Abstract
Several mutations in severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) have increased the transmission and mortality rate of coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) across the globe. Although many vaccines have been developed, a large proportion of the global population remains at high risk of infection. The current study aims to develop an antiviral peptide capable of inhibiting the interaction of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and its six major variants with the host cell angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptor. An in-silico approach was employed to design a therapeutic peptide inhibitor against the receptor-binding domain (RBD) of the spike (S) protein of SARS-CoV-2 and its variants (B.1.1.7, B.1.351, P.1, B.1.617.1, B.1.617.2 and B.1.617.3). The binding specificity and affinity of our designed peptide inhibitor Mod13AApi (YADKYQKQYKDAY) with wild-type S-RBD and its six variants was confirmed by molecular docking using the HPEPDOCK tool, whereas complex stability was determined by the MD simulation study. The physicochemical and ADMET (absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion, and toxicity) properties of inhibitory peptides were determined using the ExPASy tool and pkCSM server. The docking results and its properties from our in-silico analysis present the Mod13AApi, a promising peptide for the rapid development of anti-coronavirus peptide-based antiviral therapy. Blockage of the binding of the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 variants with ACE2 in the presence of the therapeutic peptide may prevent deadly SARS-CoV-2 variants entry into host cells. Therefore, the designed inhibitory peptide can be utilized as a promising therapeutic strategy to combat COVID-19, as evident from this in-silico study.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) is caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), an enveloped, positive-sense single-stranded RNA virus (Machhi et al. 2020). The virus particle is 50–200 nm in diameter (Xu et al. 2020) and contains four structural proteins: the spike (S), envelope (E), membrane (M), and nucleocapsid (N). The N protein encapsulates the viral genome, while S, E, and M create the viral envelope (Bosch et al. 2003). The S-protein is divided into two functional parts, S1 and S2 (V'Kovski et al. 2021). Entry of the virus into the host cell is mediated by the combined action of both subunits, with S1 catalyzing attachment and S2 mediating fusion (Shang et al. 2020; Tang et al. 2020). The S1 subunit is further divided into two functional domains: An N-terminal domain and a C-terminal domain (Shang et al. 2020). A 211-amino acid region (residues 319–529) at the S1 C-terminal comprises a receptor-binding domain (RBD), mediating a pivotal role in the interaction of the virus with the host cell angiotensin-converting enzyme-2 (ACE2) receptor (Bian and Li 2021; Davidson et al. 2020; Ni et al. 2005), the 13AApi was further modified to optimize its hydrophobicity and stability index, and a final modified 13AApi (Mod13AApi) with the sequence “YADKYQKQYKDAY” was obtained with the same binding specificity. The 3D structure of Mod13AApi was modeled in the UCSF Chimera tool using the “build structure” and “energy minimization” options with an Amber ff14SB force field. Prediction of the molecular docking of the 3D structures of these PI with wild-type S-protein was performed in the HPEPDOCK (Zhou et al. 2018) in blind docking mode without providing binding site residues to ensure the highest specificity for the target region. Similarly, this peptide Mod13AApi was docked with all other S-proteins of variants using the same tool. All docking results were analyzed in Chimera and Discovery Studio Visualizer, and final snapshots of their interactions were produced using the Discovery Studio Visualizer tool.
MD Simulation and MM/GBSA Calculation
The docking predicted protein-peptide complex structures of Mod13AApi with S-RBD’s from variants strains were prepared by soaking in a dodecahedron box filled with TIP3P water molecules. Na+ or Cl− ions were added to neutralize the MD simulation system. The parameters for protein, solvent and ions molecules were derived from Amber99SB-ILDN force field (Lindorff-Larsen et al. 2010). Classical MD simulation was performed using GROMACS version 5.0.4 using standard protocol (Abraham et al. 2015). Initially, the simulation system was relaxed using 50,000 steps of steepest-descent energy minimization followed by 1 ns equilibration under NVT and NPT ensemble respectively. Finally, production runs were performed for 500 ns at constant temperature of 300 K. The simulations were performed using time step of 2 fs. Long-range interactions were handled using Particle-Mesh Ewald (PME) method while a cut-off of 10 Å was used for short-range interactions. The MD trajectory was processed and analyzed using MDAnalysis (Michaud-Agrawal et al. 2011), MDTraj (McGibbon et al. 2015), and scikit-learn (Pedregosa et al. 2011) python libraries. MM-PBSA binding energy calculations were performed using the g_mmpbsa program (Rashmi Kumari et al. 2014 ). Graphics were prepared using Matplotlib python library (Hunter 2007) and R (R Core Team 2013).
Physicochemical and Absorption, Distribution, Metabolism, Excretion, and Toxicity Analysis of the PI
Next, we analyzed the physicochemical and absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion, and toxicity (ADMET) property of Mod13AApi. The physicochemical property of the PI was predicted using the ExPASy ProtParam (ExPASy—ProtParam tool) (Gasteiger et al. 2005), Peptide 2.0 (Peptide Hydrophobicity/Hydrophilicity Analysis Tool (peptide2.com)), and PepCalc (Innovagen) (PepCalc.com—Peptide calculator) (Lear and Cobb 2016) tools. Linear sequences of the Mod13AApi were used for the analysis. Furthermore, we generated the SMILE coordinates of the PIs using the PepSMI tool (PepSMI: Convert Peptide to SMILES string (novoprolabs.com)). The obtained SMILE coordinates were used to predict the ADMET properties using the pkCSM tool (biosig.unimelb.edu.au/pkcsm/) (Pires et al. 2015).
Results and Discussion
In Silico Docking of SARS-CoV-2 S-Protein Variants Show Strong Binding Affinity with the Human ACE2 Receptor
SARS-CoV-2 has now adapted to infect its human host at a high rate and severity. Mutations in its spike (S)-protein, mainly in the RBD at the C-terminal region of the S1 protein (Table 1), are an underlying factor for its lethality (Gómez et al. 2021; Ramanathan et al. 2021; Masaud Shah et al. 2020). We aimed to understand and compare the interaction patterns of these SARS-CoV-2 variant S-proteins, as mentioned in Table 1, with the host cell receptor ACE2. Their binding affinities were analyzed in terms of the change in binding energy as calculated from predictive docking studies. The crystal structure complex of the SARS-CoV-2 S-RBD and the human ACE2 receptor obtained from the PDB database (PDB ID 6M17) was used to determine interacting residues between the complex and each of the individual proteins (S and ACE2) within a 3 Å zone.
The SARS-CoV-2 RBD present on the S1 subunit of the S-protein has a well-characterized interaction with the human ACE2 PD domain. The interacting interface residues of this complex obtained from our analysis within the binding pocket can be used in further docking studies. To comparatively examine the docking results of S-protein variants with ACE2, we used the interaction between the wild-type S-protein and ACE2 protein as a docking control. The top-ranked docking results from two tools were analyzed, and we observed that the docking complex orientation (Fig. 1A) was similar to the solved crystal structure, and the interacting residues in the 3 Å zone were matched, confirming the accuracy of our docking predictions. Then, we examined the S-protein structure of the six variants. The sites of mutation in the RBD region of each variant were studied, and in silico substitution, mutations were created using the wild-type S-protein as a reference. The mutated S-protein of each variant was docked with the human ACE2 protein. Our docking results from pyDockWEB agreed with previous reports suggesting a higher binding affinity of variant S-proteins with ACE2 (Khan et al. 2021; Ramanathan et al. 2021) (Table 2). Recently concluded studies have determined the binding affinity between the human ACE2 and variant S-proteins (B.1.1.7, B.1.351, and P.1) and found that B.1.351 and P.1 binding with ACE2 is significantly stronger, while that of B.1.1.7 is comparable to the wild-type strain (Khan et al. 2021; Ramanathan et al. 2021; Masaud Shah et al. 2020). In addition, these findings have also been validated in in vitro experiments (Ramanathan et al. 2021). Similarly, in our study, the interacting interface between variant S-proteins and ACE2 was determined within the 3 Å zone (Table 3 B), while the docking orientations were observed to be similar to the control (Fig. 1B–G). Interestingly, changes in the binding energy (in kcal/mol) obtained from pyDockWEB were somewhat higher for complexes containing S-protein of the variants when compared to the wild-type complex (Table 2). To avoid technical errors, we cross-checked our docking results using PATCHDOCK (Table 2). Briefly, the increase in the binding energy of complexes containing variant S-proteins docking with the human ACE2 protein suggests that they bind more strongly, and this increase in binding affinity may lead to a higher rate of fusion and entry into host cells, possibly one of the major factors underlying their increased transmission and lethality. In addition, current treatment methods for the wild-type SARS-CoV-2 may not work effectively for these variants, meaning that therapeutic molecules require an adaptive modification. Therefore, with our previous experience of develo** an anti-COVID-19 peptide (Baig et al. 2020), we sought to develop a novel PI that specifically blocks the interaction of variant S-proteins with the host ACE2 receptor.
