Log in

Feasibility and safety of both His bundle pacing and left bundle branch area pacing in atrial fibrillation patients: intermediate term follow-up

  • Published:
Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

His bundle pacing (HBP) improves heart failure (HF) in atrial fibrillation (AF) pacing–dependent patients with a potential for a progressively increased threshold. HBP with right ventricular pacing (RVP) as a backup is always the preferred choice; however, RVP may induce HF. His Purkinje system pacing (HPSP) includes HBP and left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP). LBBAP maintains left ventricular synchrony but has not been proven to be safe over the long term. We assessed the feasibility and safety of both HBP and LBBAP in AF pacing–dependent patients and compared the parameters of both leads at baseline and at the 6-month follow-up.

Methods

A total of 16 AF patients in our center, who successfully attempted both HBP and LBBAP, were prospectively enrolled unless only one of these treatment statuses was attained. The electrocardiogram characteristics, leading parameters, echocardiography results, and clinical outcomes were assessed.

Results

Thirteen out of 16 patients achieved both HBP and LBBAP successfully in the same AF pacing–dependent patients. In symptomatic HF patients with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (n = 10), the left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD) was reduced from 51.8 ± 4.4 to 48.3 ± 3.1 mm (p = 0.01) with the use of diuretics, either reduced or stopped (n = 7). During the follow-up, one patient in the group without HF had an increased HBP threshold and developed HF symptoms. His HF symptoms disappeared when switched into LBBAP mode. Another patient in the group with HF got his LVEF elevated by HBP for 3 months by utilizing left bundle branch block(LBBB)correction and continued to increase when switched into LBBAP for another 3 months due to an increased HBP correction threshold. The average unipolar pacing threshold of LBBAP was lower than that of HBP. No perforation or dislodgement occurred in our study.

Conclusion

Both HBP and LBBAP could be attempted successfully in the same AF patients when one of the two modes could be adopted and switched according to the clinical feasibility. Compared with HBP, LBBAP yielded better and more stable parameters but showed comparable effects during the 6-month follow-up.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (France)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kaye GC, Linker NJ, Marwick TH, Pollock L, Graham L, Pouliot E, et al. Effect of right ventricular pacing lead site on left ventricular function in patients with high-grade atrioventricular block: results of the Protect-Pace study. Eur Heart J. 2015;36(14):856–62. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehu304.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Zhang XH, Chen H, Siu CW, Yiu KH, Chan WS, Lee KL, et al. New-onset heart failure after permanent right ventricular apical pacing in patients with acquired high-grade atrioventricular block and normal left ventricular function. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2008;19(2):136–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8167.2007.01014.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Deshmukh P, Casavant DA, Romanyshyn M, Anderson K. Permanent, direct His-bundle pacing: a novel approach to cardiac pacing in patients with normal His-Purkinje activation. Circulation. 2000;101(8):869–77.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Slotwiner DJ, Raitt MH, Del-Carpio Munoz F, Mulpuru SK, Nasser N, Peterson PN. Impact of physiologic pacing versus right ventricular pacing among patients with left ventricular ejection fraction greater than 35%: a systematic review for the 2018 ACC/AHA/HRS Guideline on the Evaluation and Management of Patients With Bradycardia and Cardiac Conduction Delay: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;74(7):988–1008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2018.10.045.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ye Y, Zhang Z, Sheng X, Wang B, Chen S, Pan Y, et al. Upgrade to his bundle pacing in pacing-dependent patients referred for pulse generator change: feasibility and intermediate term follow up. Int J Cardiol. 2018;260:88–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.01.105.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Abdelrahman M, Subzposh FA, Beer D, Durr B, Naperkowski A, Sun H, et al. Clinical outcomes of his bundle pacing compared to right ventricular pacing. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;71(20):2319–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2018.02.048.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Vijayaraman P, Subzposh FA, Naperkowski A. Atrioventricular node ablation and His bundle pacing. Europace. 2017;19(suppl_4):iv10–iv6. https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/eux263.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kaye G, Ng JY, Ahmed S, Valencia D, Harrop D, Ng ACT. The prevalence of pacing-induced cardiomyopathy (PICM) in patients with long term right ventricular pacing - is it a matter of definition? Heart Lung Circ. 2019;28(7):1027–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hlc.2018.05.196.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Huang W, Su L, Wu S, Xu L, **ao F, Zhou X, et al. Long-term outcomes of His bundle pacing in patients with heart failure with left bundle branch block. Heart. 2019;105(2):137–43. https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2018-313415.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Huang W, Su L, Wu S, Xu L, **ao F, Zhou X, et al. Benefits of permanent His bundle pacing combined with atrioventricular node ablation in atrial fibrillation patients with heart failure with both preserved and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction. J Am Heart Assoc. 2017;6(4). https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.116.005309.

  11. Cai B, Huang X, Li L, Guo J, Chen S, Meng F, et al. Evaluation of cardiac synchrony in left bundle branch pacing: insights from echocardiographic research. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2020;31(2):560–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/jce.14342.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Hou X, Qian Z, Wang Y, Qiu Y, Chen X, Jiang H, et al. Feasibility and cardiac synchrony of permanent left bundle branch pacing through the interventricular septum. Europace. 2019;21(11):1694–702. https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euz188.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Chen K, Li Y, Dai Y, Sun Q, Luo B, Li C, et al. Comparison of electrocardiogram characteristics and pacing parameters between left bundle branch pacing and right ventricular pacing in patients receiving pacemaker therapy. Europace. 2019;21(4):673–80. https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euy252.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Huang W, Su L, Wu S, Xu L, **ao F, Zhou X, et al. A novel pacing strategy with low and stable output: pacing the left bundle branch immediately beyond the conduction block. Can J Cardiol. 2017;33(12):1736 e1–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjca.2017.09.013.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Huang W, Chen X, Su L, Wu S, **a X, Vijayaraman P. A beginner's guide to permanent left bundle branch pacing. Heart Rhythm. 2019;16(12):1791–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2019.06.016.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Vijayaraman P, Herweg B, Dandamudi G, Mittal S, Bhatt AG, Marcantoni L, et al. Outcomes of His-bundle pacing upgrade after long-term right ventricular pacing and/or pacing-induced cardiomyopathy: insights into disease progression. Heart Rhythm. 2019;16(10):1554–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2019.03.026.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Yamasaki N, Kondo F, Kubo T, Okawa M, Matsumura Y, Kitaoka H, et al. Severe tricuspid regurgitation in the aged: atrial remodeling associated with long-standing atrial fibrillation. J Cardiol. 2006;48(6):315–23.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Chen X, Wu S, Su L, Su Y, Huang W. The characteristics of the electrocardiogram and the intracardiac electrogram in left bundle branch pacing. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2019;30(7):1096–101. https://doi.org/10.1111/jce.13956.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Vijayaraman P, Dandamudi G, Lustgarten D, Ellenbogen KA. Permanent His bundle pacing: electrophysiological and echocardiographic observations from long-term follow-up. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2017;40(7):883–91. https://doi.org/10.1111/pace.13130.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Wang S, Wu S, Xu L, **ao F, Whinnett ZI, Vijayaraman P, et al. Feasibility and efficacy of His bundle pacing or left bundle pacing combined with atrioventricular node ablation in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy. J Am Heart Assoc. 2019;8(24):e014253. https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.119.014253.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Huang W, Wu S, Vijayaraman P, Su L, Chen X, Cai B, et al. Cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy using left bundle branch pacing. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2020;6(7):849–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacep.2020.04.011.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Upadhyay GA, Cherian T, Shatz DY, Beaser AD, Aziz Z, Ozcan C, et al. Intracardiac delineation of septal conduction in left bundle-branch block patterns. Circulation. 2019;139(16):1876–88. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.038648.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Auricchio A, Fantoni C, Regoli F, Carbucicchio C, Goette A, Geller C, et al. Characterization of left ventricular activation in patients with heart failure and left bundle-branch block. Circulation. 2004;109(9):1133–9. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.0000118502.91105.F6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Vijayaraman P, Subzposh FA, Naperkowski A, Panikkath R, John K, Mascarenhas V, et al. Prospective evaluation of feasibility, electrophysiologic and echocardiographic characteristics of left bundle branch area pacing. Heart Rhythm. 2019;16:1774–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2019.05.011.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Su L, Xu T, Cai M, Xu L, Vijayaraman P, Sharma PS, et al. Electrophysiological characteristics and clinical values of left bundle branch current of injury in left bundle branch pacing. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2020;31(4):834–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/jce.14377.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Salden F, Luermans J, Westra SW, Weijs B, Engels EB, Heckman LIB, et al. Short-term hemodynamic and electrophysiological effects of cardiac resynchronization by left ventricular septal pacing. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;75(4):347–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2019.11.040.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Weijian Huang, MD, PhD, for sharing his experience in His bundle pacing and left bundle area pacing with us. We thank Dr. Derek from UK for his help in English writing, editing, and thoughtful review of the manuscript. We would like to thank anonymous reviewers for comments on earlier drafts.

Funding

This work was supported by the funding from Clinical research project of Zhejiang Medical Association (no. 2016ZYC-A28).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guosheng Fu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ye, Y., Zhang, K., Yang, Y. et al. Feasibility and safety of both His bundle pacing and left bundle branch area pacing in atrial fibrillation patients: intermediate term follow-up. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 66, 271–280 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-021-00964-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-021-00964-6

Keywords

Navigation