Abstract
Seed predation by rodents can act as a recruitment barrier during community assembly, limiting the establishment of exotic species. Predation rates of exotic seeds may depend on their attractiveness, determined by their traits, and how different they are from natives. Additionally, at the naturalization stage of the invasion process, exotic seeds may escape post-dispersal predation because they are rare in the community. To test these ideas, we assessed granivory in a Patagonian forest, where two species with contrasting seed sizes are naturalized. Rubus idaeus seeds are of similar size of natives, whereas Prunus cerasus seeds are four times larger. The relative abundance of their seeds within the landscape is low compared to native seeds. Throughout the fruiting season, we offered seeds from all species present in the community (native and exotics), whenever they were available in the landscape. To consider the effects of vegetation structure on rodent foraging behavior, we offered seeds in areas with and without understory cover. We found a hump-shaped relationship between predation rates and seed size. Consequently, rodents strongly avoided large exotic Prunus seeds, but removed Rubus seeds at similar rates to natives. Contrary to our expectations, seed abundance did not affect predation, and hence, rarity did not confer an advantage to exotic seeds. The presence of shrub cover increased 2.3 times the removal rates compared to open areas. We suggest that the dissimilarity in seed size compared to native species and the presence of shrub cover influenced predation pressure on exotic species within our community.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allen JA, Greenwood JJD (1988) Frequency-dependent selection by predators. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci 319:485–503
Baraibar B, Daedlow D, De Mol F, Gerowitt B (2012) Density dependence of weed seed predation by invertebrates and vertebrates in winter wheat. Weed Res 52:79–87
Batisteli AF, Email B, Washington R, Jo R (2020) Seed abundance affects seed removal of an alien and a native tree in the Brazilian savanna: implications for biotic resistance. Austral Ecol 45:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/aec.12922
Beck MJ, Vander Wall SB (2010) Seed dispersal by scatter-hoarding rodents in arid environments. J Ecol 98:1300–1309. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2010.01716.x
Blackburn TM et al (2011) A proposed unified framework for biological invasions. Trends Ecol Evol 26(7):333–339
Blate G et al (1998) Post-dispersal predation on isolated seeds: a comparative study of 40 tree species in a Southeast Asian rainforest. Oikos 82(3):522–538. https://doi.org/10.2307/3546373
Boone SR, Mortelliti A (2019) Small mammal tree seed selection in mixed forests of the Eastern United States. For Ecol Manage 449:117487. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.FORECO.2019.117487
Bravo SP, Cueto VR, Amico GC (2015) Do animal–plant interactions influence the spatial distribution of Aristotelia chilensis shrubs in temperate forests of southern South America? Plant Ecol 216:383–394
Brewer S (2001) Predation and dispersal of large and small seeds of a tropical palm. Oikos 92(2):245–255
Bürkner P (2017) brms: an R package for Bayesian multilevel models using Stan. J Stat Softw 80:1–28. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v080.i01
Bushman BS, Phillips B, Isbell T, Ou B, Crane JM, Knapp SJ (2004) Chemical composition of caneberry (Rubus spp.) seeds and oils and their antioxidant potential. J Agric Food Chem 52(26):7982–7987. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf049149a
Cabrera AL (1971) Sociedad Argentina de Botánica. Boletín de la Sociedad Argentina Botánica 14:1–50
Carlo TA, Morales JM (2016) Generalist birds promote tropical forest regeneration and increase plant diversity via rare-biased seed dispersal. Ecology 97(7):1819–1831. https://doi.org/10.1890/15-2147.1HKK
Connolly BM, Pearson D, Mack RN (2014) Granivory of invasive, naturalized, and native plants in communities differentially susceptible to invasion. Ecology 95:1759–1769
Cooper MR, Johnson AW (1984) Poisonous plants in Britain and their effect on animals and man. Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, London
