SpringerLink
Log in

An Adaboost Support Vector Machine Based Harris Hawks Optimization Algorithm for Intelligent Quotient Estimation from MRI Images

  • Published:
Neural Processing Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Human intelligence is measured using the Intelligent Quotient (IQ) score which is derived from a range of tests. Due to a lack of a large dataset, IQ was estimated utilizing consistent scanning approaches. Multiple datasets scanned from various locations are integrated using different scanning factors and procedures. As a result, there was a lot of diversity among the datasets. To overcome the aforementioned problems, this work presented a novel technique for IQ assessment based on data from Magnetic Resonance Imaging dataset. The pre-processing step focuses on regions like cerebrospinal fluid, white matter (WM), tissue segmentation, cerebellum removal, and skull strip**. Based on Gray Level Co-occurrence Matrix features, we have extracted energy, entropy, contrast, homogeneity, correlation, shade, and prominence features. The Principal Component Analysis based Discriminant Analysis with Linear Discriminant Analysis (PCA-based DP-LDA) selects the optimal feature selection score values. The Adaboost Support Vector Machine (Adaboost SVM)-based Harris Hawks Optimization (HHO) technique is used to estimate IQ values. The HHO algorithm is used to optimize the number of iterations, error threshold, and weighting factors in AdaBoost SVM, resulting in the estimation of optimal IQ values. Because memory and cognitive abilities are commonly tested in IQ testing, changes in Grey Matter/White Matter (GM/WM) tissues in these ROIs may have an influence on measuring human intelligence. Experimental results show a substantial connection between cortical thickness, laminary difference, and hierarchical position estimation for visual and auditory hierarchies and somatosensory hierarchies. The proposed Adaboost-SVM with the HHO method offers the lowest Root Mean square error value of 8.521 when compared with the existing techniques and gives a classification accuracy of 98% when evaluated with tenfold cross-validation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

taken from a sample d Mean value obtained for ten random parallelizations e Unsmoothened MRI thickness value for a single hemisphere

Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Shoeibi A, Khodatars M, Jafari M, Moridian P, Rezaei M, Alizadehsani R, Khozeimeh F et al (2021) Applications of deep learning techniques for automated multiple sclerosis detection using magnetic resonance imaging: a review. ar**v preprint ar**v 2105:04881

  2. Zhang X, Zong B, Zhao W, Li L (2021) Effects of mind-body exercise on brain structure and function a systematic review on MRI studies. Brain Sci 11(2):205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Marcello Z, Menichetti G, Retico A, Calderoni S, Castellani G, Remondini D (2021) Node centrality measures identify relevant structural MRI features of subjects with autism. Brain Sci 11(4):498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Thompson WH, Nair R, Oya H, Esteban O, Shine JM, Petkov CI, Poldrack RA, Howard M, Adolphs RA (2020) Data resource from concurrent intracranial stimulation and functional MRI of the human brain. Sci Data 7(1):1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Zhang X, Zong B, Zhao W, Li L (2021) Effects of mind–body exercise on brain structure and function: a systematic review on MRI studies. Brain Sci 11:205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Mormina E, Petracca M, Bommarito G, Piaggio N, Cocozza S, Inglese M (2017) Cerebellum and neurodegenerative diseases beyond conventional magnetic resonance imaging. World J Radiol 9(10):371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Zanghieri M, Menichetti G, Retico A, Calderoni S, Castellani G, Remondini D (2021) Node centrality measures identify relevant structural MRI features of subjects with autism. Brain Sci 11(4):498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Butler Heather A, Pentoney C, Mabelle Bong P (2017) Predicting real-world outcomes: critical thinking ability is a better predictor of life decisions than intelligence. Think Skills Creat 25:38–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sundararaj V, Muthukumar S, Kumar RS (2018) An optimal cluster formation based energy efficient dynamic scheduling hybrid MAC protocol for heavy traffic load in wireless sensor networks. Comput Secur 77:277–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Vinu S (2016) An efficient threshold prediction scheme for wavelet based ECG signal noise reduction using variable step size firefly algorithm. Int J Intell Eng Syst 9(3):117–126

    Google Scholar 

  11. Sundararaj V (2019) Optimised denoising scheme via opposition-based self-adaptive learning PSO algorithm for wavelet-based ECG signal noise reduction. Int J Biomed Eng Technol 31(4):325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sundararaj V, Anoop V, Dixit P, Arjaria A, Chourasia U, Bhambri P, MR, Rejeesh. and Regu Sundararaj, (2020) CCGPA-MPPT: Cauchy preferential crossover-based global pollination algorithm for MPPT in photovoltaic system. Prog Photovoltaics Res Appl 28(11):1128–1145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Rejeesh MR, Thejaswini P (2020) MOTF: multi-objective optimal trilateral filtering based partial moving frame algorithm for image denoising. Multimedia Tools Appl 79(37):28411–28430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hassan BA, Rashid TA (2020) Datasets on statistical analysis and performance evaluation of backtracking search optimisation algorithm compared with its counterpart algorithms. Data Brief 28:105046

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hassan BA (2020) CSCF: a chaotic sine cosine firefly algorithm for practical application problems. Neural Comput Appl 1–20

  16. Hassan BA, Rashid TA, Mirjalili S (2021) Formal context reduction in deriving concept hierarchies from corpora using adaptive evolutionary clustering algorithm star. Complex Intell Syst, pp.1–16

  17. Haseena KS, Anees S, Madheswari N (2014) Power optimization using EPAR protocol in MANET. Int J Innov Sci Eng Technol 6:430–436

    Google Scholar 

  18. Gowthul Alam MM, Baulkani S (2019) Local and global characteristics-based kernel hybridization to increase optimal support vector machine performance for stock market prediction. Knowl Inf Syst 60(2):971–1000

