SpringerLink
Log in

Reassessment of the efficiency of China's industrial circular economy considering quality of life: a meta recycle SBM dynamic under exogenous model

  • Published:
Environment, Development and Sustainability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Improving industrial circular economy efficiency (ICEE) is an inevitable goal to realize industrial transformation and upgrading, and it is also an essential requirement for following a new path of industrialization. Few studies discuss quality of life (QoL) under industrial production, the circular economy, and environmental pollution and thus fail to recognize how QoL affects the development of the industrial circular economy. Most existing studies use the traditional DEA model for calculation, ignoring that the industrial circular economy system is complex and composed of a two-way closed loop including pollution control and resource recovery. Therefore, this research innovatively takes QoL as an exogenous variable, decomposes ICEE into two subsystems of industrial production efficiency and industrial circular efficiency, and constructs a new meta SBM dynamic circulation model that considers exogenous variables. We then re-evaluate ICEE and its stage efficiencies (industrial production efficiency and industrial circular efficiency) for 30 provinces in China after adding QoL. The study finds that ignoring QoL can lead to serious errors in ICEE. China’s overall ICEE is not high, and except for the nine provinces of Shanxi, Shandong, and Tian**, which have reached the efficiency frontier, the ICEE of the remaining 21 provinces has room for improvement to varying degrees. From 2015 to 2020, the overall performance of ICEE, industrial production efficiency, and industrial cycle efficiency in terms of time series show an upward trend. The industrial production efficiency value is generally better than the industrial cycle efficiency value, contributing to overall efficiency, while industrial cycle efficiency drags down overall efficiency. The geographical distribution of ICEE exhibits clear stages. In 2015 and 2018–2020, the performance is east > central > west. From 2016 to 2017, the efficiency of the industrial circular economy is west > east > central, and the west region surpasses the east and central regions, achieving a qualitative leap. During the study period, industrial production efficiency presents a trend of east > west > central, and industrial circulation efficiency is distributed in a ladder shape of east > central > west. Regional differences in the efficiency of the industrial circular economy are obvious, but the gap between the three major regions is gradually narrowing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdel-Nour, Z., Aissa, A., Mebarek-Oudina, F., Rashad, A. M., Ali, H. M., Sahnoun, M., & El Ganaoui, M. (2020). Magnetohydrodynamic natural convection of hybrid nanofluid in a porous enclosure: Numerical analysis of the entropy generation. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, 141, 1981–1992.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Barreira, A. P., Amado, C., Santos, S., Andraz, J., & Guimaraes, M. H. (2021). Assessment and determinants of the quality of life in Portuguese Cities. International Regional Science Review, 44(6), 647–683.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Battese, G. E., & Rao, D. P. (2002). Technology gap, efficiency, and a stochastic metafrontier function. International Journal of Business and Economics, 1(2), 87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Battese, G. E., Rao, D. S., & O’donnell, C. J. (2004). A metafrontier production function for estimation of technical efficiencies and technology gaps for firms operating under different technologies. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 21(1), 91–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bi, X., Shan, S., & Xue, Y. (2012). Assessing ecological efficiency of Zhejiang Province—From the perspective of circular economy innovation. In 2012 international symposium on management of technology (ISMOT). IEEE pp 614–618

  • Boulding, K. E. (1966). The economics of coming spaceship Earth[M] (p. 357). The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Celemin, J. P., Mikkelsen, C. A., & Velázquez, G. A. (2015). La calidad de vida desde una perspectiva geográfica: Integración de indicadores objetivos y subjetivos. Revista Universitaria De Geografía, 24(1), 63–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cordova-Pizarro, D., Aguilar-Barajas, I., Romero, D., & Rodriguez, C. A. (2019). Circular economy in the electronic products sector: Material flow analysis and economic impact of cellphone e-waste in Mexico. Sustainability, 11(5), 1361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., & Suh, E. (1997). Measuring quality of life: Economic, social, and subjective indicators. Social Indicators Research, 40(1), 189–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ding, L. L., Lei, L., Wang, L., & Zhang, L. F. (2020). Assessing industrial circular economy performance and its dynamic evolution: An extended Malmquist index based on cooperative game network DEA. Science of the Total Environment, 731, 139001.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dodds, P. S., Harris, K. D., Kloumann, I. M., Bliss, C. A., & Danforth, C. M. (2011). Temporal patterns of happiness and information in a global social network: Hedonometrics and twitter. PLoS ONE, 6(12), e26752.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Eurostat. (2015). Quality of life: Facts and views (2015th ed.). Eurostat statistical books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., & Whittaker, G. (2007). Network DEA modeling data irregularities and structural complexities in data envelopment analysis (pp. 209–240). Springer Science Business Media,LLC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernández, J. A. S., Martín, J. A. R., & Molina, M. D. M. H. (2015). A synthetic indicator to measure the economic and social cohesion of the regions of Spain and Portugal. Revista De Economía Mundial, 39, 223–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garau, C., & Pavan, V. (2018). Evaluating urban quality: Indicators and assessment tools for smart sustain-able cities. Sustainability, 10(3), 575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geng, Y., Sarkis, J., & Bleischwitz, R. (2019). How to globalize the circular economy. Nature, 565, 153–155.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ghisellini, P., Cialani, C., & Ulgiati, S. (2016). A review on circular economy: The expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems. Journal of Cleaner Production, 114, 11–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giannakitsidou, O., Giannikos, I., & Chondrou, A. (2020). Ranking European countries on the basis of their environmental and circular economy performance: A DEA application in MSW. Waste Management, 109, 181–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez, E., Carcaba, A., & Ventura, J. (2011). Quality of life ranking of Spanish municipalities. Revista De Economía Aplicada, 19(56), 123–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • González, E., Cárcaba, A., & Ventura, J. (2018). Weight constrained DEA measurement of the quality of life in Spanish municipalities in 2011. Social Indicators Research, 136(3), 1157–1182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollander, J. B., Renski, H., Foster-Karim, C., & Wiley, A. (2020). Micro quality of life: Assessing health and well-being in and around public facilities in New York City. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 15(3), 791–812.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirchherr, J., Reike, D., & Hekkert, M. (2017). Conceptualizing the circular economy: An analysis of 114 definitions. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 127, 221–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lacko, R., Hajduová, Z., & Zawada, M. (2021). The efficiency of circular economies: A comparison of Visegrád group Countries. Energies, 14(6), 1680.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, P., & Ouyang, Y. (2020). Technical change and green productivity. Environmental and Resource Economics, 76(2), 271–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, X., & Tilt, B. (2018). Perceptions of quality of life and pollution among China’s urban middle class: The case of smog in Tangshan. The China Quarterly, 234, 340–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, X., Guo, P., & Guo, S. (2019). Assessing the eco-efficiency of a circular economy system in China’s coal mining areas: Emergy and data envelopment analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 206, 1101–1109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lotfi, F. H., & Fallahnejad, R. (2010). Imprecise Shannon’s entropy and multi attribute decision making. Entropy, 12(1), 53–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu, C., Zhang, Y., Li, H., Zhang, Z., Cheng, W., **, S., & Liu, W. (2020). An integrated measurement of the efficiency of China’s industrial circular economy and associated influencing factors. Mathematics, 8(9), 1610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma, S. H., Wen, Z. G., Chen, J. N., & Wen, Z. C. (2014). Mode of circular economy in China’s iron and steel industry: A case study in Wu’an city. Journal of Cleaner Production, 64, 505–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mavi, N. K., & Mavi, R. K. (2019). Energy and environmental efficiency of OECD countries in the context of the circular economy: Common weight analysis for malmquist productivity index. Journal of Environmental Management, 247, 651–661.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menz, T., & Welsch, H. (2012). Life-cycle and cohort effects in the valuation of air quality: Evidence from subjective well-being data. Land Economics, 88(2), 300–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milios, L. (2018). Advancing to a circular economy: Three essential ingredients for a comprehensive policy mix. Sustainability Science, 13(3), 861–878.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millar, N., McLaughlin, E., & Börger, T. (2019). The circular economy: Swings and round-abouts? Ecological Economics, 158, 11–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mittal, S., & Sharma, A. K. (2017). Quality of life and built environment: Theoretical understanding and research gaps. Urban India, 37(2), 37–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Navarro-Azorín, J. M., & Artal-Tur, A. (2015). Foot voting in Spain: What do internal migrations say about quality of life in the Spanish municipalities? Social Indicators Research, 124(2), 501–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nazarko, J., Chodakowska, E., & Nazarko, Ł. (2022). Evaluating the transition of the European Union member states towards a circular Economy. Energies, 15(11), 3924.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Donnell, C. J., Rao, D. S., & Battese, G. E. (2008). Metafrontier frameworks for the study of firm-level efficiencies and technology ratios. Empirical Economics, 34(2), 231–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Onnom, W., Tripathi, N., Nitivattananon, V., & Ninsawat, S. (2018). Development of a liveable city index (LCI) using multi criteria geospatial modelling for medium class cities in develo** countries. Sustainability, 10(2), 520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, D. (1989). Blueprint for a green economy: A report[M] (p. 135). Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, D. W., & Turner, R. K. (1990). Economics of natural resources and the environment[M] (p. 93). Harvester Wheatsheaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peiró, J., Perugini, F., & Picazo, A. (2019). Well-being and the great recession in Spain. Applied EconomicsLetters, 26(15), 1279–1284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rehdanz, K., & Maddison, D. (2005). Climate and happiness. Ecological Economics, 52(1), 111–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Research Group of China’s People’s Livelihood Survey of the Development Research Center of the State Council. (2018). Comprehensive research report of China’s people’s livelihood survey - People’s livelihood guarantee in the New Era. Management World, 34, 11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez-Anton, J. M., Rubio-Andrada, L., Celemín-Pedroche, M. S., & Alonso-Almeida, M. D. M. (2019). Analysis of the relations between circular economy and sustainable development goals. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 26(8), 708–720.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogge, N., & Van Nijverseel, I. (2019). Quality of life in the European Union: A multidimensional analysis. Social Indicators Research, 141(2), 765–789.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salleh, A. G., & Badarulzaman, N. (2012). Quality of life of residents in urban neighbourhoods of Pulau Pinang, Malaysia. Journal of Construction in Develo** Countries, 17(2), 117–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sánchez, A. R. (2003). Vivir el Siglo de Oro. Poder, cultura e historia en la época moderna. Estudios en homenaje al profesor Ángel Rodríguez Sánchez (Vol. 119). Universidad de Salamanca.

  • Sawicki, D. S., & Flynn, P. (1996). Neighborhood indicators: A review of the literature and an assessment of conceptual and methodological issues. Journal of American Planning Association, 62(2), 165–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun, J., Li, G., & Wang, Z. (2019). Technology heterogeneity and efficiency of China’s circular economic systems: A game meta-frontier DEA approach. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 146, 337–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang, J., Tong, M., Sun, Y., Du, J., & Liu, N. (2020). A spatio-temporal perspective of China’s industrial circular economy development. Science of the Total Environment, 706, 135754.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tone, K. (2001). A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 130(3), 498–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tone, K., & Tsutsui, M. (2009). Network DEA: A slacks based measurement approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 197, 243–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tone, K., & Tsutsui, M. (2010). Dynamic DEA: A slacks-based measure approach. Omega-International Journal of Management Science, 38(3–4), 145–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tone, K., & Tsutsui, M. (2014). Dynamic DEA with network structure: A slacks-based measure approach. Omega-International Journal of Management Science, 42(1), 124–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNDP. (1990). Human development report 1990. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Velasco-Muñoz, J. F., Mendoza, J. M. F., Aznar-Sánchez, J. A., & Gallego-Schmid, A. (2021). Circular economy implementation in the agricultural sector: Definition, strategies and indicators. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 170, 105618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, X., & Wang, Y. (2020). An interprovincial evaluation of industrial energy and environment efficiency: What drives China to make progress in sustainability? Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(5), 5222–5239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, S., Lei, L., & **ng, L. (2021). Urban circular economy performance evaluation: A novel fully fuzzy data envelopment analysis with large datasets. Journal of Cleaner Production, 324, 129214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y., Zhang, H., & Liu, L. (2022). Does city construction improve life quality?-Evidence from POI data of China. International Review of Economics & Finance, 80, 643–653.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, H. Q., Shi, Y., **a, Q., & Zhu, W. D. (2014). Effectiveness of the policy of circular economy in China: A DEA-based analysis for the period of 11th five-year-plan. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 83, 163–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu, A., Lin, X., Zhang, Y., Jiang, X., & Peng, L. (2019). Analysis of driving factors and allocation of carbon emission allowance in China. Science of the Total Environment, 673, 74–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yun, X., Wen, Y., Du, J. W., Lei, W. X., & Guo, H. X. (2015). Comprehensive evaluation andregional variation analysis on the circular economy development of Guangdong Province. Ecological Economics, 31(3), 70–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeng, S. L., & Zhang, H. L. (2011). Promoting low-carbon development of electric power industry in China: A circular economy efficiency perspective. Energy Procedia, 5, 2540–2548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeng, W., **ang, L., & Zhang, W. (2020). Evaluation of life quality and its spatial mismatch with local economic development in large Chinese cities. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 15(1), 239–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, M., Ren, F. R., Shi, Y. Y., Chen, H. S., & Tian, Z. (2022). CO2, environmental emergencies, and industrial pollution assessment in China from the perspective of the circular economy. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 9, 702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The author declared that they have no funding statement.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Law, Ningxia University, Yinchuan, 750021, Ningxia, China

    Anqi Lei

  2. School of Economics and Management, Ningxia University, Yinchuan, 750021, China

    Li Yang & Yuan-yuan Niu

  3. Department of Economics, Soochow University, 56, Kueiyang St., Sec. 1, Taipei, 100, Taiwan

    Yung-ho Chiu & Tzu-Han Chang

Authors
  1. Anqi Lei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Li Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yung-ho Chiu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yuan-yuan Niu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Tzu-Han Chang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yung-ho Chiu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lei, A., Yang, L., Chiu, Yh. et al. Reassessment of the efficiency of China's industrial circular economy considering quality of life: a meta recycle SBM dynamic under exogenous model. Environ Dev Sustain (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-024-04724-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-024-04724-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation