Abstract
This article shows how the self-determined learning environment in Paths, an innovative teacher-education (TE) program, enables students to experience meaningful learning which reinforces their mental wellbeing and resilience. According to the self-determination theory (SDT), a central goal of such a learning environment is to support students' three basic emotional and social needs of self-capacity, autonomy, and relatedness and connections with others. While the Paths program trains the students to be high-school teachers, and coaches them to be mentors for youth at risk (YAR), about half of these students define themselves as having been YAR who suffered from a low level of resilience and mental wellbeing in their adolescence. Using the self-determined learning environment, Paths fosters students as self-determined learners in many courses which use methods like Project-Based Learning (PBL), Self-Determined Learning (Heutagogy), Outdoor Training (ODT), and Self-Management Learning (SML). In kee** with the qualitative multiple-case study method, semi-structured interviews with four Paths graduates and examples of other graduates' learning presentations demonstrated that graduates’ learning experiences supported their emotional and social needs and strengthened their feelings of resilience and mental wellbeing during and after the learning. The graduates testified that this learning environment helped them to become entrepreneurs and empowering educators, as well as social and environmental activists. These findings reveal the productive contribution of the self-determined learning environment to students' development as teachers and YAR mentors, and as social and environmental leaders.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Antonovsky, A. (1996). The salutogenic model as a theory to guide health promotion. Health Promotion International, 11(1), 11–18. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/11.1.11
Azungah, T. (2018). Qualitative research: Deductive and inductive approaches to data analysis. Qualitative Research Journal, 18(4), 383–400.
Blaschke, L. M. (2018). Self-determined learning (heutagogy) and digital media creating integrated educational environments for develo** lifelong learning skills. In D. Kergel, B. Heidkamp, P. Telléus, T. Rachwal, & S. Nowakowski (Eds.), The digital turn in higher education. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-19925-8_10
Buckner, J. S., Mezzacappa, E., & Beardslee, W. R. (2009). Self-regulation and its relations to adaptive functioning in low income youths. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 79(1), 19–30. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014796
Brumovská, T. (2007). Mentors as mediators and significant adults: The role of mentors and their influence in the Czech and Swedish mentoring relationships. University of Goteborg.
Cox, S. E. (2014). Perceptions and influences behind teaching practices: Do teachers teach as they were taught? Master of Science thesis, Brigham Young University. Retrieved from https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=6300&context=etd.
Cunningham, I. (1994). The myths of self-managed learning. Management Development Review, 7(5), 3–6.
Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71–75. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13
Diener, E., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Beyond money: Toward an economy of well-being. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 5(1), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-7214
Durlak, J. A., Weissberg, R. P., Dymnicki, A. B., Taylor, R. D., & Schellinger, K. B. (2011). The impact of enhancing students’ social and emotional learning: A meta-analysis of school-based universal interventions. Child Development, 82, 405–432.
Etzion, D., & Romi, S. (2015). Typology of youth at risk. Children and Youth Services Review, 59, 184–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2015.10.017
Fraser, B. J. (1998). Classroom environment instruments: Development, validity and applications. Learning Environments Research, 1(1), 7–33.
Fraser, B. J. (2002). Learning environments research: Yesterday, today and tomorrow. In S. C. Goh & M. S. Khine (Eds.), Studies in educational learning environments: An international perspective (pp. 1–25). World Scientific Publishing Co.
Fullan, M., & Langworthy, M. (2013). Towards a new end: New pedagogies for deep learning. Pearson.
Glassner, A., & Back, S. (2020). Exploring heutagogy in higher education–Academia meeting the Zeitgeist. Springer.
Glassner, A., & Zoran-Eran, Y. (2015). Place based learning: Action learning in MA program for educational practitioners. Action Learning: Research and Practice, 13(1), 23–37.
Grant, L., Kinman, G., & Baker, S. (2015). Put on your own oxygen mask before assisting others’: Social work educators’ perspectives on an ‘emotional curriculum. British Journal of Social Work, 45(8), 2351–2367. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcu066
Hase, S., & Kenyon, C. (2000). From andragogy to heutagogy. Ulti BASE. Retrieved from http://pandora.nla.gov.au/nph-wb/20010220130000/http://ultibase.rmit.edu.au/New/newdec00.html.
