Log in

Comparison of shear bond strengths of ceramic brackets after different time lags between lasing and debonding

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Lasers in Medical Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Laser use is effective in the debonding of ceramic brackets. However, a standardization of the laser debonding techniques used has not yet been implemented. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of the time lag elapsed between lasing and shearing on debonding of ceramic brackets. One hundred polycrystalline ceramic brackets were placed on human premolar teeth, which were randomly divided into five groups of 20. One group was assigned as the control. The Er-YAG laser was applied on each bracket in four experimental groups at 5 W for 6 s with the scanning method. Debonding was performed 1 s, 18 s, 30 s, or 60 s after laser exposure. Shear bond strengths and adhesive remnant index scores were measured. Statistically significant difference was observed between the control and experimental groups when the data for the shear bond strengths was considered (p < 0.05). Adhesive remnant index scores of the groups were not statistically different (p > 0.05). Debonding ceramic brackets after 18 s when lased 6 s using an Er-YAG laser with the scanning method is safe and also suitable for clinical use since three brackets can be debonded at a time in succession.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bishara SE, Timothy S (1990) Comparisons of different debonding techniques for ceramic brackets: an in vitro study—Part 1. Background and methods. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 98:145–153

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bishara SE, Fehr DE (1993) Comparisons of the effectiveness of pliers with narrow and wide blades in debonding ceramic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 103:253–257

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Krell KV, Courey JM, Bishara SE (1993) Orthodontic bracket removal using conventional and ultrasonic debonding techniques, enamel loss, and time requirements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 103:258–266

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Rueggeberg FA, Lockwood P (1990) Thermal debracketing of orthodontic resins. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 98:56–65

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Oztoprak MO, Nalbantgil D, Erdem S, Tozlu M, Arun T (2010) Debonding of ceramic brackets by a new scanning laser method. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 138:195–200

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Nalbantgil D, Oztoprak MO, Tozlu M, Arun T (2010) Effects of different application durations of Er-YAG laser on intrapulpal temperature change during debonding. Lasers Med Sci 26:735–740

    Google Scholar 

  7. Tocchio RM, Williams PT, Mayer FS, Standing KG (1993) Laser debonding of ceramic orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 103:155–162

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Abdul-Kader HM, Ibrahim SA (1999) A comparative study of CO2 laser debonding of three types of ceramic brackets. Al-Azhar J Dent Science 2:79–84

    Google Scholar 

  9. Strobl K, Bahns TL, Willham L, Bishara SE, Stwalley WC (1992) Laser-aided debonding of orthodontic ceramic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 101:152–158

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hibst R, Keller U (1989) Experimental studies of the application of the Er:YAG laser on dental hard substances: I. Measurement of the ablation rate. Lasers Surg Med 9:338–344

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Oliveira MT, Freitas PM, Paula Eduardo C, Ambrosano GM, Giannini M (2007) Influence of diamond sono-abrasion, air-abrasion and Er:YAG laser irradiation on bonding of different adhesive systems to dentin. Eur J Dent 1:158–166

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Delme KIM, De Moor RJG (2007) Scanning electron microscopic evaluation of enamel and dentine surfaces after Er:YAG laser preparation and laser conditioning. Photomed Laser Surg 25:393–401

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Correa-Alfonso AM, Palma-Dibb RG, Pecora JD (2010) Composite filling removal with erbium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser: morphological analyses. Lasers Med Sci 25:1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Chirila TV, Constable IJ, van Saarloos PP, Barrett GD (1990) Laser-induced damage to transparent polymers: chemical effect of short-pulsed (Q-switched) Nd:YAG laser radiation on ophthalmic acrylic biomaterials: I: a review. Biomaterials 11:305–312

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Wigdor H, Abt E, Ashrafi S, Walsh JT Jr (1993) The effect of lasers on dental hard tissues. J Am Dent Assoc 124:65–70

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Usumez S, Buyukyilmaz T, Karaman AI, Gunduz B (2005) Degree of conversion of two lingual retainer adhesives cured with different light sources. Eur J Orthod 27:173–179

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ferracane JL, Greener EH (1986) The effect of resin formulation on the degree of conversion and mechanical properties of dental restorative resins. J Biomed Mater Res 20:121–131

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Artun J, Bergland S (1984) Clinical trials with crystal growth conditioning as an alternative to acid-etch enamel pretreatment. Am J Orthod 85:333–340

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Murat Tozlu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tozlu, M., Oztoprak, M.O. & Arun, T. Comparison of shear bond strengths of ceramic brackets after different time lags between lasing and debonding. Lasers Med Sci 27, 1151–1155 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-011-1018-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-011-1018-7

Keywords

Navigation