Abstract
Purpose We aimed to identify job accommodations that help persons with physical disabilities maintain or return to work and explore the barriers and facilitators that influence the provision and reception of job accommodations. Methods We conducted a systematic review using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42019129645). The search strategy incorporated keywords describing physical disabilities, employer-approved job accommodations, and employment retention or return to work approaches. We searched MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Web of Science, and ProQuest Theses and dissertations. Reviewers independently selected studies for inclusion. We used Hawker et al.’s method to assess study quality. Results We identified 2203 articles, of which 52 met inclusion criteria, developed a table of job accommodations commonly used by persons with physical disabilities, summarized the percentages of job accommodations used by persons with disabilities, synthesized evidence of the effectiveness of job accommodations, and identified the factors that influence job accommodation use. The most frequently reported accommodations were as follows: modification of job responsibilities, change of workplace policy, supportive personnel provision, flexible scheduling, and assistive technology. We summarized four types of facilitators and barriers that affect job accommodation use: employee-related factors, accommodation-related factors, job-related factors, and social workplace-related factors. Conclusion The absence of randomized controlled trials and prevalence of cross-sectional surveys provides inconclusive evidence regarding the effectiveness of specific job accommodations for people with particular functional limitations. Our system of categorizing job accommodations provides a guide to investigators seeking to evaluate the effectiveness of job accommodations using experimental methods.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Sutton BS, Ottomanelli L, Njoh E, Barnett S, Goetz L. Economic evaluation of a supported employment program for veterans with spinal cord injury. Disabil Rehabil. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2018.1527955.
Ottomanelli L, Barnett SD, Goetz LL. A prospective examination of the impact of a supported employment program and employment on health-related quality of life, handicap, and disability among Veterans with SCI. Qual Life Res. 2013;22(8):2133–2141.
Roels EH, Aertgeerts B, Ramaekers D, Peers K. Hospital- and community-based interventions enhancing (re)employment for people with spinal cord injury: a systematic review. Spinal Cord. 2016;54(1):2–7.
Guttman L. Our paralyzed fellowmen at work. Rehabilitation. 1962;63:586–589.
Kraus L. 2015 disability statistics annual report. Durham: University of New Hampshire; 2015.
Nevala N, Pehkonen I, Koskela I, Ruusuvuori J, Anttila H. Workplace accommodation among persons with disabilities: a systematic review of its effectiveness and barriers or facilitators. J Occup Rehabil. 2015;25(2):432–448.
Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago. Rehabilitation Measures Database. 2015 [cited 2019; Available from: http://www.rehabmeasures.org/rehabweb/education.aspx].
Barcus JM, Targett P. Maximizing employee effectiveness through use of personal assistance services at the workplace. J Vocat Rehabil. 2003;18(2):99–106.
Lengnick-Hall ML. Hidden talent: how leading companies hire, retrain, and benefit from people with disabilities. Wesport: Praeger Publishers; 2007.
Gates LB. Workplace accommodation as a social process. J Occup Rehabil. 2000;10(1):85–98.
Anand P, Sevak P. The role of workplace accommodations in the employment of people with disabilities. IZA J Labor Policy. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40173-017-0090-4.
Guidelines International Network. Introduction to the G-I-N Adaptation Working Group. 2010 [cited 2014; Available from: http://www.g-i-n.net/working-groups/adaptation/introduction-g-i-n-adaptation-wg].
United States. Equal Employment Opportunity C. Procedures for providing reasonable accommodation for individuals with disabilities. Washington D.C.: U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission; 1992.
Butterfield TM, Ramseur JH. Research and case study findings in the area of workplace accommodations including provisions for assistive technology: a literature review. Technol Disabil. 2004;16(4):201–210.
Padkapayeva K, Posen A, Yazdani A, Buettgen A, Mahood Q, Tompa E. Workplace accommodations for persons with physical disabilities: evidence synthesis of the peer-reviewed literature. Disabil Rehabil. 2017;39(21):2134–2147.
Yeager P, Kaye HS, Reed M, Doe TM. Assistive technology and employment: experiences of Californians with disabilities. Work. 2006;27(4):333–344.
