Log in

Composite steel beam database for seismic design and performance assessment of composite-steel moment-resisting frame systems

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper discusses the development of a publicly available database of composite steel beam-to-column connections under cyclic loading. The database is utilized to develop recommendations for the seismic design and nonlinear performance assessment of steel and composite-steel moment-resisting frames (MRFs). In particular, the sagging/hogging plastic flexural resistance as well as the effective slab width are assessed through a comparison of the European, American and Japanese design provisions. The database is also used to quantify the plastic rotation capacity of composite steel beams under sagging/hogging bending. It is found that the Eurocode 8-Part 3 provisions overestimate the plastic rotation capacities of composite beams by 50% regardless of their web slenderness ratio. Empirical relationships are developed to predict the plastic rotation capacity of composite steel beams as a function of their geometric and material properties. These relationships can facilitate the seismic performance assessment of new and existing steel and composite-steel MRFs through nonlinear static analysis. The collected data underscores that the beam-to-column web panel zone in composite steel beam-to-column connections experience higher shear demands than their non-composite counterparts. A relative panel zone-to-beam resistance ratio is proposed that allows for controlled panel zone inelastic deformation of up to 10 times the panel zone’s shear yield distortion angle. Notably, when this criterion was imposed, there was no fracture in all the examined beam-to-column connections.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Optimizing the seismic performance of steel and steel–concrete structures by standardizing material quality control.

References

  • AIJ (2010a) Recommendation for limit state design of steel structures, 3rd edn. Architectural Institute of Japan, Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  • AIJ (2010b) Design recommendations for composite construction, 2nd edn. Architectural Institute of Japan, Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  • AISC (2016a) Seismic provisions for structural steel buildings, ANSI/AISC 341-16. American Institute for Steel Construction, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • AISC (2016b) Specification for structural steel buildings, ANSI/AISC 360-16. American Institute for Steel Construction, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • AISC (2016c) Prequalified connections for special and intermediate steel moment frames for seismic applications, ANSI/AISC 358-16. American Institute for Steel Construction, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Aoki H, Masuda M (1985) Statistical investigation on mechanical properties of structural steel based on coupon tests. J Struct Const Eng Arch Inst Jpn 358:94–105

    Google Scholar 

  • Araújo M, Macedo L, Castro JM (2017) Evaluation of the rotation capacity limits of steel members defined in EC8-3. J Constr Steel Res 135:11–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2017.04.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asada H, Matoba H, Tanaka T, Yamada S (2015) Retrofit effects for composite beams—study on seismic retrofit of beam-to-column connection using supplemental H-section haunches Part 2. J Struct Constr Eng AIJ 80:1479–1487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ASCE (2017) Seismic evaluation and retrofit of existing buildings: ASCE standard ASCE/SEI 41-17. American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston

    Google Scholar 

  • Braconi A, Finetto M, Degee H et al (2013) Optimising the seismic performance of steel and steel-concrete structures by standardising material quality control (OPUS). European Commission, Luxembourg

    Google Scholar 

  • Bursi OS, Gramola G (2000) Behaviour of composite substructures with full and partial shear connection under quasi-static cyclic and pseudo-dynamic displacements. Mater Struct 33:154–163. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02479409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bursi O, Haller M, Lennon T et al (2009) Prefabricated composite beam-to-column filled tube or partially reinforced-concrete-encased column connections for severe seismic and fire loadings. European Commission, Luxembourg

    Google Scholar 

  • Castro JM, Elghazouli AY, Izzuddin BA (2007) Assessment of effective slab widths in composite beams. J Constr Steel Res 63:1317–1327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2006.11.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castro JM, Dávila-Arbona FJ, Elghazouli AY (2008) Seismic design approaches for panel zones in steel moment frames. J Earthq Eng 12:34–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632460801922712

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CEN (2004a) EN 1998-1: Eurocode 8: design of structures for earthquake resistance—part 1: general rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings. European Committee for Standardization, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • CEN (2004b) EN 1994-1-1: Eurocode 4: design of composite steel and concrete structures—part 1-1: general rules and rules for buildings. European Committee for Standardization, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • CEN (2005a) EN 1998-3: Eurocode 8: design of structures for earthquake resistance—part 3: assessment and retrofitting of buildings. European Committee for Standardization, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • CEN (2005b) EN 1993-1-1: Eurocode 3: design of steel structures—part 1-1: general rules and rules for buildings. European Committee for Standardization, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • CEN (2005c) EN 1993-1-8: Eurocode 3: design of steel structures—part 1-8: design of joints. European Committee for Standardization, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • Chatterjee S, Hadi AS (2015) Regression analysis by example, 5th edn. Wiley, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen S-J, Chao YC (2001) Effect of composite action on seismic performance of steel moment connections with reduced beam sections. J Constr Steel Res 57:417–434. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0143-974X(00)00022-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng C-T, Chen C-C (2005) Seismic behavior of steel beam and reinforced concrete column connections. J Constr Steel Res 61:587–606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2004.09.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng C-T, Chan C-F, Chung L-L (2007) Seismic behavior of steel beams and CFT column moment-resisting connections with floor slabs. J Constr Steel Res 63:1479–1493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2007.01.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ciutina AL, Dubina D (2003) Influence of column web stiffening on the seismic behaviour of beam-to-column joints. In: Proceedings of Stessa, pp 269–275

