Abstract
The six-rowed barley with brittle rachis Hordeum agriocrithon A.E. Åberg is a diverse taxon connected with the evolution and domestication processes in the genus Hordeum. However, the origin and patterns of taxonomic divergence of this barley type is still hotly disputed. Here we utilized inter-primer binding site (iPBS) retrotransposon marker analysis to assess the genetic diversity of the complex taxonomic group H. agriocrithon in reference to the other two main barley taxa H. spontaneum K. Koch and H. vulgare L.. Based on selected iPBS primers, we demonstrated that the long-term process of natural evolution and human-driven domestication have influenced the dynamics of the TE fraction of the barley genome. iPBS markers reliably differentiated at molecular level the three main Hordeum taxa but also revealed genetic and phenotypic diversity patterns at within taxon level. Although H. agriocrithon can be considered as an autochthonous species due to its genetic divergence from H. spontaneum and H. vulgare, our results have shown that most of representatives of this taxon are of hybrid origin and hybridization events have shaped its highly heterogeneous genetic structure. Furthermore, our results strongly support the notion that H. spontaneum accessions are ancestors of the H. agriocrithon subgroup paradoxon and that the Caspian sea region is the likely place of initial cultivation and domestication of the six-rowed barley.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Åberg E (1938) Hordeum agriocrithon, a wild six-rowed barley. Ann Agr Coll Sweden 6:159–216
Åberg E (1940) The taxonomy and phylogeny of Hordeum L. sect. Cerealia Ands. Syrnbolae Bot. Upsalienses, 4(2):1–156
Al-Beyroutiová M, Sabo M, Sleziak P, Dušinský R, Birčák E, Hauptvogel P, Kilian A, Švec M (2016) Evolutionary relationships in the genus Secale revealed by DArTseq DNA polymorphism. Plant Syst Evol 302:1083–1091. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-016-1318-2
Andeden EE, Baloch FS, Derya M, Kilian B, Özkan H (2013) iPBS-Retrotransposons-based genetic diversity and relationship among wild annual Cicer species. J Plant Biochem Biotechnol 22:453–466. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13562-012-0175-5
Azhaguvel P, Komatsuda T (2007) A phylogenetic analysis based on nucleotide sequence of a marker linked to the brittle rachis lucus indicates a diphyletic origin of barley. Ann Bot 100:1009–1015. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcm129
Baloch FS, Alsaleh A, de Miera LES, Hatipoğlu R, Ciftci V, Karakoy T, Yıldız M, Ozkan H (2015a) DNA based iPBS-retrotransposon markers for investigating the population structure of pea (Pisum sativum) germplasm from Turkey. Biochem Syst Ecol 61:244–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bse.2015.06.017
Baloch FS, Derya M, Andeden EE, Alsaleh A, Comertpay G, Kilian B, Ozkan H (2015b) Inter-primer binding site retrotransposon and inter-simple sequence repeat diversity among wild Lens species. Biochem Syst Ecol 58:162–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bse.2014.12.002
Baranek M, Meszaros M, Sochorova J, Čechova J, Raddova J (2012) Utility of retrotransposon-derived marker systems for differentiation of presumed clones of the apricot cultivar Velkopavlovicka. Sci Hortic 143:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2012.05.022
Belyayev A (2014) Bursts of transposable elements as an evolutionary driving force. J Evol Biol 27(12):2573–2584. https://doi.org/10.1111/jeb.12513
Bonchev G, Dusinský R, Hauptvogel P, Švec M (2017) Patterns of evolutionary trajectories and domestication history within the genus Hordeum assessed by REMAP markers. J Mol Evol 84(2–3):116–128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00239-016-9779-z
Buckler ES, Thornsberry JM, Kresovich S (2011) Molecular diversity, structure and domestication of grasses. Genet Res 77:213–218. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0016672301005158
Dai F, Nevo E, Wu D, Comadran J, Zhou M, Qiu L, Chen Z, Beiles A, Chen G, Zhang G (2012) Tibet is one of the centers of domestication of cultivated barley. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109:16969–16973. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1215265109
Demirel U, Tındaş I, Yavuz C, Baloch FS (2018) Assessing genetic diversity of potato genotypes using inter-PBS retrotransposon marker system. Plant Genet Res 16:137–145. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1479262117000041
Evanno G, Regnaut S, Goudet J (2005) Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software STRUCTURE: a simulation study. Mol Ecol 14:2611–2620. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02553.x
Excoffier L, Smouse PE, Quattro JM (1992) Analysis of molecular variance from metric distance among DNA haplotypes: application to human mitochondrial DNA restriction data. Genetics 131:479–491
