Log in

Giga-sample Pulse Acquisition and Digital Processing for Photomultiplier Detectors

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Journal of Fusion Energy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Digital Pulse Processing offers multiple advantages over traditional analogue processing chains. As a disadvantage, produce gigabytes of data every second. Storing and processing such data rates in real-time still remains a challenge. Analogue solutions are not riddled with this issue, however, they offer limited flexibility and modifiability. This work highlights the advantages of Digital Pulse Processing over Analogue Pulse Processing and describes a successful implementation of a digital pulse detection and acquisition system based on Field Programmable Gate Arrays. The system is tasked with processing pulses generated by a Photo Multiplier Tube nuclear detector. Incoming signals are sampled at a 1 GS/s rate, so to enable full acquisition resolution, throughput is reduced with digital detection filters and leading-edge triggering or with a derivative zero-crossing detector. Three different fast timing filters are adapted to high-speed real-time acquisition and compared in a simulated scenario. A trapezoidal filter is implemented in firmware alongside the detection channel for pulse height analysis. Thanks to the use of reprogrammable devices, the system remains versatile and can be remotely adapted to different needs with no additional hardware costs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Thailand)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. S.N. Ahmed, Scintillation Detectors and Photodetectors. Physics and Engineering of Radiation Detectors (Academic Press, Ontario, 2007)

    Google Scholar 

  2. E. Hergert and S. Piatek, “The WITS$ guide to selecting a photodetector,” 2017.

  3. G.F. Knoll, Radiation Detection and Measurement (John Wiley, New York, 2011)

    Google Scholar 

  4. R. Hannaske, Fast Digitizing and Digital Signal Processing of Detector Signals (Technische University Dresden, 2009)

    Google Scholar 

  5. R. V. Ribas, A. Deppman, C. Krug, G. S. Zahn, J. L. Rios, N. Added and V. S. Timoteo, Digital pulse processing: a new paradigm for nuclear instrumentation. AIP Conf. Proc. 1245, 39 (2010).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. L. Abbene, G. Gerardi, F. Principato, Real time digital pulse processing for X-ray and gamma ray semiconductor detectors. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. A 730, 124–128 (2013)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. T. Jong-Gu-Kwak et al., KSTAR Status and Upgrade Plan Toward Fusion Reactor. IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 48(6), 1388–1395 (2020).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. V. Plyusnin, V. Kiptily, A. Shevelev, E. Khilkevitch, S. Gerasimov, J. Mlynar, Hard X-ray Bremsstrahlung of relativistic Runaway Electrons in JET. J. Instrum. 14, 09042 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Fusion For Energy, System and project information on ITER Hard X-Ray Monitor Plasma diagnostic (2013)

  10. A. T. Susanto, P. Prajitno, S. K. Wijaya, S. Soekirno, I. P. Susila, A systematic literature reviews of multichannel analyzer based on FPGA for gamma spectroscopy. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 1528, 012016 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. A. Fernandes, R. Pereira, J. Sousa, A. Neto, P. Carvalho, A. Batista, B. Carvalho, C. Varandas, M. Tardocchi, G. Gorini, Parallel processing method for high-speed real time digital pulse processing for gamma-ray spectroscopy. Fusion Eng. Des. 85, 308–312 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Y. Moline, M. Thevenin, G. Corre, M. Paindavoine, Auto-Adaptive Trigger and Pulse Extraction for Digital Processing in Nuclear Instrumentation. IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 62, 480–486 (2015)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. S. Saxena, A. I. Hawari, Investigation of FPGA-based real-time adaptive digital pulse sha** for high-count-rate applications. IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 64(7), 1733–1738 (2017)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. Z. Guzik, T. Krakowski, Algorithms for digital γ-ray spectroscopy. Nukleonika 58(2), 333–338 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  15. H.-Q. Zhang, Z.-D. Li, B. Tang and H.-X. Wu, Optimal parameter choice of CR–RCm digital filter in nuclear pulse processing, NUCL SCI TECH, 108, 2019.

  16. X. Hong, H. Wang, J. Zhou, X. Yang, M. Wang, Y. Ma, W. Zhou, Y. Liu, X. Zhu, Peak tailing cancellation techniques for digital CR-(RC)n filter. Appl. Radiat. Isotopes 167, 109471 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2020.109471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. V. Krasilnikov, D. Marocco, B. Esposito, M. Riva, Y. Kaschuck, Fast pulse detection algorithms for digitized waveforms from scintillators. Comput. Phys. Commun. 182(3), 735–738 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2010.10.017

    Article  MATH  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. M. Nakhostin, Recursive Algorithms for Real-Time Digital CR−(RC)n Pulse Sha**. IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 58(5), 2378–2381 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1109/TNS.2011.2164556

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. V. Esmaeili-sani, A. Moussavi-zarandi, N. Akbar-ashrafi, B. Boghrati, Triangle bipolar pulse sha** and pileup correction based on DSP. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. A Accelerat. Spectromet. Detect. Assoc. Equip. 665, 11–14 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2011.11.039

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. V. T. Jordanov, G. F. Knoll, Digital synthesis of pulse shapes in real time for high resolution radiation spectroscopy. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 345(2), 3347–4345 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-9002(94)91011-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. P. Nowak vel Nowakowski, D. Makowski and W. Walewski, PMT signal transmission for hard x-ray diagnostics of future Tokamaks. [In publishing].

  22. L. Pibidam, D. West, Measurements of scatter peaks in 137Cs and 60Co sources. J. Res. Nat. Inst. Stand. Technol. 123, 1–6 (2018). https://doi.org/10.6028/jres.123.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Teledyne Signal Processing Devices Sweden, ADQ14 Datasheet (Linkö**, Sweden, 2021)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work has been carried out within the framework of the EUROfusion Consortium, funded by the European Union via the Euratom Research and Training Programme (Grant Agreement No 101052200—EUROfusion). Views and opinions expressed are however those of the author(s) only and do not necessarily reflect those of the European Union or the European Commission. Neither the European Union nor the European Commission can be held responsible for them. This scientific paper has been published as part of the international project called ’PMW’, co-financed by the Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education within the framework of the scientific financial resources for 2021 under the contract No W3/HEU—EURATOM/2022.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to W. Walewski.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Walewski, W., Nowak vel Nowakowski, P. & Makowski, D. Giga-sample Pulse Acquisition and Digital Processing for Photomultiplier Detectors. J Fusion Energ 41, 8 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10894-022-00320-0

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10894-022-00320-0

Keywords

Navigation