  • Civjan S, Engelhardt M, Gross J (2001) Slab effects in SMRF retrofit connection tests. J Struct Eng 127:230–237. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2001)127:3(230)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cordova PP, Deierlein G (2005) Validation of the seismic performance of composite RCS frames: full-scale testing, analytical modeling, and seismic design. The John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Stanford University, Stanford

    Google Scholar 

  • Del Carpio M, Mosqueda G, Lignos D (2014) Hybrid simulation of the seismic response of a steel moment frame building structure through collapse. University at Buffalo, Buffalo

    Google Scholar 

  • Du Plessis DP, Daniels JH (1972) Strength of composite beam-to-column connections. Fritz Engineering Laboratory, Lehigh University, Bethlehem

    Google Scholar 

  • Elkady A, Lignos DG (2014) Modeling of the composite action in fully restrained beam-to-column connections: implications in the seismic design and collapse capacity of steel special moment frames. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 43:1935–1954. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elkady A, Lignos DG (2015) Effect of gravity framing on the overstrength and collapse capacity of steel frame buildings with perimeter special moment frames. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 44:1289–1307. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Englehardt M, Fry G, Jones M, et al. (2000). Behavior and design of radius-cut reduced beam section connections, Report Bo. SAC/BD 00/17, SAC Joint Venture, Sacramendo, California, USA

  • Fardis MN (2018) Capacity design: early history. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.3110

    Google Scholar 

  • Fujisawa K, Ichinohe Y, Sugimoto M, Sonoda M (2013) Statistical study on mechanical properties and chemical compositions of SN Steels. In: Summary of technical papers of annual meeting. Architectural Institute of Japan, pp 699–700

  • Hartloper A, Lignos D (2017) Updates to the ASCE 41-13 provisions for the nonlinear modeling of steel wide flange columns for performance-based earthquake engineering. In: The 8th European conference on steel and composite structures. Copenhagen, Denmark

  • Jones SL, Fry GT, Engelhardt MD (2002) Experimental evaluation of cyclically loaded reduced beam section moment connections. J Struct Eng 128:441–451. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2002)128:4(441)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanno R (2016) Advances in steel materials for innovative and elegant steel structures in Japan—a review. Struct Eng Int 26:242–253. https://doi.org/10.2749/101686616X14555428759361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim KD, Engelhardt MD (2002) Monotonic and cyclic loading models for panel zones in steel moment frames. J Constr Steel Res 58:605–635. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0143-974X(01)00079-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim S-Y, Lee C-H (2017) Seismic retrofit of welded steel moment connections with highly composite floor slabs. J Constr Steel Res 139:62–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2017.09.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim Y-J, Oh S-H, Moon T-S (2004) Seismic behavior and retrofit of steel moment connections considering slab effects. Eng Struct 26:1993–2005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2004.07.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kishiki S, Kadono D, Satsukawa K, Yamada S (2010) Consideration of composite effects on elasto-plastic behavior of panel zone. J Struct Constr Eng AIJ 75:1527–1536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krawinkler H (1978) Shear in beam-column joints in seismic design of steel frames. Eng J 15:82–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Krawinkler H (2009) Loading histories for cyclic tests in support of performance assessment of structural components. In: The 3rd international conference on advances in experimental structural engineering. San Francisco

  • Lee C-H, Jeon S-W, Kim J-H, Uang C-M (2005) Effects of panel zone strength and beam web connection method on seismic performance of reduced beam section steel moment connections. J Struct Eng 131:1854–1865. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2005)131:12(1854)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee CH, Jung JH, Kim SY, Kim JJ (2016) Investigation of composite slab effect on seismic performance of steel moment connections. J Constr Steel Res 117:91–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2015.10.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leon R (1990) Serviceability of composite floors. In: Proceedings of the 1990 national steel construction conference. AISC, p 18

  • Leon R, Alsamsam I (1993) Performance and serviceability of composite floors. In: Structural engineering in natural hazards mitigation. ASCE, pp 1479–1484

  • Leon RT, Hajjar JF, Gustafson MA (1998) Seismic response of composite moment-resisting connections. I: performance. J Struct Eng 124:868–876. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1998)124:8(868)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lignos DG, Krawinkler H (2011) Deterioration modeling of steel components in support of collapse prediction of steel moment frames under earthquake loading. J Struct Eng 137:1291–1302. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lignos DG, Krawinkler H (2013) Development and utilization of structural component databases for performance-based earthquake engineering. J Struct Eng 139:1382–1394. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000646

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lignos DG, Hikino T, Matsuoka Y, Nakashima M (2013) Collapse assessment of steel moment frames based on E-Defense full-scale shake table collapse tests. J Struct Eng 139:120–132. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000608

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu L, Xu Y, Zheng H (2017) Investigation of composite action on seismic performance of weak-axis column bending connections. J Constr Steel Res 129:286–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2016.11.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mele E (2002) Moment resisting welded connections: an extensive review of design practice and experimental research in USA, Japan and Europe. J Earthq Eng 06:111–145. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363246902000590

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakashima M, Roeder C, Maruoka Y (2000) Steel moment frames for earthquakes in United States and Japan. J Struct Eng 126:861–868. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2000)126:8(861)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakashima M, Matsumiya T, Suita K, Liu D (2005) Test on full-scale three-storey steel moment frame and assessment of ability of numerical simulation to trace cyclic inelastic behaviour. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 35:3–19. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakashima M, Matsumiya T, Suita K, Zhou F (2007) Full-scale test of composite frame under large cyclic loading. J Struct Eng 133:297–304. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2007)133:2(297)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nam T, Kasai K (2012) Study on shake table experimental results regarding composite action of a full-scale steel building tested to collapse. In: 9th international conference on urban earthquake engineering/4th Asia conference on earthquake engineering. Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo, pp 1111–1116

  • Panagiotakos TB, Fardis MN (2001) Deformations of reinforced concrete members at yielding and ultimate. Struct J 98:135–148

    Google Scholar 

  • PEER/ATC (2010) Modeling and acceptance criteria for seismic design and analysis of tall buildings. Applied Technology Council (ATC), Redwood City

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricles JM, Fisher JW, Lu L-W, Kaufmann EJ (2002) Development of improved welded moment connections for earthquake-resistant design. J Constr Steel Res 58:565–604. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0143-974X(01)00095-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roeder CW (2000) State of the art report on connection performance. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roeder CW (2002) General issues influencing connection performance. J Struct Eng 128:420–428. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2002)128:4(420)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shin S, Engelhardt MD (2013). Cyclic performance of deep column moment frames with weak panel zones. In: Advances in structural engineering and mechanics (ASEM13), Jeju, Korea

  • Suita K, Yamada S, Tada M et al (2008) Collapse experiment on four-story steel moment frame: part 2. In: The 14th world conference on earthquake engineering. Bei**g

  • Sumner EA, Murray TM (2002) Behavior of extended end-plate moment connections subject to cyclic loading. J Struct Eng 128:501–508. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2002)128:4(501)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tagawa Y, Kato B, Aoki H (1989) Behavior of composite beams in steel frame under hysteretic loading. J Struct Eng 115:2029–2045. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1989)115:8(2029)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tremblay R, Tchebotarev N, Filiatrault A (1997) Seismic performance of RBS connections for steel moment resisting frames: influence of loading rate and floor slab. In: Proceedings of Stessa

  • Uang C-M, Yu Q-S, Noel S, Gross J (2000) Cyclic testing of steel moment connections rehabilitated with RBS or welded haunch. J Structure Engineering 126:57–68. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2000)126:1(57)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamada S, Satsukawa K, Kishiki S et al (2009) Elasto-plastic behavior of panel zone in beam to external column connection with concrete slab. J Struct Constr Eng AIJ 74:1841–1849

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang X, Ricles J, Lu L-W, Fisher J (2004) Development of seismic guidelines for deep-column steel moment connections. Lehigh University, Bethlehem

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study is based on work supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation (Project No. 200021_169248). The financial support is gratefully acknowledged. Any opinions expressed in the paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of sponsors. The authors would like to sincerely thank Prof. Masayoshi Nakashima, Prof. Tomohiro Matsumiya, Prof. Roberto Leon, Prof. Gregory G. Deierlein, Prof. Gilberto Mosqueda, Dr. Paul Cordova, and Dr. Maikol Del Carpio for providing test data for the development of the composite steel beams database.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dimitrios G. Lignos.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

El Jisr, H., Elkady, A. & Lignos, D.G. Composite steel beam database for seismic design and performance assessment of composite-steel moment-resisting frame systems. Bull Earthquake Eng 17, 3015–3039 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-019-00564-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-019-00564-w

Keywords

Navigation