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Gowthul Alam MM, Baulkani S (2017) Reformulated query-based document retrieval using optimised kernel fuzzy clustering algorithm. Int J Bus Intell Data Min 12(3):299

    Google Scholar 

  20. Gowthul Alam MM, Baulkani S (2019) Geometric structure information based multi-objective function to increase fuzzy clustering performance with artificial and real-life data. Soft Comput 23(4):1079–1098

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Yang J-J, Yoon U, Yun HJ, Im K, Choi YY, Lee KH, Park H, Hough MG, Lee JM (2013) Prediction for human intelligence using morphometric characteristics of cortical surface: partial least square analysis. Neuroscience 246:351–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ajay A, Joshua Gans S, Goldfarb A (2019) Exploring the impact of artificial intelligence: prediction versus judgment. Inf Econ Policy 47:1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Choi YY, Shamosh NA, Cho SH, DeYoung CG, Lee MJ, Lee JM, Kim SI, Cho Z, Kim K, Gray JR, Lee KH (2008) Multiple bases of human intelligence revealed by cortical thickness and neural activation. J Neurosci 28(41):10323–10329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Konrad W, Ronan L, Ian Goodyer M, Paul Fletcher C (2015) Cortical thickness gradients in structural hierarchies. Neuroimage 111:241–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kirsten H, Fukushima M, Sporns O, Christian Fiebach J (2020) Temporal stability of functional brain modules associated with human intelligence. Hum Brain Mapp 41(2):362–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Liye W, Wee C-Y, Suk H-I, Tang X, Shen D (2015) MRI-based intelligence quotient (IQ) estimation with sparse learning. PLoS ONE 10(3):e0117295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Wang Y, Nie J, Yap PT, Shi F, Guo L, et al (2011) Robust deformable-surface-based skull-strip** for large-scale studies. Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention–MICCAI 2011: Springer 635–642.

  28. Dinggang S, Davatzikos C (2002) HAMMER: hierarchical attribute matching mechanism for elastic registration. IEEE Trans Med Imag 21(11):1421–1439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Haralick Robert M, Shanmugam K, HakDinstein I (1973) Textural features for image classification. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 6:610–621

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Almeida VE, de Sousa Fernandes DD, Diniz PHGD, de Araújo Gomes A, Véras G, Galvão RKH, Araujo MCU (2021) Scores selection via Fisher’s discriminant power in PCA-LDA to improve the classification of food data. Food Chem 130296

  31. Thanyaluk J-U, Aitken S (2005) Feature selection and classification for microarray data analysis: evolutionary methods for identifying predictive genes. BMC Bioinf 6(1):1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Freund Y, Schapire RE (1997) A decision-theoretic generalization of on-line learning and an application to boosting. J Comput Syst Sci 55(1):119–139

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. Ruihu W (2012) AdaBoost for feature selection, classification and its relation with SVM, a review. Phys Procedia 25:800–807

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Jie S, Fujita H, Chen P, Li H (2017) Dynamic financial distress prediction with concept drift based on time weighting combined with Adaboost support vector machine ensemble. Knowl-Based Syst 120:4–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Dokeroglu T, Deniz A, Kiziloz HE (2021) A robust multiobjective Harris’ Hawks Optimization algorithm for the binary classification problem. Knowledge-Based Syst, 107219

  36. Yıldız BS, Yıldız AR (2019) The Harris hawks optimization algorithm, salp swarm algorithm, grasshopper optimization algorithm and dragonfly algorithm for structural design optimization of vehicle components. Mater Test 61(8):744–748

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Owusu E, Zhan Y, Mao QR (2014) An SVM-AdaBoost facial expression recognition system. Appl Intell 40(3):536–545

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Higham Desmond J, Nicholas Higham J (2016) MATLAB guide. Soc Ind Appl Math

  39. https://www.nitrc.org/forum/forum.php?offset=0&max_rows=50&style=nested&forum_id=1243

  40. Van Essen DC, Glasser MF, Dierker DL, Harwell J (2012) Cortical parcellations of the macaque monkey analyzed on surface-based atlases. Cereb Cortex 22(10):2227–2240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Thilakavathy P, Diwan B (2021) Semi-automatic framework for estimating Intelligence Quotient (IQ) Using MRI. Annalse Rom Soc Cell Biol, 2087–2101

  42. Rajmohan V, Mohandas E (2007) The limbic system. Indian J Psychiatry 49(2):132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Chipika RH, Finegan E, Shing SLH, McKenna MC, Christidi F, Chang KM, Bede P (2020) Switchboard malfunction in motor neuron diseases: Selective pathology of thalamic nuclei in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and primary lateral sclerosis. NeuroImage Clin 27:102300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Jian H, Zhu Z, John Zhang X, Mingxiang Wu, Chen H-C, Wang S (2012) The role of left inferior frontal gyrus in explicit and implicit semantic processing. Brain Res 1440:56–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. O’connor K (2012) Auditory processing in autism spectrum disorder: a review. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 36(2):836–854

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Dept of Information and Communication Engineering, Anna University, Chennai, India

    P. Thilakavathy

  2. Department of Computer Science and Engineering, St. Joseph’s College of Engineering, OMR, Chennai, India

    B. Diwan

Authors
  1. P. Thilakavathy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. B. Diwan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. Thilakavathy.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Thilakavathy, P., Diwan, B. An Adaboost Support Vector Machine Based Harris Hawks Optimization Algorithm for Intelligent Quotient Estimation from MRI Images. Neural Process Lett 55, 519–536 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11063-022-10895-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11063-022-10895-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation