Log in

Synthetic/natural fiber combining action on mechanical performance of polypropylene composite made via compression mould route

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Polymer Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The high strength-to-weight ratio based on advanced polymer hybrid composites is a trend of technological progress. Moreover, these composites are fabricated with natural and synthetic fiber, lacking qualities including moderate tensile strength, lower hardness, and variations in flexural strength, and require additional processing to enrich the adhesive quality using natural fiber. Based on these criteria, the current investigation experiences advanced polymer composite fabrication through hand layup featured with hot compression during the polypropylene (PP) hybrid composite laminate structure formation with the combined action on natural roselle fiber (RF) processed by alkali solution and carbon fiber (CF) under varied stacking sequence. The combined (processing/natural/synthetic/stacking) actions on density, X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis, mechanical characteristics such as tensile/flexural strength, and fracture toughness of mono polypropylene and its hybrid composites are experimentally evaluated and compared. With the excellence of combined actions, the hybrid polypropylene composite formed with a PP/RF/CF stacking sequence is better than others. This composite's density, tensile/flexural strength, and fracture toughness are 1.33 ± 0.05 g/cc,128 ± 1/162 ± 2 MPa, and 1.51 ± 0.05 MPam0.5.Its XRD images provide better peaks of fiber dispersion along the polypropylene matrix.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All the data required are available within the manuscript.

Abbreviations

ASTM:

American Society for Testing and Materials

CF:

Carbon fiber

IT30:

Impact tester – 300 J capacity

PP:

Polypropylene

RF:

Roselle fiber

UT40:

Universal testing – 40 ton capacity

W1:

Initial weight of composite

W2:

Final weight of composite (immersed to water)

XRD:

X-ray diffraction

References

  1. Venkatesh R, Roopashree R, Sur S, Kumar G, Raja P, De Poures MV (2023) Investigation and Performance Study of Hibiscus sabdariffa Bast Fiber-Reinforced HDPE Composite Enhanced by Silica Nanoparticles Derived from Agricultural Residues. Fibers Polym 24(6):2155–2164. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12221-023-00221-9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Aruchamy K, Palaniappan SK, Lakshminarasimhan R, Mylsamy B, Dharmalingam SK, Ross NS, PavayeeSubramani S (2023) An Experimental Study on Drilling Behavior of Silane-Treated Cotton/Bamboo Woven Hybrid Fiber Reinforced Epoxy Polymer Composites. Polymers 15(14):3075. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15143075

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Adil S, Lazoglu I (2023) A review on additive manufacturing of carbon fiber-reinforced polymers: Current methods, materials, mechanical properties, applications and challenges. Journal of Applied Polymer Science. John Wiley and Sons Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.53476

  4. Zhang Y, Sun L, Li L, Wei J (2020) Effects of strain rate and high temperature environment on the mechanical performance of carbon fiber reinforced thermoplastic composites fabricated by hot press moulding. Compos Part A: Appl Sci Manuf 134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2020.105905

  5. Karaduman NS, Karaduman Y (2021) Various fabrication methods are employed in fiber reinforced composites. In Fiber Reinforced Composites: Constituents, Compatibility, Perspectives and Applications (pp. 25–45). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-821090-1.00016-8

  6. Mohd Bakhori SN, Hassan MZ, Mohd Bakhori N, Jamaludin KR, Ramlie F, Md Daud MY, Abdul Aziz SA (2022) Physical, Mechanical and Perforation Resistance of Natural-Synthetic Fiber Interply Laminate Hybrid Composites. Polymers. MDPI. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14071322

  7. Begum S, Fawzia S, Hashmi MSJ (2020) Polymer matrix composite with natural and synthetic fibres. Advances in Materials and Processing Technologies. Taylor and Francis Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1080/2374068X.2020.1728645

  8. Das SC, Paul D, Grammatikos SA, Siddiquee MAB, Papatzani S, Koralli P, Petousis M (2021) Effect of stacking sequence on the performance of hybrid natural/synthetic fiber reinforced polymer composite laminates. Compos Struct 276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.114525

  9. **ulkar H, Mache A, Munde Y, Siva I (2022) Synergy of Interlaminar Glass Fiber Hybridization on Mechanical and Dynamic Characteristics of Jute and Flax Fabric Reinforced Epoxy Composites. J Nat Fibers 19(11):4310–4325. https://doi.org/10.1080/15440478.2020.1856280

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Raja T, Devarajan Y, Thanappan S (2023) Studies on the mechanical and thermal stability of Calotropis gigantea fibre-reinforced bran nano particulates epoxy composite. Sci Rep 13:16291. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-42316-6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Ramesh M, Deepa C (2021) Mechanical properties of natural and synthetic fiber reinforced hybrid composites. In Hybrid Natural Fiber Composites: Material Formulations, Processing, Characterization, Properties, and Engineering Applications (pp. 309–325). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-819900-8.00013-1

  12. Ng LF, Yahya MY, Muthukumar C (2022) Mechanical characterization and water absorption behaviours of pineapple leaf/glass fiber-reinforced polypropylene hybrid composites. Polym Compos 43(1):203–214. https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.26367

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kore S, Spencer R, Ghossein H, Slaven L, Knight D, Unser J, Vaidya U (2021) Performance of hybridized bamboo-carbon fiber reinforced polypropylene composites processed using wet laid technique. Compos Part C: Open Access 6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcomc.2021.100185

  14. Radzi AM, Sapuan SM, Huzaifah MRM, Noor Azammi AM, Ilyas RA, Nadlene R (2021) A Review of the Mechanical Properties of Roselle Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Hybrid Composites. In Roselle: Production, Processing, Products and Biocomposites (pp. 259–269). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-85213-5.00017-2

  15. Hamdan MHM, Siregar JP, Ahmad MR, Asghar A, Tezara C, Jamiluddin J, Zalinawati M (2020) Characterization of the woven fabric of jute, ramie and roselle for reinforcement material for polymer composite. In Materials Today: Proceedings (Vol. 46, pp. 1705–1710). Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.07.372

  16. Sakib S, Haque MR, Haque MM, Faruqi F, Ahmed SSU, Hasan M, Gafur MA (2023) Effect of fibre orientation and stacking sequence on properties of hybrid composites. Mater Sci Tech (United Kingdom) 39(13):1627–1639. https://doi.org/10.1080/02670836.2023.2177803

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Jeyaguru S, Thiagamani SMK, Rangappa SM, Siengchin S, Krishnasamy S, Muthukumar C (2023) Lightweight and sustainable materials for automotive applications. In Lightweight and Sustainable Composite Materials: Preparation, Properties and Applications (pp. 143–156). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-95189-0.00006-8

  18. Kumar N, Singh A (2023) Effect of Luffa/Basalt Fiber Hybridization on the Mechanical and Surface Morphology of Epoxy Composites. J Inst Eng (India): Series D. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40033-023-00517-3

  19. David R, Priya CB, Aruna M, Kaliyaperumal G, Mukilarasan N, Malladi A, Karthikeyan M (2023) Synthesis and Experimental Thermal Adsorption Characteristics of Epoxy Hybrid Composite for Energy Storage Applications. Adsorpt Sci Technol 2023:4817731

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Manivannan S, Sakthivel P, Vijayan V, Jidesh S (2022) The investigation on newly developed of hydrophobic coating on cast AZ91D magnesium alloy under 35 wt% NaCl solutions. J Inorg Organomet Polym 32(4):1246–1258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Sasikumar R, Prabagaran S, Kumaravel S (2023) Effect of tamarind fruit fiber contribution in epoxy resin composites as biodegradable nature: characterization and property evaluation. Biomass Conv Bioref pp.1–9

  22. Raghuvaran S, Vivekanandan M, Kannan CR, Thirugnanasambandham T, Murugan A, Barik D (2023) Evaluation of Thermal Adsorption and Mechanical Behaviour of Intralaminar Jute/Sisal/E-Glass Fibre-Bonded Epoxy Hybrid Composite as an Insulator. Adsorpt Sci Technol

  23. Sakthivel P, Selvakumar G, Krishnan AM, Purushothaman P, Priya CB (2023) Mechanical and thermal properties of a waste fly ash-bonded Al-10 Mg alloy composite improved by bioceramic silicon nanoparticles. Biomass Conv Bioref pp.1–12

  24. Kantharaj I, Sasikumar R, Kannan CR, Yadav A, Karthigairajan M, Vivekanandan P, Murugan A (2023) Thermal adsorption and mechanical behaviour of polypropylene hybrid composite synthesized by glass/hemp fibre via an injection moulding process. Adsorpt Sci Technol 2023:7450085

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors did not receive support from any organization for the submitted work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study's conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by Haston Amit Kumar, R. Asad Ahmed, J. Gunasekaran, and R. Venkatesh. The first draft of the manuscript was written by [Haston Amit Kumar], and all authors provided language help, writing assistance and proofreading of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Haston Amit Kumar.

Ethics declarations

Competing & financial interests

  • The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

  • The authors have no competing interests to declare relevant to this article's content.

  • All authors certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial or non-financial interest in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.

  • The authors have no financial or proprietary interests in any material discussed in this article.

Ethics approval

This is an observational study. Synthetic/natural fiber combining action on mechanical performance of polypropylene composite made via compression mould route, Research Ethics Committee has confirmed that no ethical approval is required.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kumar, H.A., Ahmed, R.A., Gunasekaran, J. et al. Synthetic/natural fiber combining action on mechanical performance of polypropylene composite made via compression mould route. J Polym Res 31, 179 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10965-024-04035-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10965-024-04035-y

Keywords

Navigation