Feng ZY, Liu XJ, Zhang YZ, Ling HQ (2006) Genetic diversity analysis of Tibetan wild barley using SSR markers. Acta Genet Sin 33:917–928. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0379-4172(06)60126-1
Ferreira JR, Pereira JF, Turchetto C, Minella E, Consoli L, Delatorre CA (2016) Assessment of genetic diversity in Brazilian barley using SSR markers. Genet Mol Biol 39(1):86–96. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-4685-GMB-2015-0148
Grandbastien MA, Audeon C, Bonnivard E et al (2005) Stress activation and genomic impact of Tnt1 retrotransposons in Solanaceae. Cytogenet Genome Res 110:229–241. https://doi.org/10.1159/000084957
Guo DL, Guo MX, Hou XG, Zhang GH (2014) Molecular diversity analysis of grape varieties based on iPBS markers. Bioc Syst Ecol 52:27–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bse.2013.10.008
Hirochika H (1993) Activation of tobacco retrotransposons during tissue culture. EMBO J 12:2521
Huson DH, Bryant D (2006) Application of phylogenetic networks in evolutionary studies. Mol Biol Evol 23(2):254–267. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msj030
Jilal A, Grando S, Henry RJ, Lee LS, Rice NF, Hill H, Baum M, Ceccarelli S (2008) Genetic diversity of ICARDA’s worldwide barley landrace collection. Genet Resour Crop Evol 55(8):1221–1230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-008-9322-1
Kalendar R, Tanskanen J, Immonen S, Nevo E, Schulman AH (2000) Genome evolution of wild barley (Hordeum spontaneum) by BARE-1 retrotransposon dynamics in response to sharp microclimatic divergence. Proc Natl Acad Sci 97:6603–6607. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.110587497
Kalendar R, Antonius K, Smykal P, Schulman AH (2010) iPBS: a universal method for DNA fingerprinting and retrotransposon isolation. Theor Appl Genet 121(8):1419–1430. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-010-1398-2
Kartal-Alacam G, Yilmaz S, Marakli S, Gozukirmizi N (2014) Sukkula retrotransposon insertion polymorphism in barley. Russ J Plant Physiol 61:828–833
Kashkush K, Feldman M, Levy AA (2003) Transcriptional activation of retrotransposons alters the expression of adjacent genes in wheat. Nat Genet 32:102–106
Kenan-Eichler M, Leshkowitz D, Tal L et al (2011) Wheat hybridization and polyploidization results in deregulation of small RNAs. Genetics 188:263–272. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.111.128348
Koinishi T (2001) Genetic diversity in Hordeum agriocrithon E. Åberg, six-rowed barley with brittle rachis from Tibet. Genet Resour Crop Evol 48:27–34. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011254927505
Kraitshtein Z, Yaakov B, Khasdan V, Kashkush K (2010) Genetic and epigenetic dynamics of a retrotransposon after allopolyploidization of wheat. Genetics 186:801–812. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics
Laudencia-Chingcuanco D, Fowler DB (2012) Genotype-dependent burst of transposable element expression in crowns of hexaploid wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) during cold acclimation. Comp Funct Genom 23:2530. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/232530
Ledovskoy Y, Abugalieva S, Turuspekov Y (2010) Comparative assessment of the genetic variation in wild and cultivated barley based on SSR markers. Asian Australas J Plant Sci Biotechnol 4:21–26
Mascher M, Gundlach H, Himmelbach A, Beier S, Twardziok SO, Wicker T et al (2017) A chromosome conformation capture ordered sequence of the barley genome. Nature 544:427–433. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature22043
McClintock B (1984) The significance of responses of the genome to challenge. Science 226:792–801. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.15739260
Naito K, Cho E, Yang G, Campbell MA, Yano K, Okumoto Y, Tanisaka T, Wessler SR (2006) Dramatic amplification of a rice transposable element during recent domestication. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:17620–17625. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0605421103
Nandha PS, Singh J (2014) Comparative assessment of genetic diversity between wild and cultivated barley using gSSR and EST-SSR markers. Plant Breed 133(1):28–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbr.12118
Nei M (1987) Molecular evolutionary genetics. Columbia University Press, New York, pp 219–220
Nemli S, Kianoosh T, Tanyolac MB (2015) Genetic diversity and population structure of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) accessions through retrotransposon based interprimer binding sites (iPBSs) markers. Turk J Agric For 39:940–948. https://doi.org/10.3906/tar-1505-59
Peakall R, Smouse PE (2006) GENALEX 6: genetic analysis in excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Mol Ecol Notes 6:288–295
Pourkheirandish M, Kanamori H, Wu J, Sakumash BF, Komatsuda T (2018) Elucidation of the origin of “agriocrithon” based on domestication genes questions the hypothesis that Tibet is one of the centers of barley domestication. Plant J 94(3):525–534. https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.13876
Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P (2000) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155:945–959
Roy NS, Choi J-Y, Lee S-l, Kim N-S (2015) Marker utility of transposable elements for plant genetics, breeding, and ecology: a review. Genes Genom 37:141–151. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13258-014-0252-3
Saghai Maroof M, Biyashev RM, Yang GP, Zhang Q, Allard RW (1994) Extraordinarily polymorphic microsatellite DNA in barley: species diversity, chromosomal locations, and population dynamics. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91:5466–5470. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.91.12.5466
Schiemann E (1951) Neue Gerstenformen aus Ost-Tibet und ein weiterer Fund von Hordeum agriocrithon Åberg. Ber D Bot Ges 64:56–68
Smýkal P, Bačová-Kerteszová N, Kalendar R, Corander J, Schulman AH, Pavelek M (2011) Genetic diversity of cultivated flax (Linum usitatissimum L.) germplasm assessed by retrotransposon-based markers. Theor Appl Genet 122:1385–1397. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-011-1539-2
Sneath PHA (1975) Cladistic representation of reticulate evolution. Syst Zool 24(3):360–368. https://doi.org/10.2307/2412721
Tanno K, Takeda K (2004) On the origin of six-rowed barley with brittle rachis, agriocrithon [Hordeum vulgare ssp. vulgare f. agriocrithon (Åberg) Bowd.], based on a DNA marker closely linked to the vrs1 (six-row gene) locus. Theor Appl Genet 110:145–150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-004-1816-4
Tanno K, Taketa S, Takeda K, Komatsuda T (2002) A DNA marker closely linked to the vrs1 locus (row-type gene) indicates multiple origins of six-rowed cultivated barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Theor Appl Genet 104(1):54–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001220200006
Ungerer MC, Strakosh SC, Stimpso KM (2009) Proliferation of Ty3/gypsy-like retrotransposons in hybrid sunflower taxa inferred from phylogenetic data. BMC Biol 7:40. https://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7007-7-40
Vitte C, Fustier MA, Alix K, Tenaillon MI (2014) The bright side of transposons in crop evolution. Brief Funct Genom 13(4):276–295. https://doi.org/10.1093/bfgp/elu002
von Bothmer R, Jacobsen N, Baden C, Aden RB, Jorgensen B, Linde-Laursen I (1995) An ecogeographical study of the genus Hordeum, 2nd edn. International Plant Genetic Resources Institute, FAO, Rome
Wang A, Yu Z, Ding Y (2009) Genetic diversity analysis of wild close relatives of barley from Tibet and the Middle East by ISSR and SSR markers. C R Biol 332:393–403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crvi.2008.11.007
Wessler SR (1996) Turned on by stress. Plant retrotransposons. Curr Biol 6:959–961. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-9822(02)00638-3
Yaldiz G, Camlica M, Nadeem MA, Nawaz MA, Baloch FS (2018) Genetic diversity assessment in Nicotiana tabacum L. with iPBS-retrotransposons. Turk J Agric For 42:154–164. https://doi.org/10.3906/tar-1708-32
Zeng X, Guo Y, Xu Q, Mascher M, Guo G, Li S et al (2018) Origin and evolution of qingke barley in Tibet. Nat Commun 9(1):5433. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-07920-5
Zohary D (1959) Is Hordeum agriocrithon Åberg the ancestor of six-rowed cultivated barley? Evolution 13:279–280
Funding
This work was supported by a postdoctoral fellowship grant to Dr. Georgi Bonchev (National Scholarship Programme of the Slovak Republic) and by the Slovak Research and Development Agency under the Contract Nos. APVV-0661-10 and APVV-15-0156.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Supplementary Figure 1
Example iPBS fingerprints of H. agriocrithon accessions obtained using oligonucleotide primers 2224, 2374 and 2378 (EPS 4194 kb)
Supplementary Figure 2
Patterns of band dynamics in the three barley taxa and within the agriocrithon group based on iPBS molecular data from primers 2374 and 2378. The estimated parameters are number of amplified loci (Nal), number of loci with fixed bands (Lfb), percentage of polymorphic loci (%) and average band frequencies (bf). In each panel, H. agriocrithon is subdivided into sub-groups agriocrithon (agr), dawoense (daw) and paradoxon (par) (EPS 519 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bonchev, G., Dušinský, R., Hauptvogel, P. et al. On the diversity and origin of the barley complex agriocrithon inferred by iPBS transposon markers. Genet Resour Crop Evol 66, 1573–1586 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-019-00814-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-019-00814-5