Log in

Comparison of monocultures and a mixed culture of three Chlorellaceae strains to optimize biomass production and biochemical content in microalgae grown in a greenhouse

  • Published:
Journal of Applied Phycology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Light and temperature are important environmental conditions affecting microalgal growth in outdoor culture. It is essential to evaluate microalgae strains growing under outdoor conditions where they are subjected to variable environmental parameters. The present study investigated three Chlorellaceae strains (Micractinium sp. MACC-728, Chlorella sorokiniana MACC-438, and C. sorokiniana MACC-452) and a mixed culture combining these three strains. Cultures were grown in 2-L bioreactors in a greenhouse over 3 months to assess the effects of high temperature and light on their growth, macromolecule content, and antioxidant and plant-stimulating bioactivities. The most influential environmental parameters on growth were average air temperature and the sum of photosynthetically active radiation, followed by maximum air temperature. The most affected growth parameter was daily change in cell number. Chlorella sorokiniana MACC-438 produced the lowest biomass and was most affected by the high temperature and light conditions. Micractinium sp. produced the highest biomass and was least affected, suggesting it was the most suitable strain for outdoor cultivation. The mixed Chlorellaceae culture performed well in biomass production, exceeding C. sorokiniana monocultures but significantly underyielding in lipid content. Antioxidant activity and the root-stimulating activity varied with strain and culture age. Micractinium sp. had the highest but most variable antioxidant and plant-stimulating activity. Bioactivity in the mixed culture was more consistent, remaining high regardless of culture age and environmental conditions. Thus, mixed cultures of productive strains could be a useful strategy to ensure stable and high-quality biomass production in outdoor cultivation with fluctuating environmental conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets generated during this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  • Aremu AO, Masondo NA, Molnár Z, Stirk WA, Ördög V, van Staden J (2016) Changes in phytochemical content and pharmacological activities of three Chlorella strains grown in different nitrogen conditions. J Appl Phycol 28:149–159

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Barsanti L, Gualtieri P (2018) Is exploitation of microalgae economically and energetically sustainable? Algal Res 31:107–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beacham TA, Sweet JB, Allen MJ (2017) Large scale cultivation of genetically modified microalgae: a new era for environmental risk assessment. Algal Res 25:90–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borowitzka MA (2016a) Algal physiology and large-scale outdoor cultures in microalgae. In: Borowitzka MA, Beardall J, Raven JA (eds) The physiology of microalgae. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 601–654

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Borowitzka MA (2016b) Chemically-mediated interactions in microalgae. In: Borowitzka MA, Beardall J, Raven JA (eds) The physiology of microalgae. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 321–357

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Borowitzka MA, Vonshak A (2017) Scaling up microalgal cultures to commercial scale. Eur J Phycol 52:407–418

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brennan L, Owende P (2010) Biofuels from microalgae–a review of technologies for production, processing, and extractions of biofuels and co-products. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 14:557–577

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Butterwick C, Heaney SI, Talling JF (2005) Diversity in the influence of temperature on the growth rates of freshwater algae, and its ecological relevance. Freshw Biol 50:291–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chew KW, Yap JY, Show PL, Suan NH, Juan JC, Ling TC, Lee DJ, Chang JS (2017) Microalgae biorefinery: high value products perspectives. Bioresour Technol 229:53–62

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Choochote W, Suklampoo L, Ochaikul D (2014) Evaluation of antioxidant capacities of green microalgae. J Appl Phycol 26:43–48

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Costa JAV, Freitas BCB, Cruz CG, Silveira J, Morais MG (2019) Potential of microalgae as biopesticides to contribute to sustainable agriculture and environmental development. J Environ Sci Health, Part B 54:366–375

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Crouch IJ, van Staden J (1991) Evidence for rooting factors in a seaweed concentrate prepared from Ecklonia maxima. J Plant Physiol 137:319–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahlin LR, Van Wychen S, Gerken HG, McGowen J, Plenkos PT, Posewitz MC, Guarnier MT (2018) Down-selection and outdoor evaluation of novel, halotolerant algal strains for winter cultivation. Front Plant Sci 9:1513

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • de Morais MG, da Silva VB, de Morais EG, Costa JAV (2015) Biologically active metabolites synthesized by microalgae. BioMed Res Int 2015:835761

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia-Gonzalez J, Sommerfeld M (2016) Biofertilizer and biostimulants properties of the microalga Acutodesmus dimorphus. J Appl Phycol 28:1051–1061

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goiris K, Muylaert K, Fraeye I, Foubert I, De Brabanter J, De Cooman L (2012) Antioxidant potential of microalgae in relation to their phenolic and carotenoid content. J Appl Phycol 24:1477–1486

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Grimaud GM, Mairet F, Sciandra A, Bernard O (2017) Modeling the temperature effect on the specific growth rate of phytoplankton: a review. Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol 16:625–645

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guiry MD, Guiry GM (2016) AlgaeBase. World-wide electronic publication, National University of Ireland, Galway. http://www.algaebase.org; searched on 19 November 2020

  • Kuznjecov ED, Vladimirova MG (1964) Zelezo kak factor, limitirujusij rost Chlorella na crede Tamiya. Fiziologiya Rastenii 11:615–619

    Google Scholar 

  • Moheimani NR, Borowitzka MA (2007) Limits to productivity of the alga Pleurochrysis carterae (Haptophyta) grown in outdoor raceway ponds. Biotechnol Bioeng 96:27–36

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moyo M, Ndhlala AR, Finnie JF, van Staden J (2010) Phenolic composition, antioxidant and acetylcholinesterase inhibitory activities of Sclerocarya birrea and Harpephyllum caffrum (Anacardiaceae) extracts. Food Chem 123:69–76

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Newby DT, Mathews TJ, Pate RC, Huesemann MH, Lane TW, Wahlen BD, Mandal S, Engler RK, Feris KP, Shurin JB (2016) Assessing the potential of polyculture to accelerate algal biofuel production. Algal Res 19:264–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ördög V, Stirk WA, Bálint P, van Staden J, Lovász C (2012) Changes in lipid, protein and pigment concentrations in nitrogen-stressed Chlorella minutissima cultures. J Appl Phycol 24:907–914

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ördög V, Stirk WA, Bálint P, Lovász C, Pulz O, van Staden J (2013) Lipid productivity and fatty acid composition in Chlorella and Scenedesmus strains grown in nitrogen-stressed conditions. J Appl Phycol 25:233–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ras M, Steyer JP, Bernard O (2013) Temperature effect on microalgae: a crucial factor for outdoor production. Rev Env Sci Biotechnol 12:153–164

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rodolfi L, Zittelli GC, Bassi N, Padovani G, Biondi N, Bonini G, Tredici MR (2009) Microalgae for oil: strain selection, induction of lipid synthesis and outdoor mass cultivation in a low-cost photobioreactor. Biotechnol Bioeng 102:100–112

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rossi F, De Philippis R (2016) Exocellular polysaccharides in microalgae and cyanobacteria: chemical features, role and enzymes and genes involved in their biosynthesis. In: Borowitzka MA, Beardall J, Raven JA (eds) The physiology of microalgae. Springer, Dordretch, pp 565–590

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Schabhüttl S, Hingsamer P, Weigelhofer G, Hein T, Weiger A, Striebel M (2013) Temperature and species richness effects in phytoplankton communities. Oecologia 171:527–536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shurin JB, Mandal S, Abbott RI (2014) Trait diversity enhance yield in algal biofuel assemblages. J Appl Ecol 51:603–611

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stirk WA, Bálint P, Vambe M, Lovász C, Molnár Z, van Staden J, Ördög V (2020) Effect of cell disruption methods in the extraction of bioactive metabolites from microalgal biomass. J Biotechnol 307:35–43

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stirk WA, van Staden J (2020) Potential of phytohormones as a strategy to improve microalgae productivity for biotechnological applications. Biotechnol Adv 44:107612

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stockenreiter M, Graber AK, Haupt F, Stibor H (2012) The effect of species diversity on lipid production by micro-algal communities. J Appl Phycol 24:45–54

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stockenreiter M, Haupt F, Graber AK, Seppäiä J, Spilling K, Tamminen T, Stibor H (2013) Functional group richness: implications of biodiversity for light use and light yield in microalgae. J Phycol 49:838–847

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vítová M, Bišová K, Umysová D, Hlavová M, Kawano S, Zachleder V, Čížková M (2011a) Chlamydomonas reinhardtii: duration of its cell cycle and phases at growth rates affected by light intensity. Planta 233:75–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vítová M, Bišová K, Hlavová M, Kawano S, Zachleder V, Čížková M (2011b) Chlamydomonas reinhardtii: duration of its cell cycle and phases at growth rates affected by temperature. Planta 234:599–608

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu HL, Hseu RS, Lin LP (2001) Identification of Chlorella spp. isolates using ribosomal DNA sequences. Bot Bull Acad Sinica 42:115–121

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research was funded by the project SABANA (grant number 727874) from the European Union Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Program and the EFOP-3.6.3-VEKOP-16–2017-00008 project co-funded by the European Union and European Social Fund. This work was also supported by the Hungarian NKFIH project FK123899 (GM) and by the Lendület-Programme (GM) of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences (LP2020-5/2020). The University of KwaZulu-Natal is thanked for financial support (WS and JvS).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

WAS wrote the manuscript and carried out the antioxidant and mung bean assays; PB conducted the growth experiments; GM conducted the molecular identification; ZV participated in the collection and processing of the meteorological data and the assessment of the meteorological impacts; ZL carried out the statistical analysis; JvS edited the manuscript; and VÖ conceptualized and designed the experiment and edited the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wendy A. Stirk.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Online Resource 1 Cultivation tubes (2 L) used to grow the microalgae in a greenhouse (PDF 128 KB)

10811_2021_2515_MOESM2_ESM.pdf

Online Resource 2 Effect of temperature on a) biomass (DW), b) lipid content and c) protein content of the three microalgae strains used in the current experiment. Cultures were grown in laboratory conditions in modified Tamiya medium where N was reduced to 21 mg L-1 N (3% N). Cultures were harvested on day 3 and day 6 (PDF 105 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Stirk, W.A., Bálint, P., Maróti, G. et al. Comparison of monocultures and a mixed culture of three Chlorellaceae strains to optimize biomass production and biochemical content in microalgae grown in a greenhouse. J Appl Phycol 33, 2755–2766 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10811-021-02515-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10811-021-02515-y

Keywords

Navigation