Log in

Comparison between surgery and definitive chemoradiotherapy for patients with resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a propensity score analysis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Clinical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Our intent was to compare survival following neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery versus chemoradiotherapy (CRT) among patients with potentially resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Methods

Information about 406 consecutive esophageal cancer patients with resectable disease who underwent surgery with neoadjuvant chemotherapy consisting of cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil or who underwent definitive CRT was reviewed. The survival outcomes were analyzed using the Kaplan–Meier method and propensity score-adjusted Cox proportional hazards models. Relevant variables were included in the propensity score model.

Results

Overall, 206 patients planned to undergo surgery (S group) and 200 patients planned to undergo CRT (CRT group). In the unadjusted situation, progression-free survival and overall survival did not differ statistically between the groups. After matching, both survival outcomes were better in the S group compared to the CRT group. Subanalysis showed both survival outcomes were better in the S group for patients with only stage III disease. However, survival outcomes for stages I, II, and IV were not significantly different between treatment groups.

Conclusions

Among patients with resectable disease, survival outcomes in the S group were favored over those of the CRT group. These results indicate that different therapeutic strategies should be used for stage III esophageal cancer than for other stages.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tachimori Y, Ozawa S, Numasaki H et al (2015) Comprehensive registry of esophageal cancer in Japan, 2008. Esophagus 12:130–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ishikura S, Nihei K, Ohtsu A et al (2003) Long-term toxicity after definitive chemoradiotherapy for squamous cell carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus. J Clin Oncol 21:2697–2702

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Teoh AY, Chiu PW, Yeung WK et al (2013) Long-term survival outcomes after definitive chemoradiation versus surgery in patients with resectable squamous carcinoma of the esophagus: results from a randomized controlled trial. Ann Oncol 24:165–171

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hironaka S, Ohtsu A, Boku N et al (2003) Nonrandomized comparison between definitive chemoradiotherapy and radical surgery in patients with T(2–3)N(any) M(0) squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 57:425–433

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Pöttgen C, Stuschke M (2012) Radiotherapy versus surgery within multimodality protocols for esophageal cancer–a meta-analysis of the randomized trials. Cancer Treat Rev 38:599–604

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Worni M, Martin J, Gloor B et al (2012) Does surgery improve outcomes for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma? An analysis using surveillance epidemiology and end results registry form 1998 to 2008. J Am Coll Surg 215:643–651

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Ando N, Kato H, Igaki H et al (2012) A randomized trial CF postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy for clinical stage II/III squamous cell carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus (JCOG 9907). Ann Surg Oncol 19:68–74

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Matsuda S, Tsubosa Y, Niihara M et al (2015) Comparison of transthoracic esophagectomy with definitive chemoradiotherapy as initial treatment for patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who could tolerate transthoracic esophagectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 22:1866–1873

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. International Commission of Radiation Units and Measurements (1993) ICRU Report 50: Prescribing, recording, and reporting photon beam therapy. International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements, Bethesda

    Google Scholar 

  10. International Commission of Radiation Units and Measurements (1999) ICRU Report 62: Prescribing, recording, and reporting photon beam therapy (supplement to ICRU Report 50). International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements, Bethesda

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ohtsu A, Boku N, Muro K et al (1999) Definitive chemoradiotherapy for T4 and/or M1 lymph node squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. J Clin Oncol 17:2915–2921

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kato H, Sato A, Fukuda H et al (2009) A phase II trial of chemoradiotherapy for stage I esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study (JCOG9708). Jpn J Clin Oncol 39:638–643

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kodaira T, Fuwa N, Kamata M et al (2006) Single-institute phase I/II trial of alternating chemoradiotherapy with 5-FU and nedaplatin for esophageal carcinoma. Anticancer Res 26:471–478

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Sumi H, Ohtsu A, Boku N et al (2000) A case of inoperable esophageal carcinoma with hepatic and nodal metastases which showed a long-term survival after chemoradiotherapy including nedaplatin. Jpn J Clin Oncol 30:406–409

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Minsky BD, Pajak TF, Ginsberg RJ et al (2002) INT 0123 (Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 94-05) phase III trial of combined-modality therapy for esophageal cancer: high-dose versus standard-dose radiation therapy. J Clin Oncol 20:1167–1174

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. van Hagen P, Hulshof MC, van Lanschot JJ et al (2012) Preoperative chemoradiotherapy for esophageal or junctional cancer. N Engl J Med 366:2074–2084

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Urschel JD, Vasan H (2003) A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials that compared neoadjuvant chemoradiation and surgery to surgery alone for resectable esophageal cancer. Am J Surg 185:538–543

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Herskovic A, Martz K, Al-Sarraf M et al (1992) Combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy compared with radiotherapy alone in patients with cancer of the esophagus. N Engl J Med 326:1593–1598

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Stahl M, Walz MK, Stuschke M et al (2009) Phase III comparison of preoperative chemotherapy compared with chemoradiotherapy in patients with locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction. J Clin Oncol 27:851–856

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Siewert JR, Ott K (2007) Are squamous and adenocarcinomas of the esophagus the same disease? Semin Radiat Oncol 17:38–44

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Rice TW, Rusch VW, Apperson-Hansen C et al (2009) Worldwide esophageal cancer collaboration. Dis Esophagus 22:1–8

  22. Bedenne L, Michel P, Bouché O et al (2007) Chemoradiation followed by surgery compared with chemoradiation alone in squamous cancer of the esophagus: FFCD 9102. J Clin Oncol 25:1160–1168

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Motoo Nomura.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None of the authors has identified a conflict of interest.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 48 kb)

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nomura, M., Oze, I., Kodaira, T. et al. Comparison between surgery and definitive chemoradiotherapy for patients with resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a propensity score analysis. Int J Clin Oncol 21, 890–898 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-016-0963-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-016-0963-3

Keywords

Navigation