Log in

Rapid Drawdown Analysis Using Pore Pressures from BBM

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Geotechnical and Geological Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Accurate pore pressure prediction under transient seepage conditions following the removal of external water loads, such as rapid drawdown (RDD), requires coupling the effect of changes in both hydraulic boundary conditions and stresses. The Barcelona basic model (BBM), which has been used as a coupled soil constitutive model to predict pore pressures, is used in this paper to predict pore water pressure for RDD stability analysis. RDD stability is evaluated using predicted pore pressures from the BBM for a hypothetical geometry and for the failed Sparmos Dam. The paper compares the pore pressure assumptions for the BBM to other methods of RDD and highlights the limitations of using the BBM in effective stress RDD stability analysis. Sensitivity analysis revealed that pore pressures following RDD are not affected by the values of the BBM parameters, if varied in reasonable bounds. During drawdown, the BBM simulates the influence of shear stresses on predicted pore pressures only related to an elastic response of the soil, which is not realistic for most soils. Despite these limitations, the pore pressures predicted by BBM calculated the most reasonable factor of safety close to unity using the most likely strength parameters for the failed Sparmos Dam when compared to other common RDD procedures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Tennessee Technological University’s Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering.

Funding

The authors declare that no funds, grants, or other support were received during the preparation of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. The first draft of the manuscript was written by PT. DV provided technical guidance and was a major contributor in writing the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Prince Turkson.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interests

The authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Turkson, P., VandenBerge, D.R. Rapid Drawdown Analysis Using Pore Pressures from BBM. Geotech Geol Eng 42, 1389–1404 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-023-02624-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-023-02624-0

Keywords

Navigation