SpringerLink
Log in

The role of inter- and intra-organisational networks in innovation: towards requisite variety

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Inter- and intra-organisational network characteristics equally contribute to firm innovation. This study investigates the relationship between inter-organisational network position and firms’ exploratory innovation performance by taking into account the (potentially) moderating effect of intra-organisational network characteristics. This study uses patent data on electric vehicles (including hybrid, battery, and fuel cell) available from the United States Patent and Trademark Office (2000–2015). The results show that there is an inverted U-shape relationship between the central position and the exploratory innovation performance of firms, which becomes steeper for firms characterized internally by a cohesive network. In addition, a positive relationship is revealed between broker position and exploratory innovation performance of firms. This relationship becomes stronger when firms display lower levels of network cohesion. Combined, these findings strongly suggest that firms benefit from matching the scale of their external networks with internal heterogeneity, in line with Ashby’s notion of requisite variety (Cybernetica 1(2):83–99, 1958). This study provides practical guidance for enterprises to improve their exploratory innovation capability through simultaneously develo** intra-organisational and inter-organisational collaborative networks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Website: https://www.r-project.org/

References

  • Aghion, P., Dechezleprêtre, A., Hemous, D., Martin, R., & van Reenen, J. (2016). Carbon taxes, path dependency, and directed technical change: Evidence from the auto industry. Journal of Political Economy, 124(1), 1–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahuja, G. (2000). Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(3), 425–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahuja, G., & Lampert, C. M. (2001). Entrepreneurship in the large corporation: A longitudinal study of how established firms create breakthrough inventions. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6–7), 521–543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, T. (1984). Managing the flow of technology: Technology transfer and the dissemination of technological information within the R&D organization. The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyres, N., Rios, A. L., & Silverman, S. B. (2020). Organizational Change and the Dynamics of Innovation: Formal R&D Structure and Intrafirm Inventor Networks. Strategic Management Journal, 41(11), 2015–2049.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashby, W. R. (1958). Requisite variety and its implications for the control of complex system. Cybernetica, 1(2), 83–99.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Balsmeier, B., Assaf, M., Chesebro, T., Fierro, G., Johnson, K., Johnson, S., Li, G. C., Luck, S., O’Reagan, D., Yeh, B., Zang, G., & Fleming, L. (2018). Machine learning and natural language processing on the patent corpus: Data, tools and new measures. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 27(3), 535–553.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartsch, V., Ebers, M., & Maurer, I. (2013). Learning in project-based organisations: The role of project teams’ social capital for overcoming barriers to learning. International Journal of Project Management, 31(2), 239–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baum, J. A. C., Calabrese, T., & Silverman, B. S. (2001). Don’t go it alone: Alliance network composition and startups’ performance in Canadian biotechnology. Strategic Management Journal, 21(3), 267–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belderbos, R., Faems, D., Leten, B., & Looy, B. V. (2010). Technological activities and their impact on the financial performance of the firm: Exploitation and exploration within and between firms. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 27(6), 869–882.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benner, M. J., & Tushman, M. L. (2003). Exploitation, exploration, and process management: The productivity dilemma revisited. Academy of Management Review, 28(2), 238–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borgstedt, P., Neyer, B., & Schewe, G. (2017). Paving the road to electric vehicles: A patent analysis of the automotive supply industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 167, 75–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R. S. (2004). Structural holes and good ideas. American Journal of Sociology, 110(2), 349–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carnabuci, G., & Operti, E. (2013). Where do firms’ recombinant capabilities come from? Intraorganizational networks, knowledge, and firms’ ability to innovate through technological recombination. Strategic Management Journal, 34(13), 1591–1613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiambaretto, P., Massé, D., & Mirc, N. (2019). “All for One and One for All?” - Knowledge broker roles in managing tensions of internal coopetition: The Ubisoft case. Research Policy, 48(3), 584–600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393553

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coreynen, W., Matthyssens, P., Vanderstraeten, J., & van Witteloostuijn, A. (2020). Unravelling the internal and external drivers of digital servitization: A dynamic capabilities and contingency perspective on firm strategy. Industrial Marketing Management, 89, 265–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Distel, A. P. (2019). Unveiling the Microfoundations of absorptive capacity: A study of coleman’s bathtub model. Journal of Management, 45(5), 2014–2044.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drazin, R., & Van de Ven, A. H. (1985). Alternative forms of fit in contingency theory. Administrative Science Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392695

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleming, L., King, C., III., & Juda, A. I. (2007). Small worlds and regional innovation. Organization Science, 18(6), 938–954.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Funk, R. J. (2014). Making the most of where you are: Geography, networks, and innovation in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 57(1), 193–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilsing, V., Nooteboom, B., Vanhaverbeke, W., Duysters, G., & van den Oord, A. (2008). Network embeddedness and the exploration of novel technologies: Technological distance, betweenness centrality and density. Research Policy, 37(10), 1717–1731.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greve, H. R. (2007). Exploration and exploitation in product innovation. Industrial and Corporate Change, 16(5), 945–975.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grigoriou, K., & Rothaermel, F. T. (2017). Organizing for knowledge generation: Internal knowledge networks and the contingent effect of external knowledge sourcing. Strategic Management Journal, 38(2), 395–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guan, J., & Liu, N. (2016). Exploitative and exploratory innovations in knowledge network and collaboration network: A patent analysis in the technological field of nano-energy. Research Policy, 45(1), 97–112.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Gulati, R., Nohria, N., & Zaheer, A. (2000). Strategic networks. Strategic Management Journal, 21(3), 203–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guler, I., & Nerkar, A. (2012). The impact of global and local cohesion on innovation in the pharmaceutical industry. Strategic Management Journal, 33(5), 535–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo, M., Yang, N., Wang, J., Zhang, Y., & Wang, Y. (2021). How do structural holes promote network expansion? Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 173, 121179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutton, S., Demir, R., & Eldridge, S. (2021). How does open innovation contribute to the firm’s dynamic capabilities? Technovation, 106, 102288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz, R., & Allen, T. J. (1982). Investigating the Not Invented Here (NIH) syndrome: A look at the performance, tenure, and communication patterns of 50 R&D Project Groups. R&D Management, 12(1), 7–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J. Y., Steensma, H. K., & Heidl, R. A. (2021). Clustering and connectedness: How inventor network configurations within incumbent firms influence their assimilation and absorption of new venture technologies. Academy of Management Journal, 64(5), 1527–1552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levinthal, D. A., & March, J. G. (1993). The myopia of learning. Strategic Management Journal, 14(S2), 95–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, G. C., Lai, R., D’Amour, A., Doolin, D. M., Sun, Y., Torvik, V. I., Amy, Z. Y., & Fleming, L. (2014). Disambiguation and co-authorship networks of the US patent inventor database (1975–2010). Research Policy, 43(6), 941–955.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, Z., Yang, H., & Arya, B. (2009). Alliance partners and firm performance: Resource complementarity and status association. Strategic Management Journal, 30(9), 921–940.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, F., Zhang, N., & Cao, C. (2017). An evolutionary process of global nanotechnology collaboration: A social network system of patents at USPTO. Scientometrics, 111(3), 1449–1465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martínez-Pérez, A., & Beauchesne, M. M. (2018). Overcoming the dark side of closed networks in cultural tourism clusters: The importance of diverse networks. Cornell Hospitality Quarterly, 59(3), 239–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maurer, I., Bartsch, V., & Ebers, M. (2011). The value of intra-organizational social capital: How it fosters knowledge transfer, innovation performance, and growth. Organization Studies, 32(2), 157–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maurer, I., & Ebers, M. (2016). Dynamics of social capital and their performance implications: Lessons from biotechnology start-ups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 51(2), 262–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mihalache, O. R., Jansen, J. J., Van Den Bosch, F. A., & Volberda, H. W. (2012). Offshoring and firm innovation: The moderating role of top management team attributes. Strategic Management Journal, 33(13), 1480–1498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, H. (1979). The Structuring of Organizations: A Synthesis of the Research. Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreira, S., Markus, A., & Laursen, K. (2018). Knowledge diversity and coordination: The effect of intrafirm inventor task networks on absorption speed. Strategic Management Journal, 39(9), 2517–2546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Obstfeld, D. (2005). Social networks, the tertius iungens orientation, and involvement in innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(1), 100–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orton, J. D., & Weick, K. E. (1990). Loosely Coupled Systems: A Reconceptualization. The Academy of Management Review, 15(2), 203–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owen-Smith, J., & Powell, W. W. (2004). Knowledge networks as channels and conduits: The effects of spillovers in the Boston biotechnology community. Organization Science, 15(1), 5–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paruchuri, S., & Awate, S. (2017). Organizational knowledge networks and local search: The role of intra-organizational inventor networks. Strategic Management Journal, 38(3), 657–675.