SpringerLink
Log in

Periodic fable discovery: an augmented reality serious game to introduce and motivate young children towards chemistry

  • Published:
Multimedia Tools and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Children’s interest in new technologies and games creates opportunities to use these tools to facilitate their thinking processes for scientific content and education, especially to support abstract reasoning in the areas of Science, Technology, Engineering, Maths (STEM). Chemistry concepts, in particular, can benefit from being presented through hybrid physical/digital interfaces. However, the actual impact of immersive gaming technologies on learning and teaching chemistry to young children can benefit from further evaluations. We developed the “Periodic Fable Discovery” AR game to fill this gap. “Periodic Fable Discovery” is an AR serious game that uses a tangible interface and storytelling to introduce and teach basic chemistry concepts to young children from 9 to 13 years old. After designing and implementing the game, we conducted a study with 30 children, using a mixed-method approach, comparing the AR game versus a traditional method of teaching activity. The results show a significant positive learning outcome, higher motivation and engagement in the AR experience.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Statements and Declarations

This work was supported by LARSyS-FCT Plurianual funding 2020-2023 (UIDB/50009/2020), and FCT Ph.D. Grant PD/BD/150286/2019. Also co-funded by NOVA LINCS (UIDB/04516/2020) with the financial support of FCT.IP. The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, SC, upon reasonable request. The authors have no other competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article

References

  1. Rapetti E, Pedró F (2015) Digital natives, new millennium learners and generation y, does age matter? data and reflection from the higher education context. vol 5, p 303. Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG

  2. Lampropoulos G, Keramopoulos E, Diamantaras K, Evangelidis G (2022) Augmented reality and gamification in education: a systematic literature review of research, applications, and empirical studies. Appl Sci 12(13):6809. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12136809

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Anderson A (2019) Virtual Reality, augmented Reality and Artificial Intelligence in special education: a practical guide to supporting students with learning differences, p 124. Routledge, https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429399503

  4. Kuang Y, Bai X (2019) The feasibility study of augmented reality technology in early childhood education. In: 2019 14th international conference on computer science & education (ICCSE), pp 172–175. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCSE.2019.8845339. IEEE

  5. Jesionkowska J, Wild F, Deval Y (2020) Active learning augmented reality for steam educationa case study. Educ Sci 10(8):198. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10080198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. OECD (2016) Innovating Education and Educating for Innovation: the power of digital technologies and skills. OECD Publishing, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264265097-en

  7. Rivera H, Li J-T (2020) Potential factors to enhance students’ stem college learning and career orientation. In: Frontiers in Education, vol 5, p 25. Frontiers Media SA

  8. Chi S, Wang Z, Liu X, Zhu L (2017) Associations among attitudes, perceived difficulty of learning science, gender, parents occupation and students scientific competencies. Int J Sci Ed 39(16):2171–2188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Patall EA, Hooper S, Vasquez AC, Pituch KA, Steingut RR (2018) Science class is too hard: perceived difficulty, disengagement, and the role of teacher autonomy support from a daily diary perspective. Learn & Instruc. 58:220–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Shirazi S (2017) Student experience of school science. Int J Sci Ed 39(14):1891–1912

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Solbes Matarredona J, Montserrat R, Furió Más CJ, et al (2007) El desinterés del alumnado hacia el aprendizaje de la ciencia: implicaciones en su enseñanza. Didáctica de las ciencias experimentales y sociales

  12. Cai S, Wang X, Chiang F-K (2014) A case study of Augmented Reality simulation system application in a chemistry course. Comput Hum Behav 37:31–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.04.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lam MC, Tee HK, Nizam SSM, Hashim NC, Suwadi NA, Tan SY, Abd Majid NA, Arshad H, Liew SY (2020) Interactive augmented reality with natural action for chemistry experiment learning. TEM J 9(1):351

    Google Scholar 

  14. Núñez M, Quirós R, Núñez I, Carda JB, Camahort E, Mauri J (2008) Collaborative augmented reality for inorganic chemistry education. In: WSEAS international conference. Proceedings. mathematics and computers in science and engineering, vol 5, pp 271–277. WSEAS

  15. Maier P, Tönnis M, Klinker G (2009) Dynamics in tangible chemical reactions. In: proceedings from the international conference on chemical engineering (ICCE 2009)

  16. Fatemah A, Rasool S, Habib U (2020) Interactive 3d visualization of chemical structure diagrams embedded in text to aid spatial learning process of students. J Chem Educ 97(4):992–1000

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Chen P, Liu X, Cheng W, Huang R (2017) A review of using augmented reality in education from 2011 to 2016. Innovations in smart learning, 13–18

  18. Zimmerman H, Land S, Jung YJ (2015) Using augmented reality to support children’s situational interest and science learning during context-sensitive informal mobile learning. ResearchGate 406:101–119. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26518-6_4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Zheng M, Waller M (2017) ChemPreview: towards an augmented reality-based molecular interface. J. Mol. Graphics Model. 73(J mole graph & model 73):18–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmgm.2017.01.019

  20. Anikina O, Yakimenko E (2015) Edutainment as a modern technology of education. Procedia - social and behavioral sciences. 166(Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 166:475-479):475–479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.12.558

  21. Lutfi A, Suyono S, Erman E, Hidayah R (2019) Edutainment with computer game as a chemistry learning media. JPPS (Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Sains). 8(2):1684–1689. https://doi.org/10.26740/jpps.v8n2.p1684-1689

  22. Sawyer B, Rejeski D (2002) Serious games: improving public policy through game-based learning and simulation, woodrow wilson international center for scholars: 31. Serious games. (2002-1)

  23. Prensky M (2003) Digital game-based learning. Comput Entertain (CIE) 1(1):21–21. https://doi.org/10.1145/950566.950596

  24. Butterworth M George & Harris (1994) Principles of developmental psychology. Psychology Press Ltd. (ISBN 0-86377-280-3), 51

  25. Hinske S, Langheinrich M, Lampe M (2008) Towards guidelines for designing augmented toy environments. ResearchGate 78–87. https://doi.org/10.1145/1394445.1394454

  26. Yogman M, Garner A, Hutchinson J, Hirsh-Pasek K, Golinkoff RM, Child C, Health F, et al (2018) The power of play: a pediatric role in enhancing development in young children. Pediatrics. 142(3)

  27. Schell J (2008) The art of game design: a book of lenses. CRC press, https://doi.org/10.1201/b17723

  28. Kalmpourtzis G (2018) Educational game design fundamentals: a journey to creating intrinsically motivating learning experiences. CRC Press, ISBN 10: 113863154X

  29. Timovski R, Koceska N, Koceski S (2020) Review: the use of augmented and virtual reality in education. In: international conference on information technology and development of education, vol 148, pp 148–162

  30. Li M-C, Tsai C-C (2013) Game-based learning in science education: a review of relevant research. J Sci Educ Technol 22(6):877–898

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Rastegarpour H, Marashi P (2012) The effect of card games and computer games on learning of chemistry concepts. Procedia-Soc & behav Sci 31:597–601

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Chen R, Wang X (2008) Tangible augmented reality for design learning: an implementation framework. CAADRIA 2008 - the association for computer-aided architectural design research in asia: beyond computer-aided design, 350–356

  33. Duan X, Kang S-J, Choi JI, Kim SK (2020) Mixed reality system for virtual chemistry lab. KSII Trans Int & Inf Syst (TIIS). 14(4):1673–1688. https://doi.org/10.3837/tiis.2020.04.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Chen S-Y, Liu S-Y (2020) Using augmented reality to experiment with elements in a chemistry course. Comput Hum Behav 111:106418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Nordin N, Jaafar NF (2019) Atomicfrenzy ar-fun with chemical elements using augmented reality. University carnival on e-learning (IUCEL) 2019:54

    Google Scholar 

  36. Azuma RT (1997) A survey of augmented reality. Presence: teleoperators & virtual environments. 6(4):355–385. https://doi.org/10.1162/pres.1997.6.4.355

  37. Alchemie (2020) MODELar. https://www.alchem.ie/

  38. Games S (2021) HoloLAB Champions. https://www.schellgames.com/games/hololab-champions/

  39. KL NS, Chavan PS, Murthy S (2018) Stereochem: augmented reality 3d molecular model visualization app for teaching and learning stereochemistry. In: 2018 IEEE 18th international conference on advanced learning technologies (ICALT), pp 252–256. IEEE

  40. TM A (2019) Arloon Plants. http://www.arloon.com/apps/plants/

  41. VisioneeringLearning (2020) 360ED Elements AR. https://www.360ed.org/elements-ar/

  42. Or, ANST (2020) Ansto XR. https://apps.apple.com/us/app/ansto-vr/id1418809941?platform=ipad

  43. Augmentifyit (2020) Aumentifylt AR Elements, The periodic table of me. https://augmentify.myshopify.com/products/augmentifyit-ar-elements-the-periodic-table-of-me

  44. 000 AI-VS (2020) AR VR Molecules Editor. https://apps.apple.com/us/app/ar-vr-molecules-editor/id1287093721

  45. Popar (2020) Popar periodic table of elements. https://popartoys.com/products/popar-periodic-table-of-elements-smart-chart

  46. Cortex P (2020) Dskalos - Chemistry. https://prefrontalcortex.de/en/projects/daskalos/

  47. University PC (2018) Chemistry AR (BETA). https://apkpure.com/chemistry-ar-beta/com.petra.topher.chemistry

  48. Marvel S (2020) Immersive chemistry. https://www.instamojo.com/studymarvel/?ref=offer_products

  49. Srisawasdi N, Panjaburee P (2019) Implementation of game-transformed inquiry-based learning to promote the understanding of and motivation to learn chemistry. J Sci Educ Technol 28(2):152–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Schell Games: Happy Atoms. https://www.schellgames.com/games/happy-atoms/ (2020)

  51. Master mind toys (2020) Professor Maxwell, 4D AR Science Kit. https://www.mastermindtoys.com/products/spicebox-professor-maxwells-4d-augmented-reality-science-lab

  52. Capsulate AT (2020) Capsulate toys. https://www.springwise.com/new-toy-uses-ar-teach-elements

  53. Bi T, Song S (2011) Problems and solutions of educational game development. In: 2011 international conference on consumer electronics, communications and networks (CECNet), pp 3364–3367. IEEE

  54. Roth W-M (2012) Authentic school science: knowing and learning in open-inquiry science laboratories vol 1. Springer, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0495-1

  55. Arnseth HC (2008) Activity theory and situated learning theory: contrasting views of educational practice. Pedagogy, Culture & Society 16(3):289–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Davydov VV (1995) The influence of ls vygotsky on education theory, research, and practice. Educ Res 24(3):12–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Zurita G, Nussbaum M (2004) A constructivist mobile learning environment supported by a wireless handheld network. J Comput Assist Learn 20(4):235–243. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2004.00089.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Mughal F, Zafar A (2011) Experiential learning from a constructivist perspective: reconceptualizing the kolbian cycle. Int J Learn & Dev 1(2):27–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Dunleavy M (2014) Design principles for augmented reality learning. TechTrends 58(1):28–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Bower M, Howe C, McCredie N, Robinson A, Grover D (2014) Augmented reality in education-cases, places and potentials. Educ Media Int 51(1):1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Dunleavy M, Dede C, Mitchell R (2009) Affordances and limitations of immersive participatory augmented reality simulations for teaching and learning. J Sci Educ Technol 18(1):7–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Kamarainen AM, Metcalf S, Grotzer T, Browne A, Mazzuca D, Tutwiler MS, Dede C (2013) Ecomobile: integrating augmented reality and probeware with environmental education field trips. Comput & Educ 68:545–556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. FitzGerald E, Ferguson R, Adams A, Gaved M, Mor Y, Thomas R (2015) Augmented reality and mobile learning: international journal of mobile and blended learning. 5(4):43–58. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijmbl.2013100103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Wu H-K, Lee SW-Y, Chang H-Y, Liang J-C (2013) Current status, opportunities and challenges of augmented reality in education. Computers & Education. 62(Computers & Education 62:41-49):41–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.024

  65. Dunleavy M, Dede C (2014) Augmented reality teaching and learning. In: handbook of research on educational communications and technology, pp 735–745. Springer, ???

