Log in

Bioanalysis of Cepharanthine by LC–ESI–MS–MS and Its Application to Pharmacokinetic Studies

  • Original
  • Published:
Chromatographia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A sensitive liquid chromatography–electrospray ionization–tandem mass spectrometry (LC–ESI–MS–MS) method was developed and validated for the quantification of cepharanthine (CEP) in beagle dog plasma. The chromatographic separation was performed on an Agilent-C18 column and the mobile phase was composed of methanol:water with 10 mM ammonium acetate (20:80, v/v). Detection was operated in the positive ion mode and the tandem mass spectrometer was tuned in the multiple reactions monitoring mode (MRM) to monitor m/z transitions 607 → 365 for CEP and 285 → 193 for the internal standard (IS) diazepam. This method exhibited a linear range of 5–2,500 ng mL−1. The precision (RSD%) and accuracy (RME%) of the assay were <8.7 and 2.4%, respectively. The limit of quantification was 5 ng mL−1 and no significant matrix effect was observed. The validated method has been successfully applied to pharmacokinetic study of CEP in beagle dog.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (France)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Knodo Y, Imai Y, Hojo H, Hashimoto Y, Nozoe S (1992) Int J Immunopharmacol 14:1181–1186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Shiraishi N, Arima T, Aono K, Inouye B, Morimoto Y, Utsumi K (1980) Physiol Chem and Phy 12:299–305

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Nagano M, Kanno T, Fujita H, Muranaka S, Fujiwara T, Utsumi K (2003) Physiol Chem Phy Med NMR 35:131–143

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Goto M, Zeller WP, Hurley RM (1991) J Pharm Pharmacol 43:589–591

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Asaumi J, Nishikawa K, Matsuoka H, Iwata M, Kawasaki S, Hiraki Y, Nishijima K (1995) Anticancer Res 15:67–70

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Wu J, Suzuki H, Akhand AA, Zhou YW, Hossain K, Nakashima I (2002) Cell Signal 14:509–515

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ono M, Tanaka N, Orita K (1994) Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 35:10–16

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hirai M, Tanaka K, Shimizu T, Tanigawara Y, Yasuhara M, Hori R, Kakehi Y, Yoshida O, Ueda K, Komano T, Inui KI (1995) J Pharmacol Exp Ther 275:73–78

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Lin JH, Lu AYH (1997) Pharmacol Rev 49:403–449

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Bory S, Bun SS, Baghdikian B, Mabrouki F, Cheng SK, Elias R, Bun H, Ollivier E (2010) Nat Prod Commun 5:877–882

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. White RE (2000) Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 40:133–157

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hsieh Y (2008) Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol 4:93–101

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by Professor Qing-Duan Wang and Department of Pharmacology, Henan Institute of Medical Sciences.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ze-Yuan Liu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dong, RH., Fang, ZZ., Gao, HZ. et al. Bioanalysis of Cepharanthine by LC–ESI–MS–MS and Its Application to Pharmacokinetic Studies. Chromatographia 73, 75–81 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10337-010-1823-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10337-010-1823-3

Keywords

Navigation