Log in

Roan (Hippotragus equinus) population decline in Kruger National Park, South Africa: influence of a wetland boundary

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
European Journal of Wildlife Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Effective management of grazers requires understanding of the mechanisms influencing population declines. Roan antelope, a specialist grazer, has declined in population numbers within Kruger National Park, South Africa. The most widely accepted hypothesis is that habitat deterioration throughout the entire northern plains landscape is responsible for declines in this species. Observations suggest, however, that on the northern plains of Kruger National Park, roan antelope grazes at the boundary between ephemeral wetland and the savanna matrix. The boundary is characterized by nutrient-rich soil and forage, and thus attracts grazing from both generalist and specialist species. We hypothesize that competition for resources at this ecotone, and not at other places in the landscape, is responsible for the observed declines in roan antelope. Changing management strategies to be more cognizant of patchiness and savanna heterogeneity, i.e. more spatially informed, will improve the likelihood that management will result in increasing roan population numbers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allsopp R (1979) Roan antelope population in the Lambwe valley, Kenya. J Appl Ecol 16:109–115

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellamonte G, Costantini A, Giammarioli S (1987) Comparison of modified automatic Dumas method and the traditional Kjeldahl method for nitrogen determination in infant food. J Anal Chem 70:227–229

    Google Scholar 

  • Bissonette JA (1997) Scale sensitive properties: historical context, current meaning. In: Bissonette JA (ed) Wildlife and landscape ecology: effects of pattern and scale. Springer, New York, pp 3–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown BJ, Allen TFH (1989) The importance of scale in evaluating herbivory impacts. Oikos 54:189–194

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson T (2001) Hierarchical selection and utilization of patches by zebra (Equus burchelli) on the northern plains landscape mosaic of the Kruger National Park. Master of Science Thesis, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa

  • Gertenbach WPD (1983) Landscapes of the Kruger National Park. Koedoe 26:9–121

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrington R, Owen-Smith N, Viljoen P, Biggs HC, Mason HC, Funston P (1999) Establishing the causes of the roan antelope decline in the Kruger National Park, South Africa. Biol Conserv 90:69–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris LD (1988) Edge effects and conservation of biotic diversity. Conserv Biol 2:330–332

    Google Scholar 

  • Joubert SCJ (1976) The population ecology of the roan antelope in the Kruger National Park. PhD Thesis, University of Pretoria, South Africa

  • Kotze DC, Marneweck G (1999) Landuse and wetland/riparian habitat working group. Wetland/riparian habitats: practical field procedure for identification and delineations. Version 1.2. Water Research Commission, Pretoria, South Africa

    Google Scholar 

  • Laca EA, Ortega IM (1995) Integrating foraging mechanisms across spatial and temporal scales—invited paper. 5th International Rangeland Congress, pp 129–132

  • Ludwig JA, Cornelius JM (1987) Locating discontinuities along ecological gradients. Ecology 68:448–450

    Google Scholar 

  • Naiman RJ, Decamps H, Fournier F (1987) The role of ecotones in landscape management. UNESCO Man Biosphere Programme, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Risser PG (1993) Ecotones at local to regional scales from around the world. Ecol Appl 3:367–368

    Google Scholar 

  • Risser PG (1995) Biodiversity and ecosystem function. Conserv Biol 9:742–746

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scholes RJ, Walker BH (1993) An African savanna: a synthesis of the Nylsvley study. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Senft RL, Coughenour MB, Bailey DW, Rittenhouse LR, Sala OE, Swift DM (1987) Large herbivore foraging and ecological hierarchies. Bioscience 37:789–799

    Google Scholar 

  • Ter Braack CJF (1987) The analysis of vegetation-environment relationships by canonical correspondence analysis. Vegetatio 69:69–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson DE, Hirst SM (1975) Ecology and factors limiting roan and sable antelope populations in South Africa. Wildl Monogr 14:4–111

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Thanks to colleagues, professors as well as anonymous reviewers for ideas and contributions towards earlier manuscript drafts. Thanks to the National Research Foundation, South Africa for funding and the Kruger National Park for logistic support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Kröger.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kröger, R., Rogers, K.H. Roan (Hippotragus equinus) population decline in Kruger National Park, South Africa: influence of a wetland boundary. Eur J Wildl Res 51, 25–30 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-004-0070-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-004-0070-z

Keywords

Navigation