Log in

Medium Pressure Plasma Processing of Fused Silica: A Comparative Study for Material Removal Rate

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Plasma Chemistry and Plasma Processing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The use of fused silica material is crucial in various scientific applications; however, its chemical inertness and brittle nature pose challenges to machining and fabrication processes. The present study introduced a dynamic plasma flow system for medium-pressure plasma processing of fused silica substrate to address this issue. The results indicate that the new plasma flow system can significantly enhance the material removal rate compared to existing systems, with a 300% increase in material removal rate. Importantly, this process enables a sustained linear material removal rate, essential for long process durations. Despite the higher material removal rate, there is no deterioration in surface finish observed, and in fact, an improvement in surface integrity is noted after plasma processing. Confocal Raman microscopy characterization further confirms this improvement, revealing reduced stress-induced defect peaks compared to a confined plasma system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. Komanduri R, Lucca DA, Tani Y (1997) Technological advances in fine abrasive processes. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 46:545–596. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-8506(07)60880-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Namba Y, Ohnishi N, Yoshida S et al (2004) Ultra-precision float polishing of calcium fluoride single crystals for deep ultra violet applications. CIRP Ann 53:459–462. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-8506(07)60739-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kanaoka M, Liu C, Nomura K et al (2008) Processing efficiency of elastic emission machining for low-thermal-expansion material. Surf Interface Anal 40:1002–1006. https://doi.org/10.1002/sia.2818

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kanaoka M, Liu C, Nomura K et al (2007) Figuring and smoothing capabilities of elastic emission machining for low-thermal-expansion glass optics. J Vac Sci Technol B Microelectron Nanom Struct 25:2110. https://doi.org/10.1116/1.2789440

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kanaoka M, Takino H, Nomura K et al (2007) Removal properties of low-thermal-expansion materials with rotating-sphere elastic emission machining. Sci Technol Adv Mater 8:170–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stam.2006.12.003

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Yamamuraa K, Mimurab H, Yamauchib K, et al (2002) Aspheric surface fabrication in nm-level accuracy by numerically controlled plasma chemical vaporization machining (CVM) and elastic emission machining (EEM). 4782:265–270

  7. Yamamura K, Shimada S, Mori Y (2008) Damage-free improvement of thickness uniformity of quartz crystal wafer by plasma chemical vaporization machining. CIRP Ann 57:567–570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2008.03.132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kazemi F, Arnold T, Lorenz P et al (2020) Residual layer removal of technical glass resulting from reactive atmospheric plasma jet etching by pulsed laser irradiation. Plasma Chem Plasma Process 40:1241–1251. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11090-020-10101-2

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Shi B, Dai Y, **e X et al (2016) Arc-enhanced plasma machining technology for high efficiency machining of silicon carbide. Plasma Chem Plasma Process 36:891–900. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11090-016-9695-4

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Juškevičius K, Buzelis R, Samuilovas R et al (2016) Plasma etching of fused silica substrates for manufacturing high laser damage resistance optical interference coatings. Opt InfoBase Conf Pap 7:264–272. https://doi.org/10.1364/oic.2016.wd.9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dev DSD, Krishna E, Das M (2016) A novel plasma-assisted atomistic surface finishing on freeform surfaces of fused silica. Int J Precis Technol. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPTECH.2016.079998

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Singh Yadav HN, Krishna E, Kombath S et al (2023) Investigation of MRR and surface characterization using plasma process. Mater Manuf Process. https://doi.org/10.1080/10426914.2023.2176873

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Dev DSD, Krishna E, Das M (2018) Novel finishing process development for precision complex-shaped hemispherical shell by bulk plasma processing. In: Precision product-process design and optimization. pp 313–335

  14. Hernandez-Rueda J, Clarijs J, Van Oosten D, Krol DM (2017) The influence of femtosecond laser wavelength on waveguide fabrication inside fused silica. Appl Phys Lett. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4981124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Steven LS, Hsinchu T (2000) in-situ and non-intrusive method formonitorng plasma etch chamber condition utilizing spectroscopictechnique. U S Pat 1 to 3

  16. Galeener FL, Geissberger AE (1983) Vibrational dynamics in Si-substituted vitreous Sio2. Phys Rev B 27:6199–6204

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Liu F, Qian J, Wang X et al (1997) UV irradiation-induced defect study of glasses by Raman spectroscopy. Phys Rev B Condens Matter Mater Phys 56:3066–3071. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.56.3066

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Li D, Li N, Su X et al (2019) Characterization of fused silica surface topography in capacitively coupled atmospheric pressure plasma processing. Appl Surf Sci 489:648–657. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.06.026

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. **n Q, Li N, Wang J et al (2015) Surface roughening of ground fused silica processed by atmospheric inductively coupled plasma. Appl Surf Sci 341:142–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.03.001

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

EK: Conceptualization; Methodology; Writing—original draft preparation, SK: Formal analysis and investigation; SDDD: Resources; review and editing, MD: Supervision; review and editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Manas Das.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work in this paper.

Ethical Approval

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Krishna, E., Sreelakshmy, K., Dev, D.S.D. et al. Medium Pressure Plasma Processing of Fused Silica: A Comparative Study for Material Removal Rate. Plasma Chem Plasma Process 44, 1069–1082 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11090-023-10440-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11090-023-10440-w

Keywords

Navigation