Log in

Spatial Interaction Model of Credit Risk Contagion in the CRT Market

  • Published:
Computational Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we introduce an entropy spatial model of credit risk contagion in the credit risk transfer (CRT) market that considers the effects of spatial, industry-specific, regional financial and individual factors of the CRT market on credit risk contagion. We use numerical simulation to describe the influence and active mechanism of the spatial distance and transmission capacity between banks and investors in the CRT market. We also assess bank asset quality and credit risk transfer capability, as well as investor asset scale and risk preference level, bank financial development level, investors in the area and the weight of investors in the area relative to credit risk contagion. This model contributes to the explicit formalization of the connection between probability and spatial factors and provides new ideas and a theoretical framework for considering credit risk contagion in a spatial context, which has great relevance for credit risk management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen, F., & Carletti, E. (2006). Credit risk transfer and contagion. Journal of Monetary Economics, 53, 89–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basso, A., & Barro, D. (2005). Counterparty risk: A credit contagion model for a bank loan portfolio. The ICFAI Journal of Financial Risk Management, 2, 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barro, D., & Basso, A. (2010). Credit contagion in a network of firms with spatial interaction. European Journal of Operational Research, 205, 459–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carling, K., & Lundberg, S. (2005). Asymmetric information and distance: An empirical assessment of geographical credit rationing. Journal of Economics and Business, 57, 39–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Celik, H. M., & Guldmann, J. M. (2007). Spatial interaction modeling of interregional commodity flows. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 41, 147–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, T. Q., & He, J. M. (2012a). An evolving network model of credit risk contagion. Working paper, Southeast University.

  • Chen, T. Q., & He, J. M. (2012b). A network model of credit risk contagion. Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, vol. 2012, Article ID 513982, 13 pages. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/513982

  • Chen, T. Q., He, J. M., & Wang, J. N. (2013a). Bifurcation and chaotic behavior of credit risk contagion based on FitzHugh-Nagumo system. International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos, 23, In press.

  • Chen, T. Q., & He, J. M. (2013b). Dynamics evolution of credit risk contagion in the CRT market. Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, vol. 2013, Article ID 206201, 9 pages. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/206201

  • Chen, T. Q., & He, J. M. (2013). An entropy spatial interaction model of credit risk contagion in the CRT network. Working paper, Southeast University.

  • Clarke, G., Langley, R., & Cardwell, W. (1998). Empirical applications of dynamic spatial interaction models. Computational Environmental and Urban Systems, 22, 157–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cossin, D., & Schellhorn, H. (2007). Credit risk in a network economy. Management Science, 53, 1604–1617.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, M., & Lo, V. (2000). Modelling default correlation in bond portfolios. London: Imperial College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, M., & Lo, V. (2001). Infectious defaults. Quantitive Finance, 1, 382–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egloff, D., Leippold, M., & Vanini, P. (2007). A simple model of credit contagion. Journal of Banking & Finance, 31, 2475–2492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Focardi, S. M., & Fabozzi, F. J. (2004). A percolation approach to modeling credit risk loss distribution under contagion. Journal of Risk, 7, 75–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, R., & Backhaus, J. (2003). Interacting defaults and counterparty risk: A markovian approach. Leipzig: Department of Mathematics, University of Leipzig.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fujita, M., Krugman, P., & Venables, A. J. (1999). The spatial economy: Cites, regions and international trade. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giesecke, K. (2004). Correlated default with incomplete information. Journal of Banking and Finance, 28, 1521–1545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giesecke, K. (2006). Default and information. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 30, 2281–2303.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, I. (2010). Entropy, variety, economics, and spatial interaction. Geographical Analysis, 42, 446–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haworth, H., & Reisinger, C. (2006). Modeling basket credit default swaps with default contagion. Working paper, Oxford University.

  • Haworth, H., Reisinger, C., & Shaw, W. (2008). Modelling bonds and credit default swaps using a structural model with contagion. Quantitative Finance, 8, 669–680.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Jarrow, R. A., & Yu, F. (2001). Counterparty risk and the pricing of defaultable securities. Journal of Finance, 56, 1765–1799.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jorion, P., & Zhang, G. (2009). Credit contagion from counterparty risk. The Journal of Finance, 64, 2053–2087.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kchia, Y., & Larsson, M. (2011). Credit contagion and risk management with multiple non-ordered defaults. Working paper, Ecole Polytechnique and Cornell University.

  • Kodres, L., & Pritsker, M. (2002). A rational expectations model of financial contagion. Journal of Finance, 57, 769–799.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, P. (1997). Development, geography and economic theory. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, D., & Marrison, C. (2007). Credit risk contagion. Risk, 4, 90–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neu, K., & Kuehn, R. (2004). Credit risk enhancement in a network of interdependent firms. Physica A, 342, 639C655.

  • O’Kelly, M. E. (2010). Entropy-based spatial interaction models for trip distribution. Geographical Analysis, 42, 472–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santos, T. (2006). Comment on: Credit risk transfer and contagion. Journal of Monetary Economics, 53, 113–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, A. G. (1970). Entropy in urban and regional modelling. London: Pion Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, A. (2010). Entropy in urban and regional modelling: Retrospect and prospect. Geographical Analysis, 42, 364–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We wish to express our gratitude to the referees for their invaluable comments. This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 71173098, 71271109, and 71301078), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2014M561626), the Philosophy and Social Sciences Research Funded Projects in Colleges and Universities of Jiangsu (2014SJB081).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tingqiang Chen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, T., Li, X. & Wang, J. Spatial Interaction Model of Credit Risk Contagion in the CRT Market. Comput Econ 46, 519–537 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10614-014-9475-2

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10614-014-9475-2

Keywords

Navigation