Log in

Exploration of the Relationships Among Epistemic Views of Physics, Conceptions of Learning Physics, and Approaches to Learning Physics for College Engineering Students

  • Article
  • Published:
Science & Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Physical education in colleges plays an increasingly important role in cultivating high-quality innovative talent. The main factors that affect college students’ approaches to learning physics remain unknown. This study examined the relationships among college engineering students’ epistemic views of physics, conceptions of learning physics, and approaches to learning physics. Three previously validated questionnaires were administered to 278 undergraduate engineering students in China to examine these relationships. Structural equation modeling analysis revealed that students’ epistemic views of physics led to constructivist conceptions of learning physics, i.e., learning physics as increasing knowledge, applying, understanding, and seeing in a new way. The students’ constructivist conceptions of learning physics were also found to be positively associated with deep motive and deep strategy in their approaches to learning physics, while their reproductive conceptions of learning physics, i.e., learning physics by memorizing, testing, calculating, and practicing, were negatively associated with deep motive and deep strategy and positively associated with surface motive and surface strategy. These findings suggest the importance of fostering students’ understanding of physics knowledge and constructivist conceptions of learning physics and de-emphasizing their reproductive conceptions of learning physics, such as memorization, testing, calculation, and practice, to ultimately promote their deep learning approaches. As physics educators understand the relationships among the above three aspects, they emphasize fertilizing students’ constructive conceptions of learning physics and thus benefit the cultivation of innovative talent and promote the rapid development of science and technology in the long run.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abhayawansa, S., & Fonseca, L. (2010). Conceptions of learning and approaches to learning? A phenomenographic study of a group of overseas accounting students from Sri Lanka. Accounting Education, 19(5), 527–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adams, W. K., Perkins, K. K., Podolefsky, N. S., Dubson, M., Finkelstein, N. D., & Wieman, C. E. (2006). New instrument for measuring student beliefs about physics and learning physics: The Colorado Learning Attitudes about Science Survey. Physical review special topics. Physics education research, 2(1), 010101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alkhateeb, M. A., Bani, M., & Osamah, A. Q. (2020). Student’s conceptions of and approaches to learning and the relationships between them. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 39(3), 620–632.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Apkarian, N., Henderson, C., Stains, M., Raker, J., Johnson, E., & Dancy, M. B. C. (2021). What really impacts the use of active learning in undergraduate STEM education? Results from a national survey of chemistry, mathematics, and physics instructors. PLoS ONE, 16(2), e0247544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banda, H. J., & Nzabahimana, J. (2021). Effect of integrating physics education technology simulations on students’ conceptual understanding in physics: A review of literature. Physical Review. Physics Education Research, 17(2), 023108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, A. A. (1988). Role, mission, and change in our introductory collegiate physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 56(3), 204–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bellocchi, A., Ritchie, S. M., Tobin, K., King, D., Sandhu, M., & Henderson, S. (2014). Emotional climate and high quality learning experiences in science teacher education: Emotional climate and quality in science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(10), 1301–1325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bråten, I., Strømsø, H. I., & Samuelstuen, M. S. (2008). Are sophisticated students always better? The role of topic-specific personal epistemology in the understanding of multiple expository texts. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33(4), 814–840.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brookes, D. T., Ektina, E., & Planinsic, G. (2020). Implementing an epistemologically authentic approach to student-centered inquiry learning. Physical Review. Physics Education Research, 16(2), 020148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, T. H., McGreal, R., & Conrad, D. (2015). Exploring new learning paradigms: A reflection on Barber, Donnelly, and Rizvi (2013): “An avalanche is coming: Higher education and the revolution ahead.” International review of research in open and distance learning, 16(4), 227–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cano, F. (2005). Consonance and dissonance in students’ learning experience. Learning and Instruction, 15, 201–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiou, G. L., Lee, M. H., & Tsai, C. C. (2013). High school students’ approaches to learning physics with relationship to epistemic views on physics and conceptions of learning physics. Research in Science & Technological Education, 31(1), 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiou, G. L., Liang, J. C., & Tsai, C. C. (2012). Undergraduate students’ conceptions of and approaches to learning in biology: A study of their structural models and gender differences. International Journal of Science Education, 34, 167–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • College Physics Teaching Steering Committee of the Ministry of Education. (2014). Investigation report on the establishment of basic physics courses for newly added undergraduate majors in 2013. China University Teaching, 5, 34–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cwik, S., & Singh, C. (2021). How perception of learning environment predicts male and female students’ grades and motivational outcomes in algebra-based introductory physics courses. Physical Review. Physics Education Research, 17(2), 020143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahlin, B., & Watkins, D. (2000). The role of repetition in the processes of memorising and understanding: A comparison of the views of German and Chinese secondary school students in Hong Kong. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 70(1), 65–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darmaji, D., Kurniawan, D. A., & Irdianti, I. (2019). Physics education students’ science process skills. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 8(2), 293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, K. A., Yale, M. S., Bennett, D. E., Haugan, M. P., & Bryan, L. A. (2014). Evaluation of Colorado Learning Attitudes about Science Survey. Physical review special topics. Physics education research, 10(2), 029901.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, D., & Arthurs, L. (2012). Improving student attitudes about learning science and student scientific reasoning skills. Astronomy Education Review, 11, 010102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunleavy, S., Kestin, G., Callaghan, K., McCarty, L., & Deslauriers, L. (2022). Increased learning in a college physics course with timely use of short multimedia summaries. Physical Review. Physics Education Research, 18(1), 010110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elby, A., & Hammer, D. (2001). On the substance of a sophisticated epistemology. Science education (Salem, Mass), 85(5), 554–567.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, AM., Rudd, J. (2009). Factor analysis and discriminant validity: A brief review of some practical issues. Anzmac.

