Log in

Training youth at risk mentors in Paths, an innovative TE program: promoting resilience, mental wellbeing and meaningful learning through a self-determined learning environment

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Learning Environments Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article shows how the self-determined learning environment in Paths, an innovative teacher-education (TE) program, enables students to experience meaningful learning which reinforces their mental wellbeing and resilience. According to the self-determination theory (SDT), a central goal of such a learning environment is to support students' three basic emotional and social needs of self-capacity, autonomy, and relatedness and connections with others. While the Paths program trains the students to be high-school teachers, and coaches them to be mentors for youth at risk (YAR), about half of these students define themselves as having been YAR who suffered from a low level of resilience and mental wellbeing in their adolescence. Using the self-determined learning environment, Paths fosters students as self-determined learners in many courses which use methods like Project-Based Learning (PBL), Self-Determined Learning (Heutagogy), Outdoor Training (ODT), and Self-Management Learning (SML). In kee** with the qualitative multiple-case study method, semi-structured interviews with four Paths graduates and examples of other graduates' learning presentations demonstrated that graduates’ learning experiences supported their emotional and social needs and strengthened their feelings of resilience and mental wellbeing during and after the learning. The graduates testified that this learning environment helped them to become entrepreneurs and empowering educators, as well as social and environmental activists. These findings reveal the productive contribution of the self-determined learning environment to students' development as teachers and YAR mentors, and as social and environmental leaders.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Antonovsky, A. (1996). The salutogenic model as a theory to guide health promotion. Health Promotion International, 11(1), 11–18. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/11.1.11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azungah, T. (2018). Qualitative research: Deductive and inductive approaches to data analysis. Qualitative Research Journal, 18(4), 383–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blaschke, L. M. (2018). Self-determined learning (heutagogy) and digital media creating integrated educational environments for develo** lifelong learning skills. In D. Kergel, B. Heidkamp, P. Telléus, T. Rachwal, & S. Nowakowski (Eds.), The digital turn in higher education. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-19925-8_10

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Buckner, J. S., Mezzacappa, E., & Beardslee, W. R. (2009). Self-regulation and its relations to adaptive functioning in low income youths. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 79(1), 19–30. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014796

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brumovská, T. (2007). Mentors as mediators and significant adults: The role of mentors and their influence in the Czech and Swedish mentoring relationships. University of Goteborg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, S. E. (2014). Perceptions and influences behind teaching practices: Do teachers teach as they were taught? Master of Science thesis, Brigham Young University. Retrieved from https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=6300&context=etd.

  • Cunningham, I. (1994). The myths of self-managed learning. Management Development Review, 7(5), 3–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71–75. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Beyond money: Toward an economy of well-being. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 5(1), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-7214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durlak, J. A., Weissberg, R. P., Dymnicki, A. B., Taylor, R. D., & Schellinger, K. B. (2011). The impact of enhancing students’ social and emotional learning: A meta-analysis of school-based universal interventions. Child Development, 82, 405–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Etzion, D., & Romi, S. (2015). Typology of youth at risk. Children and Youth Services Review, 59, 184–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2015.10.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, B. J. (1998). Classroom environment instruments: Development, validity and applications. Learning Environments Research, 1(1), 7–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, B. J. (2002). Learning environments research: Yesterday, today and tomorrow. In S. C. Goh & M. S. Khine (Eds.), Studies in educational learning environments: An international perspective (pp. 1–25). World Scientific Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fullan, M., & Langworthy, M. (2013). Towards a new end: New pedagogies for deep learning. Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glassner, A., & Back, S. (2020). Exploring heutagogy in higher education–Academia meeting the Zeitgeist. Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Glassner, A., & Zoran-Eran, Y. (2015). Place based learning: Action learning in MA program for educational practitioners. Action Learning: Research and Practice, 13(1), 23–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, L., Kinman, G., & Baker, S. (2015). Put on your own oxygen mask before assisting others’: Social work educators’ perspectives on an ‘emotional curriculum. British Journal of Social Work, 45(8), 2351–2367. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcu066

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hase, S., & Kenyon, C. (2000). From andragogy to heutagogy. Ulti BASE. Retrieved from http://pandora.nla.gov.au/nph-wb/20010220130000/http://ultibase.rmit.edu.au/New/newdec00.html.

  • Hase, S., & Kenyon, C. (Eds.). (2013). Self-determined learning: Heutagogy in action. Bloomsbury Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huppert, F., & So, T. Y. (2013). Flourishing across Europe: Application of a new conceptual framework for defining well-being. Social Indicators Research, 120(3), 837–861. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-011-9966-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jang, H., Kim, E.-J., & Reeve, J. (2016). Why students become more engaged or more disengaged during the semester: A self-determination theory dual-process model. Learning and Instruction, 43, 27–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, M. M. (1999). The role of preservice teacher education. In L. Darling-Hammond & G. Sykes (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of teaching and policy (p. 55). Jossey Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krajcik, J. S., Czerniak, C. M., & Berger, C. F. (1999). Teaching science: A project-based approach. McGraw-Hill College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luthar, S.S., Cicchetti, D., & Becker, B, (2000). The construct of resilience: A critical evaluation and guidelines for future work. Child Development, 71(3) 543–562. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1885202/.

  • Marshall, C. (1991). Teachers’ learning styles: How they affect student learning. Clearing House, 64(4), 225–227. https://doi.org/10.1080/00098655.1991.9955852

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonnell, A., Myfanwy, L., & Read, S. (2000). Practical considerations in case study research: The relationship between methodology and process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 32(2), 383–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mudrak, J., & Zabrodska, K. (2015). Childhood giftedness, adolescent agency: A systemic multiple-case study. Gifted Child Quarterly, 59(1), 55–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oleson, A., & Hora, M. T. (2014). Teaching the way they were taught? Revisiting the sources of teaching knowledge and the role of prior experience in sha** faculty teaching practices. Higher Education, 68(1), 29–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reeve, J., & Shin, S. H. (2020). How teachers can support students’ agentic engagement. Theory into Practice, 59(2), 150–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reichart, R., & Granit-Dgani, D. (2017). Democracy in classrooms: The story of democratic teacher education. In M. Ben-Peretz & S. Feiman-Nemser (Eds.), An arena for educational ideologies: Current practices in teacher education programs. Rowman & Littlefield Education and MOFET.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, C. (1969). Freedom to learn. Charles E. Merrill Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romi, S. (2007). Child and youth care: Development and central issues. In S. Romi & M. Schmida (Eds.), Nonformal education in a changing reality (pp. 231–249). Magnes Press (Hebrew).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarzer, R., & Warner, L. M. (2013). Perceived self-efficacy and its relationship to resilience. In S. Prince-Embury & D. H. Saklofske (Eds.), The Springer series on human exceptionality: Resilience in children, adolescents, and adults: Translating research into practice (pp. 139–150). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4939-3_10

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Seligman, M. E. P., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive psychology: An introduction. American Psychologist, 55(1), 5–14. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shanahan, L., Steinhoff, A., Bechtiger, L., Murray, A. L., Nivette, A., Hepp, U., Ribeaud, D., & Eisner, M. (2020). Emotional distress in young adults during the COVID-19 pandemic: Evidence of risk and resilience from a longitudinal cohort study. Psychological Medicine, 23, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1017/S003329172000241X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sobel, D. (2008). Children and nature: Design principles for educators. Stenhouse Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stake, R. E. (2006). Multiple case study analysis. The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart-Brown, S. (2015). Measuring wellbeing: What does the Warwick-Edinburgh mental well-being scale have to offer integrated care? European Journal of Integrative Medicine, 7(4), 384–388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eujim.2014.08.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, R. J., & Christopher, C. R. (1992). How effective is outdoor training? Training & Development, 46(7), 61–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zolkoski, S. M., & Bullock, L. M. (2012). Resilience in children and youth: A review. Children and Youth Services Review, 34(12), 2295–2303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2012.08.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amnon Glassner.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Glassner, A. Training youth at risk mentors in Paths, an innovative TE program: promoting resilience, mental wellbeing and meaningful learning through a self-determined learning environment. Learning Environ Res 25, 841–857 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-021-09391-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-021-09391-w

Keywords

Navigation