SpringerLink
Log in

Retrospective versus prospective ECG-gated dual-source CT in pediatric patients with congenital heart diseases: comparison of image quality and radiation dose

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We wanted to compare the image quality and radiation dose of retrospective versus prospective ECG-gated dual-source CT imaging in pediatric patients with congenital heart diseases. We retrospectively evaluated 44 thorax CT images that were obtained using two different protocols (retrospective helical ECG-gated [n = 22] versus prospective non-helical ECG-triggering [n = 22]) in patients younger than 5 years. Two radiologists evaluated the image quality, using a 3- or 4-point scale, in terms of the degree of homogeneity of vascular enhancement, the stair-step artifacts, the subjective image noise and the overall subjective image quality. We compared the mean score of image quality, the frequency of marked stair-step artifact and the estimated radiation dose. The mean score of the homogeneity of vascular enhancement and the stair-step artifacts tended to be higher for the patients in the retrospective group than that for the patients in the prospective group, but this did not reach statistical significance. However, marked stair-step artifacts were significantly more frequent in the prospective scan group than that in the retrospective scan group (25.8 vs. 7.6%, respectively, P < 0.01). The mean scores for subjective image noise and the overall image quality were better in the retrospective group than those scores in the prospective group (P < 0.01). The mean estimated effective dose was higher for the retrospective ECG-gated helical scan than that for the prospective non-helical scan (0.79 vs. 0.21 mSv, respectively, P < 0.01). Retrospective ECG-gated helical dual-source CT using aggressive ECG pulsing can be obtained with an acceptable radiation dose and superior image quality, as compared to the prospective ECG-triggering technique, for the evaluation of congenital heart diseases in pediatric patients who are younger than 5 years old.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Brazil)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

MDCT:

Multi-detector computed tomography

ECG:

Electrocardiography

DSCT:

Dual-source computed tomography

Bpm:

Beat per minute

CTDIvol :

Volume CT dose index

DLP:

Dose-length product

References

  1. Hayabuchi Y, Mori K, Kitagawa T et al (2007) Accurate quantification of pulmonary artery diameter in patients with cyanotic congenital heart disease using multidetector-row computed tomography. Am Heart J 154(4):783–788

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Goo HW, Park IS, Ko JK et al (2005) Computed tomography for the diagnosis of congenital heart disease in pediatric and adult patients. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 21(2–3):347–365

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Greil GF, Schoebinger M, Kuettner A et al (2006) Imaging of aortopulmonary collateral arteries with high-resolution multidetector CT. Pediatr Radiol 36(6):502–509

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Oztunc F, Baris S, Adaletli I et al (2009) Coronary events and anatomy after arterial switch operation for transposition of the great arteries: detection by 16-row multislice computed tomography angiography in pediatric patients. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 32(2):206–212

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wang XM, Wu LB, Sun C et al (2007) Clinical application of 64-slice spiral CT in the diagnosis of the Tetralogy of Fallot. Eur J Radiol 64(2):296–301

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hollingsworth CL, Yoshizumi TT, Frush DP et al (2007) Pediatric cardiac-gated CT angiography: assessment of radiation dose. Am J Roentgenol 189(1):12–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hein F, Meyer T, Hadamitzky M et al (2009) Prospective ECG-triggered sequential scan protocol for coronary dual-source CT angiography: initial experience. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 25(suppl 2):S231–S239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Petersilka M, Bruder H, Krauss B et al (2008) Technical principles of dual source CT. Eur J Radiol 68(3):362–368

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Stolzmann P, Scheffel H, Schertler T et al (2008) Radiation dose estimates in dual-source computed tomography coronary angiography. Eur Radiol 18(3):592–599

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ketelsen D, Thomas C, Werner M et al (2008) Dual-source computed tomography: estimation of radiation exposure of ECG-gated and ECG-triggered coronary angiography. Eur J Radiol. doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.10.033

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ben Saad M, Rohnean A, Sigal-Cinqualbre A et al (2009) Evaluation of image quality and radiation dose of thoracic and coronary dual-source CT in 110 infants with congenital heart disease. Pediatr Radiol 39(7):668–676

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kuettner A, Gehann B, Spolnik J et al (2009) Strategies for dose-optimized imaging in pediatric cardiac dual source CT. Rofo 181(4):339–348

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lerner CB, Frush DP, Boll DT (2008) Evaluation of a coronary-cameral fistula: benefits of coronary dual-source MDCT angiography in children. Pediatr Radiol 38(8):874–878

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33(1):159–174

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Cademartiri F, Mollet NR, Runza G et al (2006) Improving diagnostic accuracy of MDCT coronary angiography in patients with mild heart rhythm irregularities using ECG editing. Am J Roentgenol 186(3):634–638

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hirai N, Horiguchi J, Fujioka C et al (2008) Prospective versus retrospective ECG-gated 64-detector coronary CT angiography: assessment of image quality, stenosis, and radiation dose. Radiology 248(2):424–430

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Arnoldi E, Johnson TR, Rist C et al (2009) Adequate image quality with reduced radiation dose in prospectively triggered coronary CTA compared with retrospective techniques. Eur Radiol 19(9):2147–2155

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Stolzmann P, Leschka S, Scheffel H et al (2008) Dual-source CT in step-and-shoot mode: noninvasive coronary angiography with low radiation dose. Radiology 249(1):71–80

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. McCollough CH, Primak AN, Saba O et al (2007) Dose performance of a 64-channel dual-source CT scanner. Radiology 243(3):775–784

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Herzog C, Mulvihill DM, Nguyen SA et al (2008) Pediatric cardiovascular CT angiography: radiation dose reduction using automatic anatomic tube current modulation. Am J Roentgenol 190(5):1232–1240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Pages J, Buls N, Osteaux M (2003) CT doses in children: a multicentre study. Br J Radiol 76(911):803–811

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Poll LW, Cohnen M, Brachten S et al (2002) Dose reduction in multi-slice CT of the heart by use of ECG-controlled tube current modulation (“ECG pulsing”): phantom measurements. Rofo 174(12):1500–1505

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by grant no 04-2008-085-0 from the SNUH Research Fund.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University Medical Research Center Clinical Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea

    Kwang Nam **, Eun-Ah Park, Cheong-il Shin, Whal Lee, ** Wook Chung & Jae Hyung Park

  2. Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, 28 Yongon-dong, Chongno-gu, Seoul, 110-744, Korea

    Eun-Ah Park

Authors
  1. Kwang Nam **
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Eun-Ah Park
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Cheong-il Shin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Whal Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. ** Wook Chung
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Jae Hyung Park
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eun-Ah Park.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

**, K.N., Park, EA., Shin, Ci. et al. Retrospective versus prospective ECG-gated dual-source CT in pediatric patients with congenital heart diseases: comparison of image quality and radiation dose. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 26 (Suppl 1), 63–73 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-009-9579-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-009-9579-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation