Log in

A Paraconsistent Conditional Logic

  • Published:
Journal of Philosophical Logic Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We develop a paraconsistent logic by introducing new models for conditionals with acceptive and rejective selection functions which are variants of Chellas’ conditional models. The acceptance and rejection conditions are substituted for truth conditions of conditionals. The paraconsistent conditional logic is axiomatized by a sequent system \(\mathcal {C}\) which is an extension of the Belnap-Dunn four-valued logic with a conditional operator. Some acceptive extensions of \(\mathcal {C}\) are shown to be sound and complete. We also show the finite acceptive model property and decidability of these logics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Belnap, N.D. (1977). G.Epstein A useful four-valued logic. In Dunn, J.M. (Ed.) Modern uses of multiple-valued logic (pp. 5–37). Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.

  2. Bobenrieth, A.M. (2007). Paraconsistency and the consistency or inconsistency of the world. In Beziau, J.-Y., Carnielli, W., Gabbay, D. (Eds.) Handbook of paraconsistency (pp. 493–512). London: College Publications.

  3. Chellas, B.F. (1975). Basic conditional logic. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 4, 133–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Dunn, J.M. (1986). Relevance logic and entailment. In Gabbay, D., & Guenthner, F. (Eds.) Handbook of philosophical logic volume III: alternatives in classical logic (pp. 117–224). Dordrecht: Springer Science+Business Media.

  5. Dunn, J.M. (1999). A comparative study of various model-theoretic treatments of negation: a history of formal negation. In Gabbay, D.M., & Wansing, H. (Eds.) What is negation? (pp. 23–51): Kluwer Academic Publishers.

  6. Dunn, J.M. (2000). Partiality and its dual. Studia Logica, 65, 5–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Edgington, D. (2005). Ramsey’s legacies on conditionals and truth. In Lillehammer, H., & Mellor, D. H. (Eds.) Ramsey’s legacy (pp. 37–52). New York: Oxford University Press.

  8. Lewis, D. (1973). Counterfactuals. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ma, M., & Lin, Y. (2018). Countably many weakenings of Belnap–Dunn logic. Studia Logica. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11225-018-9840-6.

  10. Ma, M., & Lin, Y. (2019). A deterministic weakening of Belnap–Dunn logic. Studia Logica, 107, 283–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Fitting, M. (1988). Logic programming on a topological bilattice. Fundamenta Informatica, 11, 209–218.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ginsberg, M.L. (1988). Multivalued logics: a uniform approach to inference in artificial intelligence. Computational Intelligence, 4, 265–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Muskens, R. (1999). On Partial and Paraconsistent Logics. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 40, 352–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Priest, G. (2007). Paraconsistency and dialetheism. In Gabbay, D.M., & Woods, J. (Eds.) Handbook of the history of logic vol. 8: the many valued and nonmonotonic turn in logic (pp. 129–204). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

  15. Ramsey, F. (2013). Truth and probability. In Ramsey, F. (Ed.) The foundations of mathematics and other logical essays (pp. 156–198). Routledge.

  16. Ramsey, F. (2013). Truth and propositions. In Ramsey, F. (Ed.) The foundations of mathematics and other logical essays (pp. 138–155). Routledge.

  17. Ramsey, F. (1929). General propositions and causality. In Ramsey, F. (Ed.) The foundations of mathematics (pp. 237–255): VDM Verlag.

  18. Stalnaker, R.C. (2012). A theory of conditionals. In Rescher, N. (Ed.) Ifs: conditionals, belief, decision, chance and time (pp. 98–112). Oxford: Basil Blackwell Publishers.

Download references

Acknowledgements

Thanks are given to the referee for the helpful comments on the manuscript of this paper. The first author of this work was supported by Chinese National Funding of Social Sciences (Grant No. 18ZDA033).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Minghui Ma.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ma, M., Wong, CT. A Paraconsistent Conditional Logic. J Philos Logic 49, 883–903 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10992-019-09540-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10992-019-09540-w

Keywords

Navigation