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pennings, J. M. (1987). Structural contingency theory: A multivariate test. Organization Studies, 8(3), 223–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perry-Smith, J. E., & Shalley, C. E. (2014). A social composition view of team creativity: The role of member nationality-heterogeneous ties outside of the team. Organization Science, 25(5), 1434–1452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phelps, C. C. (2010). A longitudinal study of the influence of alliance network structure and composition on firm exploratory innovation. Academy of Management Journal, 53(4), 890–913.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reus, T. H., Ranft, A. L., Lamont, B. T., & Adams, G. L. (2009). An interpretive systems view of knowledge investments. Academy of Management Review, 34, 382–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schilling, M. A., & Phelps, C. C. (2007). Interfirm collaboration networks: The impact of large-scale network structure on firm innovation. Management Science, 53(7), 1113–1126.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Shu, C., Page, A. L., Gao, S., & Jiang, X. (2012). Managerial ties and firm innovation: Is knowledge creation a missing link? Journal of Product Innovation Management, 29(1), 125–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soda, G., Mannucci, P., & Burt, R. (2021). Networks, creativity, and time: Staying creative through brokerage and network rejuvenation. Academy of Management Journal, 64(4), 1164–1190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song, Y., Gnyawali, D. R., Srivastava, M. K., & Asgari, E. (2018). In search of precision in absorptive capacity research: A synthesis of the literature and consolidation of findings. Journal of Management, 44(6), 2343–2374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D. J. (1992). Competition, cooperation, and innovation: Organizational arrangements for regimes of rapid technological progress. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 18(1), 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uzzi, B., & Spiro, J. (2005). Collaboration and creativity: The small world problem. American Journal of Sociology, 111(2), 447–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vanhaverbeke, W., Gilsing, V., Beerkens, B., & Duysters, G. (2009). The role of alliance network redundancy in the creation of core and non-core technologies. Journal of Management Studies, 46(2), 215–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, C., & Hu, Q. (2020). Knowledge sharing in supply chain networks: Effects of collaborative innovation activities and capability on innovation performance. Technovation, 94–95, 102010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, C., Rodan, S., Fruin, M., & Xu, X. (2014). Knowledge networks, collaboration networks, and exploratory innovation. Academy of Management Journal, 57(2), 484–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wen, J., Qualls, W. J., & Zeng, D. (2021). To explore or exploit: The influence of inter-firm R&D network diversity and structural holes on innovation outcomes. Technovation, 100, 102178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yan, Y., & Guan, J. (2018). Social capital, exploitative and exploratory innovations: The mediating roles of ego-network dynamics. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 126, 244–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, H., Lin, Z., & Lin, Y. (2010). A multilevel framework of firm boundaries: Firm characteristics, dyadic differences, and network attributes. Strategic Management Journal, 31(3), 237–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yaqub, M. Z., Srećkovićb, M., Cliquetc, G., Hendriksed, G., & Windsperger, J. (2020). Network innovation versus innovation through networks. Industrial Marketing Management, 90, 79–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaheer, A., & Bell, G. G. (2005). Benefiting from network position: Firm capabilities, structural holes, and performance. Strategic Management Journal, 26(9), 809–825.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahra, S. A., & George, G. (2002). Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of Management Review, 27, 185–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, G., Duan, H., & Zhou, J. (2015). Small worldliness, Chinese culture, and firm innovation performance: An empirical study based on patent collaboration data of China. Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 23(2), 189–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Z., & Luo, T. (2020). Network capital, exploitative and exploratory innovations: From the perspective of network dynamics. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 152, 119910.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 72002021, 72104043, 72201049, 42030409), the National Social Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 21BJY264), the Commissioned Project of Philosophy and Social Science Young Talents Training Object of Liaoning Province in 2022 (Grant No. 2022lslqnrcwtkt-06) and China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (Grant No. 2021M690499).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Maritime Economics and Management, Dalian Maritime University, Dalian, China

    Na Zhang, Lu Cheng & Chao Sun

  2. Department of Management, Strategy & Innovation, Faculty of Economics and Business, KU, Leuven, Belgium

    Julie Callaert & Bart van Looy

Authors
  1. Na Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lu Cheng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Chao Sun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Julie Callaert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Bart van Looy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Na Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare none.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, N., Cheng, L., Sun, C. et al. The role of inter- and intra-organisational networks in innovation: towards requisite variety. Scientometrics 128, 4117–4136 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-023-04748-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-023-04748-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation