Abstract
Background and Aims
International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-10 codes may correspond to cirrhosis diagnosis. However, these codes have not been as well studied as ICD-9 codes. We aimed to evaluate the positive predictive value (PPV) and specificity of ICD-10 codes for cirrhosis.
Methods
We conducted a single-center retrospective study of patients in Michigan Medicine (Ann Arbor, MI, USA). We evaluated patients with at least one of 28 ICD-10 codes for cirrhosis and randomly selected controls for the presence of cirrhosis and/or portal hypertensive complications.
Results
Among 1317 patients with at least one ICD-10 code consistent with cirrhosis and/or portal hypertension, 796 had confirmed cirrhosis. After excluding ICD-10 codes found in < 10 patients, we evaluated the PPV of the 19 remaining codes. Of these, 15 had a high PPV for cirrhosis (> 80%), including codes for cirrhosis itself, gastroesophageal varices, hepatic encephalopathy, and other portal hypertensive complications. Specificity of ICD codes for cirrhosis for these 15 codes was high (> 94% for all). PPV and specificity were high across liver disease etiologies. Among patients without portal hypertension, PPVs of ICD-10 codes for cirrhosis were lower but still > 80% for the most common codes. PPVs of most codes for portal hypertensive complications were > 70%. Defining cirrhosis based on the presence of any of the 15 codes resulted in a PPV of 86% and by two different codes, a PPV 94%.
Conclusions
ICD-10 codes for cirrhosis can accurately identify patients with cirrhosis with or without portal hypertensive complications.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10620-021-07282-x/MediaObjects/10620_2021_7282_Fig1_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10620-021-07282-x/MediaObjects/10620_2021_7282_Fig2_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10620-021-07282-x/MediaObjects/10620_2021_7282_Fig3_HTML.png)
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Data are available upon reasonable request.
Abbreviations
- ICD:
-
International Classification of Diseases
- MGI:
-
Michigan Genomics Initiative
- PPV:
-
Positive predictive value
References
Asrani S, Devarbhavi H, Eaton J, Kamath P. Burden of liver diseases in the world. J Hepatol. 2019;70:151–171.
Nusrat S, Khan MS, Fazili J, Madhoun MF. Cirrhosis and its complications: evidence based treatment. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20:5442–5460.
Roth GA, Abate D, Abate KH et al. Global, regional, and national age-sex-specific mortality for 282 causes of death in 195 countries and territories, 1980–2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. The Lancet. 2018;392:1736–1788.
Beste LA, Leipertz SL, Green PK, Dominitz JA, Ross D, Ioannou GN. Trends in burden of cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma by underlying liver disease in US veterans, 2001–2013. Gastroenterology. 2015;149:1471–1482 e1475; quiz e1417–1478.
Harris R, Harman DJ, Card TR, Aithal GP, Guha IN. Prevalence of clinically significant liver disease within the general population, as defined by non-invasive markers of liver fibrosis: a systematic review. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017;2:288–297.
Kim D, Cholankeril G, Loomba R, Ahmed A. Prevalence of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease and Hepatic Fibrosis Among US Adults with Prediabetes and Diabetes, NHANES 2017–2018. J Gen Intern Med. 2021.
Scaglione S, Kliethermes S, Cao G et al. The epidemiology of cirrhosis in the United States: a population-based study. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2015;49:690–696.
Mellinger JL, Shedden K, Winder GS et al. The high burden of alcoholic cirrhosis in privately insured persons in the United States. Hepatology. 2018;68:872–882.
Tapper EB, Parikh ND. Mortality due to cirrhosis and liver cancer in the United States, 1999–2016: observational study. BMJ. 2018;362:k2817.
Global prevalence, treatment, and prevention of hepatitis B virus infection in 2016: a modelling study. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018;3:383–403.
Hirode G, Saab S, Wong RJ. Trends in the Burden of Chronic Liver Disease Among Hospitalized US Adults. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3:e201997.
Organization WH. The International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Health Related Problems ICD-10: Tenth Revision. Volume 1: Tabular List. Vol 1: World Health Organization; 2004.
Hayward KL, Johnson AL, McKillen BJ, et al. ICD-10-AM codes for cirrhosis and related complications: key performance considerations for population and healthcare studies. BMJ Open Gastroenterol. 2020;7.
Utter GH, Atolagbe OO, Cooke DT. The use of the international classification of diseases, tenth revision, clinical modification and procedure classification system in clinical and health services research: the devil is in the details. JAMA Surg. 2019;154:1089–1090.
Nehra MS, Ma Y, Clark C, Amarasingham R, Rockey DC, Singal AG. Use of administrative claims data for identifying patients with cirrhosis. Journal of clinical gastroenterology. 2013;47:e50–e54.
Goldberg D, Lewis J, Halpern S, Weiner M, Lo Re V. 3rd. Validation of three coding algorithms to identify patients with end-stage liver disease in an administrative database. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2012;21:765–769.
Bengtsson B, Askling J, Ludvigsson JF, Hagstrom H. Validity of administrative codes associated with cirrhosis in Sweden. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2020;55:1205–1210.
Ramrakhiani NS, Le MH, Yeo YH, Le AK, Maeda M, Nguyen MH. Validity of International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, Codes for Cirrhosis. Digestive Diseases. 2020.
Mapakshi S, Kramer JR, Richardson P, El-Serag HB, Kanwal F. Positive predictive value of international classification of diseases, 10th revision, codes for cirrhosis and its related complications. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018;16:1677–1678.
Chen VL, Chen Y, Du X, Handelman SK, Speliotes EK. Genetic variants that associate with cirrhosis have pleiotropic effects on human traits. Liver International. 2019;40:405–415.
Lapointe-Shaw L, Georgie F, Carlone D, et al. Identifying cirrhosis, decompensated cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma in health administrative data: A validation study. PLoS One. 2018;13:e0201120.
Collett D. Modelling Binary Data, Second Edition. Taylor & Francis; 2002.
Acknowledgments
VLC was supported in part by a Clinical, Translational and Outcomes Research Award from the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.
Funding
This study was funded in part by a Clinical, Translational and Outcomes Research Award from the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases to VLC.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
DAB and IJM contributed to data collection, data analysis, and manuscript drafting. JVD collected the data. ASL and NDP performed a critical review of the manuscript. VLC helped in study design, data analysis, and critical review of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Daniel Burkholder, Isabel Moran, Jacob DiBattista, Anna Lok, Neehar Parikh, and Vincent Chen have no personal conflicts of interest relevant to this manuscript to report.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Burkholder, D.A., Moran, I.J., DiBattista, J.V. et al. Accuracy of International Classification of Diseases-10 Codes for Cirrhosis and Portal Hypertensive Complications. Dig Dis Sci 67, 3623–3631 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-021-07282-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-021-07282-x