Yelin E, Sonneborn D, Trupin L. The prevalence and impact of accommodations on the employment of persons 51–61 years of age with musculoskeletal conditions. Arthritis Care Res. 2000;13(3):168–176.
Hill MJ, Maestas N, Mullen KJ. Employer accommodation and labor supply of disabled workers. Labour Econ. 2016;41:291–303.
Inge KJ, Strobel W, Wehman P, Todd J, Targett P. Vocational outcomes for persons with severe physical disabilities: design and implementation of workplace supports. NeuroRehabilitation. 2000;15(3):175–187.
Stoddard S. Personal assistance services as a workplace accommodation. Work. 2006;27(4):363–369.
Schur L, Nishii L, Adya M, Kruse D, Bruyère SM, Blanck P. Accommodating employees with and without disabilities. Hum Resour Manage. 2014;53(4):593–621.
Soklaridis S, Cassidy JD, van der Velde G, Tompa E, Hogg-Johnson S. The economic cost of return to work: an employer’s perspective. Work. 2012;43(3):255–262.
Dick FD, Graveling RA, Munro W, Walker-Bone K, Guideline DG. Workplace management of upper limb disorders: a systematic review. Occup Med (Lond). 2011;61(1):19–25.
Dowler DL, Solovieva TI, Walls RT. Personal assistance services in the workplace: a literature review. Disabil Health J. 2011;4(4):201–208.
Sundar V. Operationalizing workplace accommodations for individuals with disabilities: a sco** review. Work. 2017;56(1):135–155.
Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, O’Brien KK, Colquhoun H, Levac D, et al. PRISMA extension for sco** reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med. 2018;169(7):467–473.
Covidence systematic review software. 2019 March 5 [2020; Available from: www.covidence.org].
Hawker S, Payne S, Kerr C, Hardey M, Powell J. Appraising the evidence: reviewing disparate data systematically. Qual Health Res. 2002;12(9):1284–1299.
QSR International Pty Ltd. NVivo qualitative data analysis software Version 12. 2018. https://www.qsrinternational.com/nvivo-qualitative-data-analysis-software/home.
Law M, Cooper BA, Strong S, Stewart D, Rigby P, Letts L. The person-environment-occupation model: a transactive approach to occupational performance. Can J Occup Ther. 1996;63:9–23.
McNeal DR, Somerville NJ, Wilson DJ. Work problems and accommodations reported by persons who are postpolio or have a spinal cord injury. Assist Technol. 1999;11(2):137–157.
Solovieva TI, Dowler DL, Walls RT. Employer benefits from making workplace accommodations. Disabil Health J. 2011;4(1):39–45.
Codd Y, Stapleton T, Veale DJ, FitzGerald O, Bresnihan B. A qualitative study of work participation in early rheumatoid arthritis. Int J Ther Rehabil. 2010;17(1):24–33.
Unger D, Kregel J. Employers’ knowledge and utilization of accommodations. Work. 2003;21(1):5–15.
Leslie M, Kinyanjui B, Bishop M, Rumrill PD Jr, Roessler RT. Patterns in workplace accommodations for people with multiple sclerosis to overcome cognitive and other disease-related limitations. NeuroRehabilitation. 2015;37(3):425–436.
Kordovski VM, Frndak SE, Fisher CS, Rodgers J, Weinstock-Guttman B, Benedict RHB. Identifying employed multiple sclerosis patients at-risk for job loss: when do negative work events pose a threat? Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2015;4(5):409–413.
van der Hiele K, van Gorp D, Benedict R, Jongen PJ, Arnoldus E, Beenakker E, et al. Co** strategies in relation to negative work events and accommodations in employed multiple sclerosis patients. Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin. 2016;2:2055217316680638.
Alleaume C, Paraponaris A, Bendiane MK, Peretti-Watel P, Bouhnik AD. The positive effect of workplace accommodations on the continued employment of cancer survivors five years after diagnosis. Support Care Cancer. 2020;28(9):4435–4443.
Lindsay S, Cagliostro E, Leck J, Shen W, Stinson J. Disability disclosure and workplace accommodations among youth with disabilities. Disabil Rehabil. 2019;41(16):1914–1924.
Allaire SH, Wei L, LaValley MP. Work barriers experienced and job accommodations used by persons with arthritis and other rheumatic diseases. Rehabil Couns Bull. 2016;46(3):147–1456.
Gignac MAM, Ibrahim S, Smith PM, Kristman V, Beaton DE, Mustard CA. The role of sex, gender, health factors, and job context in workplace accommodation use among men and women with arthritis. Ann Work Expo Health. 2018;62(4):490–504.
O’Hagan F. Work, organisational practices, and margin of manoeuver during work reintegration. Disabil Rehabil. 2019;41(2):172–181.
Bruyère SM, Erickson WA, VanLooy S. Comparative study of workplace policy and practices contributing to disability nondiscrimination. Rehabil Psychol. 2004;49(1):28–38.
Linden M, Milchus K. Teleworkers with disabilities: characteristics and accommodation use. Work. 2014;47(4):473–483.
Williams M, Sabata D, Zolna J. User needs evaluation of workplace accommodations. Work. 2006;27(4):355–362.
Sevak P, Khan S. Psychiatric versus physical disabilities: a comparison of barriers and facilitators to employment. Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2017;40(2):163–171.
Dhanhani AA. The workplace challenges of lupus patients. Master’s thesis, University of Toronto. Retrieved from TSpace. http://hdl.handle.net/1807/25407.
Al Dhanhani AM, Gignac MA, Beaton DE, Su J, Fortin PR. Job accommodations availability and utilization among people with lupus: an examination of workplace activity limitations and work context factors. Arthritis Care Res. 2015;67(11):1536–1544.
Rumrill PD, Fraser RT, Johnson KL. Employment and workplace accommodation outcomes among participants in a vocational consultation service for people with multiple sclerosis. J Vocat Rehabil. 2013;39(2):85–90.
Anema JR, Schellart AJ, Cassidy JD, Loisel P, Veerman TJ, van der Beek AJ. Can cross country differences in return-to-work after chronic occupational back pain be explained? An exploratory analysis on disability policies in a six country cohort study. J Occup Rehabil. 2009;19(4):419–426.
Varekamp I, van Dijk FJ. Workplace problems and solutions for employees with chronic diseases. Occup Med (Oxford). 2010;60(4):287–293.
Gignac MA, Cao X, Tang K, Beaton DE. Examination of arthritis-related work place activity limitations and intermittent disability over four-and-a-half years and its relationship to job modifications and outcomes. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2011;63(7):953–962.
Chen JC, Linnan L, Callahan LF, Yelin EH, Renner JB. Workplace policies and prevalence of knee osteoarthritis: the Johnston County Osteoarthritis Project. Occup Environ Med. 2007;64(12):798–805.
Benedict RH, Rodgers JD, Emmert N, Kininger R, Weinstock-Guttman B. Negative work events and accommodations in employed multiple sclerosis patients. Mult Scler. 2014;20(1):116–119.
Gignac MA, Cao X, McAlpine J. Availability, need for, and use of work accommodations and benefits: are they related to employment outcomes in people with arthritis? Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2015;67(6):855–864.
Gould-Werth A, Morrison K, Ben-Shalom Y. Employers’ perspectives on accommodating and retaining employees with newly acquired disabilities: an exploratory study. J Occup Rehabil. 2018;28(4):611–633.
Gourdeau J, Fingold A, Colantonio A, Mansfield E, Stergiou-Kita M. Workplace accommodations following work-related mild traumatic brain injury: what works? Disabil Rehabil. 2020;42(4):552–561.
Funding
This project was funded by the National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research (NIDILRR) (Grant Number: 90RTEM0001).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.
Ethical Approval
All procedures performed in this project were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wong, J., Kallish, N., Crown, D. et al. Job Accommodations, Return to Work and Job Retention of People with Physical Disabilities: A Systematic Review. J Occup Rehabil 31, 474–490 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-020-09954-3
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-020-09954-3