Crawley MJ (2000) Seed predators and plant population dynamics. In: Fenner M (ed) Seeds: the ecology of regeneration in plant communities. Cabi, Wallingford, pp 167–182
Crego RD, Jiménez JE, Rozzi R (2018) Macro- and micro-habitat selection of small rodents and their predation risk perception under a novel invasive predator at the southern end of the Americas. Mamm Res 63:267–275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13364-018-0361-5
Dylewski L, Ortega KY, Bogdziewicz M, Pearson ED (2020) Seed size predicts global effects of small mammal seed predation on plant recruitment. Ecol Lett 23:1024–1033. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.13499
Fei Yu et al (2011) Effect of small rodents on seed dispersal of five tree species in **aoxing’ an Mountains. J Northeast For Univ 39:11–13
Fog A (2008) Sampling methods for Wallenius’ and Fisher’s noncentral hypergeometric distributions. Commun Stat Simul Comput 37(2):241–257
Fog A (2022) Biased Urn Theory. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/BiasedUrn/vignettes/UrnTheory.pdf
Fraschina BJ, Knight C (2009) Foraging efficiency of Akodon azarae under different plant cover and resource levels. J Ethol 27:447–452
García D, Zamora R, Amico GC (2011) The spatial scale of plant-animal interactions: effects of resource availability and habitat structure. Ecol Monogr 81:103–121. https://doi.org/10.1890/10-0470.1
Germain RM, Johnson L, Schneider S et al (2013) Spatial variability in plant predation determines the strength of stochastic community assembly. Am Nat 182:169–179. https://doi.org/10.1086/670928
Geyer CJ (2022) Package "mcmc". https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/mcmc/mcmc.pdf
Gómez JM, Schupp EW, Jordano P (2019) Synzoochory: the ecological and evolutionary relevance of a dual interaction. Biol Rev 94(3):874–902
Gong H, Tang C, Wang B (2015) Post-dispersal seed predation and its relations with seed traits: a thirty-species-comparative study. Plant Species Biol 30:193–201. https://doi.org/10.1111/1442-1984.12051
Grubb PJ (1977) The maintenance of species-richness in plant communities: the importance of the regeneration niche. Biol Rev 52:107–145
Hartig F (2022) DHARMa: residual diagnostics for hierarchical (multi-level/mixed) regression models. Theoretical Ecology, University of Regensburg. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/DHARMa/vignettes/DHARMa.html
Horst JL, Venable DL (2017) Frequency-dependent seed predation by rodents on Sonoran Desert winter annual plants. Ecology 99:196–203. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.2066
Hulme PE (1994) Post-dispersal seed predation in grassland: its magnitude and sources of variation. J Ecol 82:645–652
Kerley GIH, Erasmus T (1991) What do mice select for in seeds? Oecologia 86:261–267
Kollmann J, Buschor M (2003) Edges effects on seed predation by rodents in deciduous forests of northern Switzerland. Plant Ecol 164:249–261
Kollmann J, Coomes DA, White SM (1998) Consistencies in post-dispersal seed predation of temperate fleshy-fruited species among seasons, years and sites. Funct Ecol 12(4):683–690
Křivánek M, Pyšek P, Jarošík V (2006) Planting history and propagule pressure as predictors of invasion by woody species in a Temperate Region. Conserv Biol 20:1487–1498. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00477.x
Larios E, Búrquez A, Valenzuela G et al (2017a) Post-dispersal seed predation in relation to selection on seed size in Dithyrea californica. Evol Ecol Res 18:651–662
Larios L, Pearson DE, Maron JL (2017b) Incorporating the effects of generalist seed predators into plant community theory. Funct Ecol 31:1856–1867. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.12905
Lediuk KD, Damascos MA, Puntieri JG, Svriz M (2014) Differences in phenology and fruit characteristic between invasive and native woody species favor exotic species invasiveness. Plant Ecol 215:1455–1467. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-014-0402-3
Lichti NI, Steele MA, Swihart RK (2017) Seed fate and decision-making processes in scatter-hoarding rodents. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 92:474–504. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12240
Lobo N (2014) Conifer seed predation by terrestrial small mammals: a review of the patterns, implications, and limitations of top-down and bottom-up interactions. For Ecol Manage 328:45–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2014.05.019
Maron JL, Kathryn CB, Angert AL (2014) Disentangling the drivers of context-dependent plant-animal interactions. J Ecol 102(6):1485–1496
Mermoz M, Martin C (1986) Mapa de vegetación de la Reserva y del Parque Nacional Nahuel Huapi. Administración de Parques Nacionales, Delegación Técnica Regional Patagonia. Informe Técnico. 23
Monteverde MJ, Hodara K (2017) Movimientos de roedores intra- e inter-ambiente y riesgo de exposición al Hantavirus “Andes” en Patagonia norte, Argentina. Ecol Austral 27:279–289
Morán-López T, Wiegand T, Morales JM, Valladares F, Díaz M (2015) Predicting forest management effects on oak–rodent mutualisms. Oikos 000:001–013. https://doi.org/10.1111/oik.02884
Morán-López T, Valladares F, Tiribelli F et al (2018) Fragmentation modifies seed trait effects on scatter-hoarders’ foraging decisions. Plant Ecol 219:325–342. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-018-0798-2
Mortelliti A, Ilona PG, Shawn F et al (2019) Small mammal controls on the climate-driven range shift of woody plant species. Oikos. https://doi.org/10.1111/oik.06643
Motta L, Vitali A, Amico CG (2021) Post-dispersal seed predation in Patagonia temperate forest depends on habitat patchiness and seed species. Plant Ecol 222:819–827
Moyano J, Chiuffo MC, Nuñez MA, Rodriguez MA (2019) Seed predation does not explain pine invasion success. Oecologia. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-019-04354-8
Muñoz E, Garay A (1985) Caracterización climática de la provincia de Río Negro. INTA- EERA. S.C. de Bariloche. Informe técnico n° 56.
Muñoz A, Bonal R (2008) Are you strong enough to carry that seed? Seed size/body size ratios influence seed choices by rodents. Anim Behav 76(3):709–715
Murdoch WW (1969) Switching in general predators: experiments on predator specificity and stability of prey populations. Ecol Monogr 39:335–354. https://doi.org/10.2307/1942352
Muschetto E, Mazia N, Cueto GR, Busch M (2015) Are rodents a source of biotic resistance to tree invasion in Pampean grasslands? Tree seed consumption under different conditions. Austral Ecol 40:255–266
Muschetto E, Chaneton EJ, Mazía N et al (2022) Biotic resistance in a stochastic world: do rodents act as a filter to alien tree invasion in pampean old fields? Ecol Res 37(5):568–581
Myster RW (2003) Effects of species, density, patch-type, and season on post-dispersal seed predation in a Puerto Rican pasture. Biotropica 35:542–546. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1744-7429.2003.TB00610.X
Nuñez MA, Simberloff D, Relva MA (2008) Seed predation as a barrier to alien conifer invasions. Biol Invasions 10:1389–1398. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-007-9214-x
Orians GH, Pearson NE (1979) On the theory of central place foraging. In: Horn DJ, Mitchell RD, Stairs GR (eds) Analysis of ecological systems. Ohio State University Press, Columbus, OH, pp 155–177
Ostoja SM, Schupp EW, Durham S, Klinger R (2013) Seed harvesting is influenced by associational effects in mixed seed neighborhoods, not just by seed density. Funct Ecol 27:775–785
Pearson DE, Callaway RM, Maron JL (2011) Biotic resistance via granivory: establishment by invasive, naturalized, and native asters reflects generalist preference. Ecology 92:1748–1757. https://doi.org/10.1890/11-0164.1
Pearson DE, Potter T, Maron JL (2012) Biotic resistance: exclusion of native rodent consumers releases populations of a weak invader. J Ecol 100:1383–1390. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2012.02025.x
Pearson DE, Hierro JL, Chiuffo M, Villarreal D (2014) Rodent seed predation as a biotic filter influencing exotic plant abundance and distribution. Biol Invasions 16:1185–1196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-013-0573-1
Pearson DE, Ortega YK, Eren Ö, Hierro JL (2018) Community assembly theory as a framework for biological invasions. Trends Ecol Evol 33:313–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2018.03.002
Perea R, González R, San Miguel A, Gil L (2011) Moonlight and shelter cause differential seed selection and removal by rodents. Anim Behav 82:717–723
