Log in

Anxious feelings, anxious friends: on anxiety and friendship

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although anxiety is frequently seen as a predominantly negative phenomenon, some recent researchers have argued that it plays an important positive function, serving as an alert to warn agents of possible problems or threats. I argue that not only can one’s own, first-personal anxiety perform this function; because it is possible for others—in particular, one’s friends—to feel anxious on one’s behalf, their anxious feelings can sometimes play the same role in our functioning, and make similar contributions to our well-being. I distinguish between a number of kinds of cases in which what I call proxy anxiety serves a positive function, including Anxiety Avoidance (where there is good reason for an agent to avoid becoming anxious herself, but can benefit from a friend’s anxiety on her behalf), Anxiety Omission (where an agent fails to become anxious due to a malfunctioning anxiety-generating system), long-term commitments involving dispositions to feel other-directed proxy anxiety, and cases in which proxy anxiety can help reduce or relieve excessive anxiety. A person’s friends, it is argued, are particularly well positioned to help regulate deficient and/or excessive anxieties, precisely because friends are close enough to care for and identify with the agent, but at the same time distant enough to maintain a relatively objective perspective. I conclude by examining connections between proxy anxiety and theories of well-being.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Of course, we might worry that there is something unacceptably paternalistic about Knightley’s attitude toward Emma’s moral improvement. I am using the case simply as an example of anxious concern for another—and not, for instance, as an exegesis of Emma; so I can simply assume, or stipulate, that Knightley’s intentions, etc., are admirable. (Both Emma and Austen clearly judge them to be so.) Faced with a real-world example, however, we would require far more detailed information before being in a position to judge the mentor’s conduct and attitudes to be laudable.

  2. I owe thanks to an anonymous reviewer for this journal for hel** me see things in these terms.

References

  • Austen, J. (2004 [1815]) Emma. Edited by Alistair M. Duckworth. Palgrave.

  • Barlow, D. (2001). Anxiety and its disorders. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finnis, J. (1980). Natural Law and Natural Rights. Oxford University Press.

  • Frankfurt, H. (2006). Taking ourselves seriously and getting it right. Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greco, J. (2010). Achieving Knowledge. Cambridge University Press.

  • Griffin, J. (1986). Well-being: Its meaning, measurement, and moral importance. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helm, B. (2009). Love, Identification, and the Emotions. American Philosophical Quarterly, 46(1), 39–59.

  • Helm, B. (2010) Love, Friendship, & the Self. Oxford University Press.

  • Hurka, T. (2011). The best things in life: A guide to what really matters. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, S. (2004). Friendship and belief. Philosophical Papers, 33(3), 329–351. https://doi.org/10.1080/05568640409485146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurth, C. (2015). Moral anxiety and moral agency. Oxford Studies in Normative Ethics, 5, 171–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurth, C. (2018). The anxious mind. Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nozick, R. (1974). Anarchy, state, and utopia. Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettit, P. (2015). The Robust Demands of the Good: Ethics with Attachment, Virtue, and Respect. Oxford University Press.

  • Stroud, S. (2006). Epistemic partiality in friendship. Ethics, 116(3), 498–524. https://doi.org/10.1086/500337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, G. (1975). Free agency. The Journal of Philosophy, 72(8), 205–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zagzebski, L. (2003). The Search for the Source of the Epistemic Good. Metaphilosophy34, 12–28. 

Download references

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Troy Jollimore.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article belongs to the topical collection “Worry and Wellbeing: Understanding the Nature,Value, and Challenges of Anxiety”, edited by Charlie Kurth and Juliette Vazard.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jollimore, T. Anxious feelings, anxious friends: on anxiety and friendship. Synthese 199, 14709–14724 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-021-03440-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-021-03440-w

Keywords

Navigation