SpringerLink
Log in

Dispositions of 21st-Century Skills in STEM Programs and Their Changes over Time

  • Published:
International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It is important to cultivate dispositions of 21st-century skills (D21S: critical thinking, complex problem solving, creativity, communication, and collaboration) in project-based science, technology, engineering, and mathematics learning (STEM-PjBL). Previous research has seldom adopted the person-oriented approach to examine STEM-PjBL program effectiveness, and knowledge regarding group differences is still lacking. To fill this gap, a person-oriented analysis was used to form grou**s of students based on D21S. Three latent profiles (high-, medium-, and low-D21S) of students were identified in 6 elementary schools, and the transition probabilities were estimated for 2 class types (treatment vs. comparison) across 1 semester. Most of the students (63.4%) showed stable D21S profiles over 1 semester; however, some students (17.6%) exhibited improvement, and some (18.9%) showed declination. Additionally, the STEM-PjBL programs presented positive effects on the growth of D21S. This study further found that the D21S transitional types (i.e. declined, stable, and improved) could predict students’ motivation (perceived STEM domain content mastery, self-efficacy, and task value), showing that a declined D21S also decreased academic motivation. The findings suggest that students who decline in D21S should receive attention from teachers because their perceived academic performance, competence beliefs, and values in STEM also decrease simultaneously.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aizikovitsh-Udi, E., & Cheng, D. (2015). Develo** critical thinking skills from dispositions to abilities: Mathematics education from early childhood to high school. Creative Education, 6(4), 455–462. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2015.64045

  • Arens, A. K., Schmidt, I., & Preckel, F. (2019). Longitudinal relations among self-concept, intrinsic value, and attainment value across secondary school years in three academic domains. Journal of Educational Psychology, 111(4), 663–684. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartholomew, K. J., Ntoumanis, N., Ryan, R. M., & Thøgersen-Ntoumani, C. (2011). Psychological need thwarting in the sport context: Assessing the darker side of athletic experience. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 33(1), 75–102. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.33.1.75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beier, M. E., Kim, M. H., Saterbak, A., Leautaud, V., Bishnoi, S., & Gilberto, J. M. (2019). The effect of authentic project-based learning on attitudes and career aspirations in STEM. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 56(1), 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Binkley, M., Erstad, O., Herman, J., Raizen, S., Ripley, M., Miller-Ricci, M., & Rumble, M. (2012). Defining twenty-first century skills. In P. Griffin, B. McGaw, & E. Care (Eds.), Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills (pp. 17–66). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2324-5_2

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Birgili, B. (2015). Creative and critical thinking skills in problem-based learning environments. Journal of Gifted Education and Creativity, 2(2), 71–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borda, E. J. (2007). Applying Gadamer’s concept of disposition to science and science education. Science & Education, 16(9–10), 1027–1041. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-007-9079-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bransford, J. D., & Stein, B. S. (1993). The ideal problem solver: A guide for improving thinking, learning, and creativity (2nd ed.). Freeman.

  • Britner, S. L., & Pajares, F. (2006). Sources of science self-efficacy beliefs of middle school students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(5), 485–499. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cansoy, R., & Türkoglu, M. E. (2017). Examining the relationship between pre-service teachers’ critical thinking disposition, problem solving skills and teacher self-efficacy. International Education Studies, 10(6), 23–35. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v10n6p23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Capraro, M. M., & Morgan, J. R. (2013). Interdisciplinary STEM project-based learning. In R. M. Capraro, M. M. Capraro, & J. R. Morgan (Eds). STEM project-pased learning (pp. 51–58). Sense. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-143-6_6

  • Chai, C. S., Deng, F., Tsai, P. S., Koh, J. H. L., & Tsai, C. C. (2015). Assessing multidimensional students’ perceptions of twenty-first-century learning practices. Asia Pacific Education Review, 16(3), 389–398. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-015-9379-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, S., & Muthén, B. (2009). Relating latent class analysis results to variables not included in the analysis. Retrieved September 05, 2021 from https://www.statmodel.com/download/relatinglca.pdf

  • Cojocaru, D., Friesel, A., & Spikol, D. (2016). Supporting STEM knowledge and skills in engineering education: PELARS project. Paper presented at the 2016 ASEE 123rd Annual Conference & Exposition – Making Value for Society, New Orleans, LA, USA.