Docking of Spike protein receptor-binding domain (S-RBD) of SARS-CoV-2 (wild type and six variants) with ACE2 in pyDockWEB: Spike RBD is colored as Blue while ACE2 domain is colored as Red. The residues showing interaction in ACE2 are highlighted in blue, while those showing interaction in Spike RBD are highlighted in Green. All the interacting residues in both domains are named in three amino acid codes followed by residue number. A interaction of Wild-type SARS-CoV-2 S-RBD (PDB ID: 6M17_ChainE) with ACE2 (PDB ID: 6M17_ChainB). B interaction of B.1.1.7 Spike RBD (or alpha) (Mutated at N501Y; indicated by arrow) with ACE-2 (PDB ID: 6M17_ChainB). C interaction of B.1.351 Spike RBD (or beta) (Mutated at K417N, E484K, and N501Y; indicated by arrow) with ACE2 (PDB ID: 6M17_ChainB). D interaction of P.1 Spike RBD (or gamma) (Mutated at K417T, E484K, and N501Y; indicated by arrow) with ACE2 (PDB ID: 6M17_ChainB). E interaction of B.1.617.1 Spike RBD (or kappa) (Mutated at L452R, E484Q; indicated by arrow) with ACE2 (PDB ID: 6M17_ChainB). F interaction of B.1.617.2 Spike RBD (or delta) (Mutated at L452R, T478K; indicated by arrow) with ACE2 (PDB ID: 6M17_ChainB), and G interaction of B.1.617.3 Spike RBD (or delta +) (Mutated at K417N, L452R, E484Q; indicated by arrow) with ACE2 (PDB ID: 6M17_ChainB). ACE2 angiotensin-converting enzyme-2, RBD receptor-binding domain
Novel Peptide Inhibitor (PI) Binds to SARS-CoV-2 S-RBD of Variants and Inhibit Their Interaction with ACE2
A novel method to estimate the effectiveness of a peptide before in vitro and in vivo studies is via the in-silico design of peptides along with the prediction of their efficacy on their target protein using computational tools (Schutz et al. 2020). Designing peptides that can inhibit the binding of the spike receptor-binding domain (S-RBD) to ACE2 has been identified as a novel strategy to inhibit the spread of the virus (Jaiswal and Kumar 2020; Schutz et al. 2020). Other studies have also acknowledged the effectiveness of in silico-designed peptides to inhibit the S-RBD (Baig et al. 2020; Han and Kral 2020), and these have been subsequently verified in in vitro models (Zhang et al. 2020). Peptide-derived inhibitors have several advantages, which include high specificity, tolerability, and safety (Craik et al. 2013; Sharma et al. 2014; Sun 2013). Although the wild-type S-RBD has been targeted by various studies, this study designed a novel peptide inhibiting wild-type SARS-CoV-2 along with the variants, which are the main cause of increased infectivity as these strains have an increased survival advantage (Shah et al. 2020) and high binding affinity with the host. The 18AApi used in this study was taken as a template from our previous study (Baig et al. 2020), and here, we further increased its effectiveness. Although the 18AApi was effective in binding with the S-RBD, the instability index computed using the ProtParam tool on the ExPASy was shown to be 68.65, while the maximum limit of the instability index for a peptide should be 40 to classify the peptide as stable. The stability of a peptide determines its efficacy largely due to the maintenance of its secondary structure (Lee et al. 2019; Zapadka et al. 2017). Unstable peptides lose their secondary conformations and form aggregates, hampering their efficacy and inducing toxicity due to aggregation (Zapadka et al. 2017). The length of the peptide also plays a significant role in maintaining its stability; studies have suggested that short peptides are more stable than longer peptides (Zapadka et al. 2017). Thus, to decrease the length of the peptide while increasing its stability, 18AApi was truncated, removing its last five amino acids, and modifications were added at three positions (E7N, A8F, and E10K), after which the peptide was docked against the S-RBD domain. The resultant 13AApi showed an instability index of -2.21, indicating that it is highly stable. Other vital factors for PIs are their hydrophobicity and half-life. A high hydrophobicity can lead to the self-association of peptides, resulting in decreased solubility in the solvent and decreased efficacy (Zapadka et al. 2017). Half-life is another important parameter that determines the bioavailability of peptides, with a short half-life leading to less bioavailability and less therapeutic efficacy (Sharma et al. 2014). Shortening the peptide from 18 amino acids to 13 amino acids increased the stability of the peptide, but the hydrophobicity of 13AApi increased to 46% compared to 38% for 18AApi. To decrease the hydrophobicity and increase the half-life of the peptide, the amino acids in 13AApi were replaced with a similar group of amino acids possessing similar properties based on their hydrophobicity index. These changes in 13AApi resulted in the design of a novel Mod13AApi with a hydrophobicity score of 15% (compared to 46% for 13AApi) and a half-life of 2.8 h (compared to 1.1 h for 13AApi). Mod13AApi also showed an instability index of 26.8, suggesting that it is more stable than 18AApi. Finally, we performed in silico docking of Mod13AApi with the wild type SARS-CoV-2 S-RBD in HPEPDOCK tool (Fig. 2), and interacting residues within the 3 Å region were analyzed between the protein and the peptide, as shown in Table 4. The binding energy obtained from the tool is provided in Table 5. Our results show that along with better physicochemical properties after modification, Mod13AApi, like 18AApi and 13AApi, maintains specific binding to the S-RBD. Therefore, we next aim to analyze the comparative binding of Mod13AApi with S-RBD of variant strains using in silico docking tools.
Docking of Mod13AApi to Variants of the SARS-CoV-2 S-RBD
In Fig. 3, we showed the docking of Mod13AApi with S-RBD’s from variants strains. Currently, VOC strains are the main cause of the spread of the disease due to enhanced binding with the ACE2 receptor (Khan et al. 2021; Ramanathan et al. 2021; Shah et al. 2020a) and their ability to resist neutralizing antibodies (Weisblum et al. 2020; D. Zhou et al. 2021). Hence, inhibiting VOC strains may be a potential solution to curb the spread of COVID-19. Like S-RBD of the wild-type SARS-CoV-2, the Mod13AApi was docked with the S-RBD of variant strains using the HPEPDOCK (Zhou et al. 2018) tool. Interestingly, the results indicate that the peptide showed effective binding with all the variant strains (Fig. 3A–F) and bound at the same groove where the S-RBD binds to ACE2 structure (Fig. 1B-G), however, with variable dock scores as indicated in Table 5. Though the B.1.1.7 S-RBD showed less dock score with Mod13AApi, the other five strains S-RBD showed better dock scores with Mod13AApi compared to wild-type SARS-CoV-2 S-RBD. (Table 5). Also, the interacting residues in the 3 Å region between the peptide and the protein were analyzed using Chimera (Table 6). The results indicated that Mod13AApi interacts with many of the residues of the S-RBD involved in the interaction with ACE2. Thus, the peptide might successfully inhibit the interaction of the S-RBD and variants with ACE2. Further, to check the stability of binding of the PI to the wild type and the variants of SARS-CoV-2 S-RBD, we performed the molecular dynamic (MD) simulation study.
Docking of SARS-CoV-2 Spike receptor-binding domain (S-RBD) of variants with Mod13AApi. A Docking of B.1.1.7 S-RBD with Mod13AApi. B Docking of B.1.351 S-RBD with Mod13AApi. C Docking of P.1 S-RBD with Mod13AApi. D Docking of B.1.617.1 S-RBD with Mod13AApi. E Docking of B.1.617.2 S-RBD with Mod13AApi. F Docking of B.1.617.3 S-RBD with Mod13AApi. B.1.1.7, B.1.351, P.1, B.1.617.1, B.1.617.2, and B.1.617.3 S-RBDs are colored in Violet and Mod13AApi is in Red. The 3 Å interacting residue in S-RBDs with the Mod13AApi are colored in Green along with a 3-letter amino acid code and residue number
Molecular Dynamic (MD) Simulation of WT SARS-CoV-2 and Its Variants Spike Protein Receptor-Binding Domain (S-RBD) with Mod13AApi
The docking complexes of WT SARS-CoV-2 and its variants S-RBD with Mod13AApi were next subjected to MD simulation to determine the stability of the protein-peptide complexes. MD simulation of 500 ns was performed for each of the complex using the GROMACS program. Analysis of root mean squared deviations (RMSD) throughout the MD trajectory suggested no significant fluctuations in the ACE2 binding interface of the SARS-CoV-2 and its variants S-RBD (Fig. 4). Moreover, no significant changes in the radius of gyration and fraction of native contacts were observed, suggesting an overall stability of the protein-peptide complexes (Fig. 5). The Mod13AApi peptide initially showed significant fluctuations from the docking predicted binding mode, which more or less stabilized after 400 ns (Fig. 4) for most of the SARS-CoV-2 variants S-RBD. Slight conformational and positional rearrangement might have accounted for most of the deviations and fluctuations as Mod13AApi remained bound to WT SARS-CoV-2 and its variants S-RBD for the entire 500 ns MD trajectory (Fig. 4). To further estimate the energetics of Mod13AApi binding to WT SARS-CoV-2 and its variants S-RBD, MM-PBSA analysis was performed using full 500 ns MD trajectory which revealed favorable binding energies (Table 7). However, contrary to docking studies, MM-PBSA binding energy calculation revealed stronger binding of Mod13AApi to B.1.1.7 S-RBD when compared with WT SARS-CoV-2 S-RBD. Predicted binding affinity of Mod13AApi to B.1.351 S-RBD and B.1.617.3 S-RBD was also more or less similar to WT SARS-CoV-2 S-RBD. Our MD simulation study suggests that further optimization of Mod13AApi may be necessary to improve its binding to SARS-CoV-2 S-RBD variants.
