Abstract
Background and Aims
Performing colonoscopy can be technically challenging in female patients. Female patients may prefer having a female endoscopist. This preference, coupled with the fact that there are fewer female endoscopists, may result in gender differences in colonoscopy practice. We hypothesized that the duration of female colonoscopy is longer and that female endoscopists perform a higher proportion of female colonoscopy than male colleagues. We explored the potential revenue implications of gender differences in screening colonoscopy.
Methods
We analyzed procedure time and gender differences in 16,573 screening colonoscopies performed by 27 male and 7 female endoscopists over a three-year period in one large academic practice. We modeled the potential revenue impacts of differences in procedure duration, proportion of female colonoscopy and the frequency of detected adenomas.
Results
We found that screening colonoscopy takes 8.8% more time to complete in female patients compared to male patients for all endoscopists (p < 0.001), and that female endoscopists perform an average of 71.2% female exams compared to male endoscopists, who perform an average of 50.8% female exams (p < 0.001). Female patients had a lower detection adenoma rate (ADR), reducing the frequency of polypectomy and reimbursement in an RVU model. The observed gender differences could account for an estimated 9.6% revenue loss per 8-h session for a female gastroenterologist performing screening colonoscopy compared to a male counterpart.
Conclusion
Longer colonoscopy duration in females, increased proportion of female colonoscopies for female endoscopists and lower ADR in females may contribute to the gender gap in physician pay in gastroenterology.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Lam J, Wilkinson J, Brassett C, Brown J. Real-time magnetic image analysis of colonic loo** patterns between males and females undergoing diagnostic colonoscopy. Endosc Int Open 2018;6:E575–E581.
Saunders BP, Fukumoto M, Halligan S et al. Why is colonoscopy more difficult in women? Gastrointest Endosc 1996;43:124–126.
Sadahiro S, Ohmura T, Yamada Y, Saito T, Taki Y. Analysis of length and surface area of each segment of the large intestine according to age, sex, and physique. Surg Radiol Anat 1992;14:251–257.
Rutter M. Colonoscopy in patients with a prior hysterectomy. Gastroenterol Hepatol 2015;11:64–66.
Nam JH, Lee JH, Kim JH et al. Factors for cecal intubation time during colonoscopy in women: impact of surgical history. Saudi J Gastroenterol 2019;25:377–383.
Cirocco WC, Rusin LC. Factors that predict incomplete colonoscopy. Dis Colon Rectum 1995;38:964–968.
Shah SG, Brooker JC, Thapar C, Williams CB, Saunders BP. Patient pain during colonoscopy: an analysis using real-time magnetic endoscope imaging. Endoscopy 2002;34:435–440.
Childers R, Williams JL, Sonnenberg A. Practice patterns of sedation for colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2015;82:503–511.
Cassell BE, Ross K, Chang T, Austin GL. Predictors of failed conscious sedation in patients undergoing an outpatient colonoscopy and implications for the adenoma detection rate. Sci Rep 2020;10:2167.
Menees SB, Inadomi JM, Korsnes S, Elta GH. Women patients’ preference for women physicians is a barrier to colon cancer screening. Gastrointest Endosc 2005;62:219–223.
Varadarajulu S, Petruff C, Ramsey WH. Patient preferences for gender of endoscopists. Gastrointest Endosc 2002;56:170–173.
Farrye FA, Wong M, Hurwitz S et al. Barriers to endoscopic colorectal cancer screening: are women different from men? Am J Gastroenterol 2004;99:341–349.
Street SE. Editorial: Endoscopic colorectal cancer screening in women: can we do better? Gastrointest Endosc 2007;65:1047–1049.
Shukla R. Current challenges facing women in gastroenterology: How do we move forward? ACG Case Rep J 2016;3:144–145.
Association of American Medical Colleges. 2018 Physician specialty data report: active physicians by sex and specialty, 2017. Table 1.3. https://www.aamc.org/data-reports/workforce/interactive-data/active-physicians-sex-and-specialty-2017. Published 2017. Accessed January 30, 2020.
Coe S, Wallace M. Assessment of adenoma detection rate benchmarks in women versus men. Gastrointest Endoso 2013;77:631–635.
Mehrotra A, Morris M, Gourevitch RA et al. Physician characteristics associated with higher adenoma detection rate. Gastrointest Endosc 2018;87:778–786.
Ganguli I, Sheridan B, Gray J et al. Physician Work Hours and the Gender Pay Gap – Evidence from Primary Care. NEJM 2020;383:1349–1357.
Burke CA, Sastri SV, Jacobsen G, Arlow FL, Karlstadt RG, Raymond P. Gender disparity in the practice of gastroenterology: the first 5 years of a career. Am J Gastoenterol 2005;100:259–264.
Singh A, Burke CA, Larive B, Sastri SV. Do gender disparities persist in gastroenterology after 10 years of practice? Am J Gastroenterol 2008;103:1589–1595.
Rao AD, Nicholas SE, Kachniarz B et al. Association of a Simulated Institutional Gender Equity Initiative with Gender-Based Disparities in Medical School Faculty Salaries and Promotions. JAMA Netw Open 2018;1:e186054.
Whaley CM, Arnold DR, Gross N, Jena AB, Newhouse RL. Practice composition and sex differences in physician income: observational study. BMJ 2020;370:m2588.
Bushyhead D, Strate LL. Sex-Based Disparities in Annual Compensation Among Academic Gastroenterologists. Am J Gastroenterol. 2021;116:219–220.
Rabinowitz LG, Grinspan LT, Kim MK. Gender in the endoscopy suite. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;5:1032–1034.
Benoit MR, Ma JF, Upperman BA. Comparison of 2015 Medicare relative value units for gender-specific procedures: gynecologic and gynecologic-oncologic versus urologic CPT coding Has time healed gender-worth? Gynecologic Oncology 2017;144:336–342.
Funding
No funding to declare.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors participated in the study planning, interpreting the data and drafting/editing the manuscript. Data analysis was performed by JH. All authors have reviewed the final draft submitted.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
There are no conflicts of interest for all authors.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
An editorial commenting on this article is available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-021-07083-2.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Andersson, K.L., Ha, J.B., Abraczinskas, D.R. et al. Gender Differences in Colonoscopy: Implications for Clinical Practice and Female Gastroenterologists. Dig Dis Sci 67, 810–816 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-021-07079-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-021-07079-y