  • Ferla, J., Valcke, M., & Schuyten, G. (2008). Relationships between student cognitions and their effects on study strategies. Learning and Individual Differences, 18, 271–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiteriani, I., Diani, R., Hamidah, A., & Anwar, C. (2021). Project-based learning through STEM approach: Is it effective to improve students’ creative problem-solving ability and metacognitive skills in physics learning? Journal of Physics. Conference Series, 1796(1), 12058.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greene, J. A., Sandoval, W. A., Bråten, I. (2016). An introduction to epistemic cognition. Handbook of epistemic cognition (1–15). New York, NY: Routledge.

  • Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L. (1998). Multivariate data analysis, vol. 5: Prentice hall Upper Saddle River, NJ.

  • Hazari, Z., Potvin, G., Tai, R. H., & Almarode, J. (2010). For the love of learning science: Connecting learning orientation and career productivity in physics and chemistry. Physical Review Special Topics. Physics Education Research, 6, 010107.

  • Hsieh, Y. H., & Tsai, C. C. (2014). Students’ scientific epistemic beliefs, online evaluative standards, and online searching strategies for science information: The moderating role of cognitive load experience. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 23(3), 299–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoehn, J. R., Gifford, J. D., Finkelstein, N. D. (2020). Epistemic stances toward group work in learning physics: Interactions between epistemology and social dynamics in a collaborative problem solving context. ar**v:2005.02425v1.

  • Hu, D., Zwickl, B. M. (2018). Examining students’ views about validity of experiments: From introductory to Ph.D. students. Physical review. Physics education research, 14 (1): 010121.

  • Jessup, G. (1991). Outcomes. NVQs and the emerging model of education and training, London, Routledge Falmer.

  • Judith, A., Iben, J., Inger, L., David, R. O., Hanan, L. Z., & Geoffrey, T. (2021). Exploring transition in higher education: Engagement and challenges in moving from teacher-centered to student-centered learning. Journal of Problem Based Learning in Higher Education, 9(2), 113–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kember, D., Biggs, J., & Leung, D. Y. P. (2004). Examining the multidimensionality of approaches to learning through the development of a revised version of the learning process questionnaire. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 261–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kivunja, C. (2014). Innovative pedagogies in higher education to become effective teachers of 21st century skills: Unpacking the learning and innovations skills domain of the new learning paradigm. International Journal of Higher Education, 3(4), 37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kontro, I., & Buschhüter, D. (2020). Validity of Colorado Learning Attitudes about Science Survey for a high-achieving, Finnish population. Physical Review. Physics Education Research, 16(2), 020104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, M. H., Johanson, R. E., & Tsai, C. C. (2008). Exploring Taiwanese high school students’ conceptions of and approaches to learning science through a structural equation modeling analysis. Science Education, 92, 191–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liang, J. C., Lee, M. H., & Tsai, C. C. (2010). The relations between scientific epistemological beliefs and approaches to learning science among science major undergraduates in Taiwan. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 19, 43–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, C. L., Tsai, C. C., & Liang, J. C. (2012). An investigation of two profiles within conceptions of learning science: An examination of confirmatory factor analysis. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 27(4), 499–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, T. C., Liang, J. C., & Tsai, C. C. (2015). Conception of memorizing and understanding in learning, and self-efficacy held by university biology majors. International Journal of Science Education, 37(3), 446–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindfors, M., Winberg, M., & Bodin, M. (2019). The role of students’ scientific epistemic beliefs in computer-simulated problem solving. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 63(1), 124–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lising, L., & Elby, A. (2005). The impact of epistemology on learning: A case study from introductory physics. American Journal of Physics, 73(4), 372–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Louca, L., Elby, A., Hammer, D., & Kagey, T. (2004). Epistemological resources: Applying a new epistemological framework to science instruction. Educational Psychologist, 39(1), 57–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madsen, A., McKagan, S. B., & Sayre, E. C. (2015). How physics instruction impacts students’ beliefs about learning physics: A meta-analysis of 24 studies. Physical Review Special Topics. Physics Education Research, 11, 010115.

  • Mariana, D. R. (2015). Education as a determinant of the economic growth. The Case of Romania. Behavioral Sciences, 197, 404–412.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marouchou, D. V. (2012). Can students’ concept of learning influence their learning outcomes? Higher Learning Research Communications, 2(2), 18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • May, D. B., & Etkina, E. (2002). College physics students’ epistemological self-reflection and its relationship to conceptual learning. American Journal of Physics, 70(12), 1249–1258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monroy, F., & González-Geraldo, J. L. (2018). Measuring learning: Discrepancies between conceptions of and approaches to learning. Journal of Educational Studies, 44(1), 81–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mørk, G., Magne, T. A., Carstensen, T., Stigen, L., Åsli, L. A., Gramstad, A., Gramstad, A., Johnson, S. G., & Bonsaksen, T. (2020). Associations between learning environment variables and students’ approaches to studying: A cross-sectional study. BMC Medical Education, 20, 120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murray, C., Treanor, N. (2021). The importance of investing in physics. Physics (College Park, Md.),14.

  • Nadrah, T., & I., Ali, M. S., Muris. (2017). The effect of cooperative learning model of teams games tournament (TGT) and students’ motivation toward physics learning outcome. International Education Studies, 10(2), 123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nurulwati, N., Khairina, L., & Huda, I. (2020). The effect of students self-efficacy on the learning outcomes in learning physics. Journal of Physics. Conference Series, 1460(1), 12113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phan, H. P. (2008). Predicting change in epistemological beliefs, reflective thinking and learning styles: A longitudinal study. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 78(1), 75–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinto, G., Bigozzi, L., Vettori, G., & Vezzani, C. (2018). The relationship between conceptions of learning and academic outcomes in middle school students according to gender differences. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 16, 45–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prøitz, T. S. (2010). Learning outcomes: What are they? Who defines them? When and where are they defined? Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 22, 119–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reid, A., Wood, L. N., Smith, G. H., & Petocz, P. (2005). Intention approach and outcome: University mathematics students’ conceptions of learning mathematics. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 3, 567–586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, J. (2010). Conceptions of learning and approaches to studying among white and ethnic minority students in distance education. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(4), 535–556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosman, T., Peter, J., Mayer, A. K., Krampen, G. (2018). Conceptions of scientific knowledge influence learning of academic skills: Epistemic beliefs and the efficacy of information literacy instruction. Studies in higher education (Dorchester-on-Thames), 43 (1), 96–113.

  • Ryan, A. G., & Aikenhead, G. S. (1992). Students’ preconceptions about the epistemology of science. Science Education, 76, 559–580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saltzman, J., Price, M. F., & Rogers, M. B. (2016). Initial study of neutral post-instruction responses on the Maryland Physics Expectation Survey. Physical Reviews in Physical Educuational Research, 12, 013101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schommer, M. (1994). Synthesizing epistemological beliefs research: Tentative understandings and provocative confusions. Educational Psychology Review, 6(4), 293–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, S., Ahluwalia, P. K., & Sharma, S. K. (2013). Students’ epistemological beliefs, expectations, and learning physics: An international comparison. Physical Review Special Topics. Physics Education Research, 9, 010117.

  • Spady, W. G., & Marshall, K. J. (1991). Beyond traditional outcome based education. Educational Leadership, 49, 67–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suciati, S., Ali, M. N., Anggraini, A. F., & Dermawan, Z. (2018). The profile of XI grade students’ scientific thinking abilities on scientific approach implementation. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 7(3), 341–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suyitno, I., Pratiwi, Y., & Martutik, R. (2019). How prior knowledge, prospect, and learning behaviour determine learning outcomes of BIPA students? Cakrawala Pendidikan, 38(3), 499–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sweetman, R. (2017). HELOs and student centred learning – Where’s the link? European Journal of Education, 52(1), 44–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tadesse, T., Gillies, R. M., & Manathunga, C. (2020). Shifting the instructional paradigm in higher education classrooms in Ethiopia: What happens when we use cooperative learning pedagogies more seriously? International Journal of Educational Research, 99, 101509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan, A. L., Liang, J. C., & Tsai, C. C. (2020). Relationship among high school students’ science academic hardiness, conceptions of learning science and science learning self-efficacy in Singapore. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 19(2), 313–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsai, C. C. (2004). Conceptions of learning science among high school students in Taiwan: A phenomeno graphic analysis. International Journal of Science Education, 26, 1733–1750.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsai, C. C., & Liu, S. Y. (2005). Develo** a multi-dimensional instrument for assessing students’ epistemic views toward science. International Journal of Science Education, 27, 1621–1638.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsai, P. S., Chai, C. S., Hong, H. Y., & Koh, H. H. L. (2017). Students’ conceptions of and approaches to knowledge building and its relationship to learning outcomes. J. Interactive Learning Environments, 25(6), 749–761.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tuononen, T., Parpala, A., & Lindblom-Ylänne, S. (2019). Complex interrelations between academic competences and students’ approaches to learning - Mixed-methods study. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 44(8), 1080–1097.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valadas, S. (2013). Conceptions of learning, approaches to learning and cognitive development: Students profiles in a Portuguese higher education institution. International Journal of Developmental and Educational Psychology, 2(1), 107–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vettori, G., Vezzani, C., Bigozzi, L., & Pinto, G. (2020). Cluster profiles of university students’ conceptions of learning according to gender, educational level, and academic disciplines. Learning and Motivation, 70, 101628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, S. T., & Zhang, D. M. (2019). Student-centred teaching, deep learning and self-reported ability improvement in higher education: Evidence from Mainland China. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 56(5), 581–593.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilcox, B. R., & Lewandowski, H. J. (2016). Students’ epistemologies about experimental physics: Validating the Colorado Learning Attitudes about Science Survey for experimental physics. Physical Review. Physics Education Research, 12(1), 010123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, F. Y., Chen, Y. H., & Tsai, M. J. (2013). How university students evaluate online information about a socio-scientific issue and the relationship with their epistemic beliefs. Educational Technology & Society, 16(3), 385–399.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, X., Leung, F., & Zhang, S. (2019). Junior secondary school students’ conceptions of and approaches to learning mathematics and their relationships in Mainland China. Sustainability Journal, 11(9), 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors give thanks to Professors Chin-Chung Tsai and Guo-li Chiou of National Taiwan Normal University for providing three questionnaires in Chinese used in this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Haina Wu.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The author declares no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 44 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wu, H., Gong, W. & Yi, G. Exploration of the Relationships Among Epistemic Views of Physics, Conceptions of Learning Physics, and Approaches to Learning Physics for College Engineering Students. Sci & Educ 33, 699–715 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-022-00385-5

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-022-00385-5

Navigation