SpringerLink
Log in

Optimizing FACTS devices location and sizing in integrated wind power networks using Tuna Swarm Optimization Algorithm

  • Published:
Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study aims to address the problem of optimal power flow (OPF) in electrical networks by integrating wind power production FACTS devices. The main objectives of this study include minimizing generating costs, reducing power loss, enhancing the voltage profile of the system, and increasing its load ability. In this study, the tuna swarm optimization algorithm (TSO) is utilized as a novel meta-heuristic technique to optimize electrical networks to incorporate FACTS devices and stochastic wind energy production. To account for wind power, a model based on the Weibull probability density function is utilized to identify the optimal values of the decision variables. The study compares several objective functions, including minimization of fuel cost and active power loss across the transmission system, and simulates the test system consisting of TCSC, TCPS, and SVC using the IEEE 30-bus system as a network for examining system parameters. The efficacy of the TSO methodology is explored and compared to other traditional approaches in the paper. The simulation findings of the study show that by lowering the overall power cost and power losses, TSO is more successful in determining the OPF's ideal solution. The results show that the TSO algorithm performs better than driving training-based optimization (DTBO), Coulomb–Franklin’s algorithm (CFA), and whale optimization algorithm (WOA) since it can handle more difficult OPF issues with a lower convergence rate. When comparing the four methods, for instance, TSO produced a noticeable improvement. It was able to successfully reduce the cost function to 807.454 $/h which is better than 807.9545 $/h for CFA, 809.4945 for DTBO, and 828.89 $/h for WOA, while lowering the power loss to 1.842 MW which is lower than the losses incurred by CFA, DTBO, and WOA, which are 1.9137 MW, 2.703 MW, and 2.757 MW, respectively. Furthermore, in Case 3, the gross cost reduced to 914.3735 $/h.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Canada)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alomoush M. Microgrid combined power-heat economic emission dispatch considering stochastic renewable energy resources, power purchase and emission tax. Energy Convers Manag. 2019;200: 103300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Biswas P, Suganthan N, Qu Y, Amaratunga A. Multiobjective economic-environmental power dispatch with stochastic windsolar-small hydro power. Energy. 2018;150:1039–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Nusair K, Alasali F. Optimal power-flow management system for a power network with stochastic renewable energy resources using golden ratio optimization method. Energies. 2020;13:3671.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ongsakul W, Bhasaputra P. Optimal power-flow with FACTS devices by hybrid TS/SA approach. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst. 2002;24:851–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Inkollu S, Kota V. Optimal setting of FACTS devices for voltage stability improvement using PSO adaptive GSA hybrid algorithm. Eng Sci Technol Int J. 2016;19(3):1166–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jestch.2016.01.011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Mukherjee A, Mukherjee V. Solution of optimal power-flow with FACTS devices using a novel oppositional krill herd algorithm. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst. 2016;78:700–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Elattar E. Modified JAYA algorithm for optimal power-flow incorporating renewable energy sources considering the cost, emission, power loss and voltage profile improvement. Energy. 2019;178:598–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Meng A, Zeng C, Wang P, et al. A high-performance crisscross search based grey wolf optimizer for solving optimal powerflow problem. Energy. 2021;225: 120211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Biswas P, Arora P, Mallipeddi R, Suganthan P, Panigrahi B. Optimal placement and sizing of FACTS devices for optimal power-flow in a wind power integrated electrical network. Neural Comput Appl. 2020;33(1):6753–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-020-05453-x

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dawn S, Kumar Tiwari P, Kumar Goswami A, Panda R. An approach for system risk assessment and mitigation by optimal operation of wind farm and FACTS devices in a centralized competitive power market. IEEE Trans Sustain Energy. 2019;10:1054–65.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Swamy HK, Sankar M, Reddy NK, Do Y. Optimization of entropy generation and thermal mechanism of MHD hybrid nanoliquid flow in a sinusoidally heated porous cylindrical chamber. Case Stud Therm Eng. 2023;51: 103615.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Altmeyer S, Sankar M, Do Y. Bifurcation phenomena in Taylor–Couette flow in a very short annulus with radial through-flow. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):22113.

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Al-Ghafri KS, Sankar M, Krishnan EV, Khan S, Biswas A. Chirped gap solitons in fiber Bragg gratings with polynomial law of nonlinear refractive index. J Eur Opt Soc. 2023;19(1):30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kumara Swamy HA, Sankar M, Do Y. Entropy and energy analysis of MHD nanofluid thermal transport in a non-uniformly heated annulus. Waves Random Complex Media. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1080/17455030.2022.2145522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Swamy HK, Reddy NK, Sankar M, Peddinti PR. Conjugate heat transfer of aqueous hybrid nanoliquid between coaxial cylinders subjected to magnetic field. Int J Thermofluids. 2023;17: 100299.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. **e L, Han T, Zhou H, Zhang ZR, Han B, Tang A. Tuna swarm optimization: a novel swarm-based metaheuristic algorithm for global optimization. Comput Intell Neurosci. 2021;2021;1–22

    Google Scholar 

  17. Dehghani M, Trojovská E, Trojovský P. Driving Training-Based Optimization: A New Human-Based Metaheuristic Algorithm for Solving Optimization Problems.‏ 2022

  18. Ghasemi M, Ghavidel S, Aghaei J, Akbari E, Li L. CFA optimizer: a new and powerful algorithm inspired by Franklin’s and Coulomb’s laws theory for solving the economic load dispatch problems. Int Trans Electr Energy Syst. 2018;28(5): e2536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Mirjalili S, Lewis A. The whale optimization algorithm. Adv Eng Softw. 2016;95:51–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. EL-azab M, Omran W, Mekhamer S, Talaat H. Allocation of FACTS devices using a probabilistic multi-objective approach incorporating various sources of uncertainty and dynamic line rating. IEEE Access. 2020;8:167647–64. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3023744.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Naderi E, Pourakbari-Kasmaei M, Abdi H. An efficient particle swarm optimization algorithm to solve optimal power-flow problem integrated with FACTS devices. Appl Soft Comput. 2019;80:243–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Nadeem M, Imran K, Khattak A, et al. Optimal placement, sizing and coordination of facts devices in transmission network using whale optimization algorithm. Energies. 2020;13:753. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13030753.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Biswas PP, Suganthan PN, Mallipeddi R, Amaratunga GAJ. Optimal power flow solutions using differential evolution algorithm integrated with effective constraint handling techniques. Eng Appl Artif Intell. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2017.10.019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Shi L, Wang C, Yao L, Ni Y, Bazargan M. Optimal power flow solution incorporating wind power. IEEE Syst J. 2012;6(2):233–41. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSYST.2011.2162896

  25. Biswas PP, Suganthan PN, Amaratunga GAJ. Optimal power flow solutions incorporating stochastic wind and solar power. Energy Convers Manag. 2017;148:1194–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2017.06.071.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Biswas PP, Suganthan PN, Qu BY, Amaratunga GAJ. Multiobjective economic-environmental power dispatch with stochastic wind-solar-small hydro power. Energy. 2018;150:1039–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.03.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Benabid R, Boudour M, Abido MA. Optimal location and setting of SVC and TCSC devices using non-dominated sorting particle swarm optimization. Electr Power Syst Res. 2009;79(12):1668–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsr.2009.07.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Ongsakul W, Bhasaputra P. Optimal power flow with FACTS devices by hybrid TS/SA approach. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst. 2002;24(10):851–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-0615(02)00006-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Yokoyama R, Bae S, Morita T, Sasaki H. Multi objective optimal generation dispatch based on probability security criteria. IEEE Trans Power Syst. 1988;3:317–24.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  30. Mohamed AA, Kamel S, Hassan MH, Mosaad MI, Aljohani M. Optimal power flow analysis based on hybrid gradient- based optimizer with moth-flame optimization algorithm considering optimal placement and sizing of FACTS/Wind power. Math. 2022;10(3): 361

  31. Mohamed AA, Kamel S, Hassan MH, Zeinoddini-Meymand H. CAVOA: A chaotic optimization algorithm for optimal power flow with facts devices and stochastic wind power generation. IET Gener Transm Distrib. 2024;18(1): 121–144

  32. Alsac O, Stott B. "Optimal load flow with steady-state security. IEEE Trans Power Appar Syst. 1974;PAS-93:745–51.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  33. Zimmerman RD, Murillo-Sánchez CE. "Matpower Optimal Scheduling Tool MOST 1.0 User’s Manual," Power Systems Engineering Research Center (PSerc), 2016.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Aswan University, Aswan, 81542, Egypt

    Amal Amin Mohamed & Salah Kamel

  2. Ministry of Electricity and Renewable Energy, Cairo, 11517, Egypt

    Mohamed H. Hassan

  3. Department of Electrical Engineering, Canadian University Dubai, Dubai, 117781, UAE

    Firuz Kamalov

  4. Department of Automated Electrical Systems, Ural Federal University, Yekaterinburg, Russia, 620002

    Murodbek Safaraliev

Authors
  1. Amal Amin Mohamed
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Salah Kamel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mohamed H. Hassan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Firuz Kamalov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Murodbek Safaraliev
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Murodbek Safaraliev.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mohamed, A.A., Kamel, S., Hassan, M.H. et al. Optimizing FACTS devices location and sizing in integrated wind power networks using Tuna Swarm Optimization Algorithm. J Therm Anal Calorim (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-024-12909-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-024-12909-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation