. J. (1988) Composite forecasting with dirichlet priors. Decision Sciences 19(4): 771–781

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryant H. L., Bessler D. A., Haigh M. S. (2009) Disproving causal relationships using observational data. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 71(3): 357–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chong Y. Y., Hendry D. F. (1986) Econometric evaluation of linear macro-economic models. Review of Economic Studies 53: 671–690

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark T. E., McCracken M. W. (2001) Tests of equal forecast accuracy and encompassing for nested models. Journal of Econometrics 105: 85–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clements M., Hendry D. F. (1998) Forecasting economic time series. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • DeFinetti B. (1974) Theory of probability: A critical introductory treatment (Vol. 1) (Antonio Machi and Adrian Smith, Trans.). Wiley, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Doan T. (2009) RATS, version 7. Estima, Evanston

    Google Scholar 

  • Freedman D. (1983) A note on screening regressions. The American Statistician 37: 152–155

    Google Scholar 

  • Granger C. W. J. (2005) Modeling, evaluation, and methodology in the new century. Economic Inquiry 43: 1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granger C. W. J., Newbold P. (1973) Some comments on the evaluation of economic forecasts. Applied Economics 5: 35–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granger C. W. J., Ramanathan R. (1984) Improved methods of combining forecasting. Journal of Forecasting 3: 197–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey D., Leybourne S. J., Newbold P. (1998) Tests for forecast encompassing. Journal of Boniness and Economic Statistics 16: 254–259

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey D., Newbold P. (2000) Tests for multiple forecast encompassing. Journal of Applied Econometrics 15: 471–482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meehl P. E. (1954) Clinical versus statistical prediction: A theoretical analysis and a review of the evidence. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pearl J. (1988) Probabilistic reasoning in intelligent systems. Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearl J. (2000) Causality: Models, reasoning, and inference. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper K. (1959) The logic of scientific discovery. Harper & Row, Inc, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sims, C. (2002). The role of models and probabilities in the monetary policy process, Working paper, Princeton Center for Economic Policy Studies, October 2002.

  • Spirtes P., Glymour C., Scheines R. (2000) Causality, prediction, and search. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Verma, T., & Pearl J. (1988). Causal networks: Semantics and expressiveness. In Proceedings of the 4th conference on uncertainty in artificial intelligence (pp. 352–359), July, Cambridge, MA.

  • Wang Z. (2010) Directed graphs, information structure and forecast combinations: An empirical examination. Journal of Forecasting 29: 353–366

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Z., Bessler D. A. (2002) The homogeneity restriction and forecasting performance of VAR-type demand systems. Journal of Forecasting 21(3): 193–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David A. Bessler.

Additional information

An early draft of this paper was presented at the 2009 SAS forecasting conference in Cary, North Carolina, USA.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bessler, D.A., Wang, Z. D-separation, forecasting, and economic science: a conjecture. Theory Decis 73, 295–314 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-012-9305-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-012-9305-8

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation