Log in

Perceived Parental Support and Psychological Control, DNA Methylation, and Loneliness: Longitudinal Associations Across Early Adolescence

  • Empirical Research
  • Published:
Journal of Youth and Adolescence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A broad range of factors have been associated with the development of adolescent loneliness. In the family context, a lack of parental support and high levels of parental psychological control have systematically been linked to loneliness. On the biological level, DNA methylation (which is an epigenetic process that suppresses gene expression) is believed to play a role in the development of loneliness. Specifically, high levels of DNA methylation in genes that play an important role in the functioning of the human stress response system are believed to elevate the risk of loneliness. Moreover, DNA methylation levels in these stress-related genes can be influenced by stressful environmental factors, suggesting a potential mediating role of DNA methylation in the association between parenting behaviors and loneliness. The current 3-year longitudinal study is the first study to examine the potential bidirectional longitudinal associations between loneliness, DNA methylation in stress-related genes, and both perceived parental support and psychological control. Furthermore, we explored the potential mediating role of DNA methylation in stress-related genes in the associations between perceived parenting and loneliness. The sample comprised 622 early adolescents (55% girls, Mage T1 = 10.77 years, SDage T1 = 0.48) who were followed from Grade 5 to 7. Parental support, psychological control, and loneliness were assessed annually by adolescent self-report questionnaires and DNA methylation was determined from saliva samples. Cross-Lagged Panel Models (CLPM) revealed that higher levels of loneliness predicted lower perceived parental support and higher perceived psychological control over time, as well as higher DNA methylation in some stress-related genes, that is, the glucocorticoid receptor gene (NR3C1) and the brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF). In addition, higher NR3C1 methylation was predictive of lower perceived parental support and higher psychological control over time. No evidence was found for a mediating role of DNA methylation. Overall, our longitudinal findings challenge the current focus on DNA methylation and parenting behaviors as risk factors for adolescent loneliness. Instead, they suggest that the less considered direction of effects, which implies that loneliness predicts DNA methylation and aspects of parenting such as support and psychological control, should receive greater attention in future research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Due to missingness on some of the Wave 1 study variables, the MANOVA results are based on the data of 242 participants who dropped out over the course of the study and 265 participants who did not.

  2. The detailed results of these analyses can be requested from the first author.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the adolescents who participated in this study.

Funding

Data of the Methylation IN Development (MIND) study was used. This project has been financially supported by a research grant from Internal Funds KU Leuven (C14/16/040). S.A.N. was supported by a grant from the Dutch Research Council (NWO; VI.Veni.191G.023). The funders had no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Data Sharing and Declaration

The dataset analyzed for the current study is not publicly available.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Y.K. conceived of the study, performed the statistical analyses, interpreted the results, and drafted the manuscript; S.A.N. participated in the study design and coordination, was involved in the interpretation of the results, helped to draft the manuscript, and critically revised the manuscript; G.B. designed the larger project and critically revised the manuscript; W.V.D.N. designed the larger project and critically revised the manuscript; K.V.L. designed the larger project and critically revised the manuscript; L.G. designed the larger project, was involved in the interpretation of the results, helped to draft the manuscript, and critically revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yentl Koopmans.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethical Approval

All study procedures were performed in accordance with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Approval was obtained from the Institutional Review Board of KU Leuven.

Informed Consent

Written informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study, as well as their parents.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Koopmans, Y., Nelemans, S.A., Bosmans, G. et al. Perceived Parental Support and Psychological Control, DNA Methylation, and Loneliness: Longitudinal Associations Across Early Adolescence. J. Youth Adolescence 52, 1995–2011 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-023-01822-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-023-01822-6

Keywords

Navigation