  • Dare, E. A., Ellis, J. A., & Roehrig, G. H. (2018). Understanding science teachers’ implementations of integrated STEM curricular units through a phenomenological multiple case study. International Journal of STEM Education, 5(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0101-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dilley, A., Kaufman, J. C., Kennedy, C., & Plucker, J. A. (2015). What we know about critical thinking. Partnership for 21st Century Learning.

  • Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 109–132. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eccles, J. S., Wigfield, A., & Schiefele, U. (1998). Motivation to succeed. In W. Damon & N. Eisenberg (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Social, emotional, and personality development (pp. 1017–1095). John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • El Sayary, A. M. A., Forawi, S. A., & Mansour, N. (2015). STEM education and problem-based learning. In R. Wegerif, L. Li, & J. C. Kaufman (Eds.), The Routledge international handbook of research on teaching thinking (pp. 357–369). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Espey, M. (2018). Enhancing critical thinking using team-based learning. Higher Education Research & Development, 37(1), 15–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2017.1344196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friesel, A., Cojocaru, D., & Avramides, K. (2015, June 2–4). Identifying how PELARS-project can support the development of new curriculum structures in engineering education. Paper presented at the 2015 3rd Experiment International Conference (exp.at'15), Ponta Delgada, Portugal.

  • Halpern, D. F. (1999). Teaching for critical thinking: Hel** college students develop the skills and dispositions of a critical thinker. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 1999(80), 69–74. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.8005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hulleman, C. S., Barron, K. E., Kosovich, J. J., & Lazowski, R. A. (2016). Student motivation: Current theories, constructs, and interventions within an expectancy-value framework. In A. A. Lipnevich, F. Preckel, & R. D. Roberts (Eds.), Psychosocial skills and school systems in the 21st century: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 241–278). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28606-8_10

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hulleman, C. S., Durik, A. M., Schweigert, S. A., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2008). Task values, achievement goals, and interest: An integrative analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(2), 398–416. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.100.2.398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, G. J., Lai, C. L., Liang, J. C., Chu, H. C., & Tsai, C. C. (2018). A long-term experiment to investigate the relationships between high school students’ perceptions of mobile learning and peer interaction and higher-order thinking tendencies. Educational Technology Research and Development, 66(1), 75–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-017-9540-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, J. E., Lanza, S., Osgood, D. W., Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Changes in children’s self-competence and values: Gender and domain differences across grades one through twelve. Child Development, 73(2), 509–527. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jansen, M., Scherer, R., & Schroeders, U. (2015). Students’ self-concept and self-efficacy in the sciences: Differential relations to antecedents and educational outcomes. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 41, 13–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.11.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, D., Santos, R., Mayer, T., & Boyd, L. (2016). Latent transition analysis for program evaluation with multivariate longitudinal outcomes. In L. A. van der Ark, D. M. Bolt, W.-C. Wang, J. A. Douglas, & M. Wiberg (Eds.), Quantitative psychology research (pp. 377–388). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-38759-8_28

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Juhji, J., & Nuangchalerm, P. (2020). Interaction between science process skills and scientific attitudes of students towards technological pedagogical content knowledge. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 8(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.600979

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalelioğlu, F., & Gülbahar, Y. (2014). The effect of instructional techniques on critical thinking and critical thinking dispositions in online discussion. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 17(1), 248–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41(4), 212–218. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4104_2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lanza, S. T., Patrick, M. E., & Maggs, J. L. (2010). Latent transition analysis: Benefits of a latent variable approach to modeling transitions in substance use. Journal of Drug Issues, 40(1), 93–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/002204261004000106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, Q., Yin, Y., Tang, X., Hadad, R., & Zhai, X. (2020). Assessing learning in technology-rich maker activities: A systematic review of empirical research. Computers & Education, 157, 103944. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103944