Pyke GH, Pulliam HR, Charnov EL (1977) Optimal foraging: selective review of theory and tests. Q Rev Biol 52:137–154
Pyšek P et al (2015) Naturalization of central European plants in North America: species traits, habitats, propagule pressure, residence time. Ecol Soc Am 96:762–774
Rader R, Krockenberger AK (2006) Use of space by a tropical rainforest rodent, Melomys cervinipes, and its implications for foraging and home-range size. Wildl Res 33:577–582
Radtke TM (2011) Granivore seed-size preferences. Seed Sci Res 21:81–83
Reader RJ (1993) Control of seedling emergence by ground cover and seed predation in relation to seed size for some old-field species. J Ecol 81:169–175
Rebertus AJ, Veblen TT, Kitzberger T (1993) Gap formation and dieback in Fuego-Patagonian Nothofagus forests. Phytocoenologia 23(581):599
Rodríguez-Blázquez S, Gómez-Mejía E, Rosales-Conrado N, León-González ME, García-Sánchez B, Miranda R (2023) Valorization of prunus seed oils: fatty acids composition and oxidative stability. Molecules 28(20):7045. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28207045
Rosalino LM et al (2011) Usage patterns of Mediterranean agro-forest habitat components by wood mice Apodemus sylvaticus. Mamm Biol 76:268–273
Sala OE et al (2000) Global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100. Science 287:1770–1774. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.287.5459.1770
Sidhu S, Datta A (2015) Tracking seed fates of tropical tree species: evidence for seed caching in a tropical forest in north-east India. PLoS ONE 10:e0134658
Simberloff D (2009) The role of propagule pressure in biological invasions. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 40:81–102. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.110308.120304
Simberloff D, Martin JL, Genovesi P, et al (2013) Impacts of biological invasions: what’s what and the way forward. Trends Ecol Evol 28:58–66
Thompson DB, Brown JH, Spencer WD (1991) Indirect facilitation of granivorous birds by desert rodents: experimental evidence from foraging patterns. Ecology 72:852–863
Valladares-gómez B et al (2020) Morphological variation in two sigmodontine rodents along the mainland and the Fuegian archipelago in Chilean southern Patagonia. Rev Chil Hist Nat 93:2–12
Veech JA (2001) The foraging behavior of granivorous rodents and short-term apparent competition among seeds. Behav Ecol 12:467–474
Wang B (2020) Seed density affects post-dispersal seed predation: evidence from a seed removal experiment of 62 species. Integr Zool 152:135–143. https://doi.org/10.1111/1749-4877.12421
Weiher E et al (1998) Community assembly rules, morphological dispersion, and the coexistence of plant species. Oikos 81:309–322. https://doi.org/10.2307/3547051
Acknowledgements
Mariana Chiuffo and Guillermo Amico contributed to the experimental design, Gabriel A. Guerra and Bruno Alzugaray provided field work assistance. Parque Municipal Llao Llao provided the research permit. M. Sofia Campagna and Iván Barberá were beneficiary of a PhD scholarship of the National Scientific and Technical Research Council (CONICET) funded by the Argentinian government.
Funding
This study was funded by Ministerio de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación Productiva, Agencia Nacional de Promoción de la Investigación, el Desarrollo Tecnológico y la Innovación (Argentina), Project PICT 2018-01566. M. S. Campagna and I. Barberá have a Ph.D. scholarship from the National Scientific and Technical Research Council (CONICET-Argentina).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Campagna M. Sofía and Morán-López T. designed and performed the field experiments and wrote the original draft. Campagna M. Sofia, Barberá I., and Morán-López T. analyzed the data. Morales J.M provided advise in experimental design and data analysis and made writing revisions. Barberá I. made writing revisions. Morán-López T. obtained the funding and supervised the work.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors responsible of this study have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Campagna, M.S., Barberá, I., Morales, J.M. et al. Unusually large invasive seeds are spared by rodents in a Patagonian forest. Biol Invasions (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-024-03372-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-024-03372-9