Abstract
In this study, we perform a comprehensive examination of the ultrasonic dewatering of cellulose nanofibril (CNF) suspensions, with particular emphasis on the role of fines content. The production of CNFs involves mechanical fibrillation which leads to the presence of different percentages of fines (fibrils under 200 μm) in the final product. Although fines have demonstrated mechanical advantages in composite materials, they also increase water retention by the fibrils, leading to increased dewatering time and energy. We selected two distinct CNF samples with 60% and 90% fines, respectively, and subjected them to ultrasonic drying until 100 wt% CNFs is reached. We found that the 90% fines samples displayed 20% longer drying times, indicating a higher water retention capacity than the 60% fines samples due to increased hydrogen bonding sites. Both fines types exhibit a biphasic pattern in water removal, with the second phase, commencing upon the elimination of half the water, displaying similar rates regardless of the fines content. As dewatering and drying processes often induce agglomeration in CNFs, we systematically dewatered both the suspensions until concentrations of 15, 25, and 35% were achieved and then redispersed to 0.01 wt% CNF. To evaluate the stability of redispersed samples, we monitored their settling behavior and conducted UV–vis transmittance analyses. Results showed that while 60% fines samples could be redispersed in 1 min, the 90% fines samples required up to 5 min to reach a similar level of stability to their original suspensions. Notably, UV–vis transmittance values remained consistent across both the 60% and 90% fines samples and their initial suspensions, indicating a lack of significant agglomeration following redispersion. These findings provide critical insights regarding the impact of fines percentages in CNFs on dewatering duration and suspension stability during ultrasonic dewatering, contributing to improved processing strategies in industrial cellulose applications.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Additional information is provided as supplementary information.
Notes
Dewatering in our work is defined as concentrating the suspension by removal of water from the system to various solid wt%.
Complete drying in our work in defined as the state of the sample when all the water has been removed from the system and the final wt. is equivalent to the solid wt. content of the initial suspension.
References
Chen Y, Zhang L, Yang Y et al (2021) Recent progress on nanocellulose aerogels: preparation, modification, composite fabrication, applications. Adv Mater. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202005569
Colson J, Bauer W, Mayr M et al (2016) Morphology and rheology of cellulose nanofibrils derived from mixtures of pulp fibres and papermaking fines. Cellulose 23:2439–2448. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-016-0987-x
de Assis CA, Iglesias MC, Bilodeau M et al (2018) Cellulose micro- and nanofibrils (CMNF) manufacturing-financial and risk assessment. Biofuels Bioprod Biorefin 12:251–264. https://doi.org/10.1002/bbb.1835
Déléris I, Wallecan J (2017) Relationship between processing history and functionality recovery after rehydration of dried cellulose-based suspensions: a critical review. Adv Colloid Interface Sci 246:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cis.2017.06.013
Ghasemi S (2019) Cellulose nanofibrils (CNF) for textile applications: production of neat CNF filaments and reinforcement of natural fiber yarns. University of Maine.
He M, Yang G, Cho B-U et al (2017) Effects of addition method and fibrillation degree of cellulose nanofibrils on furnish drainability and paper properties. Cellulose 24:5657–5669. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-017-1495-3
ISO (2012) ISO 10376, Pulps—Determination of mass fraction of fines
ISO (2014) ISO 16065-2 pulps: determination of fiber length by automated optical analysis–part, vol 2. Unpolarized light method
Jang MJ, Park B-D, Kweon H et al (2015) Preparation, structure, and properties of cellulose nanofibril/silk sericin composite film. Int J Ind Entomol 31:1–6. https://doi.org/10.7852/IJIE.2015.31.1.1
Johnson D, Papadis M, Bilodeau M et al (2016) Effects of cellulosic nanofibrils on papermaking properties of fine papers. TJ 15:395–402. https://doi.org/10.32964/TJ15.6.395
Kelly PV, Gardner DJ, Gramlich WM (2021) Optimizing lignocellulosic nanofibril dimensions and morphology by mechanical refining for enhanced adhesion. Carbohydr Polym 273:118566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2021.118566
Lai PC, Yu SS (2021) Cationic cellulose nanocrystals-based nanocomposite hydrogels: achieving 3d printable capacitive sensors with high transparency and mechanical strength. Polymers 13:1–17. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13050688
Moon RJ, Martini A, Nairn J et al (2011) Cellulose nanomaterials review: structure, properties and nanocomposites. Chem Soc Rev 40:3941. https://doi.org/10.1039/c0cs00108b
Miller T, Kramer C, Fisher A (2015) Bandwidth study on energy use and potential energy saving opportunities in U.S. pulp and paper manufacturing. US Department of Energy
Moon RJ, Hensdal CL, Beck S et al (2023) Setting priorities in CNF particle size measurement: what is needed vs. what is feasible. TJ 22:116–137. https://doi.org/10.32964/TJ22.2.116
Nigmatullin R, Johns MA, Muñoz-García JC et al (2020) Hydrophobization of cellulose nanocrystals for aqueous colloidal suspensions and gels. Biomacromol 21:1812–1823. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.9b01721
Patel DK, Dutta SD, Lim KT (2019) Nanocellulose-based polymer hybrids and their emerging applications in biomedical engineering and water purification. RSC Adv 9:19143–19162. https://doi.org/10.1039/c9ra03261d
Posada P, Velásquez-Cock J, Gómez-Hoyos C et al (2020) Drying and redispersion of plant cellulose nanofibers for industrial applications: a review. Cellulose 27:10649–10670. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-020-03348-7
Rebouillat S, Pla F (2013) State of the art manufacturing and engineering of nanocellulose: a review of available data and industrial applications. J Biomater Nanobiotechnol 04:165–188. https://doi.org/10.4236/jbnb.2013.42022
Raj P, Mayahi A, Lahtinen P et al (2016) Gel point as a measure of cellulose nanofibre quality and feedstock development with mechanical energy. Cellulose 23:3051–3064. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-016-1039-2
Ringania U, Harrison J, Moon RJ, Bhamla MS (2022) Dewatering of cellulose nanofibrils using ultrasound. Cellulose 29:5575–5591. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-022-04626-2
Stelte W, Sanadi AR (2009) Preparation and characterization of cellulose nanofibers from two commercial hardwood and softwood pulps. Ind Eng Chem Res 48:11211–11219. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie9011672
UMaine The Process development Center (2021) https://umaine.edu/pdc/nanocellulose/. Accessed 7 July 2021
Varanasi S, He R, Batchelor W (2013) Estimation of cellulose nanofibre aspect ratio from measurements of fibre suspension gel point. Cellulose 20:1885–1896. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-013-9972-9
Xu Y, Xu Y, Chen H et al (2022) Redispersion of dried plant nanocellulose: a review. Carbohydr Polym 294:119830. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2022.119830
Zhou X, Guo Y, Zhao F, Yu G (2019) Hydrogels as an emerging material platform for solar water purification. Acc Chem Res 52:3244–3253. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.accounts.9b00455
Zambrano F, Starkey H, Wang Y et al (2020) Using micro- and nanofibrillated cellulose as a means to reduce weight of paper products. Rev BioResour 15:4553–4590
Funding
The authors would like to acknowledge the support from Renewable Bioproducts Institute and the Brook Byers Institute for Sustainable Systems at Georgia Tech, Atlanta, USA. The authors would also like to thank the team from the Process Development Centre at University of Maine, Dr. Colleen Walker, Dr. Douglas Bousfield and Donna A. Johnson, for providing samples.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
UR performed experiments, analyzed results and wrote the manuscript. RM and SB provided intellectual guidance. All authors reviewed the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Consent for publication
The authors consent for publication by the journal.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Supplementary Material 1 (MP4 934KB)
Supplementary Material 2 (MP4 605KB)
Supplementary Material 3 (MP4 344KB)
Supplementary Material 4 (MP4 657KB)
Supplementary Material 5 (MP4 2399KB)
Supplementary Material 6 (MP4 1106KB)
Supplementary Material 7 (MP4 1018KB)
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Ringania, U., Moon, R.J. & Bhamla, M.S. Effect of fines percentage on ultrasonic dewatering of cellulose nanofibrils. Cellulose 30, 10125–10138 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-023-05522-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-023-05522-z