Molecular dynamics simulation to study the dynamics of Mod13AApi in complex with WT SARS-CoV-2 and its variants S-RBD. Root mean squared deviation (RMSD) of Spike protein, Mod13AApi and protein-peptide interface of A WT with Mod13AApi. B B.1.1.7 S-RBD with Mod13AApi. C B.1.351 S-RBD with Mod13AApi. D P.1 S-RBD with Mod13AApi. E B.1.617.1 S-RBD with Mod13AApi. F B.1.617.2 S-RBD with Mod13AApi. G B.1.617.3 S-RBD with Mod13AApi
Physicochemical and ADMET Analysis
Knowledge of the physicochemical properties of any therapeutic molecule is crucial before in vitro, in vivo, or preclinical applications. These properties can aid many steps, from synthesizing the molecule to determining its chemical nature and solubility factor. While designing the peptide inhibitor (PI) for SARS-CoV-2 S-RBD, these factors also played a key role. After analyzing the binding specificity of Mod13AApi with the WT Spike-RBD as well as with the variants, we analyzed the detailed physicochemical properties of this peptide and performed a predictive analysis of their ADMET properties in the host (Table 8). Briefly, protein or peptide solubility depends on several factors, including amino acid composition, hydrophobic and hydrophilic properties, polar and non-polar groups, molecular weight, and pH of the medium. In addition, the isoelectric point (pI) of the peptide also helps in predicting the solubility of the peptide in an aqueous medium. Protein-water interactions increase at pH values significantly above or below the pI value as the protein carries positive and negative charges, whereas minimal interactions are observed when the pH is close to the pI value. Similarly, peptide displays a high solubility and dissolve in an aqueous medium when they have > 25% charged residues and < 25% hydrophobic residues, provided that their polar and non-polar residues are evenly distributed along the sequence. The predicted values of the molecular weight, pI, and net charge at a neutral pH will help determine the condition of the solubility of the aqueous medium. In contrast, in our results, the significantly lower hydrophobicity value of the peptide (15.38%), the higher charge percentage, and the regular distribution of acidic and basic residues ensure the high solubility of the PI as listed in Table 8. In terms of stability and half-life, Mod13AApi is predicted to be stable with a half-life of 2.8 h. The instability index obtained from the ProtParam tool indicates that a numeric value of 40 or below for any peptide is considered highly stable; the instability index of Mod13AApi was 26.8, thus suggesting a stable structure.
On the other hand, to further understand how these PI behave in a biological system, we performed an in-silico prediction of its ADMET property, as shown in Table 8. ADMET properties define the absorption in the body in terms of water solubility and skin permeability, and our results suggest that our PI has good water solubility and low skin permeability values. Furthermore, the PI showed a below threshold value for crossing the blood–brain barrier or having central nervous system permeability. In addition, the PI is neither an inhibitor nor substrate of cytochrome P. In terms of toxicity, our prediction suggests that the PI is safe and displays no skin toxicity or carcinogenic toxicity. We also predicted the maximum recommended tolerated dose for humans, which was below the maximum set value of 0.477 mg/kg/day (Table 8).
Conclusion
In this study, we designed a novel peptide that could effectively inhibit the interaction of the wild-type SARS-CoV-2 as well as its variants (B.1.1.7 or Alpha, B.1.351 or Beta, P.1 or Gamma, B.1.617.1 or Kappa, B.1.617.2 or Delta, and B.1.617.3 or Delta +) Spike protein with the host cell ACE2 receptor, thereby blocking the cellular entry of SARS-CoV-2 and its variants. The peptide inhibitor (Mod13AApi) designed in our study displayed high specificity and affinity toward their target spike proteins and bears good physicochemical and ADMET properties. This peptide has several advantages, including economical and ease of synthesis due to its short length, low toxicity, and high target specificity and selectivity. This study indicates that designed PI could be further tested and developed as selective therapeutic candidates for COVID-19.
Data Availability
All the data and material have been provided in the manuscript and/or supplementary data.
Code Availability
Not applicable.
References
Abraham MJ, Murtola T, Schulz R, Páll S, Smith JC, Hess B, Lindahl EJS (2015) GROMACS: High performance molecular simulations through multi-level parallelism from laptops to supercomputers. SoftwareX 1(1):19–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.softx.2015.06.001
Baig MS, Alagumuthu M, Rajpoot S, Saqib U (2020) Identification of a potential peptide inhibitor of SARS-CoV-2 targeting its entry into the host cells. Drugs R D 20(3):161–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40268-020-00312-5
Bian J, Li Z (2021) Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2): SARS-CoV-2 receptor and RAS modulator. Acta Pharm Sin B 11(1):1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsb.2020.10.006
Bosch BJ, van der Zee R, de Haan CA, Rottier PJ (2003) The coronavirus spike protein is a class I virus fusion protein: structural and functional characterization of the fusion core complex. J Virol 77(16):8801–8811. https://doi.org/10.1128/jvi.77.16.8801-8811.2003
Craik DJ, Fairlie DP, Liras S, Price D (2013) The future of peptide-based drugs. Chem Biol Drug Des 81(1):136–147. https://doi.org/10.1111/cbdd.12055
Davidson AM, Wysocki J, Batlle D (2020) Interaction of SARS-CoV-2 and other coronavirus with ACE (angiotensin-converting enzyme)-2 as their main receptor: therapeutic implications. Hypertension 76(5):1339–1349. https://doi.org/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.120.15256
Dejnirattisai W, Zhou D, Supasa P, Liu C, Mentzer AJ, Ginn HM, Zhao Y, Duyvesteyn HME, Tuekprakhon A, Nutalai R, Wang B, López-Camacho C, Slon-Campos J, Walter TS, Skelly D, Costa Clemens SA, Naveca FG, Nascimento V, Nascimento F, Fernandes da Costa C, Resende PC, Pauvolid-Correa A, Siqueira MM, Dold C, Levin R, Dong T, Pollard AJ, Knight JC, Crook D, Lambe T, Clutterbuck E, Bibi S, Flaxman A, Bittaye M, Belij-Rammerstorfer S, Gilbert SC, Carroll MW, Klenerman P, Barnes E, Dunachie SJ, Paterson NG, Williams MA, Hall DR, Hulswit RJG, Bowden TA, Fry EE, Mongkolsapaya J, Ren J, Stuart DI, Screaton GR (2021) Antibody evasion by the P.1 strain of SARS-CoV-2. Cell 184(11):2939–2954. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2021.03.055
Garcia-Beltran WF, Lam EC, Denis KS, Nitido AD, Garcia ZH, Hauser BM, Feldman J, Pavlovic MN, Gregory DJ, Poznansky MC, Sigal A, Schmidt AG, Iafrate AJ, Naranbhai V, Balazs AB (2021) Multiple SARS-CoV-2 variants escape neutralization by vaccine-induced humoral immunity. Cell 184(9):2372–2383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2021.03.013
Gasteiger E, Hoogland C, Gattiker A, Duvaud SE, Wilkins MR, Appel RD, Bairoch A (2005) Protein identification and analysis tools on the ExPASy server. In: Walker JM (ed) The proteomics protocols handbook. Humana Press, Totowa, pp 571–607
Gómez CE, Perdiguero B, Esteban M (2021) Emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants and impact in global vaccination programs against SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19. Vaccines 9(3):243
Han Y, Kral P (2020) Computational design of ACE2-based peptide inhibitors of SARS-CoV-2. ACS Nano 14(4):5143–5147. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.0c02857
Hoffmann M, Hofmann-Winkler H, Krüger N, Kempf A, Nehlmeier I, Graichen L, Arora P, Sidarovich A, Moldenhauer AS, Winkler MS, Schulz S, Jäck H-M, Stankov MV, Behrens GMN, Pohlmann S (2021) SARS-CoV-2 variant B.1.617 is resistant to bamlanivimab and evades antibodies induced by infection and vaccination. Cell Rep. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109415
Hunter JD (2007) Matplotlib: a 2D graphics environment. Comput Sci Eng 9(03):90–95
Jaiswal G, Kumar V (2020) In-silico design of a potential inhibitor of SARS-CoV-2 S protein. PLoS ONE 15(10):e0240004. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240004
Jimenez-Garcia B, Pons C, Fernandez-Recio J (2013) pyDockWEB: a web server for rigid-body protein-protein docking using electrostatics and desolvation scoring. Bioinformatics 29(13):1698–1699. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btt262
Khan A, Zia T, Suleman M, Khan T, Ali SS, Abbasi AA, Mohammad A, Wei DQ (2021) Higher infectivity of the SARS-CoV-2 new variants is associated with K417N/T, E484K, and N501Y mutants: an insight from structural data. J Cell Physiol. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcp.30367
Kim YJ, Jang US, Soh SM, Lee JY, Lee HR (2021) The impact on infectivity and neutralization efficiency of SARS-CoV-2 lineage B.1.351 pseudovirus. Viruses. https://doi.org/10.3390/v13040633
Korber B, Fischer WM, Gnanakaran S, Yoon H, Theiler J, Abfalterer W, Hengartner N, Giorgi EE, Bhattacharya T, Foley B, Hastie KM, Parker MD, Partridge DG, Evans CM, Freeman TM, de Silva TI; Sheffield COVID-19 Genomics Group, McDanal C, Perez LG, Tang H, Moon-Walker A, Whelan SP, LaBranche CC, Saphire EO, Montefiori DC (2020) Tracking changes in SARS-CoV-2 spike: evidence that D614G increases infectivity of the COVID-19 virus. Cell 182(4):812–827. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2020.06.043
Kumari R, Kumar R, Lynn A, Open Source Drug Discovery Consortium (2014) g_mmpbsa—a GROMACS tool for high-throughput MM-PBSA calculations. J Chem Inf Model 54(7):1951–1962
Kuzmina A, Khalaila Y, Voloshin O, Keren-Naus A, Boehm-Cohen L, Raviv Y, Shemer-Avni Y, Rosenberg E, Taube R (2021) SARS-CoV-2 spike variants exhibit differential infectivity and neutralization resistance to convalescent or post-vaccination sera. Cell Host Microbe 29(4):522–528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chom.2021.03.008
Lear S, Cobb SL (2016) Pep-Calc.com: a set of web utilities for the calculation of peptide and peptoid properties and automatic mass spectral peak assignment. J Comput Aided Mol Des 30(3):271–277. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10822-016-9902-7
Lee AC, Harris JL, Khanna KK, Hong JH (2019) A comprehensive review on current advances in peptide drug development and design. Int J Mol Sci. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20102383
Li R, Liu J, Zhang H (2021) The challenge of emerging SARS-CoV-2 mutants to vaccine development. J Genet Genom 48(2):102–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgg.2021.03.001
Lindorff-Larsen K, Piana S, Palmo K, Maragakis P, Klepeis JL, Dror RO, Shaw DE (2010) Improved side-chain torsion potentials for the Amber ff99SB protein force field. Proteins Struct Funct Bioinform 78(8):1950–1958
Machhi J, Herskovitz J, Senan AM, Dutta D, Nath B, Oleynikov MD, Blomberg WR, Meigs DD, Hasan M, Patel M, Kline P, Chang RC, Chang L, Gendelman HE, Kevadiya BD (2020) The natural history, pathobiology, and clinical manifestations of SARS-CoV-2 infections. J Neuroimmune Pharmacol 15(3):359–386. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11481-020-09944-5
McGibbon RT, Beauchamp KA, Harrigan MP, Klein C, Swails JM, Hernández CX, Schwantes CR, Wang LP, Lane TJ, Pande VS (2015) MDTraj: a modern open library for the analysis of molecular dynamics trajectories. Biophys J 109(8):1528–1532
Michaud-Agrawal N, Denning EJ, Woolf TB, Beckstein O (2011) MDAnalysis: a toolkit for the analysis of molecular dynamics simulations. J Comput Chem 32(10):2319–2327
Ni W, Yang X, Yang D, Bao J, Li R, **ao Y, Hou C, Wang H, Liu J, Yang D, Xu Y, Cao Z, Gao Z (2020) Role of angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) in COVID-19. Crit Care 24(1):422. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-020-03120-0
Pedregosa F, Varoquaux G, Gramfort A, Michel V, Thirion B, Grisel O, Blondel M, Prettenhofer P, Weiss R, Dubourg V, Vanderplas J (2011) Scikit-learn: machine learning in python. J Mach Learn Res 12:2825–2830
Pettersen EF, Goddard TD, Huang CC, Couch GS, Greenblatt DM, Meng EC, Ferrin TE (2004) UCSF chimera–a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J Comput Chem 25(13):1605–1612. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.20084
Pires DE, Blundell TL, Ascher DB (2015) pkCSM: predicting small-molecule pharmacokinetic and toxicity properties using graph-based signatures. J Med Chem 58(9):4066–4072. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.5b00104
R: A language and environment for statistical computing. (2013). R Core Team [Mobile application software]. https://www.R-project.org/
Ramanathan M, Ferguson ID, Miao W, Khavari PA (2021) SARS-CoV-2 B. 11. 7 and B. 1.351 spike variants bind human ACE2 with increased affinity. Lancet Infect Dis. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(21)00262-0
Schneidman-Duhovny D, Inbar Y, Nussinov R, Wolfson HJ (2005) PatchDock and SymmDock: servers for rigid and symmetric docking. Nucleic Acids Res 33(Web Server):W363-367. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gki481
Schutz D, Ruiz-Blanco YB, Munch J, Kirchhoff F, Sanchez-Garcia E, Muller JA (2020) Peptide and peptide-based inhibitors of SARS-CoV-2 entry. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 167:47–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2020.11.007
Shah M, Ahmad B, Choi S, Woo HG (2020a) Mutations in the SARS-CoV-2 spike RBD are responsible for stronger ACE2 binding and poor anti-SARS-CoV mAbs cross-neutralization. Comput Struct Biotechnol J 18:3402–3414
Shang J, Wan Y, Luo C, Ye G, Geng Q, Auerbach A, Li F (2020) Cell entry mechanisms of SARS-CoV-2. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 117(21):11727–11734. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2003138117
Sharma A, Singla D, Rashid M, Raghava GP (2014) Designing of peptides with desired half-life in intestine-like environment. BMC Bioinform 15:282. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-15-282
Sun LJMCA (2013) Peptide-based drug development. Mod Chem Appl 1(1):1–2
Systèmes D (2020) BIOVIA, discovery studio visualizer, release 2019. Dassault Systèmes, San Diego
Tang T, Bidon M, Jaimes JA, Whittaker GR, Daniel S (2020) Coronavirus membrane fusion mechanism offers a potential target for antiviral development. Antivir Res 178:104792. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.antiviral.2020.104792
V’Kovski P, Kratzel A, Steiner S, Stalder H, Thiel V (2021) Coronavirus biology and replication: implications for SARS-CoV-2. Nat Rev Microbiol 19(3):155–170. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41579-020-00468-6
Volz E, Hill V, McCrone JT, Price A, Jorgensen D, O′Toole Á, Southgate J, Johnson R, Jackson B, Nascimento FF, Rey SM, Nicholls SM, Colquhoun RM, da Silva Filipe A, Shepherd J, Pascall DJ, Shah R, Jesudason N, Li K, Jarrett R, Pacchiarini N, Bull M, Geidelberg L, Siveroni I; COG-UK Consortium, Goodfellow I, Loman NJ, Pybus OG, Robertson DL, Thomson EC, Rambaut A, Connor TR (2021) Evaluating the effects of SARS-CoV-2 Spike mutation D614G on transmissibility and pathogenicity. Cell 184(1):64–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2020.11.020
Wang P, Nair MS, Liu L, Iketani S, Luo Y, Guo Y, Wang M, Yu J, Zhang B, Kwong PD, Graham BS, Mascola JR, Chang JY, Yin MT, Sobieszczyk M, Kyratsous CA, Shapiro L, Sheng Z, Huang Y, Ho DD (2021a) Antibody resistance of SARS-CoV-2 variants B.1.351 and B.1.1.7. Nature 593(7857):130–135. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03398-2
Wang R, Chen J, Gao K, Wei GW (2021b) Vaccine-escape and fast-growing mutations in the United Kingdom, the United States, Singapore, Spain, India, and other COVID-19-devastated countries. Genomics 113(4):2158–2170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygeno.2021.05.006
Weisblum Y, Schmidt F, Zhang F, DaSilva J, Poston D, Lorenzi JC, Muecksch F, Rutkowska M, Hoffmann HH, Michailidis E, Gaebler C, Agudelo M, Cho A, Wang Z, Gazumyan A, Cipolla M, Luchsinger L, Hillyer CD, Caskey M, Robbiani DF, Rice CM, Nussenzweig MC, Hatziioannou T, Bieniasz PD (2020) Escape from neutralizing antibodies by SARS-CoV-2 spike protein variants. Elife. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.61312
Xu X, Chen P, Wang J, Feng J, Zhou H, Li X, Zhong W, Hao P (2020) Evolution of the novel coronavirus from the ongoing Wuhan outbreak and modeling of its spike protein for risk of human transmission. Sci China Life Sci 63(3):457–460. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11427-020-1637-5
Zapadka KL, Becher FJ, Gomes Dos Santos AL, Jackson SE (2017) Factors affecting the physical stability (aggregation) of peptide therapeutics. Interface Focus 7(6):20170030. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsfs.2017.0030
Zhang G, Pomplun S, Loftis AR, Tan X, Loas A, Pentelute BJB (2020) Investigation of ACE2 N-terminal fragments binding to SARS-CoV-2 Spike RBD. BioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.03.19.999318
Zhou P, ** B, Li H, Huang SY (2018) HPEPDOCK: a web server for blind peptide-protein docking based on a hierarchical algorithm. Nucleic Acids Res 46(W1):W443–W450. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gky357
Zhou D, Dejnirattisai W, Supasa P, Liu C, Mentzer AJ, Ginn HM, Zhao Y, Duyvesteyn HME, Tuekprakhon A, Nutalai R, Wang B, Paesen GC, Lopez-Camacho C, Slon-Campos J, Hallis B, Coombes N, Bewley K, Charlton S, Walter TS, Skelly D, Lumley SF, Dold C, Levin R, Dong T, Pollard AJ, Knight JC, Crook D, Lambe T, Clutterbuck E, Bibi S, Flaxman A, Bittaye M, Belij-Rammerstorfer S, Gilbert S, James W, Carroll MW, Klenerman P, Barnes E, Dunachie SJ, Fry EE, Mongkolsapaya J, Ren J, Stuart DI, Screaton GR (2021) Evidence of escape of SARS-CoV-2 variant B.1.351 from natural and vaccine-induced sera. Cell 184(9):2348–2361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2021.02.037
Acknowledgements
The authors gratefully acknowledge the Indian Institute of Technology Indore (IITI) for providing facilities and other support. This work was supported by Cumulative Professional Development Allowance (CPDA) from the Indian Institute of Technology Indore (IITI) to MSB. We acknowledge RIKEN ACCC for the supercomputing resources at the Hokusai BigWaterfall supercomputer used in this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
MSB conceived, designed, and executed the research. SR, KS, and AK executed the research, compiled, and analyzed the data. MSB has written and reviewed the manuscript. QP supervised and reviewed the manuscript. KYJZ, SP, RS, SF, and RS reviewed and edited the manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
All the authors have declared that they have no competing interests.
Consent for Publication
All authors permit the publication.
Ethical Approval
Not applicable.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rajpoot, S., Solanki, K., Kumar, A. et al. In-Silico Design of a Novel Tridecapeptide Targeting Spike Protein of SARS-CoV-2 Variants of Concern. Int J Pept Res Ther 28, 28 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10989-021-10339-0
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10989-021-10339-0