SpringerLink
Log in

The Psychometric Properties of an Iranian Translation of the Work Ability Index (WAI) questionnaire

  • Published:
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background This study was carried out to evaluate the psychometric properties of an Iranian translation of the Work Ability Index (WAI) questionnaire. Methods In this methodological study, nurses and healthcare workers aged 40 years and older who worked in educational hospitals in Ahvaz (236 workers) in 2010, completed the questionnaire and 60 of the workers filled out the WAI questionnaire for the second time to ensure test–retest reliability. Forward–backward method was applied to translate the questionnaire from English into Persian. The psychometric properties of the Iranian translation of the WAI were assessed using the fallowing tests: Internal consistency (to test reliability), test–retest analysis, exploratory factor analysis (construct validity), discriminate validity by comparing the mean WAI score in two groups of the employees that had different levels of sick leave, criterion validity by determining the correlation between the Persian version of short form health survey (SF-36) and WAI score. Results Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was estimated to be 0.79 and it was concluded that the internal consistency was high enough. The intraclass correlation coefficient was recognized to be 0.92. Factor analysis indicated three factors in the structure of the work ability including self-perceived work ability (24.5% of the variance), mental resources (22.23% of the variance), and presence of disease and health related limitation (18.55% of the variance). Statistical tests showed that this questionnaire was capable of discriminating two groups of employees who had different levels of sick leave. Criterion validity analysis showed that this instrument and all dimensions of the Iranian version of SF-36 were correlated significantly. Item correlation corrective for overlap showed the items tests had a good correlation except for one. Conclusion The finding of the study showed that the Iranian version of the WAI is a reliable and valid measure of work ability and can be used both in research and practical activities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kumashiro M, Tom C, Goedhard M, Ilmarinen J. Aging and work. London and New York: Taylor & Francis; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Mehryar AH, Ahmad-Nia S. Age-structural transition in Iran: short and long-term consequences of drastic fertility swings during the final decades of twentieth century. Paris: CICRED seminar on “Age-Structural Transitions: Population Waves, Disordered Cohort Flows and the Demographic Bonus”, 2004.

  3. Ilmarinen J. The ageing workforce-challenges for occupational health. Occup Med. 2006;56(6):362–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Martins PS, Novo ÁA, Portugal P. Increasing the legal retirement age: the impact on wages, hours, worker flows and firm performance. Bonn : Institute for the Study of Labor(IZA), 2009. IZA DP No. 4187.

  5. Kiani Sh, Bayanzadeh M, Tavallaee M, Robert S. The Iranian population is graying: are we ready? Arch Iran Med. 2010;13(4):333–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Schulte P, Vainio H. Well-being at work-overview and perspective. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2010;36(5):422–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Salehi-Isfahani D. Human resources in Iran: potentials and challenges. Iran Stud. 2005;38(1):117–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Nikopour H. Business cycles and policy making in social insurance systems the case of Iran (1962–2004), 2005. MPRA Paper No. 13060.

  9. de Zwart BCH, Frings-Dresen MHW, Van Duivenbooden JC. Test-retest reliability of the Work Ability Index questionnaire. Occup Med (Lond). 2002;52(4):177–81.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hasselhorn HM. Work ability–concept and assessment. London : Enterprise for Health Management Conference’ in London in Oct 2008-conference guide, 2008.

  11. Tengland P-A. The concept of work ability. J Occup Rehabil. 2011;21(2):275–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gould R, Ilmarinen J, Jarvisalo J, Koskinen S. Dimensions of work ability. Finish Inst Occup Health: Helsinki; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ilmarinen J. Work ability: a comprehensive concept for occupational health research and prevention. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2009;35(1):1–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Eskelinen L, Kohvakka A, Merisalo T, Hurri H, Wägar G. Relationship between the self-assessment and clinical assessment of health status and work ability. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1991;17(Suppl. 1):40–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Alavinia SM, De Boer A, van Duivenbooden JC, Frings-Dresen MHW, Burdorf A. Determinants of work ability and its predictive value for disability. Occup Med. 2009;59(1):32–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Fayers PM, Machin D. Quality of life. The assessment, analysis and interpretation of patient-reported outcomes. 2nd ed. Chichester: Wiley J & Sons; 2007.

  17. Weir JP. Quantifying test-retest reliability using intraclass correlation coefficient. J Strength Cond Res. 2005;19(1):231–40.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Nunnally JC, Bernstein IR. Psychometric theory. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Martinez MC, Latorre MRDO, Fischer FM. Validity and reliability of the Brazilian version of the Work Ability Index questionnaire. Revista de Saúde Publica. 2009;43(3):525–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hays RD, Sherbourne CD, Mazel RM. 36-item health survey 1.0. Health Econ. 1993;2(3):217–27.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Patel AA, Donegan D, Albert T. The 36-item short form. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2007;15(2):126.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Sorensen LE, Pekkonen MM, Mannikko KH, Louhevaara VA, Smolander J, Alen MJ. Associations between work ability, health-related quality of life, physical activity and fitness among middle-aged men. Appl Ergon. 2008;39(6):786–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Montazeri A, Goshtasebi A, Vahdaninia M, Gandek B. The short form health survey (SF-36): translation and validation study of the Iranian version. Qual Life Res. 2005;14(3):875–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Radkiewicz P, Widerszal-Bazyla M, The NEXT-Study Group. Psychometric properties of Work Ability Index in the light of comparative survey study. Int Congr Ser. 2005;1280:304–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Martus P, Jakob O, Rose U, Seibt R, Freude G. A comparative analysis of the work ability index. Occup Med. 2010;60(7):517–24.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Rehabilitation Administration, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, 6135733133, Ahvaz, Iran

    M. Abdolalizadeh, A. A. Arastoo & R. Ghsemzadeh

  2. Department of Mental Health, Iranian Institute for Health Sciences Research, ACECR, Tehran, Iran

    A. Montazeri

  3. Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, School of public Health, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran

    K. Ahmadi

  4. Department of Medical Record, School of Para Medicine, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran

    A. Azizi

Authors
  1. M. Abdolalizadeh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A. A. Arastoo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. R. Ghsemzadeh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. A. Montazeri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. K. Ahmadi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. A. Azizi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Abdolalizadeh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Abdolalizadeh, M., Arastoo, A.A., Ghsemzadeh, R. et al. The Psychometric Properties of an Iranian Translation of the Work Ability Index (WAI) questionnaire. J Occup Rehabil 22, 401–408 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-012-9355-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-012-9355-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation