Log in

Assessment of sources of uncertainty in macrophyte surveys and the consequences for river classification

  • Published:
Hydrobiologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The application of macrophytes in freshwater monitoring is still relatively limited and studies on their intercalibration and sources of variation are required. Therefore, the aim of the study was to compare selected indices and metrics based on macrophytes and to quantify their variability. During the STAR project, several aspects influencing uncertainty in estimation of the ecological quality of river were assessed. Results showed that several metrics based on the indicative value of plant species can be used in evaluation of the ecological status of rivers. Among estimated sources of variance in metric values the inter-surveyor differences had the lowest effect and slightly stronger were the influences of temporal variation (years and seasons) and shading. The impact of habitat modification was the most important factor. Analysis showed that some of macrophyte-based metrics (notably MTR and IBMR) are of sufficient precision in terms of sampling uncertainty, that they could be useful for estimating the ecological status of rivers in accordance with the aims of the Water Framework Directive.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Thailand)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • J. D. Allan (1995) Stream Ecology. Structure and Function of Running Waters Chapman and Hall London, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • M. S. Boyce (1984) ArticleTitleRestitution of r – and K – strategy selection as a model of density – dependent natural selection Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 15 427–447

    Google Scholar 

  • R. T. Clarke M. T. Furse J. F. Wright D. Moss (1996) ArticleTitleDerivation of a biological quality index for river sites: comparison of the observed with the expected fauna Journal of Applied Statistics 23 311–332 Occurrence Handle10.1080/02664769624279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R. T. Clarke (2000) Uncertainty in estimates of river quality based on RIVPACS J. F. Wright D. W. Sutcliffe M. T. Furse (Eds) Assessing the Biological Quality of Freshwaters: RIVPACS and Similar Techniques Freshwater Biological Association Ambleside 39–54

    Google Scholar 

  • R. T. Clarke M. T. Furse R. J. M. Gunn J. M. Winder J. F. Wright (2002) ArticleTitleSampling variation in macroinvertebrate data and implications for river quality indices Freshwater Biology 47 1735–1751 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1365-2427.2002.00885.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, R. T., 2004. STARBUGS 1.1 (STAR Bioassessment Uncertainty Guidance Software). Error/Uncertainty module software, Centre for Hydrology and Ecology in Dorset (CEH)

  • Dawson, F. H., P. J. Raven & N. T. H. Holmes, 1998. Distribution of aquatic plants by morphological group for rivers in the UK. 10th EWRS Symposium on Aquatic Weeds 1998, Lisbon, 1–5

  • F. H. Dawson K. Szoszkiewicz (1999) ArticleTitleRelationships of some ecological factors with the associations of vegetation in British rivers Hydrobiologia 415 117–122 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1003820308436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • F. H. Dawson J. R. Newman M. J. Gravelle K. J. Rouen P. Henville (1999) Assessment of the Trophic Status of Rivers using Macrophytes: Evaluation of the Mean Trophic Rank. R&D Technical Report E39 Environment Agency of England & Wales Bristol, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, F. H., 2002. Guidance for the field assessment of macrophytes of rivers within the STAR Project. http://www.eu-star.at/frameset.htm

  • Directive, 2000/60/EC. Water Framework Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000

  • Ellenberg, H., H. E. Weber, R. Dull, V. Wirth, W. Werner & D. Baulissen, 1992. Zeigerwerte von Pflanzen in Mitteleuropa. Scripta Geobotanica, Vol. 18

  • Environment Agency, 1996. Methodology for the assessment of freshwater riverine macrophytes for the purposes of the Urban Waste Water Treatment Directive. Enviroment Agency, May 1996 Version 2.

  • J. Haury M. -C. Peltre S. Muller M. Trémolières J. Barbe A. Dutartre M. Guerlesquin (1996) ArticleTitleDes indices macrophytiques pour estimer la qualité des cours d’eau français: premières propositions Ecologie 27 233–244

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Haury M. Jaffre A. Dutartre M. C. Peltre J. Barbe M. Tremolieres M. Guerlesquin S. Muller (1998) ArticleTitleApplication of the standardized protocol “Milieu Et Vegetaux aquatiques fixes” to 12 French rivers: preliminary floristic typology International Journal of Limnology 34 129–139 Occurrence Handle10.1051/limn/1998012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haury, J., M. -C. Peltre, M. Tremolieres, J. Barbe, G. Thiebaut, I. Berne, H. Daniel, P. Chatenet, S. Muller, A. Dutartre, C. Laplace-Treyture, A. Cazaubon & E. Lambert-Servien, 2002. A method involving macrophytes to assess water trophy and organic pollution: the Macrophyte Biological Index for Rivers (IBMR) – application to different types of rivers and pollutions. In Dutartre A. & M.-H. Montel (eds), Proc. 11th EWRS International Symposium on Aquatic Weeds, Moliets Et Maa, France, 247–250

  • N. T. H. Holmes J. R. Newman S. Chadd K. J. Rouen L. Saint F. H. Dawson (1999) Mean Trophic Rank: A users manual. R&D Technical Report E38 Environment Agency of England & Wales Bristol, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Jusik T. Zgola (2004) ArticleTitleInfluence of morphological transformation of littoral zone on species diversity of macrophytes Zeszyty Naukowe AR w Krakowie, Inzynieria Srodowiska 412 311–320

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, J. R., F. H. Dawson, N. T. H. Holmes, S. Chadd, K. J. Rouen & L. Sharp, 1997. Mean Trophic Rank: A User`s Manual. R&D Technical Report E38. Environment Agency, Bristol, 1–130

  • S. Schneider T. Krumpholz A. Melzer (2000) ArticleTitleTrophäeindikation in Fliessgewässern mit Hilfe des TIM (Trophäe-Index Macrophyten) – Erprobung eines neu entwickelten Index im Inniger Bach Acta hydrochimica et hydrobiologica 28 241–249 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3M**tl2q Occurrence Handle10.1002/1521-401X(200005)28:5<241::AID-AHEH241>3.0.CO;2-Z

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • C. E. Shannon W. Weaver (1949) The Mathematical Theory of Communication University of Illinois Press Urbana

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Siegel N. J. Castellan (1988) Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences EditionNumber2 McGraw-Hill New York

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Staniszewski (2001) ArticleTitleEstimation of river trophy in the Kujawskie Lakeland using Mean Trophic Rank and Chemical Index of Trophy Roczniki AR Poznan 334, Botanika 4 165–173

    Google Scholar 

  • StatSoft, Inc., 2004. STATISTICA (data analysis software system), version 6. www.statsoft.com

  • K. Szoszkiewicz K. Karolewicz A. Lawniczak F. H. Dawson (2002) ArticleTitleAn assessment of the MTR aquatic plant bioindication system for determining the trophic status of Polish rivers Polish Journal of Environmental Studies 11 421–427 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD38XlsF2ktrg%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • J. F. Wright D. W. Sutcliffe M. T. Furse (Eds) (2000) Assessing the Biological Quality of Fresh Waters: RIVPACS and Other Techniques Freshwater Biological Association Ambleside

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ryszard Staniszewski.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Staniszewski, R., Szoszkiewicz, K., Zbierska, J. et al. Assessment of sources of uncertainty in macrophyte surveys and the consequences for river classification. Hydrobiologia 566, 235–246 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-006-0093-4

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-006-0093-4

Keywords

Navigation