Log in

Effects of cellulolytic lactic acid bacteria on the lignocellulose degradation, sugar profile and lactic acid fermentation of high-moisture alfalfa ensiled in low-temperature seasons

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Cellulose Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of cellulolytic lactic acid bacteria on the lignocellulose degradation, sugar profile and lactic acid fermentation of high-moisture alfalfa during anaerobic bioprocessing in low-temperature seasons. Last cut and low dry matter (DM) alfalfa was ensiled with five additives, commercial cellulase (EN), a combination of Lactobacillus plantarum and commercial cellulase (LPEN), a combination of engineered Lactococcus lactis strains (HT2) containing cellulase gene, Enterococcus faecium Y83 (EF83), or Enterococcus faecalis JF85 (EF85), and without additives, as the control, with four replicates each. After anaerobic preservation in a silo from late fall through winter (3 to 20 °C) for 140 days, the ensiled alfalfa was sampled and analysed. Compared with the control, EF85 increased the relative contents of neutral detergent fibre (NDF), acid detergent fibre (ADF), and cellulose and decreased contents of water-soluble carbohydrates (WSCs) and lactic acid, and the conversion of WSCs into lactic acid. Consequently, lactic acid fermentation was decreased in EF85. Compared with the control, supplementation with EN, EF83, HT2, and LPEN decreased contents of NDF, ADF, cellulose, and hemicellulose and increased the contents of WSCs, disaccharide, xylose, and arabinose; interestingly, compared with EN, supplementation with EF83, HT2 and LPEN increased the lactic acid content and the ratio of lactic acid to acetic acid as indicated by strong homo-lactic acid fermentation. Furthermore, HT2 increased the lactic acid concentration to a maximum of 72.2 g/kg DM and had a higher conversion of WSCs into lactic acid than EF83 (36.3%) and LPEN (17.9%), indicating that HT2 had a greater ability to ferment lignocellulose of alfalfa into lactic acid. Therefore, HT2 could enhance the lactic acid production of alfalfa during ensiling in low-temperature seasons.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Acknowledgments

The project was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Chongqing city (csct2019jcyj-msxmX0066), National Natural Science Foundation of China (31971765), and China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2019M651865).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Professor QHL designed the experiment. Master student CZ, JXW, JGZ, Dr. ZH Dong performed the experiment using the methods in the related references. Dr. JFL provided the Enterococcus faecium Y83 and Enterococcus faecalis JF85 strains for the experiment. Dr. JZ and TS edited the manuscript, and Dr. TS, as the corresponding author, submitted this paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tao Shao.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declares that they have no competing interests in the present study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, Q., Zong, C., Dong, Z. et al. Effects of cellulolytic lactic acid bacteria on the lignocellulose degradation, sugar profile and lactic acid fermentation of high-moisture alfalfa ensiled in low-temperature seasons. Cellulose 27, 7955–7965 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-020-03350-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-020-03350-z

Keywords

Navigation