Log in

Canid Mating Systems, Social Behavior, Parental Care and Ontogeny: Are they Flexible?

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Behavior Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Benson Ginsburg’s early studies of canid socialization and wolf social and reproductive behavior were focused, in part, on the degree to which there was flexibility in social development and specifically whether there was a critical period during development after which wolf pups could not be socialized to humans. My focus was the degree to which differences in canid ecology and social structure were correlated with differences in the plasticity of social and reproductive behavior, including development. Canid species are unusual among the Mammalia in being primarily monogamous. Males may play an indirect or direct role in parental care, depending on a species degree of sociality. Canid species also differ in developmental parameters, and reproductive suppression is common in the group-living pack hunters. I review comparative studies of the social and reproductive behavior of three South American canids which vary in their degree of sociality and explore the degree to which the species are ecologically and socially flexible.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baker AJ, Bales K, Dietz JM (2002) Mating system and group dynamics in lion tamarins. In: Kleiman DG, Rylands AB (eds) Lion tamarins: biology and conservation. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC, pp 188–212

    Google Scholar 

  • Bekoff M (1978) Behavioral development in coyotes and eastern coyotes. In: Bekoff M (ed) Coyotes: biology, behavior and management. Academic Press, NY, pp 97–126

    Google Scholar 

  • Biben M (1982a) Object play and social treatment of prey in bush dogs and crab-eating foxes. Behaviour 79:201–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biben M (1982b) Ontogeny of social behavior related to feeding in the crab-eating fox (Cerdocyon thous) and the bush dog (Speothos venaticus). J Zool 196:207–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biben M (1982c) Urine-marking during agonistic encounters in the bush dog (Speothos venaticus). Zoo Biol 1:359–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biben M (1983) Comparative ontogeny of social behaviour in three South American canids, the maned wolf, crab-eating fox and bush dog: implications for sociality. Anim Behav 31:814–826

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brady CA (1978) Reproduction, growth and parental care in crag-eating foxes (Cerdocyon thous) at the National Zoological Park, Washington. Int Zoo Yearb 18:130–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brady CA (1979) Observations on the behavior and ecology of the crab-eating fox (Cerdocyon thous). In: Eisenberg JF (ed) Vertebrate ecology in the northern neotropics. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC, pp 161–171

    Google Scholar 

  • Brady CA (1981) The vocal repertoires of the bush dog (Speothos venaticus), crab-eating fox (Cerdocyon thous), and maned wolf (Chrysocyon brachyurus). Anim Behav 29:649–669

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brady CA, Ditton MK (1979) Management and breeding of maned wolves (Chrysocyon brachyurus) at the National Zoological Park, Washington, D.C. Int Zoo Yearb 19:171–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlstead K (1996) Effects of captivity on the behavior of wild mammals. In: Kleiman DG, Allen ME, Thompson KV, Lumpkin S (eds) Wild mammals in captivity: principles and techniques. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 317–333

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietz JM (1984) Ecology and social organization of the maned wolf (Chrysocyon brachyurus). Smithson Contrib Zool 392:1–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ginsburg BE, Woolpy J, Kleiman D, Edwards C (1962) Comparative studies of Canid behavior. III. Socialization to humans on varying schedules of experience and of tranquilizing drugs. Am Zool 2:l44

    Google Scholar 

  • Jantschke F (1973) On the breeding and rearing of bush dogs, Speothos venaticus, at the Frankfurt Zoo. Int Zoo Yearb 13:141–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleiman DG (1967) Some aspects of social behavior in the Canidae. Am Zool 7:365–372

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleiman DG (1969) The reproductive behaviour of the green acouchi, Myoprocta pratti. Ph.D. thesis, University of London

  • Kleiman DG (1972) The social behavior of the maned wolf, Chrysocyon brachyurus, and the bush dog, Speothos venaticus: a study in contrast. J Mammal 53:791–806

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleiman DG (1977) Monogamy in mammals. Q Rev Biol 52:39–69

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kleiman DG (1980) The sociobiology of captive propagation in mammals. In: Soulé M, Wilcox B (eds) Conservation biology. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, pp 243–261

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleiman DG (1981) Correlations among life history characteristics of mammalian species exhibiting two extreme forms of monogamy. In: Alexander RD, Tinkle DW (eds) Natural selection and social behavior. Chiron Press, NY, pp 332–344

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleiman DG (1984) Implications of monogamy for infant social development in mammals. In: Lewis M (ed) Social connections: beyond the dyad. Plenum Press, New York, pp 91–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleiman DG (1992) Behavior research in zoos: past, present, and future. Zoo Biol 11:301–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleiman DG, Brady CA (1978) Coyote behavior in the context of recent canid research: problems and perspectives. In: Bekoff M (ed) Coyotes: biology, behavior and management. Academic Press, New York, pp 163–188

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleiman DG, Eisenberg JF (1973) Comparisons of canid and felid social systems from an evolutionary perspective. Anim Behav 21:637–659

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kleiman DG, Malcolm J (1981) The evolution of male parental investment in mammals. In: Gubernick DJ, Klopfer PH (eds) Parental care in mammals. Plenum Press, NY, pp 347–387

    Google Scholar 

  • Koontz FW (1984) Sternal scent gland communication in the rufous elephant-shrew, Elephantulus rufescens Peters, with additional observations on behavior and reproduction in captivity. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park, MD

  • Koontz FW, Roeper NJ (1983) Elephantulus rufescens. Mamm Species 204:1–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moehlman PD (1997) Cooperative breeding, reproductive suppression and body mass in canids. In: Solomon NG, French JA (eds) Cooperative breeding in mammals. Cambridge University Press, NY, pp 76–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Porton I (1983) Bush dog urine marking: its role in pair formation and maintenance. Anim Behav 31:1061–1069

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porton I, Kleiman DG, Rodden M (1987) Aseasonality of bush dog reproduction and the influence of social factors on the estrous cycle. J. Mammalogy 68(4):867–871

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rabb GB, Woolpy JH, Ginsburg BE (1967) Social relationships in a group of captive wolves. Am Zool 7:305–311

    Google Scholar 

  • Racey PA, Kleiman DG (1970) Maintenance and breeding in captivity of some verspertilionid bats, with special reference to the noctule. Int Zoo Yearb 10:65–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rathbun GB (1979) The social structure and ecology of elephant shrews. Z Tierpsychol Suppl Adv Ethol 20:1–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodden MD, Sorenson LG, Sherr A, Kleiman DG (1996) Use of behavioral measures to assess reproductive status in maned wolves (Chrysocyon brachyurus). Zoo Biol 15(6):565–585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woolpy JH, Ginsburg BE (1967) Wolf socialization: a study of temperament in a wild social species. Am Zool 7:357–363

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I would like to thank Benson Ginsburg for giving me a start in canid research and supporting my interests so completely. Without the opportunities he provided, my career would have gone in a very different direction. I also wish to thank George and Mary Rabb for introducing me to the complexities of life within a wolf pack. I would also like to thank those colleagues that contributed so much to the canid studies, especially: Maxeen Biben, Chuck Brady, James Dietz, John Eisenberg, Ingrid Porton, and Melissa Rodden. These studies were supported by grants from the Smithsonian Research Foundation and NIMH 27241-03.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Edited by Stephen Maxson. Correspondence to: Department of Psychology, University of Connecticut, Stoors, CT 06269-1020, USA. email: Stephen.Maxson@UConn.Edu.

The paper originated in a festschrift, Nurturing the Genome, to honor Benson E. Ginsburg on June 2, 2002 and is part of a special issue of Behavior Genetics based on that festschrift. Devra G. Klieman passed away in 2010, and her paper is published posthumously.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kleiman, D.G. Canid Mating Systems, Social Behavior, Parental Care and Ontogeny: Are they Flexible?. Behav Genet 41, 803–809 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10519-011-9459-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10519-011-9459-0

Keywords

Navigation