Abstract
The energy of intramolecular hydrogen bond (IMHB) is a central subject in chemistry and biochemistry. In contrast with the IMHBs, there is no general accepted procedure to determine the IMHB energy. In the present study, for the first time, we applied all the different adopted models for assessing the energy of IMHB of O–H···O and O–H···S in simple resonance-assisted hydrogen bond systems (the cis enol form of malonaldehyde, thiomalonaldehyde, and a variety of halogenated derivatives), and compared them. The energy of IMHB, by various methods such as related rotamers method (RRM), rotational barrier method (RBM), conformational analysis method (CAM), isodesmic reaction method (IRM), and open–close method (OCM), was estimated. Exploring and comparing the correlations between the IMHB energies with various descriptors of hydrogen bond strength, such as geometrical, topological, molecular orbital, and spectroscopic parameters, were carried out. According to the theoretical results, we found that both RRM and RBM have the best linear correlations with all of the hydrogen bond descriptors (R ≥ 0.90) while the results of other methods (CAM, IRM and OCM) are not suitable (R ≤ 0.80). Surprisingly, we found that the OCM, which has been widely applied in the estimation of the IMHB energy, has the weakest linear dependent with all of the HB descriptors. Consequently, according to the regression coefficients, the order of linearity of these methods is as follows: RRM > RBM > > CAM > IRM > OCM.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11224-013-0281-6/MediaObjects/11224_2013_281_Sch1_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11224-013-0281-6/MediaObjects/11224_2013_281_Sch2_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11224-013-0281-6/MediaObjects/11224_2013_281_Sch3_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11224-013-0281-6/MediaObjects/11224_2013_281_Sch4_HTML.gif)
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Jeffrey GA (1997) An Introduction to Hydrogen Bonding. Oxford University Press, New York
Grabowski SJ (2006) Hydrogen Bonding-New Insights. Springer, Berlin
Gilli G, Gilli P (2009) The Nature of Hydrogen Bond. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Sanz P, Mό O, Yáñez M, Elguero J (2007) ChemPhysChem 8:1950
Sanz P, Mό O, Yáñez M, Elguero J (2008) Chem Eur J 14:4225
Alkorta I, Elguero J, Mό O, Yáñez M, Bene JD (2005) Chem Phys Lett 411:411
Temprado M, Roux MV, Umnahanant P, Zhao H, Chickos JS (2005) J Phys Chem 109B:12590
Emsley J (1984) Structure and Bonding, vol 2. Springer, Berlin
Woodford JN (2007) J Phys Chem 111A:8519
Nowroozi A, Raissi H (2006) J Mol Struct (THEOCHEM) 759:93
Raissi H, Nowroozi A, Roozbeh M, Farzad F (2006) J Mol Struct 787:148
Nowroozi A, Roohi H, Sadeghi MS, Sheibaninia M (2011) Int J Quantum Chem 111:578
Kuldova K, Corval A, Trommsdorff HP, Lehn JM (1997) J Phys Chem 101A:6850
Douhal A, Sastre R (1994) Chem Phys Lett 219:91
Sytnic A, Del Valle JC (1995) J Phys Chem 99:13028
Schuster P, Zundel G (1976) The Hydrogen Bond, Recent Development in Theory and Experiment. Nourth-Holland, Amesterdam
Buemi G, Zuccarello F (2004) Chem Phys 306:115
Nowroozi A, Raissi H, Farzad F (2005) J Mol Struct (THEOCHEM) 730:161
Jablonski M, Kaczmarek A, Sadlej AJ (2006) J Phys Chem 110A:10890
Rozas I, Alkorta I, Elguero J (2001) J Phys Chem 105A:10462
Frisch MJ, Trucks GW, Schlegel H B, Scuseria GE, Robb MA, Cheeseman JR, Zarzewski VG, Montgomery JA, Stratmann RE, Burant JC, Dapprich S, Millam JM, Daniels AD, Kudin KN, Strain MC, Farkas O, Tomasi J, Barone V, Cossi M, Cammi R, Mennucci B, Pomelli C, Adamo C, Clifford S, Ochterski J, Petersson GA, Ayala PY, Cui Q, Morokuma K, Malick DK, Rabuck AD, Raghavachari K, Foresman JB, Cioslowski J, Ortiz JV, Baboul AG, Stefanov BB, Liu G, Liashenko A, Piskorz P, Komaromi I, Gomperts R, Martin RL, Fox DJ, Keith T, Al-Laham MA, Peng CY, Nanayakkara A, Gonzalez C, Challacombe M, Gill PMW, Johnson B, Chen W, Wong MW, Andres JL, Gonzalez C, Head-Gordon M, Replogle ES, Pople JA (2003) Gaussian 03 Program Package. Gaussian, Inc., Pittsburgh
Biegler-König F, Schönbohm J, Bayles D (2001) AIM2000-A Program to Analyze and Visualize Atoms in Molecules. J Comp Chem 22:545
Glendening ED, Reed AE, Carpenter JE, Weinhold F (1995) NBO Version 3.1, Theoretical Chemistry Institute and Department of Chemistry, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin
Hameka HF (1958) Mol Phys 1:203
Pratt DA, Heer MI, Mulder P, Ingold KU (2001) J Am Chem Soc 123:5518
Song KS, Liu L, Guo Qx (2003) J Org Chem 68:262
Borges DS, Martinho SJA (1998) J Phys Chem Ref Data 1998(27):707
Musin RN, Mariam YH (2006) J Phys Org Chem 19:425
Bader RFW (1990) Atoms in Molecules: A Quantum Theory. Clarendon, Oxford
Grabowski SJ (1999) Chem Phys Lett 312:542
Espinosa E, Molins M (2000) J Chem Phys 113:5686
Grabowski SJ (2001) J Mol Struct 562:137
Reed AE, Curtis LA, Weinhold FA (1998) Chem Rev 88:899
Raissi H, Farzad F, Nowroozi A (2005) J Mol Struct 752:130
Raissi H, Nowroozi A, Farzad F (2006) Spectrochim Acta 63A:729
Raissi H, Nowroozi A, Hakimi M (2006) Spectrochim Acta 65A:605
Acknowledgments
The authors gratefully thank the university of Sistan and Baluchestan (USB) for the financial support.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nowroozi, A., Hajiabadi, H. & Akbari, F. OH···O and OH···S intramolecular interactions in simple resonance-assisted hydrogen bond systems: a comparative study of various models. Struct Chem 25, 251–258 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11224-013-0281-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11224-013-0281-6