Hase, S., & Kenyon, C. (Eds.). (2013). Self-determined learning: Heutagogy in action. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Huppert, F., & So, T. Y. (2013). Flourishing across Europe: Application of a new conceptual framework for defining well-being. Social Indicators Research, 120(3), 837–861. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-011-9966-7
Jang, H., Kim, E.-J., & Reeve, J. (2016). Why students become more engaged or more disengaged during the semester: A self-determination theory dual-process model. Learning and Instruction, 43, 27–38.
Kennedy, M. M. (1999). The role of preservice teacher education. In L. Darling-Hammond & G. Sykes (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of teaching and policy (p. 55). Jossey Bass.
Krajcik, J. S., Czerniak, C. M., & Berger, C. F. (1999). Teaching science: A project-based approach. McGraw-Hill College.
Luthar, S.S., Cicchetti, D., & Becker, B, (2000). The construct of resilience: A critical evaluation and guidelines for future work. Child Development, 71(3) 543–562. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1885202/.
Marshall, C. (1991). Teachers’ learning styles: How they affect student learning. Clearing House, 64(4), 225–227. https://doi.org/10.1080/00098655.1991.9955852
McDonnell, A., Myfanwy, L., & Read, S. (2000). Practical considerations in case study research: The relationship between methodology and process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 32(2), 383–390.
Mudrak, J., & Zabrodska, K. (2015). Childhood giftedness, adolescent agency: A systemic multiple-case study. Gifted Child Quarterly, 59(1), 55–70.
Oleson, A., & Hora, M. T. (2014). Teaching the way they were taught? Revisiting the sources of teaching knowledge and the role of prior experience in sha** faculty teaching practices. Higher Education, 68(1), 29–45.
Reeve, J., & Shin, S. H. (2020). How teachers can support students’ agentic engagement. Theory into Practice, 59(2), 150–161.
Reichart, R., & Granit-Dgani, D. (2017). Democracy in classrooms: The story of democratic teacher education. In M. Ben-Peretz & S. Feiman-Nemser (Eds.), An arena for educational ideologies: Current practices in teacher education programs. Rowman & Littlefield Education and MOFET.
Rogers, C. (1969). Freedom to learn. Charles E. Merrill Company.
Romi, S. (2007). Child and youth care: Development and central issues. In S. Romi & M. Schmida (Eds.), Nonformal education in a changing reality (pp. 231–249). Magnes Press (Hebrew).
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78.
Schwarzer, R., & Warner, L. M. (2013). Perceived self-efficacy and its relationship to resilience. In S. Prince-Embury & D. H. Saklofske (Eds.), The Springer series on human exceptionality: Resilience in children, adolescents, and adults: Translating research into practice (pp. 139–150). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4939-3_10
Seligman, M. E. P., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive psychology: An introduction. American Psychologist, 55(1), 5–14. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.5
Shanahan, L., Steinhoff, A., Bechtiger, L., Murray, A. L., Nivette, A., Hepp, U., Ribeaud, D., & Eisner, M. (2020). Emotional distress in young adults during the COVID-19 pandemic: Evidence of risk and resilience from a longitudinal cohort study. Psychological Medicine, 23, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1017/S003329172000241X
Sobel, D. (2008). Children and nature: Design principles for educators. Stenhouse Publishers.
Stake, R. E. (2006). Multiple case study analysis. The Guilford Press.
Stewart-Brown, S. (2015). Measuring wellbeing: What does the Warwick-Edinburgh mental well-being scale have to offer integrated care? European Journal of Integrative Medicine, 7(4), 384–388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eujim.2014.08.004
Wagner, R. J., & Christopher, C. R. (1992). How effective is outdoor training? Training & Development, 46(7), 61–62.
Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Sage.
Zolkoski, S. M., & Bullock, L. M. (2012). Resilience in children and youth: A review. Children and Youth Services Review, 34(12), 2295–2303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2012.08.009
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Glassner, A. Training youth at risk mentors in Paths, an innovative TE program: promoting resilience, mental wellbeing and meaningful learning through a self-determined learning environment. Learning Environ Res 25, 841–857 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-021-09391-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-021-09391-w