  66. Campos P, Pessanha S, Jorge J (2011) Fostering collaboration in kindergarten through an augmented reality game. Int J Virtual Reality 10(3):33–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Kolb DA (2014) Experiential learning: experience as the source of learning and development. FT press, ISBN: 0132952610

  68. Klopfer E (2010) Sheldon J (2010) Augmenting your own reality: student authoring of science-based augmented reality games. New directions for youth development. 128:85–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Squire KD, Jan M (2007) Mad city mystery: develo** scientific argumentation skills with a place-based augmented reality game on handheld computers. J Sci Educ & Technol 16(1):5–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Martín-Gutiérrez J, Fabiani P, Benesova W, Meneses MD, Mora CE (2015) Augmented reality to promote collaborative and autonomous learning in higher education. Comput Hum Behav 51:752–761

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Redondo B, Cózar-Gutiérrez R, González-Calero JA, Ruiz RS (2020) Integration of augmented reality in the teaching of english as a foreign language in early childhood education. Early childhood Educ J 48(2):147–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Radu I, Schneider B (2019) What can we learn from augmented reality (ar)? benefits and drawbacks of ar for inquiry-based learning of physics. In: proceedings of the 2019 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems, pp 1–12

  73. Luraschi M, Rezzonico R, Pellegri G (2012) The chemist, that madman! how children perceive science. CHIMIA int J Chem 66(11):820–825

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Morais C (2015) Storytelling with chemistry and related hands-on activities: informal learning experiences to prevent “Chemophobia” and promote young children’s scientific literacy. J Chem Educ 92(1):58–65. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed5002416

  75. Sirakaya M, Cakmak EK (2018) The effect of augmented reality use on achievement, misconception and course engagement. Contemp Educ Technol 9(3):297–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Salmi H, Thuneberg H, Vainikainen M-P (2016) Making the invisible observable by augmented reality in informal science education context. Int J Sci Educ Part B 7(3):1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2016.1254358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Kallery M, Psillos D (2001) Pre-school teachers’ content knowledge in science: their understanding of elementary science concepts and of issues raised by children’s questions. Int J Early Years Educ 9(3):165–179. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669760120086929

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Osborne J, Dillon J (2008) Science education in europe: critical reflections vol 13. London: the nuffield foundation

  79. Wu HK, Shah P (2004) Exploring visuospatial thinking in chemistry learning. Sci Educ 88(3):465–492. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Liu Y, Taber KS (2016) Analysing symbolic expressions in secondary school chemistry: their functions and implications for pedagogy. Chem Educ Res & Prac 17(3):439–451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Treagust D, Chittleborough G, Mamiala T (2003) The role of submicroscopic and symbolic representations in chemical explanations. Int J Sci Educ 25(11):1353–1368. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069032000070306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Wang Y, Chen N (2019) Application of augmented reality technology in chemistry experiment teaching. ResearchGate. https://doi.org/10.2991/aebmr.k.191225.223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Asyiah EN, Irwansyah FS, Farida I (2019) The making augmented reality technology-based learning media in molecular hybridization concept. J Phys Conf Ser 1402(5):055045. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1402/5/055045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Septi Irwansyah F, Yusuf Y, Ch I, Ramdhani M (2018) Augmented reality (AR) technology on the android operating system in chemistry learning. IOP Conf Ser: Mater Sci Eng 288(1):012068. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/288/1/012068

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Vega Garzon J, Magrini M, Galembeck E (2017) Using augmented reality to teach and learn biochemistry. Biochem Mol Biol Educ 45(5). https://doi.org/10.1002/bmb.21063

  86. Nechypurenko PP, Starova TV, Selivanova TV, Tomilina AO, Uchitel AD (2018) Use of augmented reality in chemistry education. CEUR Workshop Proceedings

  87. Habig S (2020) Who can benefit from augmented reality in chemistry? Sex differences in solving stereochemistry problems using augmented reality. Br J Educ Technol 51(3):629–644. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12891

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. Plunkett KN (2019) A simple and practical method for incorporating augmented reality into the classroom and laboratory. J Chem Educ 96(11):2628–2631. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.9b00607

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. Peleg R (2017) Teachers’ views on implementing storytelling as a way to motivate inquiry learning in high-school chemistry teaching. Chem Educ Res & Prac 18(2):304–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  90. Helmenstine T (2019) Science notes learn science do science. http://sciencenotes.org/category/chemistry/periodic-table-chemistry/page/2/

  91. Sharlin E, Watson B, Kitamura Y, Kishino F, Itoh Y (2004) On tangible user interfaces, humans and spatiality. Personal & ubiquit Comput 8(5):338–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  92. Chu JH (2016) Design space for tangible and embodied interaction with cultural heritage. In: proceedings of the 2016 ACM conference companion publication on designing interactive systems, pp 27–28

  93. Druin A (2002) The role of children in the design of new technology. Behav & Inf Technol 21(1):1–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  94. Shavelson RJ, Phillips DC, Towne L, Feuer MJ (2003) On the science of education design studies. Educ Res 32(1):5–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  95. Kelly A (2003) The role of design in research. Educational researcher 32(1):3–4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  96. Colakoglu OM, Akdemir O (2012) Motivational measure of the instruction compared: instruction based on the arcs motivation theory vs traditional instruction in blended courses. Turkish online J Dist Educ 11(2):73–89

    Google Scholar 

  97. Loorbach N, Peters O, Karreman J, Steehouder M (2015) Validation of the instructional materials motivation survey (imms) in a self-directed instructional setting aimed at working with technology. British J Educ Technol 46(1):204–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  98. Keller JM (1987) Strategies for stimulating the motivation to learn. Perform & Instr 26(8):1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  99. Green M, Sulbaran T (2006) Motivation assessment instrument for virtual reality scheduling simulator. In: e-learn: world conference on e-learning in corporate, government, healthcare, and higher education, pp 45–50. Association for the advancement of computing in education (AACE)

  100. Martin F, Bolliger DU (2018) Engagement matters: student perceptions on the importance of engagement strategies in the online learning environment. Online Learn 22(1):205–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  101. Bacca Acosta JL, Baldiris Navarro SM, Fabregat Gesa R, Graf S, et al (2014) Augmented reality trends in education: a systematic review of research and applications. Journal of Educational Technology and Society, 2014, vol 17, núm. 4, p 133-149

  102. Savi R, Von Wangenheim CG, Ulbricht V, Vanzin T (2010) Proposta de um Modelo de Avaliação de Jogos Educacionais. RENOTE 8(3). https://doi.org/10.22456/1679-1916.18043

  103. Read JC, MacFarlane S, Casey C (2002) Endurability, engagement and expectations: measuring childrens fun. In: interaction design and children, vol 2, pp 1–23 . Shaker Publishing Eindhoven

  104. Brooke J et al (1996) Sus-a quick and dirty usability scale. Usability Eval Ind 189(194):4–7

    Google Scholar 

  105. Martins AI, Rosa AF, Queirós A, Silva A, Rocha NP (2015) European portuguese validation of the system usability scale (SUS). Procedia Comput Sci 67:293–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2015.09.273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  106. Barendregt W, Bekker MM (2006) Develo** a coding scheme for detecting usability and fun problems in computer games for young children. Behav Res Methods 38(3):382–389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  107. Malone TW (1981) Toward a theory of intrinsically motivating instruction. Cogn Sci 5(4):333–369

    Google Scholar 

  108. Maguire M (2001) Methods to support human-centred design. Int J Hum Comput Stud 55(4):587–634

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by LARSyS-FCT Plurianual funding 2020-2023 and FCT Ph.D. Grant PD/BD/150286/2019. Also co-funded by NOVA LINCS (UIDB/04516/2020) with the financial support of FCT.IP. Our gratitude also goes to the students, teachers and coordinators at Doutorecos, Associação Olhar and Madeira CAB. We would like also to thank Gonçalo Martins, Michaela Sousa, Rui Trindade and Manuel Fontes for their ongoing support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. FCT NOVA, NOVA University Lisbon, Caparica, Portugal

    Sandra Câmara Olim

  2. ITI-LARSYS, Madeira, Portugal

    Sandra Câmara Olim & Valentina Nisi

  3. Instituto Superior Técnico, ITI-LARSYS, Lisboa, Portugal

    Valentina Nisi

  4. NOVA LINCS, FCT, NOVA University Lisbon, Costa da Caparica, Portugal

    Teresa Romão

Authors
  1. Sandra Câmara Olim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Valentina Nisi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Teresa Romão
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sandra Câmara Olim.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix A: PF iteration process

Appendix A: PF iteration process

PF Discovery Design and Development Process / Iterations

Table 6 PF Discovery Design and Development Process / Iterations
Full size table
Table 7  [XMLCONT] 
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Câmara Olim, S., Nisi, V. & Romão, T. Periodic fable discovery: an augmented reality serious game to introduce and motivate young children towards chemistry. Multimed Tools Appl 83, 52593–52619 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-023-17526-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-023-17526-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation