Abstract
In the indentation test, the hardness and the elastic modulus depend strongly on the estimate of the indenter-material contact area at peak load. However, many elastic–plastic behaviours such as elastic recoveries during unloading and piling-up or sinking-in of surface profiles during indentation affect the determination of the hardness and the elastic modulus. So, atomic force microscopy is a method of utmost importance to provide an accurate knowledge of the indentation impression especially when plastic deformations occur, that leads to errors in the determination of the contact area. Atomic force measurements of vanadium, tungsten, molybdenum and tantalum pure metals as well as stainless steels, often used as substrates for thin films depositions, highlight the difficulties to estimate the contact area. The variation of hardness values determined by atomic force microscopy measurements and nanoindentation test is correlated to the formation of folds of 150 and 100 nm high, around the residual impression of vanadium and tungsten indented at 0.1 N, respectively. Some folds which increase with increasing loads are detected on the residual impressions of both 35CD4 and 30NCD16 stainless steels indented under loads of 0.01 N, only. Such structures are related to piling-up of surface profiles that could lead to an underestimate of the contact area in the indentation test. So, the hardness value of tungsten could be closer to 6 than to 7 GPa whereas the effect of piling-up on the estimation of contact area of vanadium could be lower. Almost no deformation is seen on tantalum and molybdenum. So, the hardness values determined by the various methods are consistent. These results show that atomic force microscopy measurements are quite complementary of the nanoindentation test.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Armstrong RW, Shin H, Ruff AW (1995) Acta Metall Mater 43:1037. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0956-7151(94)00291-O
Oliver WC, Pharr GM (1992) J Mater Res 7:1564. doi:https://doi.org/10.1557/JMR.1992.1564
Zhao ZX, Jiang ZD, Li XX, Gao ZK (2006) Phys J Conference series 48:1121
Fu G (2006) Mater Lett 60:3855. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2006.03.128
Troyon M, Liye H (2006) Surf Coat Tech 201:1613. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2006.02.033
Doerner MF, Nix WD (1986) J Mater Res 1:601. doi:https://doi.org/10.1557/JMR.1986.0601
Yang-Tse C, Che-Min C (2000) Surf Coat Tech 133–134:417. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0257-8972(00)00893-8
Randall NX, Julia-Schmutz C, Soro JM (1998) Surf Coat Tech 108–109:489. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0257-8972(98)00573-8
Andrieux M, Ducarroir M, Ignat M, Mazot P, Angelelis C (1998) Ann Chim Sci Mat 23:847. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0151-9107(99)80026-9
Farges G, Sainte Catherine MC, Nadal M, Poirier L, Teyssandier F, Ignat M (1998) Ann Chim Sci Mat 23:863. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0151-9107(99)80027-0
Andrievski RA, Kalinnikov GV, Jauberteau I, Bates J (2000) J Mater Sci 35:2799. doi:https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004790917616
Kramer D, Huang H, Kriese M, Robach J, Nelson A, Wright A et al (1999) Acta Mater 47:333. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-6454(98)00301-2
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jauberteau, I., Nadal, M. & Jauberteau, J.L. Atomic force microscopy investigations on nanoindentation impressions of some metals: effect of piling-up on hardness measurements. J Mater Sci 43, 5956–5961 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-008-2868-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-008-2868-7