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lo, Y., Mendell, N., & Rubin, D. (2001). Testing the number of components in a normal mixture. Biometrika, 88(3), 767–778. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/88.3.767

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magidson, J., & Vermunt, J. K. (2004). Latent class models. In D. Kaplan (Ed.), The Sage handbook of quantitative methodology for the social sciences (pp. 175–198). Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Makarova, E., Aeschlimann, B., & Herzog, W. (2019). The gender gap in STEM fields: The impact of the gender stereotype of math and science on secondary students' career aspirations. Frontiers in Education, 4, 60. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2019.00060

  • Martín‐Páez, T., Aguilera, D., Perales‐Palacios, F. J., & Vílchez‐González, J. M. (2019). What are we talking about when we talk about STEM education? A review of literature. Science Education, 103(4), 799–822. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21522

  • Megayanti, T., Busono, T., & Maknun, J. (2020). Project-based learning efficacy in vocational education: Literature review. The Institute of Physics (IOP) Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 830(4), 042075. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/830/4/042075

  • Molinsky, A., Davenport, T. H., Iyer, B., & Davidson, C. (2012). Three skills every 21st-century manager needs. Harvard Business Review, 90(1–2), 139–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muthén, B., & Muthén, L. (2019). Mplus 8.4 [Computer software]. Muthén & Muthén.

  • Nylund, K. L., Muthén, B., Nishina, A., Bellmore, A., & Graham, S. (2006). Stability and instability of peer victimization during middle school: Using latent transition analysis with covariates, distal outcomes, and modeling extensions [Unpublished manuscript].

  • Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development [OECD]. (2019a). Learning Compass 2030 in brief. Retrieved February 5, 2022 from https://www.oecd.org/education/2030-project/teaching-and-learning/learning/learning-compass-2030/

  • Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development [OECD]. (2019b). Future of education and skills 2030: Attitudes and values for 2030. Retrieved January 5, 2021 from https://www.oecd.org/education/2030-project/teaching-and-learning/learning/attitudes-and-values/

  • Oie, M., & Fujii, T. (2017). Development of mathematics motivation across the transition from elementary to junior high school in Japan. Psychology, 8(2), 287–301. https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2017.82017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pajares, F. (1996). Self-efficacy beliefs in academic settings. Review of Educational Research, 66(4), 543–578. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543066004543

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritchhart, R. (2001). From IQ to IC: A dispositional view of intelligence. Roeper Review, 23(3), 143–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783190109554086

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, K. A., Lee, Y.-K., Bovee, E. A., Perez, T., Walton, S. P., Briedis, D., & Linnenbrink-Garcia, L. (2019). Motivation in transition: Development and roles of expectancy, task values, and costs in early college engineering. Journal of Educational Psychology, 111(6), 1081–1102. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development and wellness. Guilford Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sahin, A. (2013). STEM project-based learning: Specialized form of inquiry-based learning. In R. M. Capraro, M. M. Capraro, & J. R. Morgan (Eds.), STEM project-pased learning (pp. 59–64). Sense. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-143-6_7

  • Schussler, D. L. (2006). Defining dispositions: Wading through murky waters. The Teacher Educator, 41(4), 251–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/08878730609555387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, G. (1978). Estimating the dimension of a model. The Annals of Statistics, 6(2),  461–464. https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1176344136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sclove, S. L. (1987). Application of model-selection criteria to some problems in multivariate analysis. Psychometrika, 52(3), 333–343. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srisawad, K., Ratana-Olarn, T., & Kiddee, K. (2017). The development of structural equation model of critical thinking among nursing students. Walailak Journal of Science and Technology, 14(1), 65–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Talsma, K., Schüz, B., Schwarzer, R., & Norris, K. (2018). I believe, therefore I achieve (and vice versa): A meta-analytic cross-lagged panel analysis of self-efficacy and academic performance. Learning and Individual Differences, 61, 136–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2017.11.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taura, A. A., Abdullah, M. C., Roslan, S., & Omar, Z. (2015). Relationship between self-efficacy, task value, self-regulation strategies and active procrastination among pre-service teachers in colleges of education. International Journal of Psychology and Counselling, 7(2), 11–17. https://doi.org/10.5897/IJPC2014.0297

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, A. M., Macy, R. J., & Fraser, M. W. (2011). Assessing person-centered outcomes in practice research: A latent transition profile framework. Journal of Community Psychology, 39(8), 987–1002. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.20485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Usher, E. L., & Pajares, F. (2009). Sources of self-efficacy in mathematics: A validation study. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 34(1), 89–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2008.09.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valtonen, T., Hoang, N., Sointu, E., Näykki, P., Virtanen, A., Pöysä-Tarhonen, J., Häkkinen, P., Järvelä, S., Mäkitalo, K., & Kukkonen, J. (2021). How pre-service teachers perceive their 21st-century skills and dispositions: A longitudinal perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 116, 106643. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106643

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Laar, E., van Deursen, A. J.A.M., van Dijk, J. A.G.M., & de Haan, J. (2017). The relation between 21st-century skills and digital skills: A systematic literature review. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 577–588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.03.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varandi, S. B., & Mehrali, S. (2013). Investigating the effect of levels of proficiency on Iranian male and female EFL learners’ critical thinking and self-efficacy. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 3(12), 2355–2361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, H. Y., Huang, I., & Hwang, G. J. (2016). Effects of a question prompt-based concept map** approach on students’ learning achievements, attitudes and 5C competences in project-based computer course activities. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 19(3), 351–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2002). The development of competence beliefs, expectancies for success, and achievement values from childhood through adolescence. In A. Wigfield & J. S. Eccles (Eds.), Development of achievement motivation (pp. 91–120). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012750053-9/50006-1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, F., Fan, W., Arbona, C., & de la Rosa-Pohl, D. (2020). Self-efficacy and subjective task values in relation to choice, effort, persistence, and continuation in engineering: An expectancy-value theory perspective. European Journal of Engineering Education, 45(1), 151–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2019.1659231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, Y. T. C. (2012). Cultivating critical thinkers: Exploring transfer of learning from pre-service teacher training to classroom practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(8), 1116–1130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2012.06.007

  • Yang, Y. T. C., & Chou, H. A. (2008). Beyond critical thinking skills: Investigating the relationship between critical thinking skills and dispositions through different online instructional strategies. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(4), 666–684. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00767.x

  • Yang, Y. T. C., Lin, C. P., Lin, C. S., & Chiu, C. H. (2019). Advanced Interdisciplinary (STEAM) Project (Final Report). Taipei, Taiwan: Ministry of Education.

  • Yang, Y. T. C., Lin, C. P., Lin, C. S., & Lin, S. S. J. (2020). Advanced Interdisciplinary (STEAM) Project (Final Report). Taipei, Taiwan: Ministry of Education.

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by a 4-year grant from the Ministry of Education, Taiwan ROC, through the project entitled “The Advanced Interdisciplinary Project for K-12 Schools.”

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Education, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, 1001 Ta-Hsueh Rd, Hsinchu, 300, Taiwan

    Ssu-Kuang Chen & Sunny S. J. Lin

  2. Institute of Education, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan

    Ya-Ting Carolyn Yang

  3. Institute of Learning Sciences and Technologies, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu, Taiwan

    ChiuPin Lin

Authors
  1. Ssu-Kuang Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ya-Ting Carolyn Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. ChiuPin Lin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Sunny S. J. Lin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sunny S. J. Lin.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 38.2 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, SK., Yang, YT.C., Lin, C. et al. Dispositions of 21st-Century Skills in STEM Programs and Their Changes over Time. Int J of Sci and Math Educ 21, 1363–1380 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-022-10288-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-022-10288-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation