References
Baggio, G. (2018). Meaning in the brain. MIT Press.
Baggio, G. (2021). Compositionality in a parallel architecture for language processing. Cognitive Science, 45(5), e12949.
Baggio, G., Van Lambalgen, M., & Hagoort, P. (2012). The processing consequences of compositionality. In M. E. Werning, W. E. Hinzen, & E. E. Machery (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of compositionality (pp. 655–672). Oxford University Press.
Borg, E. (2004). Minimal semantics. Clarendon Press.
Frankland, S. M., & Greene, J. D. (2020). Concepts and compositionality: In search of the brain’s language of thought. Annual Review of Psychology, 71, 273–303.
Hupkes, D., Dankers, V., Mul, M., & Bruni, E. (2020). Compositionality decomposed: How do neural networks generalise? Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 67, 757–795.
Kaplan, D. (1989). Demonstratives. In J. Almog, J. Perry, & H. Wettstein (Eds.), Themes from Kaplan. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lewis, D. (1980). Index, context, and content. In S. Kanger & S. Ohman (Eds.), Philosophy and grammar. Reidel.
Nefdt, R. M. (2020). A puzzle concerning compositionality in machines. Minds and Machines, 30(1), 47–75.
Partee, B. (1979). Semantics—mathematics or psychology? In R. Bäuerle, U. Egli, & A. von Stechow (Eds.), Semantics from different points of view (pp. 1–14). Springer.
Recanati, F. (2004). Literal meaning. Cambridge University Press.
Recanati, F. (2012). Mental files. Oxford University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Baggio, G. Book Review. J of Log Lang and Inf 30, 819–823 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10849-021-09346-7
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10849-021-09346-7