Abstract
This study aimed to investigate students’ perceptions of engineers and how they vary by grade level and gender. This study proposes an approach to understanding the Chinese students’ perceptions of engineers and the interest preference of middle school students in the way of graphic analysis and questionnaire. This descriptive study incorporated a cross-age design; qualitative data were collected from 390 students in a junior high school in Bei**g. Data were analyzed using content analysis, and statistical tests were performed on eight factors. Although students have a basic common perception of engineers, gender differences exist, and there are gender stereotypes and one-sided perceptions of engineers. Most students tend to perceive engineers as males whose work area is limited to a single building. The drawings of students of higher grades are associated with mental activity in the engineering artifacts and processes factors, whereas students’ drawings with the presence of physical activity gradually decline. Students consider engineering to be mental work involving advanced psychological processes such as designing and inventing. Overall, the accuracy and comprehensiveness of students’ perceptions in senior grades is better than that in lower grades. Serious gender stereotypes and the phenomenon of cognitive simplification are present in middle school students’ perceptions of engineers.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10798-019-09513-9/MediaObjects/10798_2019_9513_Fig1_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10798-019-09513-9/MediaObjects/10798_2019_9513_Fig2_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10798-019-09513-9/MediaObjects/10798_2019_9513_Fig3_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10798-019-09513-9/MediaObjects/10798_2019_9513_Fig4_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10798-019-09513-9/MediaObjects/10798_2019_9513_Fig5_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10798-019-09513-9/MediaObjects/10798_2019_9513_Fig6_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10798-019-09513-9/MediaObjects/10798_2019_9513_Fig7_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10798-019-09513-9/MediaObjects/10798_2019_9513_Fig8_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10798-019-09513-9/MediaObjects/10798_2019_9513_Fig9_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10798-019-09513-9/MediaObjects/10798_2019_9513_Fig10_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10798-019-09513-9/MediaObjects/10798_2019_9513_Fig11_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10798-019-09513-9/MediaObjects/10798_2019_9513_Fig12_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10798-019-09513-9/MediaObjects/10798_2019_9513_Fig13_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10798-019-09513-9/MediaObjects/10798_2019_9513_Fig14_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10798-019-09513-9/MediaObjects/10798_2019_9513_Fig15_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10798-019-09513-9/MediaObjects/10798_2019_9513_Fig16_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10798-019-09513-9/MediaObjects/10798_2019_9513_Fig17_HTML.png)
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barman, C. R., Ostlund, K. L., Gatto, C. C., & Halferty, M. (1997). Fifth grade students’ perceptions about scientists and how they study and use science. In Proceedings of the 1997 annual international conference of the association for the education of teachers in science. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 405 220.
Capobianco, B. M., Deemer, E. D., & Lin, C. (2017). Analyzing predictors of children’s formative engineering identity development. International Journal of Engineering Education,33(1), 44–54.
Capobianco, B. M., Diefes-Dux, H. A., Mena, I., & Weller, J. (2011). What is an engineer? Implications of elementary school student conceptions for engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education,100(2), 304–328.
Chambers, D. W. (1983). Stereotypie images of scientists: The draw-a-scientist test. Science Education,67(2), 255–265.
Chen, Y., Li, Y., & Chen, M. (2014). Reform and development of international engineering education under the background of new industrial revolution. Research on Higher Engineering Education.,6, 1–5.
Chinese Ministry of Education. (2017). Compulsory education primary school science curriculum standards. Retrieved February 6, 2017, from http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A26/s8001/201702/t20170215_296305.html?from=timeline&isappinstalled=0.
Chou, P. N., & Chen, W. F. (2017). Elementary school students’ conceptions of engineers: A drawing analysis study in Taiwan. International Journal of Engineering Education,33(1), 476–488.
Clarebout, G., Depaepe, F., Elen, J., et al. (2007). The use of drawings to assess students’ epistemological beliefs. In 12th European conference for research on learning and instruction.
Douglas, J., Iverson, E., & Kalyandurg, C. (2004). Engineering in the K-12 classroom: An analysis of current practices and guidelines for the future. Retrieved April 15, 2006, from http://www.engineeringk12.org/educators/taking_a_closer_look/reports.htm.
Dove, J. E., Everret, L. A., & Preece, R. W. F. (1999). Exploring a hydrological concept through children’s drawings. International Journal of Science Education.,21(5), 485–497.
Ehrlen, K. (2009). Drawings as representations of children’s conceptions. International Journal of Science Education,31(1), 41–57.
Finson, K. D., Beaver, J. B., & Cramond, B. L. (1995). Development and field test of a checklist for the draw-ascientist test. School Science and Mathematics,95(4), 195–205.
Fralick, B., Keam, J., Thompson, S., & Lyons, J. (2009). How middle schoolers draw engineers and scientists. Journal of Science Education and Technology,18(1), 60–73.
Haney, W., Russell, M., & Bebell, D. (2004). Drawing on education: Using drawing to document schooling and support change. Harvard Educational Review,74(3), 241–272.
Harris, L. R., Harnett, J. A., & Brown, G. T. L. (2009). Drawing out student conceptions: Using pupils’ pictures to examine their conceptions of assessment. In D. M. McInerney, G. T. L. Brown & G. A. D. Liem (Eds.), Student perspectives on assessment: What students can tell us about assessment for learning (pp. 58). Charlotte, CN: Information Age Publishing.
Katehi, L., Pearson, G., Feder, M. A., & Committee on K-12 Engineering Education. (2009). Engineering in K-12 education: Understanding the status and improving the prospects. Washington: National Academies Press.
Knight, M., & Cunningham, C. M. (2004). Draw an engineer test (DAET): Development of a tool to investigate students’ ideas about engineers and engineering. In Proceedings of the 2004 ASEE annual conference and exposition, Salt Lake City, Utah, June 20–23, 2004.
Li, M. (2015). The application of painting psychological analysis in the selection PLA rugby players. Journal of Pla Institute of Physical Education, 34(1), 122–123.
Luo, Y. (2015). Research on key qualities of Chinese engineers from the perspective of engineering innovation. Master’s thesis, Bei**g Institute of Technology.
Lyons, J., & Thomson, S. (2006). Investigating the long-term impact of an engineering-based GK-12 program on students’ perceptions of engineering. In Proceedings of the 2006 ASEE annual conference and exposition, Chicago, Illinois (pp. 18–21).
MacPhail, A., & Kinchin, G. (2004). The use of drawings as an evaluative tool: Students’ experiences of sport education. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy,9(1), 87–108.
National Academies of Engineering. (2004). Ninth annual symposium on frontiers of engineering. Washington, DC: National Academy of Science.
Oware, E., Capobianco, B., & Diefes-Dux, H. (2007). Gifted students perceptions of engineers? A study of students in a summer outreach program. In Proceedings of the 2007 ASEE annual conference and exposition, Honolulu, Hawaii (pp. 24–27).
Pearson, G., & Young, T. (2002). Technically speaking: Why all Americans need to know more about technology. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Picker, S., & Berry, H. (2000). Investigating pupils’ images of mathematicians. Educational Studies in Mathematics,43(1), 65–94.
Plant, E. A., Baylor, A. L., Doerr, C. E., et al. (2009). Changing middle-school students’ attitudes and performance regarding engineering with computer-based social models. Computers & Education,53(2), 209–215.
Rogers, R. S. (1969). A consolidated report on the “Draw-A-Classroom” test: A study of the drawing behavior of children in toronto public schools. Unpublished manuscript.
Scherz, Z., & Oren, M. (2006). How to change students’ images of science and technology. Science Education,90(6), 965–985.
Schibeci, R. A., & Sorenson, I. (1983). Elementary school children’s perceptions of scientists. School Science and Mathematics,83(1), 14–19.
Schussler, E., & Winslow, J. (2007). Drawing on students’ knowledge. Science and Children, 44(5), 40–44.
Selvvyn, N., Boraschi, D., & Ozkula, S. M. (2009). Drawing digital pictures: An investigation of primary pupils’ representations of ICT and schools. British Educational Research Journal,35(6), 909–928.
Tu, S. (2007). Comprehensive engineering education: Introduction. Research on Higher Engineering Education, (2), 6–13.
Wang, H. Y., & Tsai, C. C. (2012). An exploration of elementary school students’ conceptions of learning: A drawing analysis. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher,21(3), 610–617.
Wei, C., & He, M. (2012). The quality structure of applied excellent engineers and its cultivation. Higher Science Education,1, 36–40.
Wei, Y., & Wang, H. (2008). The application of children’s graphic psychoanalysis in parent–child relationship processing. Journal of Educational Development (Preschool Education), (8), 29–31.
Wendell, K. B., & Rogers, C. (2013). Engineering design-based science, science content performance, and science attitudes in elementary school. Journal of Engineering Education,102(4), 513–540.
White, R. T., & Gunstone, R. F. (1992). Probing understanding. London: Falmer Press.
Wu, X., & Ji, J. (2012). Stereotypical image of scientists: Research advance and its implications. Journal of Bei**g Normal University: Social Science Edition, (6), 5–12.
Wu, X., Ji, J., Shang, X., & **e, J. (2010). The influence of middle school students’ image of scientists and science museum learning experience. Journal of South China Normal University: Social Science Edition, (5), 58–64.
Wu, Y., & Wu, W. (2013). Engineering technology education: New elements in American K-12 science education framework. Shanghai Education and Research, (1), 20–22.
Yang, J. (2013). A survey of scientists’ image and scientific cognition of primary and middle school students. Master dissertation, Hangzhou Normal University.
Yang, M. (2015). An analysis of self-image characteristics of public security new police based on painting projection technology. China Mental Health Association of College Students Psychological Counseling Professional Committee. Chinese Journal of Mental Health Education—The 12th national college students mental health education and counseling academic exchange conference proceedings.
Yuan, H., & Wang, Z. (2010). The role of graphic psychoanalysis in school mental health education. Business Culture, (7), 229.
Zhang, N., & Zhan, Y. (2014). Comparative study on the image of scientists among the primary and middle school students in Bei**g. Science Research, 9(6), 11–18.
Funding
Funding was provided by The National Education Science of China “13th Five-Year plan” key research topics of Ministry of Education (Grant No. DCA170309)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Liu, M., Chiang, FK. Middle school students’ perceptions of engineers: a case study of Bei**g students. Int J Technol Des Educ 30, 479–506 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-019-09513-9
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-019-09513-9